July 16, 2024

"My first reaction was, 'My God. This is' — look, there’s so much violence now and the way we talk about it."

"I mean, the whole notion that there is this — there’s — there’s no place at all for violence in politics in America. None. Zero. And — we’ve reached a point where it’s — it’s become too commonplace, not assassinations, but to talk about it. For example, you know, the January 6th — you know, the attack on the Capitol, the — I — I — Lester, I got in this race early on in 2020 — for the 2020 race. I wasn’t gonna run again because I’d lost my son. I didn’t — you know? And — until I watched what happened in Charlottesville, Virginia. Those folks coming out of the woods with torches, carrying swastikas, singing the same Nazi bile that was accompanied by this Ku Klux Klan and a young woman was killed. And — and it was a bystander. And — the president — then president was asked, 'What do you think?' He said, 'The very fine people on both sides.' Not fine people on both sides. No excuse. Zero."

That's our President, Joe Biden, asked by Lester Holt to describe his first reaction to the assassination attempt. Biden stumble and bumbled his way back to his happy place, the Charlottesville hoax!


Holt goes on to question Biden about his saying, just before the assassination attempt, "It’s time to put Trump in the bull’s-eye." Biden responded: "I didn’t say cross-hairs." Yeah, we know. You said "bull's eye." Corrected, Biden justifies himself. He meant focus on Trump. Holt asks if Biden has "done a little soul searching on things that you may have said that could incite — people who are not balanced?" Biden's answer is all about the problem of Trump's rhetoric. And he doesn't want to have to worry about inciting violence: "Do you just not say anything ’cause it may incite somebody?"

His administration is prosecuting Trump for saying things on January 6th that are said to have incited people. Before you cry out for your freedom to say things that might incite somebody, pardon Trump. 

Holt reminds Biden that he's said that everyone needs to turn done the heat. Biden responds:
Oh, no, no, no, no. Look, what I’m turning down — we have to stop the whole notion that there are certain things that are contrary to our — our democracy that we’re for. The idea of saying that you — “I didn’t win the election” when every court in the land — every court in the land, 120 appeals said — and including this conservative Supreme Court said we won, the idea about having — a loyalty pledge from all the folks who are in the Republican MAGA — not all Republicans, the MAGA Republicans saying that, “No, we lost the election,” inflaming the people to say — I — you — I mean —

Holt cuts off the babbling to prompt him to return to the question: "What will you do... to lower down the temperature, the rhetoric out there?" Biden's answer is a reference to one of the "inflammatory" things Trump has said: "talking about people as being vermin and all."

Later, there's colloquy about investigating the inadequacy of the Secret Service protection given to Donald Trump:

LESTER HOLT: Is it acceptable that you have still not heard, at least publicly, from the Secret Service director?

PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: Oh, I’ve heard from him. I — I’ve —

Apparently, he isn't even aware that the director of the Secret Service is a woman. 

LESTER HOLT: But have you heard from her publicly?

A little subtle help with the pronouns from Lester Holt. 

PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: Publicly. I’ve sat down in the Situation Room downstairs. The Secret Service, the FBI, the national security agencies, the Homeland Security, all the major elements. And there’s two pieces to this, too. And it’s — it’s not an excuse. It’s just an ordinary explanation. There’s a major piece of this related to domestic and local law enforcement. They play a large role. And so there’s a different comp — I’m not saying they weren’t competent either. I’m just saying it’s a complicated process. And what has changed, by the way, Lester, is (CLEARS THROAT) you me, I’m — I like to meet people. I like to walk out, shake hands, move, look at people in the eye, see what they’re thinking. It’s really curtailed that ability on my part and on everybody’s part. And so because there’s a heightened notion that when you say there’s nothing wrong with going to the Capitol, breaking in, threatening people, a couple cops dying, hanging — put — putting up a noose, a gallows for — done for the vice — the former vice president, and you — and some — somehow you — and then you say you’re gonna forgive people for that, you’re gonna pardon ’em, that that was just a normal response, that is not — I have my entire career voted against and railed against and moved against the idea of violence is never appropriate. Never, never, never, never, never in politics.

Did you follow that? Again, I see stumbling and bumbling back to a happy place — January 6th.

I don't know if I can bear to go on, but the next part is about Judge Cannon's dismissal of the documents case. He observes that the dismissal was based on a defect in the appointment of the independent prosecutor, but he proceeds to talk about the merits of the documents case against him:

PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: I had an independent prosecutor look at me.... And they looked at me and concluded I didn’t do a damn thing wrong....

That's not what they concluded! 

There follows a lot of talk about the 2024 race. Holt brings up Biden's bad performance at the debate and asks if Biden will do another one. Holt asks: "Is there a sense of wanting to get back on the horse?"

PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: I’m on the horse. Where have you been? I’ve done 22 major events, met thousands of people, overwhelming crowds. A lot’s happening. I’m on the horse....

ADDED: I've rewatched this interview, and I can't get over how inappropriately belligerent he is toward Lester Holt. Holt is so mature and dignified that it is unwise and ineffective to treat him as though he's doing something wrong. There are 2 or 3 times when Biden leans forward oddly, his eyes wild, and levels some strange challenge. 

192 comments:

traditionalguy said...

The Dems had better pull Biden out of the game. He is terrible. And he’s getting worse.

Readering said...

All the Democrats i talk to about Biden want to see him gone.

doctrev said...

Keep this fool in as long as we can. I won't be surprised to see the New York oligarchs try to "remove" him from office.

imTay said...

You know what is really funny about Charlottesville? Those guys marching with the torches and red and black "Blood and Soil" flags looked exactly like demonstrations that we have seen in Kiev, reported on by Associated Press, BTW. Look at the photo:

https://apnews.com/article/europe-russia-ukraine-army-world-war-ii-b02c64cf0b3f7cb81c7ddfa12af68217

Remember, those guys are marching to honor a holocaust collaborator.

And if history doesn't repeat itself, but rhymes, as Mark Twain purportedly said, well January 6th rhymes with Reichstag Fire.

imTay said...

"All the Democrats i talk to about Biden want to see him gone."

And yet, your beloved party fixed the primaries so that rank and file Democrats had no real voice in the process.

Michael K said...

I see we have troll exposing himself.

mindnumbrobot said...

The fact anybody is still pretending this man is fit to be president is surreal.

Mason G said...

Biden is perfect for the Democrats. They deserve each other.

Kate said...

Everyone with an elderly parent has heard the same story repeated ad infinitum. The details were incorrectly set in stone years ago and the parent can't be told differently. No matter how much evidence you present, the parent starts the conversation at page one and never budges.

I'm not going to waste my time listening to someone else's elderly parent go through the same tedious process.

Dude1394 said...

Please keep the alzheimers patient in the race.

mikee said...

My spouse bet me that Joe would be removed from the ticket in 2 weeks, back before before the assassination attempt on Trump. I don't think I'm gonna lose my money, they'll keep him on the ticket through the convention, maybe through the election, because they know it is ballot harvesting that wins this election, and nothing else. But every time Joe speaks, I know I could be wrong. This guy has always been a lying hack of a politician, but now he is just a husk of a hack. My sympathy for his dementia has long ago run out in disgust at his handlers.

Mason G said...

"All the Democrats i talk to about Biden want to see him gone."

Are those the same Democrats who support using lawfare against Trump? Who also think Trump should respect the rule of law?

lamech said...

After that interview, the DNC simply must drop Biden .... misgendering Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle cannot be accepted.

John Borell said...

That interview was a train wreck.

n.n said...

The young woman, along with her Antifa brethren, were attacking a young man trapped in his car. This became a normal model of protest with Black Lives Matter, including neighborhood incursions to intimidate families. We are past our Antidem moment.

planetgeo said...

That teleprompter in his/their head never stops, does it?

Mason G said...

FJB: "I have my entire career voted against and railed against and moved against the idea of violence is never appropriate."

You're against the idea that violence is never appropriate? Ok then- when is it appropriate? Or did you mean to say something else but that came out instead?

rehajm said...

The problem is if you pull the babbling cadaver the people who have been acting as POTUS don’t stay in power. If Kamala is made President KAMALA is President…

…so they stick with him and cook the vote. Worked before…

Christopher B said...

Readering said...
All the Democrats i talk to about Biden want to see him gone.


You all will just have to wait until 1/20/2025 like the rest of us.

No Democrat is gonna let themselves get covered by the stink of losing to Trump after the insane antics your side has pulled to try to defeat him.

