"The climate pattern linked to cool Pacific Ocean conditions... can deliver drought conditions in some places and heavy snow in others.... But there is some uncertainty over how this episode of La Niña could play out because it arrives amid over a full year of record average global temperatures and unprecedented ocean surface warmth. Climate scientists will be paying close attention to whether La Niña’s typical global cooling influence plays out as usual.... 'It’s going to be interesting to see how this La Niña intersects with the generally very warm global oceans,' said Nathan Lenssen, a climate scientist at the University of Colorado. 'We’re in really uncharted territory, globally.'.... La Niña typically lasts nine to 12 months but can sometimes last three years...."
By the way, the term El Niño originated as a reference to baby Jesus, after fishermen noticed warm water at Christmastime. La Niña doesn't refer to anyone in particular. It's just the opposite of El Niño.
Expect to be instructed time and again that the cooler weather should not be viewed as an easing up of global warming.
Posts
86 comments:
There is too much money being made off the "Global Warming " scam to expect any sense from those involved.
IOW The climate is going to what the climate has been doing since the end of the last ice age. We are just a nasty series of solar events away from another ice age.
Even if we were to stipulate that Global Warming was real, reasonable people could still disagree about what to do about it.
The Greta read this nasssty scientisses declaration! No, no...The Greta does not likesess "cooling effects" thingsess. The global warming preciousess, they ruins it! The Greta will never forgive the nasssty scientisses for this...Greta, Greta! The stupid, fat, ugly scientisses must show The Greta they love the precious global warming. Theysess must writes it again!
We're not sure what the effect will be. But we should ban something just to be safe.
I'm already assuming that La Nina is caused by Climate Change. Or IS climate change. Or would be if it got its head right. And that if the waters get cooler, that's a sure sign of climate change. But...if the waters continue to stay warm, well that's a sure sign of climate change.
I'm glad we've got that settled. After all, 97% of scientists agree on this, or so I'm told. By John Kerry. And he knows.
Bullshit, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit. I no longer believe anything THEY try to tell me. The SILO lies to us.
Do not view La Nina as an easing of global warming, but also do not view every single hurricane and hot spell as evidence of global warming. This is often just random weather.
The politicians (post-Al Gore) screwed up the global warming hypothesis for political gain. Human emissions occur in context a whole bunch of other non-human climate factors. Multi-factor nuanced analyses are desired unless they interfere with a well-funded policy agenda.
Someone said Tonga Volcano did it, but Whoopi said that it's climate change, and she knows!
The recent record heat may have been caused by the massive Hunga Tonga volcano eruption of 2022, creating the largest atmospheric disruption since Krakatoa in 1883. Enormous amounts of material and water vapor were expelled into the stratosphere.
All unpleasant weather is evidence of human misbehavior.
This was known to the ancients, but the knowledge was lost during the enlightenment.
As far as I can tell, a warm center gives you a low at that point, and a cool center gives you a high at that point. Lows and highs repel each other (bounce off each other), so form a fairly regular alternating pattern, with an average sort of spacing.
So the one puts an average low off the California coast, and the other puts a high off the California coast, and that sets up opposite weather patterns across the nation, on the average.
Nothing to do with global warming.
Expect to be instructed time and again that the cooler weather should not be viewed as an easing up of global warming.
Althouse broke the code! Althouse broke the code!
We went skiing in Chile last August and had a great week, but missed the motherlode by one year, apparently.
The South American ski resorts have been getting feet of snow, and it's early in the calendar. Portillo had so much snow, they had to delay opening for the season.
Hunga-Tonga, baby: https://www.nasa.gov/earth/tonga-eruption-blasted-unprecedented-amount-of-water-into-stratosphere/
There is too much money being made off the "Global Warming " scam to expect any sense from those involved.
At least you have stopped claiming that global cooling is just around the corner. I guess moving to Tuscon didn't work out like you thought it would.
Blogger baghdadbob said..."The recent record heat may have been caused by the massive Hunga Tonga volcano eruption of 2022, creating the largest atmospheric disruption since Krakatoa in 1883. Enormous amounts of material and water vapor were expelled into the stratosphere."
Seems plausible. Here's a good paper on the topic.
So we are in uncharted territory.
What about the vaunted models?!
