January 2, 2026

"Collectivism" — he spoke the word, as if a wedding vow.

Mamdani said it, he highlighted it: "We will replace the frigidity of rugged individualism with the warmth of collectivism." He promised it. He attributed warmth to it.

The link goes to my post yesterday with that quote as the title. In the comments, I wrote: "He's saying the words that have been left unsaid in the past. In that way, he's like Trump."

Who are the other American politicians who might have said "collectivism" — in a positive way, not as a way of criticizing somebody else? Bernie Sanders, who swore in Mamdani, doesn't use that word.

This blog has a 22-year archive, so I did a search to see how "collectivism" has figured into our discourse. I found 14 items, and I don't think any of them count as a positive use of the word in the style of Zoran Mamdami. 

Here are all the past occurrences of "collectivism" on this blog, in chronological order:

February 27, 2008: From the NYT obituary for William F. Buckley: "Mr. Buckley declared war on this liberal order, beginning with his blistering assault on Yale as a traitorous den of atheistic collectivism immediately after his graduation (with honors) from the university."

August 12, 2008: David Brooks, watching the Olympics opening ceremony in China: "We’ve seen displays of mass conformity before, but this was collectivism of the present — a high-tech vision of the harmonious society performed in the context of China’s miraculous growth."

December 7, 2008: Quoting someone: "[T]he pro-car lobby requires abstract arguments... From Hitler to Margaret Thatcher, car advocates have seen them as literal engines of change; vehicles by which to remake society, whether on the basis of individualism or collectivism."

January 11, 2009: Quoting someone: "Sure, I am all for abominating racism like any other form of odious collectivism... but this hypersensitivity to any politically incorrect use of language is really annoying."

August 12, 2009: Camille Paglia, approving of Sarah Palin's use of the term "death panels," wrote: "As a libertarian and refugee from the authoritarian Roman Catholic church of my youth, I simply do not understand the drift of my party toward a soulless collectivism."

August 14, 2012: Quoting Rush Limbaugh: "[The] 'progressive' argument... assumes there must be someone or some few who do have all the knowledge and information. We just have to find, train, and hire them to run the government’s agencies. Friedrich Hayek called this collectivism’s 'fatal conceit.' The idea that a few bureaucrats know what’s best for all of society, or possess more information about human wants and needs than millions of free individuals interacting in a free market is both false and arrogant. It has guided collectivists for two centuries down the road to serfdom -- and the road is littered with their wrecked utopias."

August 28, 2012: Stanley Fish wrote: "America,  [D'Souza] declares, is an 'empire of ideals' — individual rights, freedom of choice, upward mobility limited only by your willingness to work hard.... In contrast, Obama... is influenced by leftist teachers like Edward Said and Roberto Unger, immerses himself in texts by Marxist, feminist and ant-colonialist authors, and thus fleshes out the lineaments of 'his father’s third world collectivism.'"

August 30, 2012: I wrote: "[Salon's Joan Walsh is] saying you didn't build that — the very phrase Obama is straining to disown. You didn't build that, you can't build that, and you're psychotic if you imagine that you can. She's deeply into the collectivism the Democrats don't want to openly embrace. But she doesn't think she's openly embracing it."

July 16, 2014: On the 50th anniversary of Barry Goldwater's presidential nomination, I quoted his speech: "The good Lord raised this mighty Republic to be a home for the brave and to flourish as the land of the free — not to stagnate in the swampland of collectivism, not to cringe before the bully of communism."

September 19, 2015:
 A quote from The Unabomber Manifesto: "The leftist is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. He wants society to solve everyone’s problems for them, satisfy everyone’s needs for them, take care of them. He is not the sort of person who has an inner sense of confidence in his ability to solve his own problems and satisfy his own needs. The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.... His feelings of inferiority are so ingrained that he cannot conceive of himself as individually strong and valuable. Hence the collectivism of the leftist."

August 27, 2017: A Madison columnist says that another Madison columnist is "throwing off the Madison liberal torpor. Renouncing the creed of collectivism. Escaping the Cult of Victimhood" and will therefore "be called a racist" and is "ruined in Madison."

August 21, 2019: I wrote: "What does Ayn Rand say about race? From Rand's 'Virtue of Selfishness': 'Racism is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism....' I'm not going to go any further into the study of whether Beyonce lyrics accord with Randian philosophy! If my head were full of Beyonce lyrics — which maybe they would be if my last 10 years were my teenage years — I might want to.... But my teenage years were in the 60s. My head is full of Dylan lyrics...."