You're ridin' with Biden just like Major Kong ridin' the Bomb.

Heartless Aztec said...

Politics as sad comedy.

rehajm said...

Oh, and it was standinglachesmoot, not an examination and conclusion Democrats did not commit fraud…

tim maguire said...

mikee said...My spouse bet me that Joe would be removed from the ticket in 2 weeks,

Her mistake was putting a time limit on it. Biden will not be the Democratic nominee, but there are many ways it could happen.

Original Mike said...

Clear out all the babbling and it's still possible to see the narrative they're pushing. The audience is the people who don't do their research.

Sebastian said...

Now I wanna see Althouse write a Biden riff, like she does Trump. Tall order, no?

So, what does the Biden babbling tell us about the party of science? The top-bottom party of our credentialed betters, our educated elite, as Prof. Drout described Dems in another thread?

Their leader explodes their pretensions.

rehajm said...

Credit to Biden for the wherewithal to try the ‘crosshairs’ Jedi mind trick, I suppose…

n.n said...

A democracy? Should we then disband the government?

America is a republic that is governed under a Constitution that recognizes individual rights and mitigates authoritarian progress.

Political Junkie said...

The Lester Holt interview is so bad, IMO, that D's should try to invoke the 25th and get Kamala in as president. Won't happen. If "president" means anything, we need to make a replacement right now. Lester Holt is a good man, but he is a solid D and L, and Biden was terrible.

imTay said...

I went golfing with some rabid never Trumpets, one of whom, out of nowhere the last time we were golfing said "I think that Joe Biden is a decent man," to which I thought, "what an odd thing to say..." But anyway, his wife is a medical specialist who deals with the elderly, and she was playing too, she's pretty good, anyway, my planned response if they brought it up was "what is your professional opinion on Joe Biden," but they never brought it up. Never said a word about politics. It was kind of nice.

Narayanan said...

misgendering Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle cannot be accepted.
=================
could it be Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle presents as one of the boys? during those daily briefings in the bunker?

Amadeus 48 said...

Nothing surprising here. Here is a preview of his next interview focused on environmental issues:

"Blow winds, and crack your cheeks! Rage, blow!
You cataracts and hurricanoes, spout
Till you have drenched our steeples, drowned the
cocks.
You sulph’rous and thought-executing fires,
Vaunt-couriers of oak-cleaving thunderbolts,
Singe my white head. And thou, all-shaking
thunder,
Strike flat the thick rotundity o’ th’ world.
Crack nature’s molds, all germens spill at once
That makes ingrateful man."

Sally327 said...

Yeah he's on the horse all right, a carousel one. Up and down and around and around...weeeee!

Original Mike said...

"the idea about having — a loyalty pledge from all the folks who are in the Republican MAGA — not all Republicans, the MAGA Republicans saying that, “No, we lost the election,”"

What's this about?

M Jordan said...

I’m starting to think Trump may run unopposed. No one wants to get beat as bad as a Biden ticket will get beat. Dems may get him to drop off, give him a (fake) hero’s exit then simply not fill in for him.

Readering said...

These are all Democrats who were content to see Biden crowned in the primaries. I was a lonely voice attacking him the past year for running.

Don't assume any scenario over next 2 months.

Humperdink said...

What do the Dems have, or had in their campaign arsenal? Trump is Hitler, Trump is a liar. The former "plank" is off the table, at least for awhile. The liar thing? Listen to Lester Holt correct Biden's lies in real time.

n.n said...

misgendering Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle cannot be accepted.

Biden has probably received gender (e.g. sexual orientation) denial therapy that engenders progressive confusion, which is further aggravated under the preponderance of Diversity [dogma] of class-disordered ideologies.

CJinPA said...

He actually seems to be doing what he's been told since 2021: repeat Jan. 6 and Charlottesville.

His handlers know he just has to do that 4 more months and hope for the best. They're not going to try to tax his brain by changing the script.

--------------------

Original Mike said...
"the idea about having — a loyalty pledge from all the folks who are in the Republican MAGA — not all Republicans, the MAGA Republicans saying that, “No, we lost the election,”"

What's this about

2025 project, probably. That is the one new line added to Biden's script.

Leland said...

I keep being told “Trump lies”, but that’s not followed up by examples. Even Snopes has finally admitted that Trump never called Nazis good people in Charlottesville, yet President Biden keeps up the lie.

Mason G said...

FJB: "there’s no place at all for violence in politics in America."

Really? So who's doing all the rioting and looting and burning stuff down and screaming "Literally Hitler!" and "Threat to Our Democracy™"? And now attempting an assassination? Here's a clue- it's not the right.

doctrev said...

Readering said...
These are all Democrats who were content to see Biden crowned in the primaries. I was a lonely voice attacking him the past year for running.

Don't assume any scenario over next 2 months.

7/16/24, 9:51 AM

"I was against Biden from the start" is going to be so common you'd think Tulsi won the primary.

And ANY scenario? Against an incumbent President with 90% of the delegates? Is there something you're not telling us? Have you got your MAGA hat ready so people can say what a murderous registered Republican you were?

Static Ping said...

The worst thing about it is Biden has always been like this, except now he is decrepit and senile. The charm is gone and all that is left is the BS.

dreams said...

Biden has always been a clown, I was surprised when Obama pick him as his vice president.

Charlie said...

Biden: "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!"

Holt: "Okay!"

Bob Boyd said...

That's not a saddle, chief. That's a diaper.

Immanuel Rant said...

"Trump is Hitler" is off the table?!

Someone better tell them. They seem to not have gotten that message.

n.n said...

Biden, receives emoluments, at Obama's [ethnic] Spring(s).

Humperdink said...

I presume everyone has seen the two (2) minute video of the Dems, both high and low on the totem pole, calling for violence against former President Trump. It is astonishing. If you haven't seen it, here it is.

https://x.com/i/status/1812330719743488169

Dave Begley said...

Like I wrote earlier, Biden should pardon Trump. Let voters decide at the "battle box."

RCOCEAN II said...

So the whole interview was:

Holt: Mr. President Question 1
Biden: Glad you asked me that. Ignores question [insert attack on Trump]

Holt: Mr. President Question 2
Biden: Glad you asked me that. Ignores question [insert talking point]

I dont think Biden cares about his public utterances or the American people. To him its all just salemanship or "Campaign rhetoric". He doesn't care if its true or false, or whether it makes sense. Just attack his opponents and squawk out the party line. Inside that empty suit is a hollow man.

BTW, Biden's election was supposed to mean "the adults are back in charge". Now we see what that means.

Original Mike said...

"I was a lonely voice attacking him the past year for running."

Did you raise a voice against the Trump is Hitler spiel, Charlottesville, the lawfare, …?

I saw last night Martha Radatz is still pushing the "bloodbath" slander. It's not enough to oppose Biden's candidacy. The lying about Trump, the lying that lead to an assassination attempt, has to stop.

imTay said...

Narcissists say whatever comes into their head that they think will make the normies like them, and therefore surrender power to them. For instance Joe Biden promised to cure cancer when he was running in 2020. Never even tried. At least Trump tried to build the wall.

Readering said...

Doctrev, i've been writing since 2020 primary that both Biden and Trump are bad, but Trump is much worse. No MAGA hat for me.

Steve said...

I think the chance of Biden being replaced at the top of the Dem ticket has dropped dramatically. It's like the dems are on the bridge of the Titanic looking around for who wants to be Captain next. Anyone that might take over is whistling and looking at their shoes.

Temujin said...

Three things come to my mind.
1) He doesn't know who the Director of Secret Service is. He's not even close (calling her, him). So...who hired her? I've read that Jill was her biggest proponent. Is Jill behind some of the key decisions of this administration?

2) The Democrats are in a very precarious place. Trump was already leading in most polls before this event occurred. Now- given his show of strength and clear action in the face of extreme danger, I would say he's well on his way (if no other 'events' occur). So, do the Democrats just accept sticking with Biden, losing the White House, and focusing money and time on securing or saving what they can of the Senate and House? Or do they remove Biden immediately (somehow*) and go to Kamala?

3) *(the somehow from above). I wrote it, then deleted it. But you probably know where I was going with this.

Yancey Ward said...

I just watched the interview this morning- this was much worse than the debate or the interview done with Little George. The assassination attempt on Trump has stalled the Get Rid of Joe brigade but I expect it to start up again this week and weekend. Time has almost run out for replacing Biden on the ticket, however.

imTay said...

"Vote for Pedro, and all of your wildest dreams will come true."

