Wolff's attempt at an explanation: "I was engaged then in an in-depth conversation with Epstein about his relationship with Trump and this seems to be part of that conversation."
The Guardian also quotes what NYT reporter Maggie Haberman said about Wolff back in 2018 (when his Trump-bashing book "Fire and Fury" came out: "He believes in larger truths and narratives.... So he creates a narrative that is notionally true, that’s conceptually true; the details are often wrong."
Reminds me of the old Ratherism "fake but accurate."
Back to The Guardian: "Wolff gains the trust of his powerful and wealthy subjects, he told [Politico's Ben] Smith, in part because he himself goes into 'a bit of a Walter Mitty trance that he could be living their lives, something they can sense and appreciate.' Over the past two decades, Wolff has turned that Walter Mitty guise – that projection that he wants to be 'one of them'– into a journalistic conveyor belt.... Steve Bannon, the rightwing provocateur, gave Wolff exceptional access to the West Wing in the initial flush of Trump’s first presidency, during which the writer was allowed to wander around freely, entirely unchaperoned..... 'Fire and Fury' led to Bannon’s estrangement from Trump.... Epstein, according to Wolff, wanted him to write his biography, while Wolff wanted to extract details of Epstein’s longstanding friendship with Trump for use in 'Fire and Fury.'..."
Back to The Guardian: "Wolff gains the trust of his powerful and wealthy subjects, he told [Politico's Ben] Smith, in part because he himself goes into 'a bit of a Walter Mitty trance that he could be living their lives, something they can sense and appreciate.' Over the past two decades, Wolff has turned that Walter Mitty guise – that projection that he wants to be 'one of them'– into a journalistic conveyor belt.... Steve Bannon, the rightwing provocateur, gave Wolff exceptional access to the West Wing in the initial flush of Trump’s first presidency, during which the writer was allowed to wander around freely, entirely unchaperoned..... 'Fire and Fury' led to Bannon’s estrangement from Trump.... Epstein, according to Wolff, wanted him to write his biography, while Wolff wanted to extract details of Epstein’s longstanding friendship with Trump for use in 'Fire and Fury.'..."
I guess that answers the question "WTF is going on here with Michael Wolff giving PR strategy to Jeffrey Epstein?" He wasn't colluding with Epstein. He was conning Epstein. He had a journalistic modus operandi, one that irked Maggie Haberman and Ben Smith (for good reason).
Here's Wolff explaining himself (in 2018):
And here's Fred Armisen impersonating him on "SNL" back then:Michael Wolff asked on MSNBC about the factual errors in his Trump book.
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) January 8, 2018
His actual response: "If it makes sense to you, if it strikes a cord, if it rings true, it is true."
Katy Tur response: "I read it, I -- a lot of the did feel true"
This is Journalisming. pic.twitter.com/IOowlxWNvV
Posts
128 comments:
It gets frustrating this type of stuff goes on and the market doesn’t correct for it. Instead these creeps are granted historic preservation status…
It is fun to watch all the retards realize everyone is calling them retards.
If you are still accepting anything the media or these obvious liars are pedaling on behalf of Democrats you are just really stupid.
[Politico's Ben] Smith
Here’s another of the creepers granted such status. The rag he ran makes claims in a gotcha bit and that’s good enough for the fans and now the onus is on you to prove it isn’t true. Garbage it all is…
Walter Mitty is a story of a guy successfully escaping his controlling wife.
Thanks for reminding us what Wolff is all about. LOL. "Hey, its mostly true".
And that SNL clip. I really wanted to laugh especially with Bill Murray there. But God, the mugging and lack of talent. the guy playing wolff is good. everyone else is mediocre. And there's no great writing. You really need a Phil hartmann or Darrell Hammond.
"I was engaged then in an in-depth conversation with Epstein about his relationship with Trump and this seems to be part of that conversation."
This is so much like Patrick Bateman's "I had to return some videotapes" deflection it's eerie.
Zombie PR with ulterior motives published under umbrella incorporations.