January 22, 2022:  A study purported to detect a "surge of post-truth political argumentation" and a "historical rearrangement of the balance between collectivism and individualism and — inextricably linked — between the rational and the emotional."

December 7, 2024: Something about the Supreme Court case upholding Tennessee law banning puberty blockers and hormones for transgender children led me to read Wikipedia's description of the reaction to Darwinism in the Soviet Union: "Marxists... perceived a fissure between Marxism and Darwinism. Specifically, the issue is that while the 'struggle for survival' in Marxism applies to a social class as a whole (the class struggle), the struggle for survival in Darwinism is decided by individual random mutations. This was deemed a liberal doctrine, against the Marxist framework of 'immutable laws of history' and the spirit of collectivism."

ADDED: Only one of those examples is my own use of the word: "She's deeply into the collectivism the Democrats don't want to openly embrace." Do they want to openly embrace it now? Maybe not, but it wants to embrace them. Like a creepy uncle, Zohran Mamdani stumbles forward, arms outstretched, offering the warmth of his hugs. 

175 comments:

Dave Begley said...

A number of posts on X (with stats) that Mamdani was elected by foreign-born people living in NYC; many of them being illegal aliens.

The Dems brought these people to the US in order to win elections and destroy America.

Unlike Trump, I want to see this guy to fail in a spectacular fashion.

Shouting Thomas said...

And so, the thievery, rent seeking and money laundering kicks into high gear with no opposition.

wendybar said...

I already avoid NYC and don't see myself ever going back as long as Communists run the city into the ground.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

Collecting Unemployment has some not so soulful connotations. Just saying.

Bart Hall (Kansas, USA) said...

Rugged individualism built America, and to some extent both Canada and Australia as well. "Collectivism" has destroyed many societies and killed countless millions. Nearly led to the failure of both Jamestown and Plimoth.

No brainer. Next slide, please.

Heartless Aztec said...

If "collectivism" only appears fourteen times in the 22 year history of the Althouse chronicles then it's not a particularly important word in and of itself to the discourse here. Given the Profs NYT addiction it's about to become a lot more discoursed - is that even a word? - among us.

tcrosse said...

Rugged individualism is dog eat dog. Collectivism is the other way around.

GatorNavy said...

Much blood has been shed for such an innocuous word. I remember my entire family getting up and walking out of church when a guest MaryKnoll nun praised the collectivism she witnessed during her travels in Central and South America in the 70's.
Unfortunately, the useful idiots in NYC will learn what an evil little word it is indeed.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

Collect taxes. Passing the collection plate. In the American psyche, the word is not, I don’t know, revered? Going to College is probably an exception to that.

gilbar said...

they had a BIG Inauguration for a New Era Block Party to
celebrate the warmth! It was THE MOST AWSOME THING, EVER!
no food
no toilets
no music
no heat
just staffers walking around collecting donations to Mamdani

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/nutrition/zohran-mamdani-fans-disappointed-by-disastrous-block-party-with-no-food-bathrooms/ar-AA1TpKJk

Temujin said...

Any thorough reader of Ayn Rand thinks the word "collectivism" regularly, probably daily, when hearing and seeing the world around us. I am sure this includes more than a few of your commenters.

The concept of individual liberty vs collectivism is a pretty basic one. And given the past century and a quarter, given the lessons in real life that we've seen about what collectivism does to entire cultures and millions of people that went missing....it's inconceivable to me that any breathing adult would nonetheless vote in a socialist or communist in this day and age.

But I have to give in to that nagging thought that I've tried to bury: We learn nothing. Which is why history always repeats itself. For some reason, for a few years, I thought we were smarter than previous generations. As it turns out, not only are we not smarter, we're far less intelligent because we have far more evidence to go on than they had and we still managed to learn nothing.

We're morons. And to watch the press gleefully cover this guy (and that blithering idiot now running Seattle) is par for the course.

Wilbur said...

Merriam-Webster defines collectivism as a political or economic theory advocating collective control especially over production and distribution.

The Althouse Leftist contingent (excepting the newly-minted ones) boycotted the thread yesterday on Mandami's use of the word. Will they do so today? Why so shy?

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

Collectivism, another one of life's simple pleasures ruined by meddling bureaucracy. To paraphrase Letterman’s joke about a time when following garbage trucks was a family activity.

William said...