It drives me crazy that the CACC (I have altered the acronym from CAGW since it seems we're all on "climate change" now) proponents steadfastly refuse to acknowledge that their models do not and cannot capture all the necessary inputs. Also that they steadfastly avoid talking about the ice-free majority of the earth's history, and about the horrible effects of returning the developing world to wood and dung fires, since the Prime Directive is to eliminate the use of fossil fuels - even though that Prime Directive would not only condemn the poor to much deeper poverty but would also have negative effects on air pollution, proximally, and climate change, by their own models.
Sociopathic science. Lovely.
BUMBLE BEE said...
Someone said Tonga Volcano did it, but Whoopi said that it's climate change, and she knows!
They cannot mention volcanoes for any reason. Volcanic releases dwarf anything humans are doing.
Especially the undersea activity.
"At least you have stopped claiming that global cooling is just around the corner."
Nobody can predict volcanoes that shoot trillions of gallons of water into the stratosphere, not something that happens every century.
Freder Frederson said...
There is too much money being made off the "Global Warming " scam to expect any sense from those involved.
At least you have stopped claiming that global cooling is just around the corner. I guess moving to Tuscon didn't work out like you thought it would.
Now this is funny.
Freder has been declaring that all glaciers will be gone from Everest for the last 20 years. How is that going?
Freder has declared that our seas would be rising for 3 decades now. How is that going?
Freder has declared that the polar ice caps would be gone 10 years ago. How is that going.
You douchebags have been predicting the end of the earth for 30 years now. Nobody thinks you are anything but a retard.
"...it arrives amid over a full year of record average global temperatures and unprecedented ocean surface warmth."
------------
So in the millions of years the earth has been in existence, ocean surface temps have never been this high. I don't believe it.
The most hilarious thing about the global warming brigade is that everything they are doing is for nothing at all. China and India will burn increasing amounts of coal and oil that will cancel out what we do here in the U.S. and Europe by a factor of 5 or more. Trillions of dollars going down a rat hole to accomplish literally nothing at all but to ship all manufacturing capability to Asia.
Freder has been declaring that all glaciers will be gone from Everest for the last 20 years. How is that going?
Freder has declared that our seas would be rising for 3 decades now. How is that going?
Freder has declared that the polar ice caps would be gone 10 years ago. How is that going.
You douchebags have been predicting the end of the earth for 30 years now. Nobody thinks you are anything but a retard.
Please provide links to when I have declared any of things.
You are just lying, as usual.
"Expect to be instructed time and again that the cooler weather should not be viewed as an easing up of global warming."
Those government and private grants for more research aren't just going to appear out of nowhere. You have to show that you're working in the prevailing paradigm (using the Thomas Khun technical meaning of the word.) Nobody is getting awarded grants to attempt to understand the factors that caused ice ages and whether those factors are at work and prevailing over the current climate.
We can't all be landed gentry with wealth and time enough to tinker around with experiments, form academies of science, and explore things like phlogiston. Today, it's 'get in line and you get the money; step out of line and you get frozen out.'
And they still call this "Science!"
Also: It's a cooling event, so no credit could possibly be given to any human entity for its presence. Completely non-anthropogenic, so don't even think it, loser.
The recent record heat may have been caused by the massive Hunga Tonga volcano eruption of 2022, creating the largest atmospheric disruption since Krakatoa in 1883. Enormous amounts of material and water vapor were expelled into the stratosphere.
@baghdadbob, Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai, which had an underwater caldera, is believed to have injected 146 million tons of water vapor more than 30 miles into the air, directly into the stratosphere. This is believed to have increased the total atmospheric water vapor by somewhere between 10% to 15%. Given that water vapor is a much stronger greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, we should expect that global temperatures will be warmer than usual, and for some number of years. Eventually the water vapor will be returned to the earth’s surface as rain (or snow) but given that so much of the vapor is so high up in the stratosphere, I’m not aware of any good mathematical models for how long that will take. Perhaps MadisonMan can weigh in.
Ancient civilizations used human sacrifice to control these disturbing events. The more things change the more they stay the same. At least we are able to spread the cost to entire populations instead of specific individuals now. Progress.
@Achilles said 10:03: "You douchebags have been predicting the end of the earth for 30 years now. Nobody thinks you are anything but a retard...."
Allow me to refine this:
"You douchebags have been predicting the end of the earth in 5 or 10 or 12 years, for 30 years now. Nobody thinks you are anything but a retard...."
