January 29, 2026

"Um, the President of the United States called me Monday morning and asked me to deploy here. I got here Monday evening, and I'm staying until the problem's gone."

Said Tom Homan, in Minneapolis, just now. I'm quoting from the transcript at YouTube, here, along with video.

What follows is my edit of the high points from the 35-minute performance:
President Trump promised the American people, including the residents of Minnesota, that he would work to ensure our communities are safe. And with that, this administration has absolutely focused on identifying removable aliens that pose a public safety threat and national security threats. The numbers prove it. The data proves it. In the past few days, I have met with Governor Walz, Attorney General Ellison, Mayor Frey, numerous police chiefs and sheriffs, and I have more to meet. I'll also be continuing the dialogue with business and religious leaders in partnership in Minnesota—your communities. I'll be meeting with them too, because I want to hear what they have to say. 
In my meetings with folks so far—and most importantly the governor and the AG to Mayor Fry—we didn't agree on everything. I didn't expect to agree on anything. I've heard many people want to know why we're talking to people who they don't consider friends of the administration. Bottom line is you can't fix problems if you don't have discussions. I didn't come to Minnesota for photo ops or headlines. I came here to seek solutions, and that's what we're going to do. We've come a long way, and we've got some good wins for the people of Minnesota, I think, and for the administration and for the safety [and] security of this city. 
One thing we did agree on, though—everybody I talked to agreed on—was that community safety is paramount. One thing we all agreed on was [that] U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a legitimate law enforcement agency that has a duty to enforce the laws enacted by Congress and keep this community safe. 
Like I've said many times for the last several years, even before this administration, jurisdictions that refuse to cooperate with federal immigration authorities are sanctuaries for criminals. Sanctuary cities are sanctuaries for criminals and endanger the residents of the community. 
To be clear, we did not agree with Minnesota state and local officials that they would be involved in immigration enforcement. I didn't ask them to be immigration officers. I'm asking them to be cops working with the cops to help us take criminal aliens off the street. 
What we did agree upon is not to release public safety threats back into the community and [that] they could be lawfully transferred to ICE. I'll speak more about that. I will highlight that the Minnesota State Prison System under the Department of Corrections has been honoring ICE detainers, and we appreciate the important collaboration. We're going to expand upon that. That decision has made Minnesota safer—not only for residents of Minnesota, but for the men and women of law enforcement, not just ICE, all law enforcement. Rather than arresting the same significant public safety threat over and over again, they agreed to work with us to identify those people and remove them. 
I'm also pleased to announce I had a very good meeting with Attorney General Ellison, and he has clarified for me that county jails may notify ICE of the release dates of criminal public safety risks so ICE can take custody of them upon release from the jail. And let me tell you why that's important. I know people are a little concerned about law enforcement manpower. Look, I've said this many times before—I've said it for the last several years: Give us access to the illegal alien public safety threat in the safety and security of a jail. It's common sense. It's safer for the community. It's safer for the agent. And it's safer for the alien, because anything can happen on a street arrest. It just makes common sense. 
And for the people that argue, "Well, we're a welcoming community because we want victims and witnesses of crime that are here illegally to feel safe to come to police without fear of working with ICE"—we're not going to talk to the victim [or] witness of the crime. There's no problem there. They should feel safe to come to the police and ask for help. All we want is to talk to the person that local and state law enforcement authorities locked in a jail cell. They chose to lock this person up. That's who we want to talk to: the public safety threat. So the argument that it protects victims [and] witnesses of crime—it's a bunch of crap. Victims and witnesses of crime don't want the bad guy back in their neighborhood either. So great progress. 
We're there with the attorney general and local sheriffs. And one thing [is that] when we have these agreements, it takes less law enforcement agents to do the job. One agent can arrest one bad guy in the safety and security of a jail where he's behind the wire. We know he doesn't have weapons. But when you normally release that public safety threat—illegal alien—back into the community, we have a job to do. We're going to arrest him. So we're going to find him. And what happens is now we've got to arrest somebody on his turf. He has access to who knows what weapons. Now we've got to send the whole team out—cover the back door, cover the front door—for officer safety reasons. Then, because of the hateful rhetoric and the attacks on ICE officers, now we've got to send a security team behind the arrest team. So what could have been done with one person in the safety and security of a jail, now we've got 15, 16 people out there doing it. 
I know that causes stress in the community. So if we get these agreements in place, that means less agents on the street. More agents in the jail means less agents in the street. This is common sense cooperation that allows us to draw down on the number of people we have here. Yes, I said it: draw down the number of people here because we have the efficiency and safety of the jails and the prison. Matter of fact, I have staff from CBP and ICE working on a draw-down plan. What does that look like based on the cooperation? What does that look like based on how many targets we have left to find? In my meetings with Governor Walz, AG Ellison, and Mayor Fry, as well as state and local law enforcement, again, I appreciate [that] they all acknowledge that we do have federal immigration laws in this country that have been passed by Congress and that ICE is in fact a legitimate law enforcement agency charged with enforcing those laws. We're not making this up, folks. ICE is enforcing laws enacted by Congress. They're in federal statute. 
That said, I'm not here because the federal government has carried this mission out perfectly. The first thing I said to senior staff when I walked in here—that's what I told you—I didn't come here looking for ops or headlines. I came here looking for solutions. I do not want to hear that everything that's been done here has been perfect. Nothing's ever perfect, and anything can be improved on. And what we've been working on is making this operation safer, more efficient, by the book
The mission is going to improve because of the changes we're making internally. No agency [or] organization is perfect. President Trump and I, along with others in the administration, have recognized that certain improvements could and should be made. That's exactly what I'm doing here. As such, in meetings I've had with federal law enforcement managers—including ICE and CBP and other federal partners—as well as state and local officials, I have conveyed the president's expectations with regard to federal immigration enforcement efforts.  We will conduct targeted enforcement operations. Targeted—what we've done for decades. When we hit the streets, we know exactly who we're looking for [and have a] good idea where we may find them. You have a criminal history. You have their immigration history. A lot of information about this person that we get from numerous databases out there. Targeted, strategic enforcement operations. That's traditionally been the case, and that's where we're going. That's what we're going to continue to do and improve upon with the prioritization on public safety threats. 
I want to be clear. I don't read a lot of social media. I don't read a lot of media. I can only believe half [of what] I see. We are not surrendering the president's mission in immigration enforcement. Let's make that clear. Prioritization of criminal aliens doesn't mean we forget about everybody else. That's just simply ridiculous. But when you have a criminal standing here and a noncriminal standing there, that criminal always should be targeted first because he's a significant concern to the safety and security of the community. 
By and large, for decades, ICE and CBP have carried out their duties with integrity, professionalism, and compassion. That remains the expectation under President Trump, and I will hold our agents and officers to that standard.... 
As far as the agitators, I want to reiterate and make very clear: ICE and CBP officers are performing their duties in a challenging environment under tremendous circumstances, but they're trying to do it with professionalism. If they don't, they'll be dealt with. Like any other federal agency, we have standards of conduct. They are sworn law enforcement officers working tirelessly to enforce our country's border security [and] immigration laws, protecting the interests of our country, and preventing dangerous people from walking the streets of this nation when they're not supposed to be here to begin with. 
Men and women of ICE: I was a Border Patrol agent. I was an ICE agent. I was the first ICE director [who] came up through the ranks. I spent over 40 years doing this. These men and women that carry that badge and gun are American patriots. They put themselves on the line for this nation every day. But I want you to remember: they don't hang their badge [or] their heart on the hook every day to come to work. They're mothers and fathers too. They're sons and daughters too. If they've seen a fraction of the tragedies I've seen in my career, they take a lot of that damage home every day. The things they've seen—especially on the border: people drowning in the river, women being raped by criminal cartels, giving CPR to a baby that was thrown in the river by the cartels because the Border Patrol came too close. So they throw the baby in the river—that way the Border Patrol is concentrated on that so [they] can get away. These men and women see some terrible things, but I want you to remember they're mothers and fathers too. Many of them are members of this community. God bless every one of them. 
The hostile rhetoric and dangerous threats and hate must stop. And we all agreed to that. Everybody here today will tell you we've got to stop the hateful rhetoric that has caused an increase in assaults—that has caused us to send security teams out with arrest teams, which surges this city with additional resources because of the threats [and] because of the assaults. 
Again, with the agreements we've achieved and [with] follow-through on the agreements, with the rhetoric dropping down, that allows us to pull more agents out once we feel the environment is safer. I begged for the last two months on TV for the rhetoric to stop. I said in March, if the rhetoric didn't stop, there's going to be bloodshed. And there has been. I wish I wasn't right. I don't want to see anybody die—not officers, not members of the community, and not the targets of our operations. For the people out there [who] don't like what ICE is doing: if you want certain laws reformed, take it up with Congress. Again, ICE is not making this up. They're enforcing laws enacted by Congress and signed by presidents. 
The same laws have been on the books for the last six presidents I worked for—I started with President Reagan and [am] ending with President Trump. Every administration, we enforce the same laws. If you don't like what ICE is doing, instead of protesting this building, go protest Congress. Tell them what changes [you want]. You have your First Amendment rights. I support that. You have the right to protest. I'm just asking to keep it peaceful. But threatening law enforcement officers, engaging in impeding and obstruction, and assault is never okay. And there will be zero tolerance. You interfere, impede [or] assault ICE officers, you will be arrested. 
Like I said a bit earlier, in my meetings with Governor Walz, Ellison, and Frey as well as state and local law enforcement, I appreciate [that] they acknowledge public safety should be paramount. The chiefs I've talked to committed to responding to 911 calls when protesters turn violent, [when] agents are in a dangerous situation and there's assaults. They have committed to upholding public safety and responding to the needs—not to enforce immigration law, but to keep the peace. With that, I call upon those officials to stand shoulder-to-shoulder with us to tone down the dangerous rhetoric and condemn all unlawful actions against law enforcement in the community.... 
President Trump wants this fixed, and I'm gonna fix it with your help....