Pedo Relations for the third leg of the liberal triad. #NoJudgment #NoLabels
"I was enough of an insider to engage in an inside conversation with Epstein who was enough of an insider to have a 'relationship' with Trump and this is a part of an inside joke that I just have with all of my scuzzy friends. What? You mean you don't hand out free PR advice like Fleishman-Hillard to all your insider friends too? Peasant..."
Honestly do not understand why these emails are considered some kind of smoking gun against Trump. Reading them carefully, there’s no there-there. In fact, the wording implies that Epstein could choose to construct a narrative based on innocent facts (such as that Trump was merely present in Epstein’s house) and then threaten Trump with the falsehood and innuendo. Alternatively, they could pretend to be on Trump’s side and assure him that they wouldn’t support speculation that Trump had behaved inappropriately with young women.
The leftist corporate media wants to talk about anything other than the collapse of the shutdown.
The rightist corporate media wants to talk about anything other than the AIPAC lobby meltdown.
So lets talk about Epstein.
Meanwhile the majority of the electorate is talking about the actually important events happening right now.
The democratic regime and it's Apparatchiks - FAKE narratives for dummies.
The depiction of Mika in the SNL is spot on. A ditz from the get-go.
If we determine that Donald Trump's involvement in sex trafficking was part of an official act as a future president, then the Constitution demands that he face no consequences. ~ SCOTUS
It’s notionally true, I swear to God
Everywhere you look it's Dobie Gray:
I'm in with the in crowd (Do-do-do)
I go where the in crowd goes (Do-do-do)
I'm in with the in crowd (Do-do-do)
And I know what the in crowd knows (Da-da-da-da)
What the in crowd knows is subject to debate.
Wow! Some actual humor from SNL!
Nothingburgers... not one 'smoking gun'.. hell not one smoking anything... just more 'I think Trump is bad' just cause...
"He wasn't colluding with Epstein. He was conning Epstein."
See Janet Malcolm's criticisms of her own profession of journalism.
Armisen is good as Wolff, but I don't see much similarity between the real and the parody Joe and Mika. It's as if they had the lovey-dovey newscaster characters already and tried to squeeze them into a Morning Joe skit.
"Honestly do not understand why these emails are considered some kind of smoking gun against Trump...."
The lateral answer is they're not. Everyone knows they're not. It's a game being played including by Trump.
I love the skit! The humor is at times too broad (usual for SNL), but it’s better than too tepid (also usual for SNL). The only weak link was Murray, who basked in the adulation, and had had some good lines, but flubbed the delivery (usual for Murray)
If you are paid a (shit)ton on money to move Trump's approve ratings south just what are you to do? This is what you do...
Three thoughts.
-The overlap in personal ethics and social climbing aspirations between Epstein and Wolff are considerable. No wonder they got along.
-I'm very surprised this story was in the Guardian. I would have guessed The Telegraph.
-There's a story today in the NYT by Ken Bensinger that almost directly targets Ann's piece yesterday on the Time's "sleazy" take on the Epstein emails: "Conservative Media Picks an Epstein story line and Sticks to it". Normally this would ire me a bit, but this thing is so pathetic, I did the eye roll/laugh.
Kate MacKinnon is hot.
but this thing is so pathetic, I did the eye roll/laugh.
...not that many weeks ago this stuff was still moving the needle. Even here...
You know, lost in all of the Epstein files disclosure, is the most important fact: that girls were abused and raped by rich and powerful men who have gotten away with it.
Why has Trump done everything in his power to protect these individuals?
Gosh, he's just following modern practice. He wants a good story to write about. You need a good story to read. Ethics? Dull and boring. You know, getting a good story rolling, it's like CNN hiring their local populace to juice up the video a little. Or like Anderson Cooper, standing hip deep in the hurricane water while his cameraman is 15 ft away on dry pavement.
Ethics? Now that's funny, right there.
If he actually had this info he would have put in his other three books each one more ridiculous than the next
Thats why the justice department paid everyone in 2022 buehler
The suggestions sound much like the tartaglione proffers suggested by maurene comey
ThĆØ russian hoax carrier bensinger says what?