There is a sound factual basis for global warming. But the issue has been so politicized that it is nearly impossible to have a calm discussion. Bjorn Lonborg and Steve Koonin are especially informative.
Climate scientists? This is weather.
Stop it already.
I see where the UN wants to use the Law of the Seas Treaty to force countries to reduce their carbon dioxide emissions. China and India will blow off the UN.
CAGW is the biggest scam in the history of the world.
Aggis at 10:21 is correct. The scam part is that the end of the world is always 5-12 years out. That's why we have to achieve net zero by 2050 and won't find out if it works until 2100. We all be dead anyway.
People are so easy to con. Can't everyone see this? It is so, so obvious to me. If the Left has it way, the US will spend $12 trillion on this insanity.
It's almost like it is part of a natural oscillation
El Niño & La Niña (El Niño-Southern Oscillation)
El Niño—the warm phase of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation ("ENSO") climate pattern—has ended, and forecasters think La Niña, the cool phase of ENSO, is likely to emerge later this summer—just in time to influence the peak of Atlantic Hurricane season.
Waxing and waning, oh wait, they've named both so which is waxing and which is waning?
We're not sure what the effect will be. But we should ban something just to be safe.
And raise taxes. Don't forget the taxes! We don't have enough cushy government jobs, and those important climate conferences in Geneva and Monaco and the Maldives aren't cheap. You wouldn't want to see important climate bureaucrats eating fish and chips instead of lobster and caviar, would you?
Freder has been declaring that all glaciers will be gone from Everest for the last 20 years. How is that going?
Freder has declared that our seas would be rising for 3 decades now. How is that going?
Freder has declared that the polar ice caps would be gone 10 years ago. How is that going.
As usual, you are just making shit up. Provide links where I declared any of these things.
A little word about the recent temperature events from Dr. Judith......
And I wish Althouse would treat the use of the word "retard" the same as she treats one other word that will immediately get your post deleted.
Let's all of us agree to call Freder a moron to avoid hurting his feelings about being a retard.
Freder,
Why don't you provide us with links where you specifically denied such things would happen- like, for example, that the polar ice caps would be gone by 2030. The truth is that people on your political side have, in fact, claimed all of those things would happen over the last 35 years and denying that would often get one called a science denier.
Good thing 1.4 billion electric vehicles are going to cool 'the planet'.
I saw a map of all time highs in the states of the US for June. They were mostly established in the 1930s. Remember the Dust Bowl?
Um, "record average temperatures"?
Why don't you provide us with links where you specifically denied such things would happen
I have no responsibility to rebut every stupid assertion made about global warming on this website. That should be Ann's job. After all she has never not denied that she disbelieves in global warming.
for example, that the polar ice caps would be gone by 2030.
Who on earth has claimed this? Some people are predicting that the Arctic Ocean will be ice free by that year (and for the record, I think that date is premature), but that certainly isn't the same as "polar ice caps", which since you made it plural would include Antarctica and the Greenland ice sheet). Please provide links to these claims.
Of course you can't, because like Achilles, you are lying.
Remember the Dust Bowl?
Actually the Dust Bowl was a perfect example of regional and national warming resulting from bad farming practices (in other words, anthropogenic warming)
"A little word about the recent temperature events from Dr. Judith......"
Javier Vinós.
I'm thinking about buying his book:
Climate of the Past, Present and Future: A scientific debate, 2nd ed.
If only my to-read pile weren't so large already.
“It drives me crazy that the CACC (I have altered the acronym from CAGW since it seems we're all on "climate change" now) proponents steadfastly refuse to acknowledge that their models do not and cannot capture all the necessary inputs. Also that they steadfastly avoid talking about the ice-free majority of the earth's history, and about the horrible effects of returning the developing world to wood and dung fires, since the Prime Directive is to eliminate the use of fossil fuels - even though that Prime Directive would not only condemn the poor to much deeper poverty but would also have negative effects on air pollution, proximally, and climate change, by their own models.”
Awhile back, some B School types did what they usually do with problems of this sort - they ran multivariate regression analysis on a number of variables in order to determine which ones were significant in determine global temperature. Surprising probably no one, variables affecting the amount of sun energy received, and where (Sunspot cycle, Earth’s distance from the sun, Earth’s tilt and wobble, etc) predominated. Interestingly though, the factor that was also in the top 5 was the El Niño/La Niña cycle. What was not in the top 5 was CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, and indeed, the statistical error with these top 5 factors swamp the potential effects of CO2.