232 comments:

1 – 200 of 232   Newer›   Newest»
Peachy said...

Signal Chat. The MN communists on it are going to face the music soon.
Bondi - you are up. Get off the TV and do your job.

Peachy said...

Corrupt Ilhan Omar(D) had to stage an incident to help the media(D) go to batt for her boo hoo sob story.
We can all see it was staged.

Peachy said...

Mike Johnson just funded Sanctuary cities.

why?

Defund all Sanctuary cities.

Kevin said...

I damn good speech. I just wish Homan knew the difference between less and fewer.

RideSpaceMountain said...

That's a pretti good speech! 9 golf claps out of 10 IMO.

Peachy said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Left Bank of the Charles said...

“U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a legitimate law enforcement agency“

When will they start wearing professional uniforms? It’s a small thing, but the Trump administration should stop dressing them like goons if they want to get public respect.

RCOCEAN II said...

Nothing will change until the Republican Congress starts passing laws giving immigration enforcement some teeth. And allows for the punishment of illegal "sanctuary cities". And passing election laws requiring proof of citizenship.

Instead the usual suspects are working on another Amnesty Bill. LOL. The mask is off. The old fake con of "Enforcement for Amnesty" is gone. Its now clear that the Establishment just wants open borders and citizenship for Illegals.

Peachy said...

Ellison is a criminal.
He might be realizing he needs to cooperate.

Chris said...

Walz and Fey immediately left the meeting to get in front of cameras and encourage more agitation against ice. These are the idiot causing all the problems. They need to distract from the fraud.

RCOCEAN II said...

And of course, our real rulers, the US District Judges are getting into the act demanding ICE do this and do that, and show up at their court - in person - to explain why they've not obeyed their royal commands.

Even worse, the media and dummies keep referring to them as "Minnesota Judges". Talk about fucking annoying. They are US District court judges.

Ice Nine said...

>Left Bank of the Charles said...
“U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a legitimate law enforcement agency“
When will they start wearing professional uniforms? It’s a small thing, but the Trump administration should stop dressing them like goons if they want to get public respect.<

Oh yeah, that's the problem with ICE - their wardrobes! You lefties are reduced to this, given the dearth of legitimate complaints against these wholly legal Fed agents doing their wholly legal jobs.

RCOCEAN II said...

They Walz and Ellison are motivated by Leftwing politics. Calling them "Stupid" is just a way to avoid the issue. But lots of people aren't political and cant understand that others are driven by ideology and have an agenda. Its akin to talking to religion to an atheist.

"Why, they're just like us, and want the same thing, they're just confused or stuck on stupid. Gosh darn it." Wrong - completely wrong.

Saint Croix said...

Tom Homan rocks. I'm with him 100%.

Iman said...

“When will they start wearing professional uniforms? It’s a small thing, but the Trump administration should stop dressing them like goons if they want to get public respect.”

Yes! Dress for Success! Sweet Jaysus, that is funny!!!

Big Mike said...

I subscribe to Bari Weiss’s Free Press. Yesterday this was the lede of the top article:

“They messed with the wrong city,” Mary Irene Slatt, a 48-year-old realtor, told The Free Press’s Olivia Reingold in Minneapolis yesterday.

What this tells me is that the organized protesters must be hit so hard and so relentlessly that the lefty loonies of Minnesota never try anything like this again.

Peachy said...

so MSNBC, ABC, CNN and other leftwing D-hack news sources are lying again. Got it.

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ said...

Administration to Draw Down Immigration Officers in Minneapolis, Homan Says ~ WSJ

ICE has ended 'enhanced' operations in Maine, Collins says ~ Politico

They are talking about drawdowns to avoid addressing the indictment of Alex Pretti's murderers.

Polling was showing Trump’s approval rating hovering near all-time lows before this. Now it will sink even lower and Republicans with him.

Stephen Miller is undeniably the central figure and the most extreme example, yet the Trump administration is saturated with his disciples and intellectual clones from the highest ranks to the lowest. Hundreds embrace the same worldview, the same combative attitude, and the same disregard for legal norms and basic decency.

This is the real problem.

Peachy said...

Big Mike - who is "they" ?

Peachy said...

Kak - read the speech. What is wrong with you cult-leftists?
You only know the fake reality. It's astonishing.

Mr. D said...

It's always been in Minnesota's court. I can promise you Homan and the rest of the people conducting operations in Minnesota would much rather not be here now - it's cold as hell. The local politicians want the street theater and don't mind a few dead vigilante ICU nurses, because it keeps the conversation away from the billions of dollars that have gone missing.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

Harder to spin the source material this way. Leftists and anti-ICE propagandists hardest hit.

Breezy said...

All common sense!

Big Mike said...

When will they start wearing professional uniforms?

Unless they’re dressed in tactical gear for an early morning raid — the way ICE is dressed in Minnesota — the FBI is dressed in civilian clothing. Their “uniform” might be as little as a windbreaker jacket with “FBI” printed on it. Are you arguing that the FBI is therefore not a professional law enforcement agency.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

True. "Less than" and "fewer than" trip up many. Lesser orators make fewer correct formulations using them.

Peachy said...

MN leftist commie scum remain leftist commie scum.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

Trolls argue minutae. It's what they do Big Mike.

Aggie said...

For that matter, I would attach more meaning to the Govenor and the Mayor if they would only start wearing professional uniforms befitting of their role, the ones with big clompy shoes and red rubber noses.

Big Mike said...

@Peachy, why not look up the phone number for Mary Irene Slatt and ask her yourself?

Peachy said...

When Police chiefs openly call for war on "nazi" ICE - those police chiefs are politicized frauds.

Greg The Class Traitor said...

You didn't highlight this, but it's the most important thing he said:

I'm also pleased to announce I had a very good meeting with Attorney General Ellison, and he has clarified for me that county jails may notify ICE of the release dates of criminal public safety risks so ICE can take custody of them upon release from the jail.

No, there's a huge difference between "may" and "will". But up until now the MN Dem position has been that it was "may not" for jails.

Switching to "May" is a huge defeat for the ICE haters, the open borders enemies of democracy known as the Left

Kai Akker said...

Thank you, Ann! Great transcription highlights.

Now will the people who need to hear it, hear it? They sure do NOT want to hear it.

Howard said...

Finally, the Trump administration has put an adult in charge instead of that Stupid cosplaying cunt Noem. If he had just stuck with Homan leading the charge the whole way, I guarantee those two people that were murdered by those temporary employees on steroids would be alive today.