Kaka queried: “ Why has Trump done everything in his power to protect these individuals?”
Was that a typo? You meant Biden, didn’t you? And he did for 4 years. I suspect the answer to your question is that both parties have huge donors on the list.
Can we take a moment to think that Trump campaigned on releasing this information? I'm not sure I've seen a more shortsighted and (dare I say) unintelligent man.
It is hilarious to see all the MAGA Trump supporters in the comments defending Trump and his potential ties to Epstein. Says more about them and their lack of concern for the victims. If there is nothing there, just release everything. I am sure you all would agree to that.
Noise not actual news they got none
Just as with the Russia hoax with Luke Harding MI-6s trusted poodle
Hey Kaki,
Now that you are mostly out of work Brian (Stelter) I see that you are publishing your bizarro world theories here.
We have a (pseudo) celebrity folks!
Well, on the plus side, it takes some amount of journalistic skill to suborn perjury without actually doing anything actionable. The guy's a pro. Wolff's appearance and mannerisms don't inspire trust, rather the opposite. He must have some quality that's not readily apparent.....Kate MacKinnon's Mika. while not quite on a level with her Hillary, is terrific.
Rather's "fake but accurate" was the first thing I thought of.
Disappointed (but not surprised) that the MAGA commenters here are making excuses for Trump instead of holding him accountable on his campaign promise to release all the files.
Fox and NewsNation said it’s a nothing burger so that’s why I am seeing comments claiming exactly that…
And who can possibly forget "Crab Rangoon?" The media ran Wolff's BS 24/7 for months. You would think that any editor not absolutely in the tank would say "Don't touch anything by this serial fabulist."
Emma-Jo Morris on X: "Hunter Biden is a depraved and disgusting, vile pervert and a traitor to the United States. Never forget it." / X https://share.google/LlAzmfLHhAYEzNfh9
They are more in the tank then william hurt
'Crab rangoon 'i must have missed that
Kakistocracy said...
You know, lost in all of the Epstein files disclosure, is the most important fact: that girls were abused and raped by rich and powerful men who have gotten away with it.
Why has Trump done everything in his power to protect these individuals?
He hasn't. Trump can't just release court sealed documents.
These women all have obviously signed NDAs and been paid to keep quiet. If any of them had even the slightest evidence Trump abused a single woman they would be an instant multimillionaire.
Even more Joe Biden had all of these files for 4 years. If there was anything about Trump in these files that pointed to criminal activity he would be in jail.
This is all obvious. You are just a retard.
I do remember 'the Gorilla Channel'
1. Fred Armisen has exceptional talent (as Portlandia can attest to) and so much more fun than the real, obnoxious douche Wolff (two Fs). He's a douche, in fact, for posing as a journalist while extracting information to be used in one of his "flight iof fancy" imagination books.
2. Even the "conning Epstein" supposition is too generous. Wolff was also coaching Epstein to blackmail Trump (probably to make Mr. W's eventual book even juicier!).
3. Journalism has an ethics and a tradition, even if few are still observed by most Corporate News anymore, and "conning" a source is but one of Wolff's many ethical lapses. Adding the prefix "Access" to Journalism (see "Michael Wolff and Access Journalism) does the same for the base noun as adding "social" to Justice does for that one.
"I want my Gorilla TV!" Good times then.
Why has Trump done everything in his power to protect these individuals
They are all Democrats. I think you will see some action, but I don't expect it will make you happy.
Woolf is like Woodwards bizarre nephew another fantasist with a press kit
Did all of these girls come to a bad end? Did some of them take the money and run? Just about everyone on earth has a few rotten experiences during adolescence, but, by and large, they muddle through......Just now, I'm reading about the two great fan dancers of the Chicago Exposition: Sally Rand and Faith Bacon. Sally had a long career and was by most accounts an accomplished woman. Faith committed suicide. Apparently Sally rather enjoyed being naked in front of admiring men.
Look how most of the corporate press treated incontrovertible evidence in the hunter laptop vs second and third hand hearsay here
Why wouldn’t every MAGA Republican want to expose all those Democrats by releasing the files?