Freder doubles down on dumbass.
"Why don't you provide us with links where you specifically denied such things would happen
I have no responsibility to rebut every stupid assertion made about global warming on this website. That should be Ann's job. After all she has never not denied that she disbelieves in global warming."
Everyone else needs top provide a source. Dumbass wants a pass.
Freder doubles down on dumbass.
"Why don't you provide us with links where you specifically denied such things would happen
I have no responsibility to rebut every stupid assertion made about global warming on this website. That should be Ann's job. After all she has never not denied that she disbelieves in global warming."
Everyone else needs top provide a source. Dumbass wants a pass.
The Climatistas wouldn’t ease up on their global warming mantra if glaciers were advancing on New York City.
For Freder.
I have been seeing similar articles since the 1990s, Freder, and date of it happening is always just 10 years away. And every single IPCC statement announces it is only 10 years left to stop global warming. By their own words it should have been too late by 2020 to stop it.
From Real Climate Science, Fifty Years Of Failed Apocalyptic Forecasts, including links and newspaper/magazine screenshots.
At the end of the list, this: "I have hundreds more of these predictions on file, but this is enough to get the point across. Climate alarmists, and alarmists in general, are incompetent, dishonest hacks – who change their story every time the wind shifts."
Freder,
Is it or isn't true that you think global warming is going to be catastrophic for humans?
Freder Frederson said...
Why don't you provide us with links where you specifically denied such things would happen
I have no responsibility to rebut every stupid assertion made about global warming on this website. That should be Ann's job. After all she has never not denied that she disbelieves in global warming.
for example, that the polar ice caps would be gone by 2030.
Who on earth has claimed this? Some people are predicting that the Arctic Ocean will be ice free by that year (and for the record, I think that date is premature), but that certainly isn't the same as "polar ice caps", which since you made it plural would include Antarctica and the Greenland ice sheet). Please provide links to these claims.
Of course you can't, because like Achilles, you are lying.
I am just posting this up before this all gets deleted. Posting articles of Al Gore's greatest hits and Hockey Sticks will have to come after work. The doom cycles and turning into Venus articles will be fun too. RECORD HEATWAVES and PEOPLE DYING OF GLOBAL WARMING.
Just like Russian Collusion Freder will pretend he did not support predictions of melted Ice caps and coast lines disappearing.
But that is the part where Freder's stupidity comes in. He just doesn't realize that other people remember the things he pretends didn't happen.
for last 20 or thirty years.. EACH AND EVERY year has been "THE WARMEST ON RECORD!!"
So.. Y'all (well, Most of you) are all OLD Folk..
Can you remember the 1990's? how about the 1980's?
IF EACH AND EVERY year since, has been "THE WARMEST ON RECORD!!" Shouldn't it be NOTICEABLY Warmer NOW?
Does it SEEM NOTICEABLY Warmer NOW? Does it SEEM ANY Warmer NOW?
ps, this is July 11th
“There is a sound factual basis for global warming. But the issue has been so politicized that it is nearly impossible to have a calm discussion. Bjorn Lonborg and Steve Koonin are especially informative.”
Yes, but it isn’t CO2 in the atmosphere. The basic problem with the CO2 theory is that it is based on the scientific reality that in a small closed system, CO2 concentration does affect the temperature of the whole system. But the reality is far more complex. What most of the CO2 based models fail to do is to inadequately take into account the positive, and esp negative, feedbacks involved. They become ever more complex as they try to model the feedback, but continue to fail, and the failure is consistently in one direction, because of the mistaken belief that CO2 is a significant driver of global temperatures.
The CO2 theory is based on models, which don’t work all that well. The models tend to run hot, because they underestimate the amount of negative feedback in the system. AGW really got going when a bunch of tree ring counters, using highly inaccurate proxy data, kinda found some weak correlation. Controlling the peer review process, they were able to control the debate for awhile, getting UN approval, because their theory seemingly incriminated First World countries, and 2nd and esp 3rd World countries control much of the UN, including the IPCC. Then, the grifters, such as AlGore, jumped in. By now, too many $billions$ have been siphoned off by the grifters, that there doesn’t seem much chance at seriously investigating whether CO2 poses a threat to the climate at all. And under FJB and the Dems, it just turned our economy into a piggy back for those capitalizing on the panic they help maintain.
