September 1, 2019

"Just four states are likely to determine the outcome in 2020. Each flipped to the Republicans in 2016, but President Trump won each by only a percentage point or less."

"The four are Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida. Many analysts point to Wisconsin as the single state upon which the election could turn."

Writes Dan Balz in WaPo.

As a Wisconsinite, I'm pleased and anticipating all the pandering, but I want to focus on this about Michigan, under the heading "Clinton lost big in Detroit...":



What happened in Detroit (and why won't that happen again)? The article doesn't really explain — except to refer to the declining population. Elsewhere in the column, there is talk about African American voters. Balz writes that there are 4 "demographic groups" that will be focused on, including "African Americans, and particularly younger African Americans, whose turnout levels will be critical to Democrats’ fortunes." And in talking about Milwaukee, there's this:
In 2016, Clinton suffered a falloff in the Milwaukee media market that was about double that of the state as a whole. Much of that erosion was concentrated in African American precincts in the city of Milwaukee. Combined with Trump’s big margins in the northwestern part of the state, that was enough to doom her chances.
Of course, we're deprived of any painfully honest discussion of how much the Democrats need black voters in big cities to control the electoral votes of the swing states and why they're having trouble getting these votes in the post-Obama era. Here's how Trump talked to black voters in Michigan in 2016:



"America must reject the bigotry of Hillary Clinton, who sees communities of color only as votes, not as human beings worthy of a better future."

201 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 201 of 201
JamesB.BKK said...

This is why the corrupt left want to abolish the electoral college. Because it gives democrats an unfair advantage of using CA to win all elections henceforth.

Having given that advantage, Ronald Reagan is highly overrated - or rather insufficiently spurned - by self-described conservatives and other Republican progressives. Any takers that a future Republican President will hand the rest of the kit to the members of the feral left, their fellow travelers, promoters of suffering and wasting cities, and Dem managers and looting paymasters?

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 201 of 201   Newer› Newest»