... you can talk about whatever you like.
The sunrise today was, as you can see, the dullest possible sunrise — solid clouds and not even any interesting texture to the clouds. This is what I am calling a type #1 sunrise in my system of classifying sunrises. Yesterday's was also type #1, as were the sunrises of January 3 and December 27th. You get the idea.
Posts
237 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 237 of 237asking POTUS directly would end the discussion instantly
... why wont the media do it?
Inga: "If I thought the charges were reckless, I’d give them no credence. What the rest of America is worried about is that a reckless president is tearing the nation apart."
Your latest batch of 'reckless" accusations from 1 week ago have already been proven to be lies. Just like your reckless accusations and lies concerning Carter Page bein a russian agent and Trump colluding with Putin.
All lies. 24/7. It never ends.
and here's a couple more Q's:
Trudeau is growing a beard-- is he transitioning to male?
was that the Dem debate, or the 50 year anniversary of the Brady Bunch?
More rotten deals
https://mobile.twitter.com/AcrossTheBay/status/1217129644366888961
Now if carter page had actually helmed the rosneft deal as claimed it wouldnt be the burning dumpsterfire that everyones tryi ngto bail out of.
Starting in late October 2017, Q drops became part of Trump’s information war giving out a heads up from Military Intelligence on what is happening. Because it deals in classified material, it comes to us as hints, some little known facts and reveales motives, accompanied with a demand that we think for ourselves.
Is Q real? Absolutely. His info is always confirmed by the future events.
Does Q explain everything? No. He holds back much, because everybody in the world reads it. Q has become a world wide force for truth.all over the world
@buwaya 11:43
nicely done.
Regardless of the lack of evidence, you think Trump conspired with Russia to steal an election. A loon like you has no standing to speak for "the rest of America".
I’m not speaking for people on the right, that should be apparent. There is another half of America (the rest of America) that doesn’t see things your way. We exist. We vote too. And 2020 will be a good test to see which half of America prevails.
traditionalguy said...
“Starting in late October 2017, Q drops became part of Trump’s information war giving out a heads up from Military Intelligence on what is happening. Because it deals in classified material, it comes to us as hints, some little known facts and reveales motives, accompanied with a demand that we think for ourselves.
Is Q real? Absolutely. His info is always confirmed by the future events.
Does Q explain everything? No. He holds back much, because everybody in the world reads it. Q has become a world wide force for truth.all over the world.”
Thanks to Tradguy for being honest. I think that most people who support Trump have heard of QAnon. OM was being coy.
As opposed to frisch and simpson who shoukd have laughed at out of the counsels at first glance. Now apelbaums expert analysis figured out the nunes memo even the ic report almost three years ago through effective data mining lee smith had been on the ball more often than i can count
Iranian RESTART Q inspired
https://gab.com/system/media_attachments/files/029/117/404/original/fe9bf61f3472b13f.png?1578892343
Counsels of state, my go too expert on mifsud is chris blackburn a liberal democdat on ukraine stephen mcintyre who is a staunch anti interventionist.
I didnt think mueller or comey were up to any good because i know their records goingback 35 years
“ There is no reason to dismiss Qanon's narrative and frame just because it diverges from the MSM.”
The reason to dismiss it is because it is contrary to the narrative pushed so hard by the MSM.
Inga: "Thanks to Tradguy for being honest. I think that most people who support Trump have heard of QAnon."
Trump supporters number over 63,000,000 million Americans.
You believe at least 31,500,001 of them have heard of QAnon?
LOL
You are insane.
I'd say Q ==>> who is John Galt
Is this what y'all talking about?
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/01/an_introduction_to_q.html
Wow. Thanks for the link Narayanan,
“The mainstream media has published hundreds of articles attacking Q as an insane rightwing conspiracy, particularly after President Trump seemed to publicly confirm his connection to it. At a North Carolina rally in 2019, Trump made a point of drawing attention to a baby wearing a onesie with a big Q.
In recent weeks, the tempo of Trump’s spotlighting of Q has accelerated, with the President retweeting Q followers twenty times in one day. Trump has featured Q fans in his ads and deployed one of Q’s signature phrases (“These people are sick”) at his rallies. The President’s lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, has also retweeted Q followers.
