From "Stanford Used A.I. to Swap Black Student for Hispanic Student in a Photo/Universities have been accused of doctoring photos to showcase diversity in the past. In this case, a Black woman replaced a Hispanic young man, who said it was upsetting to be 'erased'" (NYT gift link).
Who cares if the fake impression is created by A.I. as opposed to moving real people into positions they didn't get into on their own? What's the difference? It's fake, it's deceptive, it's shallow, it's pathetic. Either way.

12 comments:
surprise!
everything (EVERY THING) that modren colleges do is FAKE
Higher education advertising is as honest as a beer commercial, and often funny, but never intentionally so.
White leftists are racist? again? another clue? ya don't say.
AI doctoring of the image is ordinary advertising. I can't find it but there's a picture of my college fencing team, maybe 40 people, all white guys. That was back before AI.
Clearly it was about race,
But if he had a better face
They would have photoshopped the other guy.
Didn't UW do that in a campus brochure a few years ago?
My wife was a highly respected manager of the Alabama division of a Federal agency. A highly male-dominated agency overseeing a highly male dominated industry.
The agency got a female Cabinet Secretary. After that my wife
would be placed on virtually every committee with any high profile activities. She'd spend the first day or two demonstrating she was there for valid reasons. She was also seated on the dais or in the front row where agency photos made sure her image was prominent.
All BS marketing
I agree with AA. It’s pathetic no matter how you do it.
My alma mater magazine depicted the current student body as about 5% White male and 75% minority female and male. They are so proud of their diversity.
"Didn't UW do that in a campus brochure a few years ago?"
Yes. I think it was about 25 years ago. Instapundit linked to it last yesterday, but for some reason I can't access that post today.
They thought the Asian girl was too fat for Stanford? Very insulting.
A model of color judgments and class bigotry under the Diversity umbrella. One step forward, three steps backward.
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith. Also: No italics, even briefly. Use asterisks for emphasis. And don't play with the format by changing fonts or using boldface or all caps. Never include more than one extra line break between paragraphs.