"... and many more will soon be lost. There is death all over the place. This is one of the worst catastrophes in the history of our Country. They just can’t put out the fires. What’s wrong with them?"
Trump wrote on Truth Social 3 hours ago (that is to say, in the middle of the night).
And, here, the NYT got a guy to write a whole article about it in the middle of the night:
"Trump Calls Officials Handling Los Angeles Wildfires ‘Incompetent’/Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles County authorities have invited President-elect Donald J. Trump to tour the devastation, but he has not publicly responded."
Published at 4:37 a.m. Ah, but I clicked on the reporter's name —
Mike Ives — and I see he's "based in Seoul." It was 6:37 p.m. — Korea Standard Time. A normal work day. The NYT didn't roust some reporter in the middle of the night to make an article out of the most recent Trump truthing.
"Mr. Trump’s comments indicated that the fires, and officials’ response to them, will likely occupy a prominent place on his domestic political agenda when he takes office on Jan. 20. He has renewed a longstanding
feud with California’s governor, Gavin Newsom, who in turn has accused Mr. Trump of politicizing the fires."
Is it wrong to "politicize" the fires? Isn't fire fighting one of the top services we demand from government? I can see saying, don't distract us with recriminations while we're right in the middle of an epic struggle against fire, but that only means, don't politicize
yet. But
are they fighting the fire right now or are they helpless? And if they are helpless, are we supposed to refrain from asking why are they helpless?
ADDED: I wondered if there are earlier examples of anyone ever saying
"There is death all over the place." I only found one thing, at Internet Public Library, from what looks like a sample answer to a predicable high-school essay test question:
"Similarities Between Death Of A Salesman And Hamlet": "In Hamlet there is death all over the place...."