Greg The Class Traitor said...

Kakistocracy said...
Administration to Draw Down Immigration Officers in Minneapolis, Homan Says ~ WSJ

Open borders freaks tell lies, story at 11!

What Homan said was that if Minneapolis completely caves and gives ICE everything they want, ICE will draw down their forces from Minneapolis, and send them to the next most obnoxious city.

ICE has ended 'enhanced' operations in Maine, Collins says ~ Politico

Well, Politico pretty much always lies, so I'll ignore that.

They are talking about drawdowns to avoid addressing the indictment of Alex Pretti's murderers

Pretti Good were both properly killed while violently resisting arrest. no one is going to be indicted in either case.

Polling was showing Trump’s approval rating hovering near all-time lows before this. Now it will sink even lower and Republicans with him.

Th same "polling" groups that showed Harris winning are showing Trump losing. Only a pathetic moron pays attention to them.

And this point it's not even "drunk looking for his keys by a light pole" level of stupid, it's beyond that.

John henry said...

A bit off topic but just a reminder, illustrated by the recent Signal megillah.

The underlying encryption of Signal seems to be secure. Ditto RSA/PGP encryption. Neither encryption has been broken.

The problem is not encryption but the way people use it. If someone can get access to the groups where Signal is being used, they don't have to hack the encryption.

If someone else forwards them the the decrypted Signal messages, they don't have to hack the encryption.

Signal was not broken, its use was sloppy.

Even if Alice uses Signal 100% securely, she has no guarantee that Bob will. If Bob is not secure, Carol may be able to read the messages.

NEVER, EVER, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES put anything online that you would not be OK seeing in the Althouse comments or the front page of the NYT recipe, game and news service.

Donald Trump has never been much of a user of email. He took a lot of heat for this 10 years ago. A dinosaur. Behind the times and so on. Turns out that he is the smart one.

John Henry

Greg The Class Traitor said...

Left Bank of the Charles said...
“U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is a legitimate law enforcement agency“

When will they start wearing professional uniforms?


When will you learn how to make a valid argument?

The SS had real professional, nay "spiffy" uniforms. What kind of moron cares?

Peachy said...

Noem had nothing to do with the radicalized broken Walz-obedient freak-show leftist cultists Signal chat anti-ICE rioters who died in MN.

john mosby said...

RSM, I see what you did there. CC, JSM

Howard said...

No repeat of the BLM protests, no instigation of a civil war. This course correction was way too late. Trump better accomplish something spectacular between now and November. Otherwise it's back to the DNC clown show

G. Poulin said...

Meanwhile here in Massachusetts, the Democommunists -- meaning every public official in the Commonwealth--- are busy screaming at the top of their lungs, trying to fan the flames and rev up the violence. I'm talking about you, Healy, Neal, Markey, the whole blasted lot of you. I hope and pray that you end up in prison for the rest of your worthless miserable lives. Commie scum.

Alan from Whittier said...

When will they start wearing professional uniforms?
On Saturday here it was obvious who they were.
What isn’t always obvious is who is “directing traffic” in my neighborhood.

Mary Beth said...

When will they start wearing professional uniforms? It’s a small thing, but the Trump administration should stop dressing them like goons if they want to get public respect.

Yes. Spend millions on new uniforms so we can hear about how DHS is wasting money on uniforms. And then we'll also hear about how them going out in uniform is intimidating to the legal immigrants and how the uniforms all have pants, just like Nazi uniforms.

Ann Althouse said...

"I just wish Homan knew the difference between less and fewer."

The less/fewer distinction deserves to die and is dying. It originated with some guy in the 1700s and has been nurtured by pedants. "Less" is a shorter, more natural word and everyone knows what it means. A guy like Homan is better off using "less."

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ said...

Mr D writes: "The local politicians want the street theater and don't mind a few dead vigilante ICU nurses, because it keeps the conversation away from the billions of dollars that have gone missing."

Mass resignation at Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office stems from Renee Good shooting, investigation ~ Minnesota Star Tribune (gift link)
https://www.startribune.com/joe-thompson-us-attorney-who-uncovered-massive-fraud-in-minnesota-resigns-from-office/601563206?utm_source=gift

In the Minnesota U.S. Attorney's Office, at least nine prosecutors have recently resigned amid controversy over the Justice Department's handling of the investigation into the fatal shooting of Renee Good by an ICE agent.

Reports indicate this includes an initial group of six top prosecutors, followed by additional departures, leaving the office significantly understaffed. Additionally, one FBI supervisor (Tracee Mergen) in the Minneapolis field office has resigned over concerns with the direction of the same investigation.

The resignations of at least six top prosecutors from the Minnesota U.S. Attorney's Office, including key figures like Acting U.S. Attorney Joe Thompson and Criminal Division Chief Melinda Williams, are expected to significantly impair ongoing fraud investigations in the state.

These departures, prompted by pressure from the Justice Department to prioritize an investigation into the widow of Renee Good (killed by an ICE agent) over the shooting itself, have left the office short-staffed and depleted of institutional knowledge critical for handling complex white-collar cases.

Overall, experts and former prosecutors warn that without swift replacements of experienced staff, Minnesota's fraud investigations—already described as "never-ending" schemes—could see reduced convictions, recovered funds, and deterrence against future scams.

The focus on immigration-related probes under the Trump administration has diverted attention and personnel from fraud work, exacerbating the impact of the resignations.

With the office now down to a skeleton crew for major cases—e.g., only one prosecutor currently assigned to Feeding Our Future—trials could face delays, plea deals might weaken, and new charges in related Medicaid fraud.

The resignations risk politicizing what was previously a bipartisan effort, potentially eroding credibility and cooperation with state agencies.

Another 'self own' from Team Trump....

Aggie said...

@Greg The Class Traitor, this would be the next argument, should the suggestion be taken - that ICE are really just Trump's storm troopers, because 'uniforms'. Right after the demands that masks be forbidden, so that ICE may be properly doxxed, tracked down, and eliminated, and their families terrorized.

I've concluded that Bad Faith arguments serve a great purpose when they're left to wither on the vine.

SeanF said...

Howard: Finally, the Trump administration has put an adult in charge instead of that Stupid cosplaying cunt Noem.

So, Walz and Frey weren't willing to cooperate with Noem, but they are with Homan. That makes them sexist misogynists, doesn't it?

Howard said...

The problem with your argument Kak is that the resignations of all those prosecutors is a political act itself. Quiting and shirking your duty is never acceptable. It's the coward's way out

Howard said...

Misogyny doesn't apply to a trans woman like Noem. She has bigger hands than Donald Trump, LOL

Peachy said...

Anti-ICE riots - are 100% the fault of the people paying, fueling, and instigating them.

BTW - some MN dems might face justice and the law with their organized Signal Chat participation.

Greg The Class Traitor said...

Kakistocracy said...
Mass resignation at Minnesota U.S. Attorney’s Office stems from Renee Good shooting, investigation ~ Minnesota Star Tribune

Wow, more lies from the Minnesota Star Tribune, the "news" paper that ha as of yet refused to cover the MN Dem "Signal" chat.

They're not residing because of Renee Good, they're resigning because they're all partisan Democrats, who are upset that Trump is enforcing laws they don't like.

Good riddance to bad rubbish

Peachy said...


"So, Walz and Frey weren't willing to cooperate with Noem, but they are with Homan. That makes them sexist misogynists, doesn't it?"

Why yes it does.

And! fraud Ilhan Omar's little stunt of a presser - where the cameras were rolling just as she said "Noem should be impeached" - and the man squirted at her with a tiny syringe. Huh. But he didn't squirt at her face. huh. and she had no fear. huh. and he was right there in the front row. huh.
How strange.

Wince said...

Homan has a unique, street-cred eloquence that is very logical and persuasive.

John henry said...

Speaking of dressing professionally, yesterday the FBI raided the Fulton County (Atlanta) election center where the 2020 ballots were warehoused and carried off the ballots and other election related stuff subject to a court search and seizure order.

Guess how they were dressed?

Professionally, in tactical gear, much like the Minneapolis ICE agents, complete with bullet proof vests.

