"In 1986, Justice Byron R. White... summoned his clerks to his chambers for a special assignment that took several weekends. Together they marked his quarter-century on the court..."

"...  by feeding his records, including from the landmark Miranda rights case, into a shredder purchased for the occasion, according to Dennis J. Hutchinson, his biographer. 'Well, here’s an article. Here’s an entire book,' one of the clerks later told Mr. Hutchinson, describing what it was like to insert invaluable history into the jaws of the machine. 'I couldn’t believe how much history was going down the chute,' he said."

Writes Jodi Kantor "How the Supreme Court Locks Away Its Own History/After Justice Scalia died, the justices held private negotiations about locking away their papers. We may not see the ultimate record of the Roberts court for decades" (NYT gift link).

To suppress these communications is to promote the belief that the Justices are humble servants of the law, a belief that enhances their power. But how can that work unless all the Justices go Byron White on their papers? And it's too late for that. Justice Blackmun set the release date for all his papers at 5 years after his death. He died in 1999. You might think that would motivate the other Justices to formalize their position one way or the other, but Justice Scalia, who died in 2016, did not. Perhaps his papers are full of material that offsets things in Blackmun's, but it doesn't seem that he cared. Perhaps he thought the final written opinion was the operative text. That's what a humble servant of the law would believe.