At least Pedro from Napoleon Dynamite never said "If I lose, all of your worst nightmares will come true," because Pedro was a decent guy, unlike Joe Biden.

Jess said...

The question he should have asked is: "Who is running the country?" At this point, it's obvious Biden has no idea, and his handlers now find it's convenient to have him go away. Biden should feel blessed. If he was sharper, he would be in a funeral procession. Of course he has no idea of his predicament, but his wife does, and she is sweating while wondering what's next.

Achilles said...

Readering said...

These are all Democrats who were content to see Biden crowned in the primaries. I was a lonely voice attacking him the past year for running.

Don't assume any scenario over next 2 months.


Exactly as I predicted 4 years ago.

Biden is going to be so bad that democrats are embarrassed to be associated with the democrat party.

The "threat to democracy" and "racist" and "fascist" rhetoric you murderous jerks have been spewing overshadows everything you say.

Nobody gives a shit what you say until you recognize the basic humanity and good faith of Trump and his supporters.

Curious George said...

Althouse, great post but Biden interviews...and speeches...really need to be seen and heard, not just read. You don't get the true anger and dementia of the man with words.
Holt wasn't vert tough on him, but Biden still gave him a "what's wrong with you guys, c'mon man" scolding.

Eva Marie said...

Thanks for the link. Lester Holt is a good interviewer. He lets Biden talk. My impression of Biden is that he’s confident of what he’s known in the past and not so sure of his ability to synthesize new information.There’s a lot of anger that starts to surface when he thinks he’s being pushed into new territory. That’s a defense mechanism that probably serves him well when speaking to underlings. And he views Lester Holt as an underling.

Lawnerd said...

The asshole also restate the “bloodshed” hoax.

Humperdink said...

I said: "Trump is Hitler" is off the table.

Immanuel Rant responded: "Someone better tell them. They seem to not have gotten that message."

You may be right. Desperate people do desperate things, especially when circling the drain.

Gusty Winds said...

Biden stumble and bumbled his way back to his happy place, the Charlottesville hoax!

One trick pony.

Yancey Ward said...

Curious George is right- my normal practice for every other political speech or interview is to read the transcripts- I read 10 times as fast as any normal human can speak so it saves me time. However, I always listen/watch Biden speeches and interviews because you really do need to see it and hear it to really understand how far gone the man's mind is.

Sydney said...

What stood out to me was when he was asked if he has had any conversations with Obama about staying in the race and he said he couldn’t remember. A genuine answer that couldn’t be diverted to a memorized talking point. As a lifelong politician he’s really good at memorizing talking points and that is one function of his brain that still works somewhat. But he can’t remember anything else, like whether or not he’s spoken with Obama, or watched the debate performance

Skeptical Voter said...

You look at the interview--and think, "My gosh, this guy is one soggy taco shy of a Mexican combo plate"--in both the brains and physical force departments. He's old, he's tired, he's in over his head, and he was never very smart on his best day. Now when he was a bit friskier the party could put him up as a reliable front man. But those days of physical strength are gone, and he can't sell the Democrat dog chow as well as he did in the past. Were his father still around he might well say to Joe, "Champ--it's time to retire."

FleetUSA said...

A befuddled old man who only knows J6 and Charlottesville. Shaky grounds for his logic.

Readering said...

I have always said no one but Hitler should be called Hitler. I still think the Charlottesville critique of Trump was warranted, and I have read all AA's posts on the matter. Lawfare is not what has been happening. (Athough i was against the NY criminal case as a locally driven reaction to criticism--and am a Necheles fan. I am against any RICO case not going after organized crime, but prosecution for what happened in GA was certainly warranted.)

Todd said...

For progressives/lefties/Democrats, history always starts a minute from now. I recall that there was a fair bit of political violence in the 60s, were there not a number of political bombings in the 70s? What about BLM? What about Antifa? None of that counts because it is left [of center] violence?

According to "them", only the right does political violence and right violence starts with silence, everything after that also counts. The right is 100% responsible for any non-lefty nutball but the left is blemish free even for their own words and actions. They get a 100% pass on everything they say and do, from the bum in the street all the way up to POTUS. It is the power of the magical (D)...

Lawnerd said...

“Bloodbath” hoax, sorry.

Lilly, a dog said...

Of course Biden's on the horse. C'mon, man.

Riding on the range
I've got my hat- on
I've got my boots- dusty
I've got my saddle
On my horse
He's called (t-t-t-t-t-trigger)
Of course

I wanna be a cowboy
And you can be my cowgirl
I wanna be a cowboy
And you can be my cowgirl
I wanna be a cowboy

Gunner said...

This was the opposite of a Mea Culpa. The hoaxes will continue.

BUMBLE BEE said...

He's so consistent with his mentor it is startling.
Byrd made an indelible impression!

Lawnerd said...

Joe Biden, number 76 in a class of 85 in law school. He isn’t qualified to clean dog shit off the sidewalk let alone be named town dog catcher.

Original Mike said...

"Lawfare is not what has been happening."

I just don't know what to say to that.

Achilles said...

Yancey Ward said...

I just watched the interview this morning- this was much worse than the debate or the interview done with Little George. The assassination attempt on Trump has stalled the Get Rid of Joe brigade but I expect it to start up again this week and weekend. Time has almost run out for replacing Biden on the ticket, however.

The problem is that they don't have anyone who wants to sign up to lose to Trump. And not just lose to Trump. Historically lose. Newsome and Michelle are out. Whitmer will probably hole up in the governor's mansion.

Only people like Desantis take that deal. Anyone they foist up there is just as much a patsy as Thomas Crook.

One thing everyone should notice about this situation that flies under the radar. Look at the effect X is having on this situation. There are videos of the shooter popping up everywhere. Everyone knows the SS coordinated this attempt now. They cannot hide the truth anymore.

There are going to be people with phones hiding in every bush around those Wisconsin drop boxes. X is going to make the mail in bullshit very hard.

And nobody is going to accept the non-transparent crap they ran in 2020. Not after they tried to murder Trump.

Achilles said...

Yancey Ward said...

Curious George is right- my normal practice for every other political speech or interview is to read the transcripts- I read 10 times as fast as any normal human can speak so it saves me time. However, I always listen/watch Biden speeches and interviews because you really do need to see it and hear it to really understand how far gone the man's mind is.

Biden's "transcripts" are almost always edited. What he actually says is rarely written down.

Achilles said...

Readering said...

I have always said no one but Hitler should be called Hitler. I still think the Charlottesville critique of Trump was warranted, and I have read all AA's posts on the matter. Lawfare is not what has been happening. (Athough i was against the NY criminal case as a locally driven reaction to criticism--and am a Necheles fan. I am against any RICO case not going after organized crime, but prosecution for what happened in GA was certainly warranted.)

So you are willing to support lies to dehumanize your opponents and justify shooting them.

Got it.

Humperdink said...

Readering said: "Lawfare is not what has been happening."

^^^^^^ Statements like is why you have zero credibility on this blog.

Oso Negro said...

How can any sentient being support the idea that Biden is functional enough to serve as President for even one more minute? Surely there must be a Biden supporter here who meets that standard. What have you got?

Big Mike said...

Anyone besides me old enough to remember "Violence is as American as cherry pie"? This was spoken by H. Rap Brown, then the chairman of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. (Yes, I love the irony!) Violence didn't work out all that well for him; he's currently serving a life sentence in a maximum security prison for murdering a deputy sheriff.

Over at Instapundit I found a link to a thought-provoking Substack article where the author argues that the Hard Left will not abandon violence because they have been "educated" (if I may abuse the term) to believe that violence is not only accceptable and appropriate, but also sometimes even necessary.

And the author, Richard Pollock, should know because he has impeccable far left credentials. He was a roommate of Rennie Davis, one of the Chicago Seven defendants, and personal friends with the likes of Abbie Hoffman, Tom Hayden, and Jerry Rubin. Althouse and Meade should recognize those names, some of you Gen-X and younger folks may have to look them up.

Their spiritual descendants, with their philosophy of violence as a political tool, appear to have taken over the US Government, or how else do you you explain that people are arrested by twenty-person FBI teams in full battle-rattle for praying in front of abortion clinics while 436 vandalism and arson attacks against churches in 2023 go essentially uninvestigated.

Can this trend be stopped without massive counter-violence? God, I hope so.

Michael Fitzgerald said...

M Jordan said...
I’m starting to think Trump may run unopposed. No one wants to get beat as bad as a Biden ticket will get beat. Dems may get him to drop off, give him a (fake) hero’s exit then simply not fill in for him.