I live in NYC. The garbage gets collected and crime is down. Maybe things will work out. We got through DeBlasio more or less intact. How much worse can Mamdani be?.......Maybe we'll go the way of Detroit, but if NYC stumbles and falls, don't for a minute think the left will in any way think it's due to their failed policies. Coleman Young presided over the demise of that Detroit, and I have never read anything that pins the blame on him.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

Collectivism, not going to do it, it wouldn’t be prudent.

Goldenpause said...

All the many millions killed by “collectivism” were not available for comment.

rehajm said...

…a strange riff on this I have- before contemplating this entry I saw an image from in the NY Post the people watching the swearing in. NYC has been integral in my life since I was little, grew up nearby, lived there for a time in college, regular business trips as an adult, etc- so I have history with the city. So the image of the people in the crowd standing there, watching I was struck at how odd their faces looked, how…alien. Used to be you could place what borough or neighborhood someone was from but not these people. Alien culture to me…odd…except yes,perhaps they are imports, un-American, not used to our elections…

Duty of Inquiry said...

I predict he will burrow as many of his allies as possible into the government as possible to make sure that the next time the votes are counted he wins.

I also think it is possible the charter is changed to remove that pesky term limit thing.

Michael Fitzgerald said...

I'm currently reading Rand's novel 'We The Living'. Collectivism, Socialism, Communism, all lead to privation, starvation, misery, and squalor. The history is self-evident, the results are clear and invariable, but politics borne of envy, vengeance, cruelty and hatred is animated and empowered by those ideologies.

rehajm said...

…of course none of this exists outside the wake of the economic engine born from freedom to pursue individual needs and desires. Oh the irony…

narciso said...

Only goldwater and rush understood it

Kevin said...

The warmth of collectivism is important when electricity and heat are no longer available.

Blackbeard said...

We need to remember that the people of NYC did NOT select Mamdani. He got about 300,000 votes in the primary, in a city of over 8 million, and, given the way the Democrats in NY have organized elections, that was enough to ultimately put him in city hall.

narciso said...

They will get it 'good and hard' anyways

narciso said...

AAGHarmeetDhillon on X: "Asking questions/citizen journalism are NOT HATE CRIMES in America — they are protected speech, and if Seattle tries to chill that speech, @CivilRights will step in to protect it and set them straight! Govern yourselves accordingly!" / X https://share.google/q1khKzfMeAwIdc3ML

Achilles said...

Dave Begley said...

A number of posts on X (with stats) that Mamdani was elected by foreign-born people living in NYC; many of them being illegal aliens.

The only people who want collectivism are the people who don't build things.

Collectivism is the mother of slavery. Greed is the father.

narciso said...

That was responding to the karen mayor on the west coast

Bob Boyd said...

"the frigidity of rugged individualism" - People who don't want to get fucked by the government.
"the warmth of collectivism" - You're all going to get fucked by the government like it or not.

Nice said...

"So the image of the people in the crowd standing there, watching I was struck at how odd their faces looked"

Crowds are fake. It's all AI now. And before that, they were photo-shopped in.

chuck said...

Even Stalin liked Hollywood westerns.

MadTownGuy said...

Now do collectivism's more common synonym: "It takes a village." How many times did that come up?

Achilles said...

A majority of Mamadani voters should have been deported by now.

It is almost as if Republicans want this to happen.

Aggie said...

Years ago I worked in the FSU, on the Asian steppe. We would fly in on our company plane because our safety group didn't trust Aeroflot's fleet, for very good reasons. We'd refuel in the Ukraine and then land at a regional airport. As soon as you stepped from the plane, you knew where you were - because everything was grey, and the buildings were that unique, low-quality Soviet mass production, ugly, square 2-3 story buildings, modular cement construction. And that dingy grey combination of ugly colors, faded and weatherbeaten, with a patina of pollution, soot, and grime. I used to call them 'Bloc Blocks'.

Then we'd drive to the camp. We had brought in big Ford Power-stroke pickups, and the field camp was an old Czech construction camp, same kind of architect, same modular temporary buildings well past their original design life. The drive was a couple of hours on Soviet roads. No signs, few guard rails, lots of hazards. Collectives. We'd roll past agricultural collective farms, one after another. Wide open empty rolling hills. One after the other, trees only where they had been allowed by Central Planning to be planted as windbreaks to stop that howling wind, to make an attempt at retaining the topsoil. Bleak, sorry little homes scattered among the important thing, the barns and industrial assets. The thing you really noticed though, as we roared through on this night drive, was the absence of light. These collectives would have only a couple of them, harsh industrial light bulbs, bare, where they counted - at the barn doors for instance, so you could see to open them in early morning. Each of the collectives would only have 2 - 3 lights visible. Not a single light shining in a window. The rest was just oppressive darkness. 'Collectivism' has a special meaning for me.