’Disappointed (but not surprised) that the MAGA commenters here are making excuses for Trump instead of holding him accountable on his campaign promise to release all the files.’
Poor Kak. There has to be a pony in there somewhere…
These stories are lame, they show no creativity
Not everyday a dead book comes back to life.
Trump wont get credit where credit is due.
https://x.com/robbystarbuck/status/1989371147360804965
Achilles says; “He hasn't. Trump can't just release court sealed documents.”
Achilles then says; “Even more Joe Biden had all of these files for 4 years. If there was anything about Trump in these files that pointed to criminal activity he would be in jail.”
?
?
?
On another note, can we all agree that sex trafficking is still a very bad thing? Are we phasing into some Kelly Megan mindset where as long as they’re past puberty, maybe it ain’t so bad?
Kakistocracy said...
Why wouldn’t every MAGA Republican want to expose all those Democrats by releasing the files?
Because we aren't retards.
We realize that these files have a lot of personal information of people who were asked to testify in grand juries who were promised confidentiality if charges were not filed.
We realize these women were paid through NDA's and they have mostly all decided to keep the money rather than file charges publicly.
We realize that Trump isn't a dictator who can jest release whatever files he wants. We realize that leaking files like the Democrats are doing undermines the entire system.
Really it just comes down to being an adult and being able to think abstractly about how systems work and future consequences of actions.
You on the other hand are a stupid toddler shitting his diaper and drinking whatever slop your masters put in your bottle.
Ronald J. Ward said...
On another note, can we all agree that sex trafficking is still a very bad thing? Are we phasing into some Kelly Megan mindset where as long as they’re past puberty, maybe it ain’t so bad?
Hundreds of thousands of children came across the border illegally without parents during the 4 years of the Biden administration. They were counted and documented by ICE but told they had to release these children to the custody of other illegals they dumped in the country.
They were all released into our country by the Biden administration and completely forgotten.
ICE under Trump has found thousands of them. Funny how democrats are trying to stop ICE from finding these trafficked children.
The Democrat party is the party of child trafficking.
You are a piece of shit that doesn't believe a single word he says.
"Why wouldn’t every MAGA Republican want to expose all those Democrats by releasing the files?"
They'd love too, but it would make them look foolish if the files were just a comforting myth.
I'm at a loss to understand why so many people assume Epstein kept incriminating files. Such documents are detective fiction boilerplate, beginning with "A Scandal in Bohemia" (Sherlock Holmes) and continuing through "The Big Sleep" (Philip Marlowe), and far beyond. The detective discovering the hidden blackmail photograph or decoding the encrypted list of victim compacts the narrative the way pulp publishers admire. However, real crime doesn't follow those rules. Generally, criminals operate without files. They don't pay taxes on their ill-gotten gains. They don't have fiduciary obligations to stockholders. The Mafia are never audited, and Epstein has never been shown to have blackmailed anyone. Instead, from all real evidence, he liked underage girls and famous company. From all real evidence, his crimes were mostly statutory rape, and little else. Epstein was just a garden-variety prevert, which ought to have made him very popular with the party that thinks men can transform into women and pedophilia is just another valid lifestyle. The files are just another flat-earth delusion.
It's not about exposing Ds or Rs, it's about the idea that the establishment always papers things like this over to protect powerful people from embarrassment.
Trump is supposed to be anti-establishment, so his supporters expect something different from the usual cover-up. The disappointment isn't about whose ox is being gored it's about Trump not just releasing everything he can, and letting the chips fall where they may.
Would any amount of lawsuits by people revealed to be Epstein's clients be doing more damage to Trump's administration than the current fiasco has?
Achillies, I don’t know or care where you get or fabricate your information but that’s a fascinating version of both the boarder under Biden and Ice under Trump.
If the Democrat Party (sic) is, as you say, the party of child trafficking, I think we can both agree that’s a very bad thing. If Trump is implicated, would you say the same? I answered a similar question earlier- of course not.
A handmade tale following ethical emotions.
Are 15-year-olds now considered "barely legal"? We spoke to the Althouse MAGA commentariat for clarity.