1960s – Oil gone in 10 years
1970s – Another ice age in 10 years
1980s – Acid rain will destroy all crops in 10 years
1990s – The ozone layer will be gone in 10 years
2000s – Ice caps will be gone in 10 years
2010s – We’ll all be dead in 10 years
2020s - Ok we were off by a few years but you'll really be dead by 2030
None of this is real, but all resulted in more taxes, more government, and more hysteria.
We are into uncharted territory, shouts the expert, describing a weather phenomenon that is so common it has a nickname.
Oh Lord, no. Not cooling. Somebody call Chicken Little! Tell the NOAA!
"When you want to mislead people with statistics, picking your start date is very important." - Tony Heller
For Freder.
Well, thank you for the link, as it proves exactly what I said and disproves Achilles stupid assertion that "Freder has declared that the polar ice caps would be gone 10 years ago. How is that going." There is a huge difference between polar ice caps and an ice free Arctic Ocean.
And, btw, I did not write that article, which Achilles, lying, claimed I declared.
“I have spent most of my life worrying about things that never happened” – Mark Twain
Climate alarmists, in a nutshell.
dwshelf said...
All unpleasant weather is evidence of human misbehavior.
This was known to the ancients, but the knowledge was lost during the enlightenment.
************
Yes! It was Ancient Wisdom that hot weather occurs because humans have angered the gods!!!
p.s. Didja notice how they threw in a comment about unprecedented warm ocean waters, which they imply are linked to CO2 concentrations, but then spoke of La Nina-induced cooler water?
Well, it should be obvious that El Nino itself produces the warmer water.
El Nino - La Nina currents are created by natural forces (trade winds, deep currents off South Ameriaca) acting on massive amounts of water. These forces dwarf any human contribution to ocean temperatures.
What's more, infrared from CO2 can penetrate only a couple of MICRONS into the oceans' surface, while the Sun's radiation goes a bit deeper, up to a few centimeters. Then there's the effect of underwater volcanoes and fumaroles.
Compared to all these warming sources, CO2's contribution is exceedingly small.
Has the mean ocean level risen in the past 30 years? If so, how much ?It is summer in the Northern Hemisphere and the Arctic Ocean sea ice-our North Polar Ice cap-is melting. It does this every summer. Meanwhile our Antarctic sea ice-otherwise known as our southern ice cap has grown to record levels because it is the middle of winter down there.
Were there dinosaurs on Saturns moon Titan?
Freder Frederson said...
For Freder.
Well, thank you for the link, as it proves exactly what I said and disproves Achilles stupid assertion that "Freder has declared that the polar ice caps would be gone 10 years ago. How is that going." There is a huge difference between polar ice caps and an ice free Arctic Ocean.
And, btw, I did not write that article, which Achilles, lying, claimed I declared.
So freder doesn't believe in anthropogenic global warming.
Good game.
Lefty fullfact.org article about Greta predicting the world would end in 2023.
This article is the perfect encapsulation of Freder's dishonesty.
A tweet shared by Greta Thunberg in 2018 did not warn that the world would end in five years, as some on social media have implied.
False or misleading claims online have the potential to harm individuals, groups and democratic processes and institutions. Online claims can spread fast and far, and are difficult to contain and correct.
Ms Thunberg’s tweet, which was shared on 21 June 2018, but has since been deleted, read: ““A top climate scientist is warning that climate change will wipe out all of humanity unless we stop using fossil fuels over the next five years.””
PM said...
“Good thing 1.4 billion electric vehicles are going to cool 'the planet'.”
Are the effects of them catching on fire included in those thermal calculations?
LOL! Freder, the article answers your question of who is claiming such things- asked, as any reasonable person would interpret you question, in the belief that there were no such people.
You are literally as dumb as dog shit.
Al Gore and Reuters.
I love the "fact check" nature of the articles. al-gore-did-not-predict-ice-caps-melting-by-2013-but-misrepresented-data!
Al Gore 100% predicted Ice Caps would be gone. That becomes obvious as you read the article.
Everyone knows that Freder and the rest of the climate cult are stupid idiots who have made many predictions that were brutally wrong.