What a capacity for suffering these people had. It left a real impression on me, this pervasive darkness. It's a good thing this thin-wristed, rich pansy doesn't have much real power, and hasn't been on-scene long enough to accumulate a network. But he'll have plenty of thugs around him, all the same. They'll be doing some damage, thanks to the focused operatives that ushered his way through the primaries, and the millions of fools that voted him in with enthusiasm, lest anybody think they're Republicans.

imTay said...

Collectivism is about victory over the “other” inevitably. The subjugation and elimination of those not like us.

imTay said...

A lot like fascism, the other side of the same coin.

Achilles said...

MadTownGuy said...

Now do collectivism's more common synonym: "It takes a village." How many times did that come up?

Someone told me if we elected Trump Hillary would be in jail. Why isn't hillary in jail?

chuck said...

AFAICT, none of Mamdani's appointments have useful experience or competence. It is likely that they will achieve little apart from painting pretty pictures. We will see.

narciso said...

Have you been paying what happened with halligan and habba

imTay said...

“Freedom, that’s just some people talking, your prison is walking this world all alone.” -Desperado

Bob Boyd said...

Just lie back and think of the collective.

Temujin said...

'Aggie' capped this entire thing. We've seen this before. Mamdani introducing it as a nice sounding vehicle works among those completely ignorant of history, economics, or just the world outside of Manhattan.

Bob Boyd said...

@ Aggie
What's the FSU?

Kakistocracy said...

So ….. Apart from public schools, community colleges, the subway, buses, bridges, roads, libraries, public hospitals, clinics, water and sewer systems, electricity grids, sanitation, snow removal, fire services, police, emergency medical services, public housing, parks, playgrounds, zoning, building safety, food inspection, and disease control… all seem to keep popping up wherever there’s collective investment.

One of life’s great mysteries. Yes …. a truly astonishing coincidence.

Disparity of Cult said...

Which of the above have not been in serious decline?

Bob Boyd said...

But where does the money come from for all those things, Kak? One of life’s great mysteries.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

The phrase “warm embrace of collectivism” is destined to be quoted and mocked by all America loving patriots. That he set the phrase as a counterpoint to “rugged individualism” was chef’s kiss perfect in form. Every “socialist” on the stage with him got bloody rich exploiting capitalism and their insider positions as lawmakers and would be worth nothing if they actually believed in collectivism.

But they don’t. It’s a con. Ironically the same people who insist Trump is a con man are running this long con on their supporters, similar to socialist party hacks everywhere, as they live in their multiple luxury homes paid for by the People and criticize the president who earned his wealth in the private sector and owns mansions paid for with his own money.

Christopher B said...

public schools, community colleges, the subway, buses, bridges, roads, libraries, public hospitals, clinics, water and sewer systems, electricity grids, sanitation, snow removal, fire services, police, emergency medical services, public housing, parks, playgrounds, zoning, building safety, food inspection, and disease control

As if none of those things existed before Mamdani and his ilk thought of them.

The DSA has not taken over the Democrat Party (and the RINO portion of the GOP). They just dropped the mask.

Breezy said...

Because our K-12 schools have failed us, perhaps some enterprising creators should develop a series of short PSAs, privately funded, that teach the historic lessons of collectivism vs individualism. If the video quality is high, the dialogue compelling, the series may just help people understand what’s ahead.

The Vault Dweller said...

@tcrosse 6:56 am

I got a pretty good laugh at that.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

I will observe the slow motion train wreck as it engulfs New York and enjoy using it as a cautionary tale in the future.

Wince said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Larry J said...

Goldenpause said...
“All the many millions killed by “collectivism” were not available for comment.”

Indeed. When the Soviet Union imposed collective farming on Ukraine, millions starved to death. When China imposed collectivism during its Great Leap Forward, tens of millions died. Collectivism is a word with a tainted history.

Achilles said...

Abdisalam Abdi Ali was appointed Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation of Somalia in May 2025.

Born in Somalia but building a life in the U.S., Ali established Ritechoice Healthcare Services LLC in Toledo, Ohio, over a decade ago. Shockingly, two additional healthcare companies operate out of the same office suite.

The company specializes in home health care, providing services such as nursing aides and therapy to vulnerable populations, including the elderly and disabled.

These operations have reportedly received substantial funding from U.S. government programs like Medicaid and Medicare, which reimburse providers for caring for low-income patients.


Meanwhile my dad can't get anything from medicare in Washington state. He has to pay for everything.