But in short sleeve shirts as it is Atlanta, not Minneapolis.

https://www.ajc.com/politics/2026/01/fbi-raids-fulton-county-election-office/

John Henry

Rustygrommet said...

I get the impression that Homan walked into the offices of both Walz and Frey and the AG and gave them the good news.
Being. The admin. has something on every one of you and if you don't play ball the next step is to start arresting the NPCs in the field with the help of the 101st Airborne Division.

So glad you approve of Homan, Howard. Still no help for your agitator friends.

narciso said...

https://x.com/TonySeruga/status/2016862220429541472

narciso said...

funny how certain prosecutors do stop of short of certain redlines, like the one in Wilmington, that protected Hunter,

Ann Althouse said...

Alfred the Great wrote, circa 888: "Swa mid læs worda swa mid ma, swæðer we hit yereccan mayon."

That's "With less words or with more, whichever we may prove it."

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ said...

@ Mr D & Alan from Whittier: I was hoping to get a bit of a local perspective on a comment I left re:The MN gubernatorial race.
https://althouse.blogspot.com/2026/01/we-have-got-children-in-minnesota.html

Sydney said...

" I don't read a lot of social media. I don't read a lot of media. I can only believe half [of what] I see." - Homan.
I think you can believe less than half of what you see.

Known Unknown said...

Homan at least seems to have the proper experience for this role (not Noem to be honest)

Sebastian said...

"Sanctuary cities are sanctuaries for criminals" And of course, claiming sanctuary has no basis in federal law.

Homan is good, but the admin should know that, in this case as in many others, the issue is not the issue: the issue is the revolution. Hence the Minneapolis problem is only part of the problem. It will require a more organized, determined response, including disruption of prog networks and better propaganda operations. Meanwhile, keep stressing need for self-deportation.

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ said...

I'm waiting for Homan to tell Trump "Mission Accomplished," according to the pre-ordained script.

narciso said...

shocking our bavarian friend, didn't give us the whole picture,
we operate in a wilderness of mirrors, where one sees only part of the story,

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ said...

The Onion’s Exclusive Interview With Gregory Bovino
https://theonion.com/the-onions-exclusive-interview-with-gregory-bovino/

The Onion: What are you most proud of?

Bovino: The collection of children’s backpacks mounted on my wall.

Achilles said...

Howard said...
Finally, the Trump administration has put an adult in charge instead of that Stupid cosplaying cunt Noem. If he had just stuck with Homan leading the charge the whole way, I guarantee those two people that were murdered by those temporary employees on steroids would be alive today.

Those ICE agents got spit on by Pretti.

Good tried to run over ICE agents multiple times.

They showed way more restraint than a coward like Howard would have shown.

Every one of those ICE agents was a better man than Howard, a coward sitting at his keyboard ever will be.

narciso said...

she did fine, note schwalm and other accounts of the nature of this insurgency, the bigger picture, Peter Schweitzer has laid out in the Invisible Coup, about state and non state actors,

Achilles said...

Kakistocracy said...
The Onion’s Exclusive Interview With Gregory Bovino
https://theonion.com/the-onions-exclusive-interview-with-gregory-bovino/

The Onion: What are you most proud of?

Bovino: The collection of children’s backpacks mounted on my wall.


Making up characterizations.

Kak is the worst type of coward and scum.

Just an evil person.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

Homan at least seems to have the proper experience for this role (not Noem to be honest)

Noem, Homan and Bovino all have different and distinct roles. Homan did not replace Noem, who is his boss as head of the DHS. Bovino is head of the CBP. Homan is a "border czar" just as Harris was, although he actually works at it. He is highly valuable as a team player who speaks plainly with a wealth of experience in DHS/Border Security.

Peachy said...

The ONION - bad humor for moronic cultists.

Rick67 said...

"You can't fix problems if you don't have discussions. I didn't come to Minnesota for photo ops or headlines. I came here to seek solutions, and that's what we're going to do."

And that is how you talk to people in a contentious situation. Secretary Noem please take note.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

Should have written "putative boss" as Trump did make the announcement that for now Homan will "answer directly to me (Trump)."

narciso said...

the Babylon Bee, long since surpassed the Onion, (because Time travel)

FWBuff said...

Homan is an excellent communicator and a calm, authoritative presence. He used the right tone and stood up for the law enforcement officers.

boatbuilder said...

It seems odd that a bunch of prosecutors would "resign in protest" without telling anyone what they were protesting.

I suspect that those Dem-affiliated prosecutors are trading up to white-shoe law firms.

Note that Joe Thompson was "Acting" U.S. Attorney until October, when he was replaced by Daniel Rosen.

None of this is to imply that Joe Thompson and his team are not excellent attorneys, or that they have not done a great job prosecuting the Feeding Our Future fraud cases.

But they are Democrats in a Republican administration. That's the way politics works.

narciso said...

Todd Lyons was the local ice chief, he hasn't been reassigned,

Ronald J. Ward said...

Sebastian at 10:47, so, it isn’t about criminals at all?

Because if this is about criminals, why are you talking about propaganda and disrupting political networks instead of courts and warrants?

n.n said...

All government agents: teachers, representatives, sanitation workers, etc, should wear a uniform as a label to clearly indicate their authority and class.

n.n said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
n.n said...

Abortionists who receive public funding or privilege, should wear a uniform to identify their vocational stock and trade. Perhaps a hazmat suit adorned with baby... fetal parts and an appropriate label.

john mosby said...

Homan should have continued his sentence: I came here to seek solutions and chew bubble gum….and I’m fresh outta bubble gum. CC, JSM

john mosby said...

nn: you know what other country put all public servants in uniforms? CC, JSM

john mosby said...

Ciso: that’s a great Fish solo album. CC, JSM

hombre said...

Obstructing federal officers enforcing federal law, any federal law, is a crime. It is also sedition and may be insurrection. Trump should have stopped pussyfooting around with the “protestors” and had them arrested regardless of logistics and scofflaw Minnesotan problem. Otherwise, he should have pulled out of “sanctuaries” and cut their funding. The optics of this Minneapolis bullshit have been terrible and will be reflected in the midterms. If Democrats have the Speaker - third in line for POTUS - Trump and Vance will be in great danger.

john mosby said...

RJW: the admin can do more than one thing at once. Lots of ways to disrupt networks, including the criminal justice system when applicable. But I would think you’d approve of the Admin accomplishing political goals without locking people up? CC, JSM

Greg The Class Traitor said...

Newly surfaced video shows Alex Pretti spitting at federal immigration agents, kicking a government vehicle, and screaming profanities during a violent confrontation in south Minneapolis on January 13 -- just 11 days before he was fatally shot by Border Patrol agents.

The footage, obtained by the Minnesota Star Tribune, captures Pretti, 37, amid a chaotic street scene as an unmarked federal convoy moved through the area. Surrounded by a crowd blowing whistles and heckling officers, Pretti is seen shouting abuse at agents, spitting in their direction, and kicking a vehicle before officers move in and take him to the ground. As he stands back up, what appears to be a handgun is clearly visible in his waistband. Moments later, he is released and remains in the area as the confrontation dissipates. A spokesperson for Pretti's family and the family's attorney confirmed to the Star Tribune that the man in the video is Pretti, whose death nearly two weeks later would ignite protests.

The video was recorded by The News Movement on January 13 and later reviewed and aired by the BBC. During a 10 p.m. GMT broadcast, BBC journalist Ros Atkins said the individual in the footage matches Pretti's appearance, clothing, and gait, adding that facial recognition technology suggested a 97 percent match. Atkins told viewers the video shows Pretti "shouting abuse at the agents" and "kicking a car" before being wrestled to the ground, noting that a firearm is visible in his waistband as he gets back to his feet. A BBC spokesperson later confirmed to Mediaite that the network reviewed and authenticated the footage using facial recognition tools.

Now, obviously ICE screwed up. They should have arrested him then and there, and he should have been denied bail and still be in custody, awaiting trial.

Everyone who agrees with what I wrote above can say how sad their are about Pretti's death.
But if you didn't want him arrested, thrown in jail, and left there for what he did on Jan 13, if you wanted him out on the street where he could assault more ICE / BP people, then you are the cause of his death.

bagoh20 said...