Q has noted that the media never asks Trump the obvious question: What do you think of Q? To Q followers, the reason they don’t ask is obvious. They’re afraid of the answer.”
Fascinating.
Ok, I was wrong about tonight's debate- wasn't exciting at all, and won't change anything.
It is now up to the voters in Iowa. It probably always was.
once it reaches 'critical mass'
...the jig is up
I did enjoy the bit where Biden was asked by the moderator about how he could hope to handle a debate with Trump that was sure to be tougher than the one tonight. Predictably, Biden flubbed his answer- hilarious.
On the alleged Burisma hack- you don't have to hack Burisma in order to leak fake material.
Wikipedia's referenced allegations about QAnon:
'...QAnon's posting campaign has a history of false, baseless, and unsubstantiated claims. Beginning with the first posts incorrectly predicting Hillary Clinton's imminent arrest and followed by more false allegations, such as claiming that North Korean Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un is a puppet ruler installed by the Central Intelligence Agency,[46] QAnon's posts have become more cryptic and vague allowing followers to map their own beliefs onto them.[47] By generating a keyboard heatmap of QAnon's supposedly coded messages, information security researcher Mark Burnett concluded that they "are not actual codes, just random typing by someone who might play an instrument and uses a QWERTY keyboard", adding that "almost all the characters" in the codes alternate between the left and right hands, or the characters are close to each other on the keyboard.[48]
Some of QAnon's other allegations include his February 16, 2018 false claim that U.S. Representative and former Democratic National Committee chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz hired El Salvadorian gang MS-13 to murder DNC staffer Seth Rich,[39][49] and his March 1, 2018 apparent suggestion that German Chancellor Angela Merkel is the granddaughter of Adolf Hitler.[50] A July 7, 2018 article published in The Daily Beast also noted that QAnon falsely claimed that "each mass shooting is a false-flag attack organized by the cabal".[51] Other beliefs held by QAnon adherents include that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, George Soros, and others are planning a coup while simultaneously involved as members of an international child sex trafficking ring. According to this idea, the Mueller investigation is actually a countercoup led by Donald Trump, who pretended to collude with Russia in order to hire Robert Mueller to secretly investigate the Democrats.[22] Another recurring theme is that certain Hollywood stars are pedophiles, and that the Rothschild family are the leaders of a satanic cult.[14] By interpreting the information fed to them by Q, QAnon adherents come to these conclusions.[22]"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QAnon
So, Bloomberg is 100% Pro-Choice, selective, opportunistic. Selective-child, or wicked solution... again, and again, and again for social progress. Presumably also Planned Parenthood or clinical cannibalism a la Mengele for medical progress, too. He also supports Obamacare (e.g. Medicaid) or cost shifting to sustain progressive prices and availability. Perhaps these are the first-order forcings of their acute obsession after more than 12 trimesters of attempting to abort... cancel the president, and diverse witch hunts (e.g. cover-ups of quid pro Joes, quid pro Bos) and warlock trials (e.g. trial by press).
Re: beating Milwaukee cops
You're not from around here are you son?
Let it burn.
The story Q is telling, on the strategic level, is of a shadow conflict between an organized "deep state", with very close and powerful non-state allies, and the Trump administration and its allies. This conflict, per Q, takes place largely behind the curtains, and is only visible to the public in passing glimpses or indications of movement behind those curtains.
From what we know at this point based on the revelations, glimpses we have been granted over the last three years, from the results of the various investigations and also Judicial Watch, this is a very accurate narrative. Most of what we now know about the actions of the intelligence agencies, the FBI, the FISA courts, and the Justice Department were done out of sight and were intended to remain obscure. That part of the curtain has been tugged away, in part. We are obviously watching exactly such a conflict as Q describes. This is a much more accurate "big picture" narrative than what the US MSM is pushing.
In particular the scale of the "deep state" structure is obvious. This was not a small group. This was authorized and operated at the highest levels across multiple enormous government departments, in coordination, to boot, with multiple foreign governments, and was coordinated with major players in the MSM, also obviously authorized by their corporate masters.