Well My brother and I have to pay for everything.

That is the collective at work.

RideSpaceMountain said...

Forced "Collectivism"...It's a bold move cotton. Let's see if it works out for him.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

Weird how we keep having foreigners try to impose collectivism on us. Just another job actual Americans won’t do!

TosaGuy said...

Someone owns Mamdani and he won’t be allowed to go after their money. The rest of his time will be spent redirecting the graft towards his people.

Curious George said...

"If I can make it there
I'll make it
Anywhere
It's up to you
New York, New York"

Frank's rolling over in his grave.

narciso said...

The bacardis thought that about fidel they were mistaken

bagoh20 said...

Think about how prosperity happens every single time, everywhere it happens. Think of the process, the details of transactions, of people making choices, of people striving to achieve their dreams, of all those millions of individual decisions, from big corporate deals to a person deciding to stay late at work and finish something important to them. That's capitalism: wide-reaching and self-sustaining like a bonfire that builds without the unscalable limitations of a few small unimaginative minds trying to control it.

How does collectivism do that? Simple. I doesn't. It can be faked for a very short time, but that's the beauty of capitalism. It doesn't need to be forced. It just needs air.

Dogma and Pony Show said...

"We need to remember that the people of NYC did NOT select Mamdani. He got about 300,000 votes in the primary, in a city of over 8 million, and, given the way the Democrats in NY have organized elections, that was enough to ultimately put him in city hall."

Regardless, based on polling data and the overall reception Mamdani was getting before the election, he was supported by at least a near-majority of NYers.

Wince said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dunham said...

Exactly Kakistocracy! Working together to improve society is the whole point but instead people just prefer to give our rights, money and power to the oligarchs.

narciso said...

About half turned out against him, even in this small sample

Dogma and Pony Show said...

Collectivism is Marxism. It says that society is comprised of groups, and what you deserve to have happen to you depends on what group you're in.

Aggie said...

@Bob Boyd: FSU = Former Soviet Union.

bagoh20 said...

Now describe how collectivism works without using a word that means forced, or describing something only imagined but never lived.

Achilles said...

TosaGuy said...

Someone owns Mamdani and he won’t be allowed to go after their money. The rest of his time will be spent redirecting the graft towards his people.


Collectivism is pushed by the .00001% to keep the 1% under control.

Wince said...

August 21, 2019: [Althouse] wrote...
"But my teenage years were in the 60s. My head is full of Dylan lyrics...."

Althouse's Headline today...
"'Collectivism' — he spoke the word, as if a wedding vow."

A self-ordained professor’s tongue
Too serious to fool
Spouted out that liberty
Is just equality in school
“Equality,” I spoke the word
As if a wedding vow
Ah, but I was so much older then
I’m younger than that now


Maybe Mamdani's "Back Pages" truly are the Communist Manifesto? For now, it looks NYC will have to suffer through Mamdani's "so much older then" phase for a while.

Crimson flames tied through my ears
Rollin’ high and mighty traps
Pounced with fire on flaming roads
Using ideas as my maps
“We’ll meet on edges, soon,” said I
Proud ’neath heated brow
Ah, but I was so much older then
I’m younger than that now

Half-wracked prejudice leaped forth
“Rip down all hate,” I screamed
Lies that life is black and white
Spoke from my skull. I dreamed
Romantic facts of musketeers
Foundationed deep, somehow
Ah, but I was so much older then
I’m younger than that now

Girls’ faces formed the forward path
From phony jealousy
To memorizing politics
Of ancient history
Flung down by corpse evangelists
Unthought of, though, somehow
Ah, but I was so much older then
I’m younger than that now

A self-ordained professor’s tongue
Too serious to fool
Spouted out that liberty
Is just equality in school
“Equality,” I spoke the word
As if a wedding vow
Ah, but I was so much older then
I’m younger than that now

In a soldier’s stance, I aimed my hand
At the mongrel dogs who teach
Fearing not that I’d become my enemy
In the instant that I preach
My pathway led by confusion boats
Mutiny from stern to bow
Ah, but I was so much older then
I’m younger than that now

Yes, my guard stood hard when abstract threats
Too noble to neglect
Deceived me into thinking
I had something to protect
Good and bad, I define these terms
Quite clear, no doubt, somehow
Ah, but I was so much older then
I’m younger than that now

Dogma and Pony Show said...

What is Mamdani's actually governing strategy? From what I gather, part of it will be to impose huge fines on landlords that can be leveraged to seize their properties. I suppose he'll also use the Obama scheme of having various interest groups sue the city over some dubious grievance so that his administration can dump loads of money on them via "settlement."