This doesn't sound like the same Democrats we've been hearing. They've been telling us they will do none of these things, and that ICE should be resisted. "Put your body on the line" and all that. I welcome the return of sanity to the politicians, but they already started a fire among the public. Now what?

Ronald J. Ward said...

Again John, if this is about crime, why does it require “propaganda operations” and targeting “prog networks” at all?

Maybe I’m wrong but when I hear advocating for “propaganda operations” that sounds like a need for a well oiled lying machine.

Kevin said...

A guy like Homan is better off using "less."

Shorter Althouse: Less is more.

Gerda Sprinchorn said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
John henry said...

Ann Althouse said...

"Swa mid læs worda swa mid ma, swæðer we hit yereccan mayon."

That's easy for you to say.

John Henry

narciso said...

venkman (he never studied) is getting tedious,

Ann Althouse said...

Homan said: "when we have these agreements, it takes less law enforcement agents to do the job... So if we get these agreements in place, that means less agents on the street. More agents in the jail means less agents in the street."

I think it was smart for him to say "less" there because it makes him sound manly, connected to the people, and not distracted by elite bullshit. No nonsense.

John henry said...

hombre said...

It is also sedition

Sedition is not a federal crime and hasn't been for a long, long, time.

John Henry

gadfly said...

Why waste all those words on a crook like Tom Homan, who accepted a $50 grand bribe proferred by FBI undercover agents? And the video proving the bribe acceptance will be around when an honest DOJ reappears in the future.

But Tom Homan continues to be deeply involved in securing contracts for his clientelle that are a part of his time in the private sector have been awarded lucrative border and immigration-related contracts during the second Trump administration .

narciso said...

everything thats old is new again,

the Dems tried to fit seditious conspiracy into their
attack on the counter to the color revolution

narciso said...

what language is that,

narciso said...

most assuredly they would put out the same sob story, that we've seen before,

narciso said...

like they did somewhat successfully with the gentle giant, with eric garner et al

narciso said...

the legal system, their media auxiliaries, even elements of corporate america, always follow the same playbook
see maryland man,

Lem Vibe Bandit said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Quaestor said...

Kak, Inag, and the Gang want ICE agents to unmask so that their children can be identified and murdered. Don't bother to deny it, Kak. We know your plans in detail because half of your crime syndicate is stupid enough to reveal your blood-drenched conspiracy on TikTok.

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ said...

When Trump’s agents murdered multiple people in Minneapolis, he pulled back his forces—showing humility that Obama and Biden rarely demonstrated. 😉

boatbuilder said...

I'm trying to imagine what would happen to me if I kicked and broke the taillight of a police car while the police were in it.

Pretti's resistance to the officers in the earlier video is very similar to the resistance on the day he got shot, including his insistence on getting to his feet--while carrying a gun.

I don't understand why he wasn't arrested in the earlier encounter. It certainly seems to have emboldened him to engage in the idiocy which ended up costing his life.

narciso said...

it doesnt really translate, its kind of an ideomatic expression,
but ritmo and co, are really spiraling,

narciso said...

who was going to arrest him , the minnesota police,

Greg The Class Traitor said...

gadfly said...
Why waste all those words on a crook like Tom Homan, who accepted a $50 grand bribe proferred by FBI undercover agents?

Really gadfly? That sounds horrible!

So, what was Homan's gov't job when he took that bribe? What's that, he wasn't working for the gov't? he had no power?

He had no "tit" to provide for the "tat"?

In short, what you're saying is you're completely full of shit? Ah, got it

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

Sorry.

Greg The Class Traitor said...

But don't worry, gadfly, Trump will be following the Biden example, and giving full and complete Federal pardons to Homan, and every single ICE agent, and probably everyone else in his Administration, on the way out the door.

Because precedents matter

narciso said...

its curious, because Spanish has a certain fatalist bent, that was received from the Arabs,

Greg The Class Traitor said...

boatbuilder said...
I don't understand why he wasn't arrested in the earlier encounter. It certainly seems to have emboldened him to engage in the idiocy which ended up costing his life.

Yeah, that's what happens when the Trump Admin decides to be "non-confrontational". The Left is just inspired to ramp up

john mosby said...

RJW: "Again John, if this is about crime, why does it require “propaganda operations” and targeting “prog networks” at all?"

As I said, the administration can do more than one thing at a time. In fact, it is obligated to. It has the Constitutional obligation to take care that the laws be followed, and it has the electoral obligation to carry out the manifesto on which it was elected.

And these things work together. You can lock up the street fighters for street fighting - doesn't matter whether it's BLM or PSAC (Puppies Sure Are Cute). And you can also have a public-information campaign explaining why unfettered immigration is lousy for everyone. And also use the economic instrument to lay out incentives and counterincentives for states to go along with the national government's manifesto.

Nearly all of these methods are nonviolent. And the violent one is only violent when the opposition gets violent. CC, JSM

john mosby said...

Lem: no need to apologize - Walz, Ellison, and Frey are in dire need of FAFO parenting, and Daddy Homan is going to give it to them. CC, JSM

Rabel said...

"The less/fewer distinction deserves to die and is dying."

I disagree and will abide but will not comply.

And since your changing the rules can you get that apostrophe out of its?

narciso said...

'OMG, can you believe they arrested a VA nurse,'
the headlines write themselves,

bagoh20 said...

" I got here Monday evening, and I'm staying until the problem's gone."
Compare to:
"We've been to the border." "You haven't been to the border," Holt said. "And I haven't been to Europe, Harris said. "And I mean, I don't understand the point that you're making."

The difference between Trump people who get things done and Democrats who only talk and deflect is stark. Harris was absolutely useless to the nation and almost became President.
Thank you Trump, Thank you MAGA.

john mosby said...

RJW, you are probably old enough to remember when fedgov made highway money conditional on the 55 speed limit and 21-yo drinking age. At the same time, they put out PSAs like "drive 55, stay alive," and "please God I'm only 17."

Or heavier drug penalties, accompanied by Nancy Reagan's "Just Say No (Like I Do To Ron)" and the "This is Your Brain on Drugs" commercial.

It's like those. CC, JSM

SeanF said...

Howard: Misogyny doesn't apply to a trans woman like Noem.

So they - and you - are just transphobic bigots, rather than sexist bigots. Got it.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

From what I recall of Homan speaking on camera before today, this is a strikingly different subdued tone coming thru, at least to me. I noticed Althouse calls it a "performance". Does that mean it's inauthentic?

He might be going thru some health issues. Just not something bad enough that he can't... perform?

bagoh20 said...

"...showing humility that Obama and Biden rarely demonstrated."

Agreed. Obama's deportation operation killed 56 immigrants during his term, without any need for humility or change in course. Those were the days.

jim5301 said...

When the cancer—MAGA—has been cut away from the body of our republic, historians will look back and mark Minneapolis, January 2026, as the key turning point.

Mason G said...

So- are Democrats still in favor of illegal alien rapists and murderers being allowed to remain in the country today or what?

john mosby said...

jimmy numbers, How can Make America Great Again be a cancer to the body of the republic?

That's like saying you don't think black lives matter! CC, JSM

Yancey Ward said...

Shorter Homan: "We aren't backing down and will continue to round up illegal immigrants with deportation notices but we will draw down the numbers of agents as long as Minnesota law enforcement do their jobs in controlling rioters (and, yes, they are rioters, RJW). I am guessing Walz, Frey, and Ellison will play nice for a few days but they can't do so for long without getting cancelled by the left media. But we will see.

Greg The Class Traitor said...

Rabel said...
And since your changing the rules can you get that apostrophe out of its?

First of all, it's "you're changing the rules". A contraction of "you are", which is indicated by the '

When "its" is possessive "the company sent its car", there is no '. When "it's" is a contraction "it's late", then it must be there.

john mosby said...

Yancey: the test will be if Minneapolis PD or Minnesota SP hold a perimeter around an ICE operation and wind up having to use deadly force on some leftie street fighter. Walz and Ellison will be sorely tempted to go Chauvin on the copper. Then Homan will have to remind them that Bondi can always go Illinois Governor on them if they don't do the right thing. CC, JSM

Ronald J. Ward said...

John Mosby at 12:20, you’re shifting this from “this is about criminals” to “this is about enforcing a manifesto and disrupting networks.” Those are two different justifications. Which one is primary?