7/16/24, 9:51 AM

This is actually a very plausible, and depending on the date of Biden's pre-election death, potentially likely scenario. This is the democrat party conspiratorial hivemind after all, these are the despicably petty Party members who for four years refused to allow a single American fashion magazine to feature the most beautiful First Lady in the history of the USA who was also a professional model. When they can't stop Trump at the battle box and they can't kill him and the cheat won't fit, then the only way to deny him legitimate victory is by having him run unopposed, the first such election in American history, and then claim afterward that his presidency is illegitimate and tainted.

Achilles said...

Oso Negro said...

How can any sentient being support the idea that Biden is functional enough to serve as President for even one more minute? Surely there must be a Biden supporter here who meets that standard. What have you got?

Readering said...

I have always said no one but Hitler should be called Hitler. I still think the Charlottesville critique of Trump was warranted, and I have read all AA's posts on the matter. Lawfare is not what has been happening. (Athough i was against the NY criminal case as a locally driven reaction to criticism--and am a Necheles fan. I am against any RICO case not going after organized crime, but prosecution for what happened in GA was certainly warranted.)

Milo Minderbinder said...

Clowns to the left of me.... I'm waiting on the jokers still.

mezzrow said...

Like Barack Obama, I don't underestimate Joe Biden.

Especially in times like these.

We are propelled by events, dear friends, and so it shall continue.

Original Mike said...

"The problem is that they don't have anyone who wants to sign up to lose to Trump."

It hadn't occurred to me before I saw someone post this, but Kamala probably doesn't want to be on the top of the ticket.

Narayanan said...

Blogger Michael Fitzgerald said...

M Jordan said...
I’m starting to think Trump may run unopposed. No one wants to get beat as bad as a Biden ticket will get beat. Dems may get him to drop off, give him a (fake) hero’s exit then simply not fill in for him.

7/16/24, 9:51 AM

This is actually a very plausible,
=====================
and thus let's give Kamala a chance to self coronate herself?

Big Mike said...

I do have to wonder how many of the houses with "Hate has no home here" signs on the front lawn also have people inside lamenting that Trump was only nicked on the ear and didn't die. But Lefties don't get irony, do they?

FullMoon said...

Watch the interview, it is even worse than it reads.

BTW, Joey always says Trump told 28 lies in the debate. I hope that in the next debate, Trump asks Joe to say each lie referred to. Would be hilarious, not sure Joe can always count to 28, much less repeat a list of 28 "lies".

Michael K said...

Rendering seems to be assuming the Inga role here.

Bob Boyd said...

Biden's shot.
Trump got shot.
Biden is shot. He's just shot.

Can you imagine interviewing Biden for a job and deciding to hire him? I can't.
Nobody would want to put Biden in charge of anything, any department, any business, any multi-step task. Nobody would even want to put Biden in an advisory role.

He's shot. It happens to all of us sooner or later if we don't go under a bus or something.

Now having said that, I hope he stays in the race.

donald said...

You’re a retard Readering. Just babbling old talking points like some demented old NE hack pol.

Original Mike said...

Did Holt ask Biden about his debate claim that no soldiers died on his watch?

Yeah…

Drago said...

readering: "I have always said no one but Hitler should be called Hitler. I still think the Charlottesville critique of Trump was warranted..."

Complete and utter self-contradiction right off the bat and it places readering solidly in the lunatic left side of the discussion.

And claiming the lawfare is hunky dory just nails the coffin shut.

readering, you might as well be Joy Behar or Rosie O'Donnell.

Readering said...

Achilles: i was raised by Republicans. My mom voted for Trump in 2016. I have never had a problem with Republicans voting Republican.

But i have followed Trump since I litigated against him in the eighties, and never understood what Republicans saw in him (my mom was a huge fan of the Apprentice).

Credit Vance with terrific political instincts in following McCarthy to MAL in February 2021, but I still don't see how the Vance of 2016 could bring himself to do it.

rhhardin said...

Violence is an ordinary, commonplace, and literary way to describe change. Kenneth Burke in A Rhetoric of Motive, preface starts.

"THE ONLY difficult portion of this book happens, unfortunately, to be at the start. There, selecting texts that are usually treated as pure poetry, we try to show why rhetorical and dialectical considerations are also called for. Since these texts involve an imagery of killing (as a typical text for today should) we note how, behind the surface, lies a quite different realm that has little to do with such motives. An imagery of killing is but one of many terminologies by which writers can represent the process of change. And while recognizing the sinister implications of a preference for homicidal and suicidal terms, we indicate that the principles of development or transformation (“rebirth”) which they stand for are not strictly of such a nature at all."

Be careful what you want to ban.

Drago said...

Michael K: "Rendering seems to be assuming the Inga role here."

While simultaneously attempting to draw some distinction between him/her self and Inga....which in practice does not exist.

Gerda Sprinchorn said...

M Jordan said: "I’m starting to think Trump may run unopposed."

Or, Trump may run AS IF he is unopposed.

Criticizing Biden at this point is just cruel, so don't do it. Assume people in the middle have written off Biden and reach out to them as if they have no other choice. Make them feel more comfortable with their "only choice." Reach out in our time of national crisis where half the electorate has been denied a candidate of their choice. Be the unity candidate. Be the compromise candidate. Be generous. Occasionally mention that we are "Stronger Together".

Drago said...

readering: "Achilles: i was raised by Republicans. My mom voted for Trump in 2016. I have never had a problem with Republicans voting Republican."

Irrelevant.

readering: "But i have followed Trump since I litigated against him in the eighties, and never understood what Republicans saw in him (my mom was a huge fan of the Apprentice)."

It's been explained explicitly and ad nauseum by supporters for about 9 years now.

readering: "Credit Vance with terrific political instincts in following McCarthy to MAL in February 2021, but I still don't see how the Vance of 2016 could bring himself to do it."

New facts arise, observations grow, understanding increases, purposes become clearer, results matter, etc.

Readering said...

People keep commenting about perceived terrible Democratic pilitical rhetoric even as they waste their time hurling personal insults at lowly me. It's hard crafting actual arguments.

Drago said...

readering: "It's hard crafting actual arguments."

It certainly is for some.......

Drago said...

Not to worry readering. Your team is already in full blown Vance is a worse Hitler than Trump mode as we speak.

So much for "crafting arguments".

Mason G said...

Arguments against... what? Assassination? Voting fraud? Lawfare? Race baiting? Not so hard for honest, moral people.

Bushman of the Kohlrabi said...

The people who are actually running the country will not allow Joe to be replaced until they find a new host to inhabit. This arrangement where a progressive group of ideologues governs via a clueless puppet is a DNC dream come true. They won’t voluntarily give it up. Right now replacing Joe likely depends on Kamala agreeing to this arrangement. The other candidates mentioned by the media are less likely to play along IMO.

Narayanan said...

There are going to be people with phones hiding in every bush around those Wisconsin drop boxes.
=================
is it possible to have R's Only and D's Only boxes? to validate disparate impact theory?

Achilles said...

Readering said...

Achilles: i was raised by Republicans. My mom voted for Trump in 2016. I have never had a problem with Republicans voting Republican.

Until they voted for Trump.

But i have followed Trump since I litigated against him in the eighties, and never understood what Republicans saw in him (my mom was a huge fan of the Apprentice).

He is honest and he knows how to lead. You know where you stand with Trump. He keeps promises and does business in good faith. Even when he comes up short you know he tried and he gets back up to try again.

Credit Vance with terrific political instincts in following McCarthy to MAL in February 2021, but I still don't see how the Vance of 2016 could bring himself to do it.

You need to understand why we support Trump. You need to actually get into the shoes of working people.

You need to understand how the current Regime and the Beautiful People have treated the working class. Your constant sneering and calling us racist and fascist. The constant hollowing out of industry and open borders to keep wages low.

The regime prints off money at the federal level and subsidizes a sneering class of HR managers, lawyers, professors and bureaucrats while calling the people who actually keep this country running racist nazi redknecks. Then you put these sneering mediocrities who can't even change a tire in positions of power where I work in a company with a worthless DEI manager telling me how racist I am while I design and build the products that actually make money for the company.

Then you are shocked when your sneering violent rhetoric and your constant violence against us results in an assassination attempt.

Mason G said...

"Then you are shocked when your sneering violent rhetoric and your constant violence against us results in an assassination attempt."

They're not shocked. Many seem awfully disappointed, though.