Kakistocracy said...

The city’s personal income tax rate on earnings over $1 million will increase by 2 percentage points to 5.9%, and the top corporate tax rate will match New Jersey’s at 11.5%.

These are hardly “communist” as some would characterize Mamdani.

Achilles said...

bagoh20 said...

Think about how prosperity happens every single time, everywhere it happens. Think of the process, the details of transactions, of people making choices, of people striving to achieve their dreams, of all those millions of individual decisions, from big corporate deals to a person deciding to stay late at work and finish something important to them. That's capitalism: wide-reaching and self-sustaining like a bonfire that builds without the unscalable limitations of a few small unimaginative minds trying to control it.

About 1% of the population is responsible for most of that work and the 1% prefers an educated responsible middle class that make dependable honest employees.

How does collectivism do that? Simple. I doesn't. It can be faked for a very short time, but that's the beauty of capitalism. It doesn't need to be forced. It just needs air.

Capitalism absolutely needs to be forced. It has only happened in a few places and it has to be protected. Barbarians surround every capitalist project waiting to loot it.

The natural order for humanity is poverty and barbarism. Capitalism is the exception, not the rule. We need to be more proactive in destroying barbarians in our midst.

Beasts of England said...

I saw the collectivism quote on FB and assumed it was the Babylon Bee. Enjoy the reaming, NYC!! This will be exciting to watch… lol

Bob Boyd said...

"Matt Taibbi on his disgust at Mehdi Hassan, Jamal Bowman, and Hasan Piker doing USSR nostalgia at Mamdani’s victory party:

‘I could fill a whole book with stories of horrible things I heard and saw from eyewitnesses to the Soviet history. And to see people laughing about that shit, I can’t even describe the emotions.

When I saw some of those clips [from Mamdani’s party], I went through in my mind, I started cataloging all the top 20 or 30 awful things that I heard, and I just want to share one.
And one of the things that they did at that time period is that they didn’t even want to waste money on bullets for the kulaks. So what they would do is just declare you a kulak, you and your family, and then there would be a proclamation that it would be illegal for anybody in the area to give shelter to that person and his family and his kids. So for years on end, people went to bed at night to the sound of people freezing to death, kids screaming at night in the Soviet Union, because that’s how they liquidated the kulak class.' "

https://x.com/feelsdesperate/status/1988807753779830839

narciso said...

It has to arise organically it cant be forced it can be encoursged like pinochets chile mileis argentina thatchers england etc

imTay said...

“Don’t you draw the queen of diamonds, boy, she’ll beat you if she’s able, you know the queen of hearts is always your best bet.”

They have been programming this for a long time, but I am with Achilles, it’s a bait and switch, they sell us on taking care of our own, like Kak here, but when the rubber hits the road, they are taking from us to take care of their own, freshly imported from overseas in order to cement their political power.

bagoh20 said...

Nobody works for the collective good on a sustained basis. All those public works were actually done by people collecting checks to feed their own families, and the vast majority of work was done by private industry as contactors and suppliers. Those parts most collectively managed are always the highest cost and lowest quality, because they are incentivized to check minimum boxes and to grease palms and talk, rather than building and maintaining a personal reputation for quality or skill in making things and getting them done economically and well.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

So fitting that he inaugurated at a train station built by rugged individuals but closed down in a collectivist fervor by party hacks who preceded Mandami because as I wrote above his administration will be a bigger TRAIN WRECK than the Puxatawny Phil killer DeBlasio, last seen failing to account for $5M in "collective tax dollars" with which his woke wife was entrusted.

Damn near poetic in form.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

My bad. Mrs. DeBlasio misplaced $5 billion! Oopsie. Commies are so absentminded aren't they.

Rusty said...

If you stand real still and listen closely you can hear "The Internationale"
BTW Where is comrade Bob?

Iman said...

Is there a non-violent, quick fix for “STUPID”?

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

Capitalism requires the Rule of Law to succeed but the act of free trade preceded the rule of law because humans have always bartered and traded with others. Specialization and acquired expertise are natural and unevenly distributed, as economists say.

bagoh20 said...