I’m not arguing “admins can’t do more than one thing.” I’m saying that calling it crime control while advocating propaganda and network disruption is misleading.
And that’s exactly what you and Sebastian are doing.

Rabel said...

"The generality of boys past five, six or seven years at school are so imperfect even in the Latin tongue (not to speak of the Greek) at their coming away, that they might almost as well be entirely ignorant of it. When they are grown up, they will know less of it than at their leaving the school, because not understanding it well enough, when they come away, to comprehend a Latin author with ease, so as to read him with any sort of pleasure, they entirely neglect the language from that time, and consequently forget some part of even the little they once knew. Some few indeed, who are fond of books, and have a good deal of leisure, pursue the study of it after leaving the school, and come to understand it well. But the number of these is very small."

A version of "The kids ain't learning anything" from the less/fewer guy in 1770.

Sounds familiar.

john mosby said...

Lots of ways to control crime besides locking people up. Address the root causes! Isn't that what your lot have been saying for 60 years? And what does "address the root causes" mean if it doesn't include social engineering? CC, JSM

Rabel said...

'First of all, it's "you're changing the rules". A contraction of "you are", which is indicated by the '"

You're not real quick, are you.

john mosby said...

The root cause of migrant crime is migrants. The root cause of migrants is wokeism. You address that root cause by making wokeism painful. CC, JSM

MacMacConnell said...

“When will they start wearing professional uniforms? It’s a small thing, but the Trump administration should stop dressing them like goons if they want to get public respect.”

Maybe Ralph Lauren could design some really bespoke uniforms made in China, like airline hosts or the Olympics. Come to think of it Dems call ICE the Gestapo. The Gestapo wore street clothes, usually suits, they didn't have badges, they carried universal warrant chits in their pockets. You see the Gestapo were secret police they "don't need no stinking badges".
Dems are theater kids.

Jamie said...

So this was Sebastian, with the original comment that started RJW on his diversion:

Homan is good, but the admin should know that, in this case as in many others, the issue is not the issue: the issue is the revolution. Hence the Minneapolis problem is only part of the problem. It will require a more organized, determined response, including disruption of prog networks and better propaganda operations.

And this was how RJW got started:

Sebastian at 10:47, so, it isn’t about criminals at all?

Because if this is about criminals, why are you talking about propaganda and disrupting political networks instead of courts and warrants?


He started with a false premise, that is: that immigration enforcement is "about criminals" and therefore requiring (implied "criminal" rather than administrative) "courts and warrants."

From the beginning, the focus on illegal immigrants with criminal arrests and/or convictions was a prioritization mechanism, never an expression of "the only illegal immigrants we will find and deport." But in order for RJW to try to divert attention from the fact that for the left, none of the Minneapolis chaos is about ICE methods and all of it is about making enforcement of immigration law impossible,*, he has to pretend that (a) the administration said it was only ever going to deport criminals, and (b) public opinion and support doesn't matter, and therefore messaging that does not engender public support renders the entire effort less effective.

* I want to highlight Sebastian's statement again: "the issue is not the issue: the issue is the revolution." I think it was just yesterday that one of the lefties here - Left Bank maybe? - made the risible claim that the left "is only upset about the methods," even though the protestors' "methods" preceded the federal agents attempts at crowd control and resulted directly from Minnesota elected officials' urging them - the protestors - to #resist. To #resist the enforcement of federal law, that is.

And I return to my hypothesis that if abortion were still available, maybe immigration enforcement wouldn't be the New Hotness. It really is about the revolution; the issues don't matter.

MacMacConnell said...

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz worries that the violence in his state could produce a national rupture. “I mean, is this a Fort Sumter?
Waltz is a moron if he thinks Minneapolis is Federal Fort Sumter. Minneapolis riots are the Confederates. Trump was right Waltz is a retard.

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ said...

Althouse writes: “I think it was smart for him to say "less" there because it makes him sound manly, connected to the people, and not distracted by elite bullshit.”

I think it’s a bit late. We all see Trumpism now.

The ‘home of the free and the land of the brave' has 'secret police' running around the streets in masks detaining, assaulting and killing people.

You can't drawdown from that.

Gusty Winds said...

Blue State resistance to ICE is about nothing more than headcount. Even if an illegal alien is in prison, they still count in the census, and that counts toward House seats / districts and electoral votes. They convinced their followers that is was about some fake moral high ground.

Same fake moral high ground as "Stay Home, Save Lives" and "Defund the Police."

Ronald J. Ward said...

Jamie, what I’m hearing from John, Sebastian, and now from you, is that immigration enforcement isn’t primarily about criminals at all — it’s part of a broader political strategy for “the revolution,” disrupt opposing networks, and shape public opinion through propaganda and gaslighting.

Thanks for finally admitting that.

That means ICE and deportations are not the mission; they’re tools or byproducts of a political campaign.

If that’s the case, then calling this simply “law enforcement” is misleading. It’s political warfare wearing a law-enforcement badge.

What strikes me is that protesters are condemned for being political, while this operation is now openly described as a political campaign involving propaganda and disruption of networks.

That’s not law enforcement anymore — that’s politics. And it’s odd to criticize one side for politicizing while embracing it on the other.

This is a version of a movie we’ve seen before around 80 years ago. It didn’t turn out well.

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ said...

It can't come soon enough, although things improved a bit when Bovino left.

Gusty Winds said...

WTF is with Nurses?? They are leaning into the Nurse Ratched end of the spectrum. Not just fighting violently with ICE. But also posting videos on line advising to inject ICE agents with paralyzing drugs. From X Malinda Rose Cook, a certified registered nurse anesthetist at VCU Health, posted now-deleted TikTok videos proposing sabotage tactics like filling syringes with succinylcholine or saline to scare agents, spraying poison ivy extract, and laxative-spiking drinks. The hospital fired her Tuesday after an internal investigation, confirming she no longer works there and fulfilling state reporting requirements.

Another (from X): Lexie Lawler, formerly at Baptist Health Boca Raton Regional Hospital, posted videos as a nurse wishing a severe fourth-degree tear on White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, who is due with her second child in May.

I thought the COVID line dancing nurses were bad enough.

MacMacConnell said...

I was delivering payroll checks to a local bar one afternoon. I always say hello to the regulars, sometimes talk politics or sports. Four old retired Ford workers were having a beers waiting to pick up their wives at the Salon. They were talking about the riots in Minneapolis. One said, "That governor seems to enjoy riots". Another ," Well his wife enjoys the smell of burning cars". Guy at the end says," Well that maybe the only time his wife gets aroused". The all nodded.
On the drive back to the office I couldn't stop laughing.

Christopher B said...

Yancey, I just saw on Instapundit this NBC report that Walz announced yesterday he is permanently withdrawing from seeking elective office so at least he doesn't need to worry about cancellation. I also take it as a sign he's the one who backed down.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/minnesota-governor-tim-walz-will-never-seek-elected-office-again-rcna256424

Beasts of England said...

’That means ICE and deportations are not the mission; they’re tools or byproducts of a political campaign.’

ICE and deportations are the mission. If other positive byproducts accrue because of progtard insanity, so be it.

MacMacConnell said...

"And I return to my hypothesis that if abortion were still available, maybe immigration enforcement wouldn't be the New Hotness. It really is about the revolution; the issues don't matter."
Bingo!

Inga said...

ICE and CBP drawing down in Maine and MN is because Republicans are panicking about impending shutdown and Trump’s abysmal polling on the one issue he was actually doing well in. What did they think, that Democrats would vote to give DHS even money after the debacle in Minneapolis?

Are Republicans getting a clearer picture of what will be happening in Midterms?

Gusty Winds said...

I just heard on The News from Lake Wobegon that the Chatterbox Cafe has been raided by ICE and the kitchen staff taken away. Darlene, the counter lady, was quoted saying, "The last time we were raided was when the Lutherans stormed in to get the last Lemon Meringue pie."

narciso said...

Guy noir was a witness

Inga said...

Why wasn’t Kristi Gnome invited to speak in the Cabinet meeting today? Treating her like a child, be seen but not heard, probably a good idea. There’s a lot at stake.

john mosby said...

