November 12, 2026

"The lesson in the Jensen Huang scandal... middle-aged men need to slow down with testosterone replacement therapy..."

"Feel the TRT oozing..."

Goodbye to Judge Posner.

NYT obituary: "Judge Richard A. Posner Has Died. His Influence in Law Was Beyond Compare. He was the most-cited legal scholar of the latter half of the 20th century and an unapologetic iconoclast, favoring pragmatism over judicial tradition. He was 87."
Judge Posner’s admirers said he had no real competition in the annals of American jurisprudence. They regarded him as a superb writer, with a limpid, conversational style and a sure command of tone. He wrote with self-confidence and authority, qualities his critics said were not always entirely deserved. Most important, in a field that overvalues tradition and formalism, he was known as a brilliantly original iconoclast....

Judge Posner called his approach to judging pragmatic. His critics called it lawless. “I pay very little attention to legal rules, statutes, constitutional provisions,” Judge Posner said in a 2017 interview. “A case is just a dispute. The first thing you do is ask yourself — forget about the law — what is a sensible resolution of this dispute?”

He was among the leading figures in the movement to analyze legal problems using economics. In looking to social utility rather than abstract moral values like fairness or equality, he gained a reputation as a cold, calculating conservative. He was just 33 when he published “Economic Analysis of Law,” a tour de force that helped establish the field....

I have so many posts with the "Posner" tag in my 22-year archive. It would take a long time just to cherry-pick the best things. Click the tag and scroll to find many fascinating quotes from Posner collected over all those years. For example, what he said when somebody asked him, "In what ways, if any, does it make sense to speak of the study of law as the study of legal science?"

But I will cherry-pick one thing that's very special to me, from April 2005. It's about blogging:

November 11, 2026

Sunrise.

IMG_1386 (2)

IMG_1393

"The pubic hair had been among the more notorious items in Wynd’s collection for over a decade."

"According to a 2016 account of the museum, the hair was originally sent to Wynd by a woman who claimed to have shaved Brand at a Camden Town salon. The donation was accompanied by a handwritten letter explaining that she thought the collector would appreciate the unusual souvenir.... Opened in 2014... Wynd’s museum is modeled after the traditional Wunderkammer, or cabinet of curiosities, and houses an eclectic assortment of macabre artifacts, natural history specimens and celebrity memorabilia."

From "Russell Brand’s Pubic Hair Removed From London Museum After Rape Conviction, Curator Says/‘I Have No Desire to Hear His Name Again'" (Variety).

It calls to mind this scene from one of my favorite movies, "Slacker":

"Biden, 83, was accompanied by former first lady Jill Biden to a ceremony where their son, Hunter Biden, accepted the Gold Medal for Outstanding Contribution for Public Discourse."

"Demonstrators and spectators gathered outside the venue during the event hosted by the College Historical Society (HIST). As Biden departed, some people stepped forward and threw objects."

From "Joe Biden swarmed by protesters during surprise Dublin visit to support Hunter/Chaos broke out near the event attended by Biden and his family" (Independent).

This is bloggable because:

1. A Gold Medal for Outstanding Contribution for Public Discourse!

2. For Hunter!

3. Is he really "their son"? 

4. People threw objects at Joe Biden? Why? What exactly was their beef?

5. The throwing of objects is public discourse, but it doesn't deserve the gold medal.

6. I'm happy to see Joe is well enough to travel to Dublin, but it heightens my skepticism about why he's avoiding doing interviews about this new book he wrote/"wrote."

"Editing’s just a more relentless and specific form of reading in which you read a book more closely than any sane person would ever think of doing."

Said Gary Fisketjon, quoted in "Gary Fisketjon Has Died. He Edited Ellis, Tartt, McInerney and McCarthy. A champion of slow, methodical editing and long working relationships with writers, he was regarded as one of the best of his generation. He was 72" (NYT).

Remember Vintage Contemporaries?
Less expensive than hardback editions but with an eye-catching design palette that captured the 1980s zeitgeist, Vintage Contemporaries allowed Mr. Fisketjon to take risks on new authors and resurrect the careers of respected but underselling midcareer writers, like Raymond Carver and Thomas McGuane.... 
Mr. Fisketjon developed a reputation for methodical editing and close personal relationships with his writers. Armed with a green pen, he would go slowly, reading just five pages an hour, covering each with a spider web of notes, suggestions and cuts....

"The zipless fuck is absolutely pure. It is free of ulterior motives. There is no power game."

"The man is not 'taking' and the woman is not 'giving.' No one is attempting to cuckold a husband or humiliate a wife. No one is trying to prove anything or get anything out of anyone. The zipless fuck is the purest thing there is."

So wrote Erica Jong, in "Fear of Flying," quoted by Kat Rosenfield, in "What the Cornell 7 Texts Reveal" (The Free Press). 
Just over 50 years later, albeit less articulately, another young woman expressed similar sentiments—in a series of disjointed, typo-laden text messages, following a now-infamous incident of drunken, drug-fueled group sex at a Cornell University fraternity house.

“I think we all have a soul bond now cause very few people can say they’ve had an experience like that,” she wrote in one message. In another: “i don’t think we should feel any shame for the part. our body our choice asf”—asf being shorthand for the emphatic as fuck.