Jersey Fled said...

This is starting to remind me of a baseball game where one team gets so far behind that they put a position player in to pitch. He then just starts lobbing it in there and hopes the batter hits the ball where a fielder is standing. No sense wasting valuable resources in a losing cause.

I’m sure there are discussions along these lines going on among the Democrats right now. In words of one syllable, they are f*cked.

wendybar said...

What else does he have to run on?? The hate and violence brigade of the left thinks they are righteous. Normal Americans are appalled by their ignorance. The Progressives ruined the party, and Joe helped them.

Levi Starks said...

“Out of the woods with torches”
Really?
No one is going to call him on that?

Narayanan said...

There are going to be people with phones hiding in every bush around those Wisconsin drop boxes.
=================
is it possible to have R's Only and D's Only boxes at every location? to validate disparate impact theory?

Achilles said...

Readering said...

People keep commenting about perceived terrible Democratic pilitical rhetoric even as they waste their time hurling personal insults at lowly me. It's hard crafting actual arguments.

I accept your challenge. I craft my argument. We want:

1. An end to stupid warmongering.
2. Borders that function.
3. Deportation of illegals here lowering our wages and receiving more from the government than we get paid to work.
4. A government that does not make up crimes to jail political opponents.
5. An open transparent auditable election with reasonable voter verification and registration efforts.
6. Adherence to the second amendment.
7. A Secret Service that does not try to get the next president killed in an obvious plot by shooting him in broad daylight at a political rally.
8. And end to the censorship of political views by government and giant corporations.
9. Acknowledgement that you lied about Russian Collusion.
10. Acknowledgement that you lied about COVID origins.
11. Acknowledgement that you lied about Hunters laptop.
12. Acknowledgement that Trump did not rape E Jean Carrol.
13. Acknowledgement that Trump did not steal classified documents
14. Acknowledgement that Trump did not defraud the banks he paid back

Not a comprehensive list but a good start.

Now it is your turn. Tell us what you want.

Mason G said...

"Now it is your turn. Tell us what you want."

You need to realize the left calls killing an unborn baby "reproductive care". You might want to be careful when assessing what they say their "wants" are.

Jersey Fled said...

Nicely done, Achilles.

Rusty said...

Finally. After 8 years. Some honest dialog from Readering. Late, but here none the less.
Now you want to be taken seriously.
If you had bothered to listen to the full quote of what Trump said about Charlottsville you'd have doubt about what he meant.
You are, I think, at heart a political animal and only secondarily a moral one.

Ironclad said...

Sooner or later someone from the MSM is going to get the order to call out Biden in an Interview. “ that’s a lie sir, what you said is not true, he didn’t say that at all.” And Biden will go nuclear on live TV. Because the first reaction of someone that gone mentally is always anger - see Commander the dogs behavior for a reflection of Joey’s real self.

Tick tick. It’s coming.

Achilles said...

Mostly Readering you need to realize how close we were to having dozens of videos of Trump's head exploding in broad daylight because he was shot in the head at a political rally.

I can picture a head being shot because I have seen it. I know the sound a shattered skull makes. One of my buddies remarked on it while he grabbed the hair of someone who just got shot and bounced his head on the ground. It isn't quite like broken glass in a bag of water because blood and brain is a bit thicker.

The videos would have been graphic and heinous. Most Americans have not seen the real world. This introduction would have been so bad.

Really people have no idea about the hell that was so close to being unleashed.

And the SS was so obviously behind this that I don't see how they could be that stupid. They might just be stupid enough to try again.

I went to church. I am on the brink of acknowledging god over this.

We are all so fucking lucky.

You people need to step back from the brink. You do not want this. You need to stop with the racist fascist threat to democracy crap.

pacwest said...

It's hard crafting actual arguments.

LOL. I'd suggest you stop trying to "craft them" and just make them. Or just use the pre-crafted ones provided by the MSM. "Charlottesville critique of Trump was warranted". See how easy that was?

Original Mike said...

Let's whittle it down to bite-sized chunks. Start with this one:

9. Acknowledgement that you lied about Russian Collusion.

Or is even that a bridge too far?

Paul said...

The Charlottesville hoax is all Biden's got now... no vision of the future.. just Trump hate (if he can remember his hate.)

Trump is gonna win... foregone conclusion.

M Jordan said...

The more I consider my idea posted above — that Trump may run unopposed — the more I think it has merit. The Dems could come to agreement with Biden that he’d have a glorious, exit at the convention. He accepts the nomination to great fanfare and applause then one week later announces his Parkinson’s has simply made it impossible to continue. With his name on the ballot he still gets 50, 60 million votes, a huge comfort to him. And he never has to admit Trump beat him.

Meanwhile Dems leave the ballot as is, protecting the whole raft of 2028 potentials from the shame of losing to Trump. As for Dems down ballot suffering under this scenario, it doesn’t matter what route they take: they’re going to lose all three, House, Senate, and Presidency and they know it. So the real goal is now 2028 where they see JD Vance as very vulnerable.

Dr Weevil said...

Big Mike (10:54am):
If I didn't rent, I'd be tempted to put a sign out front reading HATE IS ALWAYS WELCOME HERE! with the second line in smaller letters (as long as it's Trump hate). I figure the effect on passers-by would be like the meme of the guy mopping his sweaty forehead as he tries to decide which of two buttons to push.

Yancey Ward said...

Achilles at 11:20 AM.

+1000

Paul said...

dreams said...
"Biden has always been a clown, I was surprised when Obama pick him as his vice president."

He picked him for the same reason Biden picked Camila... he saw Biden as no threat to himself.

Yancey Ward said...

Ironclad is right- if the Dems really want Biden out it will take one of these interviewers actively and on video calling Biden out on his more ridiculous lies- I can pretty much guarantee it would cause Biden to explode in rage.

James K said...

"The worst thing about it is Biden has always been like this, except now he is decrepit and senile. The charm is gone and all that is left is the BS."

Like the Cheshire cat.

Holt may be good in the sense of letting the interviewee talk, but do you think Trump could get away with such blatant lies without an MSM interviewer challenging him? Holt just listened to the Charlottesville BS, smiled, and moved onto the next question.

Curious George said...

"Ironclad said...
Sooner or later someone from the MSM is going to get the order to call out Biden in an Interview. “ that’s a lie sir, what you said is not true..."

Already happening. Watch the Lester Holt interview. But it will get worse.

Jersey Fled said...

Biden also has abortion. For the life of me, I can’t figure out why. The Supreme Court has ruled that this is an issue reserved for the individual states. Explain to me why so many (mostly) women see this as a major issue in a Presidential election. Ignorance?

JAORE said...

That bastard Hitler wanna be should stop undermining democracy and destroying the earth. I'll, however, continue to be nice even though he's an existential threat that CAN NOT be allowed to be President!

Did I mention he supports Klansmen and has ordered Seal Team 6 to kill MSNBC journalists?

Original Mike said...

I'm actually concerned about a left wing nutjob taking a shot at Biden.

JAORE said...

"If you had bothered to listen to the full quote of what Trump said about Charlottsville..."

Full quote? That would undermine the cheap fake. (Example # 4,817 of when D's talk about R's it is nothing but projection.)

Old and slow said...

I hope that all the optimism is not terribly misplaced. I've learned to assume the worst where elections are concerned. They really will stop at nothing, and they don't care if you know they stole the election. The only question that matters is "what are you going to do about it?" Short of a full scale insurgency (which I am NOT advocating!), the left control all the levers of power. So really, what ARE you going to do about it when they blatantly steal another election?

cfs said...

https://nypost.com/2024/07/16/us-news/sen-bob-menendez-convicted-of-sprawling-gold-bar-bribery-scheme/

Menendez Convicted.

Goetz von Berlichingen said...

I seem to recall that years ago Readering was tagged with the sobriquet 'chicken fucker'...someone who thinks he's having real sex when all he is really doing is fucking a chicken... for his inane comments here.

I guess once you've fucked a chicken it's hard to go back.

MfG
Goetz von Berlichingen

Readering said...

Achilles: delete #7 and i'll think you are serious. I posted early about how terrible the security was, but the idea that USSS wanted Trump harmed has no basis. Both USSS and PA police should have lots of disciplinary actions. If i was family of shot bystanders i'd be consulting lawyers.

PS i never wrote here about the Mueller investigation. Just waited to see how it turned out. Do think AG Barr behaved shamefully. Don't think it was a hoax, but do think the role of the Clinton campaign was an example of how bad that campaign was (Biden campaign 2024: hold my beer.)

pacwest said...