It's just the opposite of El Niño
And it's not like you could call it the anti-El Niño. That might summon the Devil.
(I'm not familiar enough with stratospheric/mesospheric water vapor to speculate on its residence time, btw. I can ask some colleagues next time I see them at a meeting, although the next big one is in January, and several of them have said they're retiring after the Nov election.)
If you believe that CO2 in the atmosphere is a real problem, then you are literally fucked since the concentrations are going to double in the next 75 years- that is already baked in by China all by itself. Nothing, literally nothing, done in the U.S. or Europe is going to do anything at all except make our lives more expensive while the rest of the world gets to enjoy the benefits of even cheaper fossil fuels. It is like cutting off your dick to save the world from rapists.
"If you believe that CO2 in the atmosphere is a real problem, then you are literally fucked since the concentrations are going to double in the next 75 years- that is already baked in by China all by itself. Nothing, literally nothing, done in the U.S. or Europe is going to do anything at all except make our lives more expensive while the rest of the world gets to enjoy the benefits of even cheaper fossil fuels. It is like cutting off your dick to save the world from rapists."
And not just China. India. Africa. Russia. Notice how St. Greta of Thurnberg never shows up in Beijing shouting "HOW DARE YOU" to Xi JinPing?
The deafening silence of Western climate alarmist's ignorance of more than half the rest of the world's fossil fuel consumption is like Western feminist's inattention to the 90% of women that don't live in America or Western Europe who actually live the oppressed lives they claim are just around the corner, but never materialize.
It almost seems like someone might be orchestrating this behind the scenes. Gee, wonder who that could be.
"I'm not familiar enough with stratospheric/mesospheric water vapor to speculate on its residence time,…"
It's several years, apparently. After reading Vinós' article, I wonder if it will swamp the upcoming La Niña.
Awhile back, some B School types did what they usually do with problems of this sort
And as usual, Bruce does not provide a link to this study.
Is this a bad time to bring up the Maldives?
RideSpaceMountain: That was cruel. All Gollum wanted was his fish and his Precious, he didn't want to dictate the Shire's agricultural policy, or how much methane Rohan's horses could fart, unlike Greta the Swedish Climate Goblin.
"Is this a bad time to bring up the Maldives?"
Doesn't really matter. Climate alarmism is a religion, their beliefs supersede actual evidence.
Females tend to run cooler with some hot flashes at times.
Rocco:
No. Back to the slide rule!
The Arctic ice cap is floating.
The Antarctic ice cap is supported by islands underneath its immense mass.
There are ancient maps that show Antarctica as islands- none mention ice.
Scientists and historians don't really know how to explain that.
Today's retreating Alaskan glaciers are revealing forests of tree trunks that belonged to trees that were mowed down when the glaciers advanced. Does anyone here actually think mankind would be worse off if Alaska was tree covered instead of ice covered?
We have essentially zero effect on climate. The biggest effect comes from that big yellow orb in thr sky that various ancients used to worship. We know for a fact it's output is variable. And haven't been around long enough to find out just how variable it might be.
Freder Frederson said...
"Awhile back, some B School types did what they usually do with problems of this sort
And as usual, Bruce does not provide a link to this study.
Why? You won't read it. Hows about you do your own research. Nobody here is getting paid to think for you.
Gospace.
What if at some time in the past a large body, not moon size but big enough,passed close enough to earth to bleed enough off some of our atmosphere out into space and causing an ice age. Some of the animals found in the permafrost still had food in their mouths when they died. Meaning the freezing occurred very rapidly.
And as usual, Bruce does not provide a link to this study.
If you don ‘t have the intelligence to track it down with DuckDuckGo, you don’t have the intelligence to understand it anyway, Freder.
There's recent (geologically) evidence of what life was like under two distinct climate episodes - the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice age. Life flourished during the former, and during the latter, not so much.
All the chatter about how if a certain trace gas is reduced, there will no longer be "extreme" weather. It's silly, ridiculous, and foolish of course. The "experts" haven't the foggiest idea and all their theories about this brief period of warming have been scientifically "falsified". Hence AGW, global warming, then climate crisis. You don't get government largesse if you disagree with the desired narrative.
"Blogger pacwest said...
Ancient civilizations used human sacrifice to control these disturbing events."
We need to sacrifice the president to save Gaia. Joe vs the Volcano.
Post a Comment