We cannot be certain of the significance of any other details Q is revealing or implying. But the big picture Q describes is certainly sound.
What is most significantly unclear in the Q narrative is what constitutes the "Trump" side of this. We have, now, a fairly good idea of who are the "bad guys", though it would be most interesting to know who is actually financing that side. The "good guys" though are still behind the curtain. Trump is just the public face. These conflicts are fought by teams, armies, not single men, however capable.
It is important to understand that Q is a propaganda operation.
We are getting what Q intends us, the international public, to see. This is not a backdoor to secrets.
Like with any propaganda source one must regard every communication as serving a purpose. This includes the usual one of flinging dirt, which can consist of truth or lies, or some mix of both.
Where does a rainy sunrise fall on the scale of boring sunrises?
Just gray sky over gray water, with water falling from the sky into the lake.
buwaya said...
. . .
We are getting what Q intends us, the international public, to see. This is not a backdoor to secrets.
. . .
Well, one shouldn't assume mere competence on the part of Q. Competence seems to be a hard thing to find among political and intelligence operators.
Disclaimer, this is from Vox, who I understand is not a reliable source to many of you ...
Quite the understatement.
If I thought the charges were reckless, I’d give them no credence.
The best I can give you is that you’re lying to yourself.
What the rest of America is worried about is that a reckless president is tearing the nation apart.
Not hardly. What the “rest of America” is worried about is that they’ll be exposed as the condescending poltroons that they are, and held to account for their terrible stewardship of the American economy and American interests.
We’re not going to see eye to eye on eye on this, that is pretty clear.
Another understatement.
Royal ass Inga: "...to see which half of America prevails.."
It's all about power.
This statement reveals that truth.
There is no concern for broad benefit.
Xhe only cares about ruling*.
It is about fandom, not public good.
*Why do the plebes think they'll participate in the ruling?
Just remember, men are no different than women!
https://geekologie.com/2019/12/man-builds-16-foot-starship-enterprise-f.php
Too cold for penguins in Calgary
https://ca.news.yahoo.com/calgary-zoo-penguin-walk-cancelled-235800782.html
Some of the conspiracy that many suspect is going on, and that I find hard to understand, involves George Soros and his motives. Why is he spending so much money to fill cities with violent criminals.
The case of the attacks on Eric Greitens is a mystery. Why did that Soros funded prosecutor got after him ?
In February 2018, St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly Gardner charged Greitens with felony invasion of privacy relating to alleged actions associated with an extramarital affair he had before becoming governor. Later, Gardner also charged him with campaign-related offenses. All charges were dropped in May 2018, and Greitens resigned from office on June 1[3] after the Missouri Legislature commenced a special session to consider impeachment. Greitens and his supporters deny any criminal wrongdoing and have repeatedly called the allegations a "political witch hunt"
Now, that prosecutor is in trouble herself.
The current controversy centers around a private investigator Gardner tapped to investigate claims against Greitens, who resigned in June 2018. The investigator, former FBI agent William Tisaby, was accused of lying under oath, and Gardner's communications and involvement with him are now the subject of a separate investigation.
Soros has provided a group of prosecutors from other states who were funded by him to descend on St Louis to support her.
What the hell is going on ? Maybe Q can tell us.
Here is a nice summary of the arguments about Trump and the Deep State.
I miss a lot by being an early-to-bedder: buwaya@1143PM nails it.
Decades or centuries later, because of the hard work of historians, we often find that what was going on in plain sight--usually bad enough--was only a fraction of the iniquity.
Muchas gracias!
Narr
I wouldn't know Q from Adam
I’m not speaking for people on the right, that should be apparent. There is another half of America (the rest of America) that doesn’t see things your way. We exist. We vote too. And 2020 will be a good test to see which half of America prevails.
In 2016, the one half prevailed and we all see what the other half has done during the four years since: we can reasonably predict what the next four years will be like if and when the one half wins again. The 'test' has already happened and the results are obvious.
Post a Comment