While we're on the Charlottesville subject it does point out what I think is one of Trump's flaws. He thinks that there is some sort of middle ground with these people. He says he rewrote his speech to not be so fiery. Should be interesting to see him try yet again though. Good luck to him, but it's a total waste of time.

Drago said...

Paul: "The Charlottesville hoax is all Biden's got now... no vision of the future.. just Trump hate (if he can remember his hate.)"

Correct.

Trump = Hitler is the entire New Soviet Democratical Campaign.

As noted as Ace of Spades HQ, the Biden campaign leadership has already said they are going back to that theme...and in fact, never really paused it at all.

Its all they have and all they are going to have.

Readering said...

Jersey Fled: remember how many women have had abortions or know someone close who has.

Drago said...

Readering: "Achilles: delete #7 and i'll think you are serious. I posted early about how terrible the security was, but the idea that USSS wanted Trump harmed has no basis."

Recent items that also had no basis...until they did:

- Accusations that the russia collusion investigation began as a Hillary campaign op which weaponized the federal agencies against the Trump campaign has no basis.

- Accusations that the dossier "kompromat" from a "respected" (LOL) former British Intelligence agent was funded by the Clinton campaign, populated by a Brookings Institute resource (Deripaska) and his pals and then laundered thru the government and used as the key component for FISA warrants against the Trump campaign has no basis.

- Accusations that 51 former senior intelligence officers would be willing to lie publicly about the validity of the Hunter Biden laptop information has no basis.

- Accusations that the COVID virus was a lab grown product has no basis.

- Accusations that an FBI official would lie on a FISA warrant application turning a Trump advisor from a CIA asset into a russian asset has no basis.

And on and on the "has no basis" BS goes.....

imTay said...

"but the idea that USSS wanted Trump harmed has no basis."

Two extremely difficult to accept scenarios present themselves, one involves extreme incompetence and an extremely lucky shooter who walks up and finds the hole in the security that a bright high school kid would have closed, had he been in charge,, and the other involves a deliberate letdown of the guard, figuring, "Hey, if somebody wants to take a shot, and rid me of this threat to our power, who are we to stand int their way."

It wasn't that long ago that the two scenarios were "It's was definitely a pangolin carrying a virus from a bat cave in another part of China that just happened to jump the species barrier and then jump to humans, by an amazing coincidence, just a short distance from a lab in Wuhan where we were doing experiments on that same virus, using gene splicing techniques, paid for by the US government, and Oh by the way, given an exception to the law prohibiting such research by Dr Fauci, on the basis of the lack of risk. Whichever could it be...

How many lies are you willing to accept from these people? I could drone on and on about their lies, but I am probably skating too close to the repetition rule.

Jamie said...

"Out of the woods with torches”
Really?
No one is going to call him on that?


[shrug] It's become a drinking game at our house.

imTay said...

"Like the Cheshire cat."

Yes, he's fading away, leaving nothing but the creepy rictus.

Original Mike said...

"PS i never wrote here about the Mueller investigation."

Forget the "Mueller investigation". You have no opinion on Fusion GPS, the Steele Dossier, Comey sending agents to entrap Flynn, lying to the FISA Court, Clinesmith altering the CIA email, etc, etc, etc?

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

The Charlotsville lie:

"Good people on both sides" - Trump was referring to the debate as to weather or not to take down confederate statues. .. if YOU keep listening to the recording of Trump he goes on to say he does not support white supremacists or neo-nazis - and does not include those people in his commnet.


THE collective liar left - LIE. (Much like their "Hands up don't shoot" lie in Ferguson - where even Eric Holder's report stated clearly that that never happened)

THE LEFT WILL BUY ANY LIE.

Also- the "Bloodbath" lie - Trump is inarticulate yes - but that was a discussion on allowing the importation of cheap foreign made cars into our nation. It would be a bloodbath for American made auto industry.

AGAIN - THE LEFT LIE ABOUT CONTEXT. lie lie lie lie. aLL THE LEFT HAVE ARE lies.

Original Mike said...

"Out of the woods with torches”
"Really?
No one is going to call him on that?"


At least he's dropped the "veins bulging". Or maybe he's forgotten it.

Aggie said...

@ImTay wrote 09:30: "You know what is really funny about Charlottesville? Those guys marching with the torches and red and black "Blood and Soil" flags looked exactly like demonstrations that we have seen in Kiev, reported on by Associated Press, BTW...."


So.... your point is, these guys in the khaki pants and face masks and tiki torches are Nazis? You know what I find interesting, as much as these bad-actors show up at key events as 'inciters', as much as they are claimed to be 'Nazi's' or 'White Supremacists', and when one considers the number of Prog-Left journalists that hate the who MAGA idea: Why is it, none of them has the sense to follow one of these guys back to his car and figure out who they really are? And none of these journalists seem particularly interested in 'proving' the Nazi White Supremacist tag back in their fetid lair. Isn't that a little odd? It's almost like the point of the exercise is to provide support for, I dunno, propaganda or something. The only thing reported on is the actual parade, and none of the supposed backstory. Interesting, that - eh?

imTay said...

Here is a simple question for readering, why wasn't Jack Smith approved by the Senate?

Here is another one, why was a hundred year old law in New York State applied in a way it has never been applied, except of course, being uniquely applied this way to Donald Trump?

That's just two, you can pick one or the other and explain why it doesn't point to lawfare.

Original Mike said...

"when one considers the number of Prog-Left journalists that hate the who MAGA idea: Why is it, none of them has the sense to follow one of these guys back to his car and figure out who they really are? "

What is it the lawyers say? Res ipsa loquitur

Butkus51 said...

Soviet Union had a better term. Wreckers. They put wreckers all over the place. They wrecked business sectors, families, farms, religions, trade associations of all kinds.

The anti-fascists of that era.

Drago said...

Its a real shame that readering cannot see what is because he/she is too burdened by what has been.

imTay said...

I am also waiting with bated breath to hear about the last time somebody was fined a half a billion dollars for a "crime" in which there as no victim, and where expert witnesses testified that Trump's actions were standard operating procedure, and witnesses to the actual value of Mar a Lago were not allowed. Remember that a plain ole oceanfront property in Palm Beach can go for $150 million, and the prosecutor valued Mar a Lago at $26 million, so include the explanation for that in your reply.

Jamie said...

Explain to me why so many (mostly) women see [abortion] as a major issue in a Presidential election. Ignorance?

Maybe willful ignorance? But I think it's more likely that we women are more - shall we say more evolutionarily predisposed to -

Let me start again. It's deep in our genes that we're at risk for unwanted pregnancy. A broad societal structure of monogamous marriage based on mutual regard is a VERY new innovation. A broad societal structure of sexual liberation for both sexes is even newer. And contraception is almost always a female responsibility, not just because all the most reliable forms (except abstinence) HAVE to be used by the woman, risks and side effects and all, but also because, evolutionarily and according to current social mores that accept the reality of absent fathers, men have almost zero impetus to use it and women have a lot.

I am pro-life, but I recognize that in any society prior to or elsewhere than this one, that statement would be meaningless - during my late lamented reproductive years I would have had all the children any man who was able to impregnate me with, under whatever circumstances he or they could, subject only to the ability and willingness of men in my life to protect me and to my potential to die in childbirth. Now, my psyche has caught up to the Judeo-Christian ethos of mutual monogamy, so I knew that any child I bore would have been mine and my husband's, barring a badly timed rape; and we wanted our children (I more than he, for the first one, but he learned on Number One Son that fatherhood was his happy place). So pro-life works for me, for us.

My psyche has not, however, caught up to the sexual revolution or to the reliability of contraception. I am (or was), at root, a vulnerable female in a world of potentially rapacious males. As such, maybe I should want as much access to safe and legal means of - going to put this in terms that may inflame the other pro-lifers here - emergency contraception as possible.

Or... maybe it's just another feelings thing.

What I don't think it is is an abiding interest in Freedom!! of whatever kind.

JaimeRoberto said...

"I’m on the horse."

I think he meant to say that Hunter is on horse.

Drago said...

imTay: "Here is another one (for readering), why was a hundred year old law in New York State applied in a way it has never been applied, except of course, being uniquely applied this way to Donald Trump?"

And we know it was intended to be uniquely applied to Trump because the DA and the Governor explicitly said so!

Bill of Attainder. Quite something.

Goetz von Berlichingen said...

