


a blog by Ann Althouse
1. Random boy doesn't seem to know what freckles are.
2. The Italian husband makes caprese salad.
3. Do you think your happiness depends on finding that special someone?
4. Why not paint your car Tiffany blue?
5. Time to practice hippie dancing.
6. The Canadian guy was warned: Don't let New York City change you.
According to the new Harvard-Harris poll:
I don't care whether "Trump was furious at being barred from proceeding to the Capitol." There's got to be more about what he believed would happen there. I'm stuck on the idea that what he wanted was a huge, attention-getting protest against resolving the election without more inquiry into whether the vote counts were accurate. If he had joined the crowd it would have been a stunning sight. But he didn't get his way. It was too dangerous. That he thought he could do it seems to be evidence that he was NOT picturing a violent scene. So what if he was "furious" that he didn't get to do his gigantic, historic photo-op?
They chose to talk about sex a lot. They tended to be opposed to birth control and were fond of explaining 'God’s plan for human sexuality.' One woman illustrated this plan with unasked-for details about her virtuous married sex life. She felt that abortion and hormonal birth control were murder, and that condoms were undignified. Her husband learned to suppress his sexual urges, she said, and they now had sex only for procreation....
1. Irish guys doing American accents to talk about the 4th of July.
2. The real deal behind this Bali beach.
3. A very charming rendition of "Gymnopedie."
6. The meticulous restoration of an ox-tongue iron.
7. A porcupine tail hairbrush.
8. Sandy Dennis laughs and screams.
9. A puzzling Zillow listing.
10. "POV: you're at a diy house show." (This is a whole page of "duets," so click around. The first one, in the upper left corner is the original, and then others have added their interaction with him in a split screen.)
Writes Jordan Peterson at The Daily Wire.
Since Twitter did not do me the favor of actually specifying my crime, we unfortunately have to guess at why this has occurred — and that’s actually a big problem in and of itself, and also indicative of the utter carelessness of the Twitter organization with regard to the propriety of its own censorial actions. I should at least know exactly what I did wrong if I am required to “acknowledge that” my “Tweet violated the Twitter Rules.”
What rules, you sons of bitches?...