Capitalism is not forced. It needs protected, but herding cats is a metaphor for failure for a reason. Or to use another one, you get more bees with honey than vinegar. Collectivism needs to be forced at every level and every transaction, which is obviously impossible, but it still tries through absolute and granular control, which always kills spirit, motivation and innovation. How could it not?
I know the adage that capitalism is rare in history, but it's actually not at the micro level where most most human transactions happen. It's rare in conditions of power and government, but even in the most collective environments the part that really works is the private market, whether tolerated or hidden. It's always there, because it must be or the society dies.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

I absolutely love how commies always claim these privately built things are magically "collective works" when running for office. If they told the truth, that the only thing NYC did for subways is preside over their decline after taking them from the entity that built them, it would lose all its mythical cachet.

Big Mike said...

New York City has taken the first step on the road that leads to Snake Plissken.

Amadeus 48 said...

The warmth of collectivism. What could go wrong?

Heat up the ovens! We have a new batch coming in!

All those folks shivering in the gulags in Siberia got to experience the warmth of collectivism at first hand.

And then there were the kulaks...

Paul Zrimsek said...

It really was a singular thing to say. Up to now "collectivism" has always been a thing conservatives and (especially) libertarians accuse liberals of being in favor of-- not a thing the liberals themselves ever say they're in favor of. It's as if a Republican gave a speech promising "trickle-down economics".

RideSpaceMountain said...

TosaGuy said, "Someone owns Mamdani and he won’t be allowed to go after their money."

COBRA COBRA, EAT US LAST!...

John henry said...

Collectivism definitions

Everything within the state,
Nothing outside the state
Nothing against the state

Or

Ownership /control of the means of production /economy by the people/state/govt/admin etc

John Henry

bagoh20 said...

Collectivism starts out depending on private enterprise even as it tries to destroy it, which it eventually has some success at, and that results in failed promises, which eventually convinces the leaders to relax and accept more private enterprise than they want, but they see the success and crave the income. That part in the middle has been from bad to catastrophic in every case, usually depending on how long it lasts. The Soviets died there, the North Koreans are still stuck there, and the Chinese moved beyond it decades back, are now a collective in administration and defense only. There are no cases of collectivism succeeding long term without the private sector saving it.

Aggie said...

It's not about who built that; we've all been told sternly, 'You didn't build that', even if it was with your tax dollars. No. It's not about who built it. It's about who's running it now. All you need is control of the Contracts & Procurement Dept. to get the money flowing to the right places. Then comes the 'collectivism' part.

Paul said...

NYC... meet Communism... and reap what you sow cause I can guarantee you with Trump and Vance at the helm... YOU ARE NOT GONNA BE BAILED OUT.... tough nuts. You did it to yourself.

mezzrow said...

After spending a significant chunk of his lifetime going through more historical transcripts of actual meetings of Stalin and his ever changing cast of comrades than anyone else who writes in English, Stephen Kotkin came to the following conclusion about the ethos that drove them in these private meetings.

"They were Communists."

The heart wants what it wants, and will rearrange the world to comply. So it is with Mamdani. Keep your receipts for the reckoning.

bagoh20 said...

Marxists in power are rarely true believers. They are con artists, and that's what NYC just fell for again. Their agenda is not collectivist ideals, it's wealth and power as always. They will make deals with the private sector via threats and compliance schemes that will enrich those connected and rip off all classes of the public by taxes and bribes from the rich and delivering crap for the middle and poor. Has anyone ever seen a "Marxist" in power that was not living like a king?

Lazarus said...

That is the fantasy: that we could recreate the "warmth" of the family or tribe in the modern bureaucratic world. But it doesn't happen. You get more "cold" and burdensome bureaucracy. You get more red tape -- and outright commands from those in power. In English, the word "collective" even has a very "cold," sterile, and unwelcoming sound compared to "community" or even "society."

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

Achilles, the highly ordered system we have that brought more people out of poverty than any other nation state in history was not "forced." It flourishes under orderly societies and in the shadows of socialist ones. It is inescapable, a part of human nature. I reject the idea and word "capitalism" entirely as it is simply a Marx term he invented to be a straw man argument in juxtaposition to his idea of collectivism. He had no money or skills and resented those that had either or both. Marx was a miserable failure and his invention of envy-driven ideology is his revenge. It is very attractive to lazy losers who covet the wealth they see and don't have. They perceive the socialist system as one that will make them equal to the productive and industrious when the actual promise is that the party leaders will spend the wealth and the "equality" they voted for in practice makes the rich poor like them so they are all equal, equally miserable.

Reject "capitalism" and embrace freedom and the rule of law and the people can prosper.

RCOCEAN II said...

Words like "collectivism" and "Individualism" are meaningless in 2026 America. Is Mark Zuckerberg, Bezos, or Ellison a "individualist"? LOL.