The delusion/hope of "a soul bond" is just about the opposite of Jong's "zipless fuck." It's a desire for deep attachment. It's the something more that wrecks the purity Jong envisioned.

"The judiciary should not be abused to politicize a structure designed to unite our nation.... We will continue making the case for this beautiful and fitting monument...."

Said a White House spokesman, quoted in "Kennedys sue to block Trump's arch, arguing it would cast shadow on JFK's grave" (BBC).

I don't know about the legal arguments but:

1. The monument is already political, and its hard to see how it can ever rise above its political origin.

2. Even if it is "designed to unite our nation," which I doubt, it's obviously not uniting us, and it's hard to see how it ever could.

3. It's not "beautiful and fitting" to me and to a lot of us Americans, and it shouldn't be built until there is far more consensus and desire for this immense thing in such a conspicuous and hallowed place. 

"Former Wisconsin Lt. Gov. and gubernatorial candidate Mandela Barnes sued the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel on Tuesday..."

"... alleging the newspaper published a defamatory story about his consensual sex life at a key moment during the Democratic primary for governor that caused great harm to his reputation. The legal complaint includes an explosive charge: that a female political reporter at the newspaper had a past sexual relationship with Barnes and then was involved in the flawed reporting process on his consensual sex life, and that the newspaper learned about the alleged conflict but did not tell readers, instead rushing the story into print."

From "Barnes Charges JS Reporter Who Slept With Him Worked on ‘Defamatory’ Story/Explosive complaint charges conflict of interest in newspaper's story about former Lt. Governor" (Urban Milwaukee).

Here's the Journal's response— "Former Lt. Gov. Mandela Barnes sues Journal Sentinel alleging defamation" — "The story went through our standard editing and legal review, and Mr. Barnes was given the opportunity to respond before publication."

Trump calls in.

Trump, on Truth Social, says it was all quite normal and anyone who says otherwise is a big fat liar:


But the laughing woman... was that fully planned?

By the way, doesn't the use of the word "apparently" absolve the NYT from the sin of lying?

"Asked whether pursuing the failed impeachment effort had been worth it, Mr. Massie said it 'absolutely' had been, because it provided proof that his party was still in thrall to Mr. Trump."

[Republican] Party leaders had also been concerned that low attendance by their members could doom their chances of saving Mr. Hegseth. In the end, though, more Democrats than Republicans missed the vote. 
The 11 Democrats who did not vote were Representatives Julia Brownley, Lou Correa and Nancy Pelosi, all of California; Laura Gillen of New York; Steven Horsford of Nevada; Jonathan L. Jackson of Illinois; Brittany Pettersen of Colorado; Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico; Haley Stevens of Michigan; Marilyn Strickland of Washington; and Frederica Wilson of Florida. 
The Republicans who did not record a position were Representatives Monica De La Cruz of Texas; Neal Dunn of Florida; Russell Fry of South Carolina; Julia Letlow of Louisiana; Tom Tiffany and Derrick Van Orden, both of Wisconsin; and Rudy Yakym III of Indiana."

Thanks to the Democrats who participated — albeit passively — in saving us from the misguided impeachment ordeal. You won the big election. Do something constructive with it. Something sane. 

November 10, 2026

Sunrise.

IMG_1384

Axios portrays DeSantis and Rubio as "alligator people."

 

There's no reason to refer to them as "alligator people" other than that they're Floridian. Axios has a quote from somebody else, somebody nameless: "'The alligator people are stirring,' said one national Republican consultant with extensive Florida experience, referring to the Sunshine State's official reptile."

You know the alligator is also the official reptile of Mississippi, and its scientific name is Alligator mississippiensis. And I await the day when New York politicians are called snapping turtles.

"Dear Joe, Coming to work every day in the Oval Office is a blessing beyond imagination. History resounds from every wall, every statue, every beautiful painting..."

"... and every corner of this magical place. Each staircase, hallway, and door leads to yet another door and memory, another inflection point in the glorious story of America. I hope you take a moment every single day to take stock of where you are and the people who came before you, the titans who shaped the course of human events. You now have the opportunity to choose your place in history, and I know you will be true to yourself and the American people. Many presidents have come and gone who simply governed as Republicans or Democrats. Largely, they did not change history, they were just swept along in its relentless tide. This will not happen to you because I know how much you love the American people...."


It's a warm letter. I wonder who drafted it. It doesn't sound like Trump, and I'm not saying that because I don't think Trump can be warm. And some of it does sound a lot like Trump. He's interested in architecture, interior design, and the profundities of history. I'm saying it doesn't sound like Trump because he used the phrase "inflection point."

In August 2020, I blogged about "inflection point" in a post that begins with a quote from Kamala Harris's convention speech:  

A walk in the woods.

IMG_1379

Late afternoon, yesterday.

"Pete Hegseth gets an 'A' PLUS, PLUS, PLUS for his defense against a disgruntled, angry, defeated, former Congressman, Thomas Massie, a TOTAL LOSER!"

Signed "President DJT" at Truth Social.

Here's the entire press conference, 25 minutes long:


"Well, uh, good morning. I'll get right to it. What one disgruntled and defeated congressman is attempting is not oversight and it's not accountability. It's a political spectacle, a personal manifesto driven by ego and resentment. Time for one man's final days in Congress to try to do damage to this president, this country, and most irresponsibly the warriors who defend it. It's a farce, and it's a stunt, and everybody knows it.