Imtay,

let's not overlook the fact that the FJB administration provided the Trump campaign with minimal levels of SS protection and ignored their repeated requests for additional support. At the same time, dems in congress were pushing a bill to remove SS protections for presidents convicted of a felony... while their DOJ comrades railroaded PDJT with trumped up charges and kangaroo courts.

That's their way of saying "Go shoot that guy!" without actually saying it.

At some point, if one has any self-respect, one gets angry when they discover they've been lied to.

MfG
Goetz von Berlichingen

imTay said...

My point is that what happened in Charlottesville stinks like a false flag, and I strongly suspect Ukrainian involvement, since their heroes in the Third Reich were wildly successful at manipulating their populations with psy-ops like Charlottesville and J6.

Another thing about everybody's hero, Youngkin, is why hasn't he released the evidence from the trial that Hillary's buddy, Terry McAullife locked down for all time? I seem to remember video of a car being chased, by a mob with improvised weapons, down the street, that may have been the one that killed that girl, which puts an entirely different spin on it, doesn't it. But we will never know, because all trial evidence has been locked away forever by the Democrats, whom, you would think, would want to rub our noses in the majesty of their case against the guy. It was totally the Democratic governor's discretion as to whether to release it or not.

Original Mike said...

The purpose of the "Mueller Investigation" was to protect the democrats from repercussions for their actions in the Russia hoax. It froze Trump's options. Remember the cries of "Obstruction!" That's what they were going to get him on.

It has been Lawfare from literally Day One.

Achilles said...

Readering said...

Achilles: delete #7 and i'll think you are serious. I posted early about how terrible the security was, but the idea that USSS wanted Trump harmed has no basis. Both USSS and PA police should have lots of disciplinary actions. If i was family of shot bystanders i'd be consulting lawyers.

First the security plan for this event was so obviously flawed it was criminal. And there is no blaming this on Local police. If you have responsibility for something you don't get to shirk it off. That is not how responsibility works in real combat professions. Anything you delegate is still your responsibility.

The SS knew about a man crawling around on a roof with a gun 30 minutes before the shooting. They saw him disappear and reappear 3 times. The third time with a bag.

But somehow the shooter knew where to stage in a building 300 meters away.

He ingressed at least 3 times along an obvious path to the shooting location.

The shooting location was 400 feet with a clear completely open shot at the stage.

The shooting location was on top of a building that security forces were using to stage operations.

The shooter carried a 12 foot ladder that he just bought from a vehicle to get on the roof less than 300 meters from Trump. You don't sneak around with a 12 foot ladder.

The idea that you can decide to take me seriously or not is a joke and it underlines your inability to take responsibility for your actions.

We were so close to seeing hell unleashed.

My earlier post about what a bullet from a 556 rifle does to a head is in the spam folder. It makes a wet squishy crunchy sound when it bounces on the ground. Sounds like broken glass in a bag of muddy water. Blood and a variety of grey mucous/brains liquid splatters around.

You are not a serious person. You do not know what an exploding head looks like. Millions of Americans were almost introduced to watching their party leader have his head explode in broad daylight at a political rally.

Even most Trump supporters cannot actually envision the world where Trump's head explodes on live TV.

Everyone needs to wake up and realize what is in the abyss and how lucky we are today.

donald said...

The absolutely delicious reaction of that fucking monster getting crushed in November, and all those scumbags around him
Losing their shit is gonna be lit.

stlcdr said...

Whoever the DNC puts on the ballot, they will get Trump votes plus one.

As well, the attacks (sic) on Trump and Vance are already ramping up: a double Hitler whammy.

Steve said...

PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN: I had an independent prosecutor look at me.... And they looked at me and concluded I didn’t do a damn thing wrong....

Prof: That's not what they concluded!

Special Counsel Hur: The president could portray himself as an "elderly man with a poor memory" who would be sympathetic to a jury.

Jersey Fled said...

“Jersey Fled: remember how many women have had abortions or know someone close who has.”

Again, what difference does that make in a Presidential election when abortion is strictly a state issue?

Jersey Fled said...

Jamie:

Again, why is this an issue in presidential election when it is strictly a state issue?

Did I miss something?

Jersey Fled said...

There is virtually nothing a President can do as regards abortion rights. As Biden has clearly demonstrated over the past four years.

Governors and state legislatures yes. The President, no.

Big Mike said...

@Jersey Fled, have you forgotten that Trump put Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett on the Supreme Court? Does Dobbs get decided the way it was decided without their votes? That’s why it may be an issue.

narciso said...

We have had a million charlottesvilles all over the country

Readering said...

Achilles: i agree we are all lucky Trump only nicked. I would argue Dems unlucky shooter wasn't prevented from getting off shots. Inside job narrative makes no sense and hurts everyone.

Rick67 said...

What Achilles said and said very well.

We're way past the point of sounding polite while we sip our mint julips. We've put up with at least a decade of weapons grade b*llsh*t and being told we're evil for having a problem with the systematic dismantling of a flawed but generally excellent social and political order.

Time to rest our hand on their shoulders and say "do you feel in charge?"

Jersey Fled said...

Bingo! I was waiting for that answer!

So the plan is to wait decades for Democrats to nominate and get Senate approval for three pro-abortion Justices, and pro-abortion majorities in both houses of Congress in order to draft a national right to abortion bill, which would then have to pass Supreme Court review in spite of its Dobbs decision?


I get it.

Do you honestly think this is what today’s single issue pro-abortion voters see as their path forward. Or do they just think Biden and the Democrats are going to fix it on their own come November.

I’m guessing it’s number two.

Wouldn’t it be simpler to face reality and work the issue in their own states?

Or haven’t they thought tha far ahead.

BUMBLE BEE said...


M Jordan said: "I’m starting to think Trump may run unopposed."
This country is poised on the edge of a steep cliff.
Whoever is next in line is gonna get hosed bigly. IMHO none of the dems in the dugout will risk election.

Achilles said...

Readering said...

Achilles: i agree we are all lucky Trump only nicked. I would argue Dems unlucky shooter wasn't prevented from getting off shots. Inside job narrative makes no sense and hurts everyone.

The only rational explanation for how this shooter got to the position he got to is the SS was in on it.

There is no lone wolf scenario possible here. They knew he was sneaking around with a gun for 30 minutes and nobody told Trump. They just let Trump walk right out there.

He staged in a building 300 meters away hanging out. They knew he was there. He carried a ladder he just bought to climb up on the roof. You don't just sneak around with a god damn ladder.

People were pointing at him 2 minutes before the shots. Nobody told Trump.

They waited for him to shoot. They had eyes on and they let him take the shots.

They did not shoot him until the only thing he could do was tell everyone who helped him.

And you people have been lying about everything for 8 years.

And while you have been lying about everything for 8 years you have been throwing us in jail, calling us racists, fascists, nazis, and "threats to democracy." You have been calling for our censorship and supporting their censorship efforts.

You are terrible people. You refuse to take responsibility for where you have brought us.

There is no more polite space for people like you. We absolutely cannot afford it. Your actions brought us to this point.

Everyone supporting this obviously corrupt evil lying warmongering murderous Regime.

You.

Jamie said...

Jamie:

Again, why is this an issue in presidential election when it is strictly a state issue?

Did I miss something?


I guess what I'm getting at is that the question is sold to women who appear to think and act as if they're politically engaged, but in fact don't know a lot about politics, as super critical - no further explanation required... because (in my still rather inchoate opinion) the question hits at a very deep level.

J. Peterson appears to believe that women vote disproportionately for whatever their country's liberal or progressive party is, because the nanny-state thing speaks to our desire to see the vulnerable taken care of. This idea rings pretty true for me. When I exercise my conservative mind-muscles, I sometimes feel that I'm having actively to suppress my feelings.

The effort is worth it. As in my family life, in which I frequently have had to suppress my desire to keep my kids from having any bad experience in order to allow them to mature, I've found that trying to examine the actual effects of well-meaning policies, while uncomfortable, is better - for me as a reasoning being and for society - than closing my eyes to those effects.

pacwest said...

I thought I'd drop back in to see if Readering ever answered Achilles' 14 points. About what I expected. She won't, she can't, she never will.

Mason G said...

"Wouldn’t it be simpler to face reality and work the issue in their own states?"

I don't get it.

Seems to me, anyone worried about being prohibited from having an abortion would be in favor of leaving the issue to the states. If, for whatever reason, you find yourself in a state that won't allow you to have one, there are 49 others to choose from and almost certainly, one of them will. If, on the other hand, the federal government implements a "one size fits all" policy outlawing abortions, you're screwed. I guess in that case, you could go to another country but isn't that pretty much the same as going to another state, except more difficult?