RJW: "It’s political warfare wearing a law-enforcement badge."

To slightly modify Clausewitz, the criminal law is politics by other means. Especially in this postmodern world. We don't like something, we make it illegal, enforced by people with chains, sticks, and guns.

Isn't that Critical Legal Studies?

More RJW: " it’s odd to criticize one side for politicizing while embracing it on the other."

Mmm, not criticizing, exactly. More like noticing. And yes, embracing the concept. To bring up another Kraut, it's like Patton yelling "Rommel, I read your book!!"

That's the biggest improvement between 45 and 47 - Trump has finally learned how to mix all the instruments. And he's found musicians he can depend on. CC, JSM

Beasts of England said...

’ICE and CBP drawing down in Maine and MN is because Republicans are panicking…’

Apparently Inga missed the title of this post, in which Homan stated: ‘I got here Monday evening, and I’m staying until the problem’s gone.’ lol

narciso said...

Andrew Kolvet on X: "At the end of Border Czar Tom Homan's press conference, he was asked about Signal chats: "About the organization and the funding of the attacks on ICE, I'm not going to say a lot about that because I don't want to show our hand, but justice is coming." https://t.co/fXyeeLNIJS" / X https://share.google/8N1sL1SANHr4nw3TD

Jamie said...

Jamie, what I’m hearing from John, Sebastian, and now from you, is that immigration enforcement isn’t primarily about criminals at all — it’s part of a broader political strategy for “the revolution,” disrupt opposing networks, and shape public opinion through propaganda and gaslighting.

No, you're not. But you're trying really hard to make someone - anyone - believe that that's "what you're hearing." It's patiently obvious that "the revolution" is your side's obsession.

What strikes me is that protesters are condemned for being political, while this operation is now openly described as a political campaign involving propaganda and disruption of networks.

That’s not law enforcement anymore — that’s politics. And it’s odd to criticize one side for politicizing while embracing it on the other.


Protestors aren't "condemned for being political." They're condemned for being violent and, even when they're "only" making it impossible for federal agents to communicate with one another or pushing them to the brink, for obstructing them in the performance of their lawful duties. The protestors are political - it is "about the revolution" for at least some of them, and many of the rest are there for explicitly political reasons (hating Trump, that is). The administration is trying to fulfill its electoral and legislative mandate, which, as we've seen, must involve attempting to counter the media edifice that is committed to presenting every protestor as a hero and every ICE agent as a thug.

You want to call that "propaganda and gaslighting" but if you were honest (who knows - maybe you are honest with yourself), you would have to concede that what the media and the Democrat establishment have been doing is sheer unadulterated propaganda and gaslighting; that's why they have to bury every "hero's" backstory so deeply. You know it; we know it; but carry on about "what you're hearing."

This is a version of a movie we’ve seen before around 80 years ago. It didn’t turn out well.

You're right - it didn't. But you're misrepresenting which group your side represents.

Rustygrommet said...

"I was delivering payroll checks to a local bar one afternoon."

Such a simple statement. So filled with promise. I have questions. Many, many questions.

Inga said...

First Amendment lawyers say Minneapolis ICE observers are protected by Constitution.
Prosecutors have a high bar to bring charges


Beasts of England said...

Jamie @ 2:56 pm: very well stated, as always!

Beasts of England said...

Thanks for that self-refuting link, Inga!!

’Brandenburg prohibits speech only if it is “directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action,” such as violence against law enforcement officers, and “is likely to incite or produce such action,” according to a summary by Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute.’

Which is precisely what ICE Watch was and is doing. lol

narciso said...

Scott Jennings on X: "Dem messaging today: Walz publicly fantasizing about a Civil War Krasner says hunt down federal law enforcement like Nazis. Jeffries says a cabinet secretary needs to be “put on ice permanently.”" / X https://share.google/ypOpSRFidHwXUKLeZ

Inga said...

Protesting is not lawless action Beasts. I’m pretty sure there are going to be arguments made as to the nature of the protestors’ actions. The 1st Amendment will be a HUGE hurdle for DHS to get over I suspect. I’m pretty sure the violence from ICE and CBP toward the protestors will come into the argument when and IF it hits the courts.

Iman said...

Igna with a righteous self-beclowning… bravissimo!!!

Inga said...

“Which is precisely what ICE Watch was and is doing. lol”

YOUR opinion, we all have one or many, lol.

narciso said...

Weve already seen this movie, peaceful protests my eye!

narciso said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ronald J. Ward said...

Jamie at 2:56, I’m not assigning motives or sides — I’m quoting Sebastian’s language and following it to its logical conclusion.

Once enforcement is framed as counter-revolution, propaganda (gaslighting) and network disruption, it ceases to be merely law enforcement and becomes political strategy.

You may believe that’s justified. But denying that it’s political — while condemning others for politicizing it — is the inconsistency I’m pointing out.

Iman said...

If Homan can convince whatever sane Minnesotans remain to pull their heads out of their backsides, ICE will get the job done and will do it well.

Beasts of England said...

’Protesting is not lawless action Beasts.’

Of course not. The ‘No Kings’ rallies were proof of that! Interfering with law enforcement operations is, however, lawless. And we have video evidence of such, so not exactly my opinion…

Inga said...

“‘The First Amendment has narrow exceptions for true threats and speech intended and likely to provoke imminent unlawful action, but the government cannot trigger those exceptions simply by claiming that speech puts officials in harm’s way,” Terr said. “The First Amendment also does not protect criminal conspiracy, but that requires evidence of an agreement to commit a specific crime and a substantial step toward carrying it out. No such evidence appears in the Signal messages that have been made public.”

Other free speech advocates agreed.

“I got the sense the [Signal chat] group has been organized for purposes that are fully protected by the First Amendment: to observe, to speak and to alert others of possible dangers,” Kevin Goldberg, vice president at the Freedom Forum told the Guardian. “I didn’t see anything that impedes or obstructs justice.”

https://san.com/cc/fbi-investigation-of-protesters-signal-chats-creates-first-amendment-clash/

Achilles said...

Inga said...
Protesting is not lawless action Beasts.

When Inga doesn’t like the results of an election she gets to do whatever she wants and decide what she thinks the truth is.

Pretti was a violent thug that is on video spitting on ICE agents.

You are insurrectionist scum.

Achilles said...

Pretti was far more violent than Ashli Babbit.

Beasts of England said...

’Once enforcement is framed as counter-revolution, propaganda (gaslighting) and network disruption…’

Counter-revolution and network disruption are legitimate law enforcement actions. What point, exactly, do you think you’re making?

Achilles said...

The signal chat shows thousands of Democrats organizing and conspiring to impede lawful immigration enforcement to aid and protect illegal foreigner soldiers who invaded our country.

The first amendment does not allow treason and conspiracy to commit treason.

Mason G said...

"Apparently Inga missed the title of this post, in which Homan stated: ‘I got here Monday evening, and I’m staying until the problem’s gone.’ lol"

Wouldn't matter if she read the title, if it doesn't align with what she's instructed to believe, it won't register. She's not very bright.

Beasts of England said...

’No such evidence appears in the Signal messages that have been made public.’

In their opinion, right? And ‘been made public’ is another tell. But, I think we agree that the courts, if it makes it that far, will decide, not us.

Greg The Class Traitor said...

What strikes me is that protesters are condemned for being political, while this operation is now openly described as a political campaign involving propaganda and disruption of networks.

No, shit for brains, the "protesters" are being condemned for being criminal thugs, domestic terrorists, and insurrectionists.

"Political is when you stand on the sidewalks, not obstructing anyone or anything, and have a protest.

Once you start obstructing things, you're no longer political, you're criminal

Ronald J. Ward said...

Beast at 3:43, if this is “counter-revolution,” then it is no longer about criminals, illegality, or the enforcement of neutral law. It is about suppressing political opposition. That is precisely my point. The original claim—that this operation was narrowly about criminals—cannot coexist with this framing, and your consistent use of it confirms that contradiction.

Mason G said...

"Once you start obstructing things, you're no longer political, you're criminal"

The left thinks rioting and burning down buildings is "mostly peaceful protesting", so take their pronouncements about 'political' with an exceedingly large grain of salt.

Or just ignore their bleatings altogether, they pretty much always lie about everything.