In reviewing the Epstein emails, I was repulsed by the heartless arrogance of Epstein himself, but I must admit I was taken by the polite civility of Ghislaine Maxwell. š
Quaestor: "I'm at a loss to understand why so many people assume Epstein kept incriminating files."
Is you takin notes on a criminal fuckin conspiracy?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKGdhJybmT8
CC, JSM
He really is that ignorant well a diet of corporate news will do that to you
“It's not about exposing Ds or Rs, it's about the idea that the establishment always papers things like this over to protect powerful people from embarrassment.”
“Trump Administration Live Updates: Bondi Assigns
Prosecutor to Look Into Epstein’s Ties to Prominent Democrats”
NYT
LOL! Does Trump think Democrats are going to be enraged? Nope, if there are any Democrats that sexually abused underage girls, we want to know. That goes for Republicans too and other powerful men no matter what their politics. This move makes the way Trump is handling the Epstein fiasco even more suspicious. What is it that is making Trump meltdown.
“if there are any Democrats that sexually abused underage girls, we want to know.”
Biden taking showers with his daughter
Hundreds of thousands of children came across the border illegally without parents during the 4 years of the Biden administration.
They were counted and documented by ICE but told they had to release these children to the custody of other illegals they dumped in the country.
ICE under Trump has found thousands of them.
Ignorance is a choice.
See my link above they bury incriminating evidence for them and exculpatory for those they deem unpersons
I can't think of two people I'd trust less than Epstein and Wolff--before I heard about them knowing each other.
Donald Trump's unsettling record of comments about his daughter Ivanka
Fuse them together
Anyone wonder why Maxwell is being given royal treatment at the minimum security prison she was recently transferred to?
Lololol “comments”
“Anyone wonder why Maxwell is being given royal treatment at the minimum security prison she was recently transferred to?”
She’s the daughter of a revered Mossad agent.
“Anyone wonder why Maxwell is being given royal treatment at the minimum security prison she was recently transferred to?”
Because she made a deal to keep her yap shut.
You should make the same deal.
Eva Marie said...
You should make the same deal.
Kings are consequential.
Wow. That’s deep.
O, never mind. My apologies. That’s a great comment.
Robert Maxwell was indeed consequential.
If he wasn’t a king, he was certainly a king maker.
I wonder why the four Republicans, Boebert, Mace, MTG, and Massie, who signed the Discharge Petition despite pressure from Trump, Bondi and Patel to remove their names, did not cave. Either they are very brave or they know something about what might be revealed in the Files, once fully released. Maybe they know it’s a wise thing to distance themselves from Trump at this point.
Your brain has to be rotting in your skull not merely brain dead for this to make sense
As a publisher probably until he ran out other peoples money
No, he was Mossad.
Attending his funeral: Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir, President Chaim Herzog, 6 current and former heads of Israeli intelligence (including Mossad)
At his eulogy Shamir said, “He has done more for Israel than today can be said.”
BTW he was also probably killed by Mossad agents.
Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Wouldnt they saved him if he was so valuable
Im sure there are many such publishers with agency ties if nog ours another countries
Now bannon has 15 hours on interviews with epstein those might be interesting
He was strongly allied with the labour party like murdoch was with more affiliated with the tories
Who? Bannon?
Maxwell, but bannon has the tapes
Maxwell was an Israel backed arms dealer
That’s where he made his money. Everything else was a cover.
Like the owner of the independent is ex kgb? and a russian oligarch
I have no idea about anyone else but Maxwell was an arms dealer working for/with Mossad.
If this is true about Maxwell then that must be true about someone else. No. That’s illogical.
Just the facts ma'am
What facts?
About who owns what and why maxwell doesnt really interest me, the circle of people around epstein
Maxwell interests me a lot. He was an extraordinary man.
There are plenty of bad actors in politics, however, on balance, most don't go on vacations or develop long-term relationships with a child sex-trafficker who has been credibly involved in hundreds if not more than a thousand cases of abuse. The fact that the trafficker also had ties to at least one intelligence agency and was effectively protected for years by major political figures is another issue. This isn't like some politician steering a few million dollars to friends, families, and political supporters, or engaging in more routine acts of political patronage. When we talk about a violation of the public trust, there are degrees of difference that matter.