Anyone who's thinking that having the federal government pass a law permitting abortions would solve the problem for good needs to consider what happened with Prohibition.

Jersey Fled said...

Maybe those voting for Biden on the abortion issue are doing so because he is making promises he can’t keep.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/joe-biden/biden-big-abortion-promise-fact-check-roe-v-wade-rcna146668

Swede said...

There is nothing that Biden's team, or the press, can do to keep this dementia patient out of the public eye.
The next time Biden says anything without drooling will be heralded as "HE'S BACK, BABY!".
And for Joe, that'll be true.
For five minutes.

Jim at said...

Keep talking, Joe.
The more you run your trap, the more you damage yourself and your party.

Keep it up.

Jim at said...

All the Democrats i talk to about Biden want to see him gone.

Well, if you hadn't stolen the damn thing in 2020, you wouldn't be in this mess.
He's all yours. Own it.

The Vault Dweller said...

I don't think that Biden has been able to reassure Democratic politicians and voters that he is competent or a good candidate to run. However, I think he is more secure in his position than he was a week ago. No other prominent Democratic politician is going to want to run against Trump now, after the assassination attempt.

Goldenpause said...

Biden’s brain is fried. He probably believes that all the tall tales he peddles are true. And he allegedly is the man in charge of our country. Be afraid. Very afraid.

Dr Weevil said...

Hahahaha! imTay inway ermontVay 'strongly suspects Ukrainian involvement' in Charlottesville. Either his wife/girlfriend/boyfriend/husband (we're not here to judge) ran off with a studly Ukrainian and turned him into a total bigot, or he needs to seek professional help.

imTay said...

I just pointed out that there was a strong similarity between the Tiki Torch blood and soil flagged Charlottesville guys and that massive demonstration of supporters for a holocaust collaborator in Kiev.

But speaking of Ha ha ha!

You said that Ukraine was not responsible for any assassination attempts against Putin, when we all know that Ukrainian suicide drones hit the Kremlin, and were aimed at Putin's office.

So lol.

But anyway. I was very early in pointing out that this war was none of America's business and that the US provoked it, in the same way that Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor admitted in a 1998 interview to secretly inserting CIA assets in Afghanistan to arm the Taliban and Al Qaeda with the specific intention of provoking a Soviet invasion, and even bragging about writing a letter to Jimmy Carter when they did invade, bragging that the trap had worked!

Afghanistan used to be a beautiful country, and we ruined it, using it as a pawn in our geopolitical game against Russia. But even though we have admissions from the highest levels of power in the US about Afghanistan. This same ploy could *never* have been used by the US against Russia in Ukraine... Oh no! That's impossible!

Here, read about what we did to Afghanistan in 1979, there are quotes from the interview. I especially liked the part where Brzezinski laughed at the fact that the Soviets claimed that they were responding to US actions, the US denied it, even though it was true, and nobody believed the Soviets!

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/938496770

You should familiarize yourself with some of the history of the United States, and consider carefully whether the US has betrayed Ukraine, and turned it into a hell hole, the same way we did Afghanistan, when we first provoked the Soviet Invasion, and then went there to fight a war against the monster that we had created.

imTay said...

Afghanistan has been at war since 1979 because of a little geostratigic move on the "chessboard" by Mika Brzezinski's dad.

imTay said...

But the reason I said that "very early" thing is that I think that this war's goose is cooked. I did my part undermining support for it with the truth of the situation, so I am going to stop posting about it, at least I won't be the first to bring it up. The die is cast, the course is set, nothing I write is going to change it now.

I probably wouldn't have gotten so into Ukraine if it weren't for Ukraine's involvement in interference in the US election on behalf of Hillary, google New York Times, and "Black Ledger," and also in the New York Times you can read about the 12 CIA bases created in Ukraine and how. some of that disinformation like the Black Ledger came from those bases. And Ukraine's involvement in impeaching Trump, I would probably have just accepted the word of the security state, but when they started turning their techniques like psy-ops, usually reserved for backwaters like Kiev, on the American people, specially Trump and his supporters, well, it was too much.

But as I say, I think the situation is clear now, and beyond my feeble power to change.

PM said...

Joe must go.

Michael Fitzgerald said...

Narayanan said...
Blogger Michael Fitzgerald said...

M Jordan said...
I’m starting to think Trump may run unopposed. No one wants to get beat as bad as a Biden ticket will get beat. Dems may get him to drop off, give him a (fake) hero’s exit then simply not fill in for him.

7/16/24, 9:51 AM

This is actually a very plausible,
=====================
and thus let's give Kamala a chance to self coronate herself?

7/16/24, 10:53 AM

Hmmm, how do you solve a problem like Kamala?

Dr Weevil said...

The two or three drones that hit the Kremlin last year hit in the middle of the night, when no one, including Putin, was there, and did not hit at all close to his office. That was obviously not an assassination attempt. Russia bombs hospitals, restaurants, department stores, and train stations in the daytime, and apartment buildings at night, to kill as many civilians as possible, and that's just fine with imTay.

The involvement of "Ukraine" in screwing with American elections was in fact the involvement of President Poroshenko, whom the Ukrainian people voted out in a landslide and replaced with Zelenskyy. You think Zelenskyy should die and his people should be enslaved because of something he (and they) didn't do. It would be like cheering the assassination attempt on Trump because of things Obama did: stooooopid.

And Afghanistan's troubles didn't start in 1979, they started in 1973, when Mohammed Daoud overthrew the monarchy, and worsened in 1978, when the People's Democratic Party overthrew Daoud, established a brutal communist dictatorship, and called in Russian "advisors" when the people rebelled against them. They were already thoroughly screwed before any Americans did anything at all.

I could go on, but you're obviously unteachable, as well as a shit who delights in the continuing conquest and enslavement of an entire nation.

Michael Fitzgerald said...

pacwest said...
While we're on the Charlottesville subject it does point out what I think is one of Trump's flaws. He thinks that there is some sort of middle ground with these people. He says he rewrote his speech to not be so fiery. Should be interesting to see him try yet again though. Good luck to him, but it's a total waste of time.

7/16/24, 12:19 PM

Exactly my sentiments. Went from Fight! to Hold My Hand without any admission of guilt or responsibility, and no cease fire from the left whatsoever. In fact, the opposite has happened- less than 48 hours after Trump was shot Biden slandered him, Latrine-Pissoir slandered him, he's been blamed for the shooting and accused of faking it, and to top it off I heard some dumb cunt Party member on tv complain that Trump got up and said Fight after he got shot, and that was inciting violence.

Our leader needs to say, Ladies and Gentlemen, we are in an existential fight for our lives, and our enemy is our fellow countrymen. They are bloodthirsty revolutionaries who hate America and they despise you patriotic Americans most of all. They have been brainwashed with evil ideology and cannot be reasoned with. They are violent, they are lawless, they are armed and the shooting has started. Arm yourselves and prepare to fight for your lives.

Eugene Dillenburg said...

Most of those 120 cases were not decided on the merits. About 2/3rds -- including the one that made it to the Supreme Court -- were decided on technical grounds such as standing or jurisdiction. Of those that were decided on merits, Trump won most of them, including a case in Pennsylvania where the judge found that the changes to the voting system were unconstitutional; and other in Wisconsin which found that state's election was fraudulent.

No cops died at the Capitol on January 6th, nor did any later succumb to injuries suffered during that event.

Nice said...

This comment: "Biden has always been like this, except now he is decrepit and senile. The charm is gone"

What charm was there, ever? In his younger days, he was the opposite of charming, fairly smarmy--the creepy smile, especially during the Anita Hill hearings. I doubt she was charmed, at that time.

Dave said...

Unopposed:
You cannot leave the top of the ticket empty, so Trump running unopposed is not going to happen. If you have no head of party running, all your down ticket will suffer. Not everyone lives in districts where the voting machinery is controlled by a friendly party.

Stochastic Terrorism:
Set up the dominos and wait for someone else to knock them down.

Rube Goldberg Machine:
This attempt looked much more like a Rube Goldberg Machine than it did a line of dominos.

Rusty said...

Readering said...
"Achilles: i agree we are all lucky Trump only nicked. I would argue Dems unlucky shooter wasn't prevented from getting off shots. Inside job narrative makes no sense and hurts everyone."

True. But you're never going to find the truth if you don't look for it.