Mkd said...

Ronald J. Ward said..."Once enforcement is framed as counter-revolution, propaganda (gaslighting) and network disruption, it ceases to be merely law enforcement and becomes political strategy."

I think you misread Sebastian. He didn't frame enforcement as counter-revolution. He framed it as enforcement. And noted that enforcement alone won't solve the problem because the problem is bigger than that. We need to do more than enforce the law. To solve the problem we need a coherent political strategy that includes disrupting progressive networks and better propaganda.

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ said...

Source: ICE to begin using empty Melania theaters as temporary detention facilities. Well that’s definitely torture. ..

Inga said...

“To solve the problem we need a coherent political strategy that includes disrupting progressive networks and better propaganda.”

In other words, you want the government to take away First Amendment speech from “disrupting progressives”?
How will that play in front of the Supreme Court?

Greg The Class Traitor said...

Ronald J. Ward said...
Beast at 3:43, if this is “counter-revolution,” then it is no longer about criminals, illegality, or the enforcement of neutral law.

Revolution is illegal, dumbshit. So yes, "counter-revolution" which is to say opposing an illegal revolution, is entirely about criminals, illegality, and the enforcement of neutral law.

Beasts of England said...

’…if this is “counter-revolution,” then it is no longer about criminals, illegality, or the enforcement of neutral law. It is about suppressing political opposition. That is precisely my point.’

Yes, those engaged in ‘revolution’ are criminals, and, yes: that’s illegal. They discovered this criminal activity in the course of their initial operations, and it’s legal and proper to follow up. It’s not suppressing political activity, it’s enforcing the law.

Beasts of England said...

’Source: ICE to begin using empty Melania theaters as temporary detention facilities. Well that’s definitely torture.’

Okay, that’s funny… :)

Ronald J. Ward said...

Thanks MKD @ 4:12, I get your distinction but once law enforcement is knowingly used as part of a broader political strategy—alongside propaganda and disruption of political networks—it is no longer neutral enforcement. At that point, “criminals” is no longer the operative explanation; it becomes a pretext. You don’t need propaganda or political suppression to remove criminals. You need those tools to change population behavior and political outcomes.

Ronald J. Ward said...

Beast at 4:24, you’re following your instructed marching orders from your handlers to the tee. Labeling political opposition as “revolutionary” does not make it criminal. In a constitutional system, criminality must be defined in advance by statute, tied to specific acts, and established through warrants and courts — not discovered retroactively by the operation itself. When enforcement is justified by what it uncovers rather than what was lawfully alleged beforehand, enforcement stops being neutral and becomes a mechanism for pursuing the manufactured enemies the cult has been groomed to believe exists.

narciso said...

Venkman has gone extra stupid

narciso said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Charlotte Allen said...

Hi Ann:
"Worda" is the genitive plural--in Old English, Alfred's language--of the Old English word "word," meaning "word." So "laes worda" means "less of words," which is grammatical in modern English. "Less words" isn't.

narciso said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
narciso said...

They arrested people praying outside abortion clinics even though roe is finite they stalked churches and pta meetingz because you cannot speak heresey against trans

john mosby said...

RJW: " once law enforcement is knowingly used as part of a broader political strategy—alongside propaganda and disruption of political networks—it is no longer neutral enforcement"

And?

It never was neutral enforcement. The statutes themselves are enacted by the political branches. We used to have a common law, but you people destroyed it and replaced it with statutes.

And there are so many statutes that the executive has to use prosecutorial discretion. And, as a politically elected branch, guess what? Political concerns - or more accurately policy concerns - will guide that discretion. See, eg, turning stop-and-frisk on and off, based not on how legal it is, but on what kind of city you want.

Your lot have pounded the Critical Legal Studies drum so long and loudly that, guess what - our lot believes it now, too. And it's glorious. CC, JSM

bagoh20 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
bagoh20 said...

As always, all you need to do is imagine if it was MAGA instead of ICE Watch doing the exact same thing under a Democrat President. Change nothing else, but reverse the Rs and Ds. MAGA would be rounded up, imprisoned and be in solitary confinement right now. Jan. 6th proved it. Every Dem apologist here would be cheering the government on.

On January 6th, there were actual secret police without badges or uniforms. Inciting, pretending to be citizens. You guys have zero principles beyond need for power.

Are the Republicans going to have show trials with a Hollywood director, and terabytes of exculpatory video disappearing? We all know the answer. That's why Dems always feel free to riot at will.

Jim at said...

WTF is with Nurses?? They are leaning into the Nurse Ratched end of the spectrum. Not just fighting violently with ICE. But also posting videos on line advising to inject ICE agents with paralyzing drugs.

Haven't you heard? They aren't really leftists. They're conservatives acting like leftists.

And even if they are leftists, they're the victims in all this.

A retired nurse said so. Believe her.

narciso said...

We already saw this movie too, hundreds were locked up under kangaroo tribunals mostly on simple treapass that were boosted to felonies on political grounds

Water buffalo man chansley was one of the most absurd examples

boatbuilder said...

I’m not arguing “admins can’t do more than one thing.” I’m saying that calling it crime control while advocating propaganda and network disruption is misleading.
And that’s exactly what you and Sebastian are doing.


"Pop! goes the Weasel!"

Please stop trying to reason with the Weasel. He doesn't care about the facts, the law, principles, or logic. He just wants to distract.

Which is why he makes up fake "controversies" and "concerns." Last week it was the end of the Republic that Noem referred to a guy engaged in a conspiracy to obstruct and interfere with lawful Border Patrol operations who physically attacked officers while carrying a loaded gun as a "terrorist." That seems to have fizzled, so now it's this BS that Republicans aren't allowed to fight propaganda with their own propaganda, or law enforcement can't do anything at all without a warrant beforehand, or whatever the hell he's talking about.
Read what he posted at 4:48. Pure nonsense. If that was true, there would not only be no reason for cops on the beat, or the FBI, it would be unconstitutional.
And no, Weasel, I am not going to "debate" with you.

Mason G said...

"You guys have zero principles beyond need for power."

When normal people think your ideas suck, power is needed.

Peachy said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Peachy said...

Walz is promising to go away and never seek office.
He knows he is in big trouble. Not only with his personal assassin - but with his involvement with ICE Watch and direct action.

Peachy said...

Alex Pretti was involved with "ICE Watch" - and he was partaking in DIRECT ACTION. He was guided by rage and Signal Chats. These signal chats are highly organized.
Top Dems are involved.
He was not a protestor.
Protesting means - holding up a sign to persuade.
Direct Action is harassment and obstruction of justice.

ICE agents are legally arresting those here illegally and many or all with deportation orders. Many of these illegals are criminals, too. (but dems need illegals counted in the census)
Of those illegal alien criminals- many are child sex traffickers.

So - Alex Pretti died for a child sex trafficker.

His own mother warned Alex to NOT mix his level of rage with a gun.

Mason G said...

"So - Alex Pretti died for a child sex trafficker."

You don't have to tell Democrats. They know who they support.

Beasts of England said...

’Beast at 4:24, you’re following your instructed marching orders from your handlers to the tee.’

That’s a pitiful ad hominem, but I recognize that you don’t have a rational argument, only an unhealthy obsession. And ‘revolution’ is a word you quoted.

And if you don’t think it can be discovered and acted upon after the fact, are you saying that police on a drug raid can’t act upon a bullet-ridden dead body they happen to find on the premises? lol

Peachy said...

When low level dumb cultists call it "Protesting" - They lie.
Clearly, thanks to the revelation of the highly organized Signal Chats, and the video of Alex Pretti spitting, kicking a tail light so hard he smashed it out, & it looks like a gun in his pants. That is not protesting. It is organized Direct Action.

But lying liars like useful Communist Inag - are going to play the left's corrupt lying game. We all laugh at you, idiot.

Beasts of England said...

I meant to quote this absurdity for the last sentence of my 5:59 post:

’When enforcement is justified by what it uncovers rather than what was lawfully alleged beforehand, enforcement stops being neutral and becomes a mechanism for pursuing the manufactured enemies the cult has been groomed to believe exists.’

Way too funny…

«Oldest ‹Older   1 – 200 of 232   Newer› Newest»

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.