The reality is that sometimes conspiracies are also true and there are "hidden power networks". Anyone who even spends a little time looking at the Epstein case — seeing how things were reported not just in one moment — but over the course of decades has to wonder. Maybe it was just an incredibly coincidental turn of history that the person who was initially involved in overseeing the case -- Bill Barr — who was involved in a sleazy cover-up involving Iran-Contra, also happened to have a father who helped Epstein get his first job at the Dalton School forty years earlier (at a time when Epstein only had a high school degree). These are documented facts.
Epstein's association with Robert Maxwell's daughter -- another person with close ties to intelligence agencies — is another one of those "coincidences" that just seems way too rich to be a historical accident.
Do rich and powerful people engage in egregious misbehavior and then use their social networks to protect themselves? Is that a "conspiracy" or is it just a fact? In this particular instance, why were rich and powerful people around Epstein willing to put their names and reputations on the line to ensure that Epstein received incredibly lenient treatment? e.g. actions that the DOJ even flagged in its review of the Epstein case in 2020.
The child abuse aspects of this case are not in dispute either. Why did this one person receive such an absurd level of protection and such lenient treatment? Let's begin with that fact. Why were so many people involved in that lenient treatment rewarded with future political advancement, rather than having their careers absolutely destroyed, as would be the case in any other normal professional sphere?
It is pretty obvious why this case hits close to home for Trump. Bondi was Attorney General in Florida at a time when Epstein's activities were open and notorious, and she did nothing. In Trump's first up term, he rewarded Alex Acosta with a cabinet position (Acosta was involved in the initial prosecution of Epstein when he was a U.S. Attorney and provided an agreement with incredibly favorable release terms for Epstein that was largely seen as a farce).
Only a fool would believe that Trump has any interest in "protecting the innocent". The same is true with other politicians who maintained a close relationship with Epstein through the years. I'm sure there are Trump supporters who will try to rationalize what is going on. But I suspect this is one of those cases where there are going to be many who start to see Trump with clearer eyes going forward. Trump has always been sleazy, which is one reason he was able to maintain a close relationship for years with Epstein. He and Bill Clinton probably maintained the same close relationship for years for the same reasons. Even if they didn't actively engage in the kind of abuse Epstein was involved in, they were almost certainly aware of what was going on. Trump even alluded to it as well in previous comments about how Epstein "liked them young”.
Maxwell interests me a lot. He was an extraordinary man.
If you mean an extraordinary evil man, you're correct. It is interesting how he managed to leave Nazi occupied Czechoslovakia and managed to end up in England in 1940, despite being a Jew of fighting age. Supposedly, the last sort of person the nazi's would let through their fingers.
After that came an equally mysterious rise to riches despite allegations of shady business practices, links to Soviet intelligence, and a lack of business acumen.
Then after being made a Newspaper "Tycoon", Maxwell suddenly started selling software. Per Wikipedia: "Maxwell is alleged to have distributed a bugged version of a software, PROMIS, to a plethora of national governments and global financial institutions that enabled mass spying by the government of Israel."
After Maxwell's death it emerged he's stolen money from pension funds to help keep his business going. Some pensioners got 1/2 their promised pension as a result.
And if wikipedia is to be believed the company declared bankruptcy with 400 million in debts, with the directors going to trial for conspiracy to defraud. I guess someone "madoff" the money.
He escaped Czechoslovakia in 39 at 15 before Germans had full control
Joined the Czech army in exile in France at 15 then evacuated to England when France fell
Joined the British army
Earned the military cross 3rd highest military honor at 20? 21?
Ambushed by German SS, volunteered with 2 other men to locate and silence the enemy. Crawled 200 yards under fire, convinced 50 German soldiers including 2 officers to surrender. He told them they were surrounded (he spoke German). Zero casualties
He really puts foot in it
Hundreds of thousands of children came across the border illegally without parents during the 4 years of the Biden administration.
They were counted and documented by ICE but told they had to release these children to the custody of other illegals they dumped in the country.
It's even worse than that. A pilot DNA test showed that 20 or 30 percent of the children apprehended at the border with their "family" were in fact unrelated to the adults who were shepherding them across. The Biden administration responded by ignoring this fact, releasing the children to the custody of the men claiming to be their fathers-- never to be seen again in many cases-- and issued strict orders cancelling any future DNA tests.
That's right. The diabolically, ontologically evil Democrat scum turned a blind eye to what was almost certainly mass trafficking of vulnerable children by unrelated adults, because to them there is nothing in heaven or earth as important as clinging to political power by keeping the replacement immigration train on the rails.
However much you hate Joe Biden and the Democrats, it can't possibly be enough.
Kak: You know, lost in all of the Epstein files disclosure, is the most important fact: that girls were abused and raped by rich and powerful men who have gotten away with it.
Why has Trump done everything in his power to protect these individuals?
Put your back into it! Those goalposts won't move themselves!
He was promoted from Sargeant to Captain in less than a year.
Courage and smarts. He spoke 9 languages
“Anyone wonder why Maxwell is being given royal treatment at the minimum security prison she was recently transferred to?”
Because she made a deal to keep her yap shut.
Some people are so hopelessly dense that they must diligently labor 24/7/355 to descend to the intellectual netherworld they inhabit. No one reaches their level of simplicity without effort.
All federal maximum security inmates get the "royal treatment". They're fed in their cells, and the diet varies from prisoner to prisoner. Muslims get halal meals. Jews kosher. Vegans veggies. Appeals court decisions dating back twenty years established those standards. And every meal is definitely delivered in person by a person. There are no corrections bots as of yet.
By 28, he was a millionaire publisher and an arms dealer
“lack of business acumen” says who?
Hassayamper - said -
"That's right. The diabolically, ontologically evil Democrat scum turned a blind eye to what was almost certainly mass trafficking of vulnerable children by unrelated adults, because to them there is nothing in heaven or earth as important as clinging to political power by keeping the replacement immigration train on the rails.
However much you hate Joe Biden and the Democrats, it can't possibly be enough."
Media(D) uninterested.
Eva - I trust your info. Thanks.
Ann Coulter called "fake but accurate" the Tawana Brawley excuse.
Robert Maxwell helped Mossad steal intelligence-gathering software from the U.S. and then sold it around the world. He was so trustworthy that the Israelis whacked him in 1991.
Understanding the power of Jeffrey Epstein, should readily be linked to global militarism and authoritarianism. Epstein trafficked not just in the bodies of the children he abused but also in social connections that could bring elites together. He well understood that the “desperation of those in power” could make them eager to buy what he was selling: connections with other powerful figures and security systems to clamp down on dissent. The many mysteries surrounding Epstein’s wealth and social connections have long fueled speculation that he had been an asset of the CIA or Mossad.
gadfly - other than dopes - no one trusts you.
Epstein liked under age girls - but they were not children.
No - i'm not defending him. Just sick and tired of leftwing liars.
Many of his victims willingly stayed with him because of the money and the perks. Again - not blaming the victims - as they were indeed victims .
Even after all this Wolff could still win the election for attorney general in any blue state.
Never forget to never trust Steve Bannon. He and that low-rent Jenny Beth Martin (who should use some of the money she stole from seniors to work on her fake accents) convinced a bunch of politically naive but very decent people in Georgia that their "votes would be stolen" if they voted and thus lost us the Senate. Two seats.
Steve's pathetic, chaotic, not even lit right movie sucked too. What a fucking pathetic amateur. His West Point daughter should be ashamed to have him for a father. He is a disgrace. I know you don't remember me, Steve, but I remember you. Very, very well. You should worry about that.
Now thanks to your lies, Senator Warnock has a path to the presidency: he's actually a very smart guy. Senator Ossoff is just a man-bun from Clarkston who hates female athletes and their privacy in changing rooms. Perv with a man bun.
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.