We have the "anti-collectivist" Republican party spending $6 billion to help 3rd worlders come to the USA under the label "Refugees". We have social security, medicare, and medicaid. The Government, state, local, Federal regulate every aspect of the economy and controls 40 percent of the GDP.

Its not 1931 anymore.

RCOCEAN II said...

All these word games just focus everyone away from the concrete issues. Rents in NYC are too high. What are we going to do about it? Houses are so expensive young people can't buy them. What are we going to do about it?

People want the Government to solve problems and increase the quality of life. If you campaign against that, you're gonna lose. Thats why libertarianism is losertarianism.

Peachy said...

COLLECT being the operative word.

As in, pay up suckers.
the left would like to collect as much of your hard working money as they can - so they can blame the Jews and disperse it to their mob bosses and loyalist vote scammers.

wildswan said...

I was amazed when I read about the two parties at the Mamdani inauguration - one, at the inauguration site, for the politically connected and one, some distance off, for the proles. Amazed, because the two parties presented the probable future so clearly and presented that future on Day One. The socialist leaders' party-section had well-dressed people who will benefit from the regime - people like Three House Bernie and AOC, the $30 million dollar barista babe. Then, there was the people's party - no food, no music, no toilets - just a huge screen with a chance to listen to Dear Leader haranguing them while all about them they saw their future - no food, no music, no fun. Just a voice endlessly promising. Just noise.

And that was on Day One.

John henry said...

Slightly off topic but, since it deals with soviet collectivism under Stalin not totally OT

the other day several people recommend Alan furst novels. I downloaded, started reading his Night Soldiers series. About 17%IN And wow what a great book.

I don't remember who recommend it but thank you for a very enjoyable read.

John Henry

Peachy said...

RC Ocean - so you're for rent control?
RC Ocean -@9:47 Homes/rent
Curious what you think the answer is?

wildswan said...

And when they get tired of that empty noise, they'll be presented with scapegoats - the wealthy, the Jews, the whites. Pogroms.
There is, however, an outside world, outside NYC and independent of it. So, we'll see.

Aggie said...

"...Rents in NYC are too high. What are we going to do about it? Houses are so expensive young people can't buy them. What are we going to do about it?"

I was told that NYC has rent control. I'm told that it's been in place for decades. Not true? You mean it isn't working, and they need more rent control? Didn't they just vote for that?

Maybe we need better voter education, so they can vote for the right kind of rent control.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

Government caused the housing shortage and the high rents that result from no supply with high demand. NYC government won’t deregulate the housing market to encourage builders so rents stay high. Since they elected a rich man hoarding a rent-controlled property my guess is that no action will be taken that could reasonably be expected to help the housing shortage in NYC.

Even if they did find vacancies Hochul would just stick illegals in there and use state funds to pay it, further reducing availability for working New Yorkers.

narciso said...

You didnt build that

Peachy said...

Most of the ideologies of the left are based on a "Cult of Victimhood"

Peachy said...

Eternal Victims like to target certain groups / and make life miserable. The misery is part of the show.

Peachy said...

"Capitalism absolutely needs to be forced."
Achilles brings the stupid.

No. never.

Peachy said...

William 7:13.
I think Madmamni will do his best to destroy NYC - and I agree with you - he will not get the blame.

Peachy said...

Housing prices and rents shot up during Crook Joe Biden's rule.
All while NGO's -infused with our tax dollars- flushed thru billions to house Biden's illegals.
Inflation was a biden/covid/ deal. all of the fraud being discovered now also has a lot to do with inflated costs.

narciso said...

The 1940 constitution was the goal like unicorns it didnt exist

Peachy said...

Bagoh nails it.
"Talk rather than build" - is a a succinct way to describe the left. And they do love to hear themselves talk.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

Fox News : "Critics say Mamdani’s vow to swap ‘rugged individualism’ with ‘warmth of collectivism’ has sinister undertone"

Fox News is reading Althouse Blog.

Big Mike said...

Mamdani and his admirers think they can plan an entire city’s economy, and they can’t even plan for Port-a-Potties at an outdoors party.

Christopher B said...

Despite the gaslighting from Kaka-Bich and his sock puppets, collectivism has never been about providing services that are otherwise unobtainable.

Collectivism is about *control*

Control of who gets paid to provide services and, more important, control of who, if anyone, actually gets those services.

Lazarus said...

Socialism is based on nostalgia for hunter-gatherer days, before there was private property. It doesn't work well in modern industrial societies. The attitude of early socialists and anarchists was that private property and capitalism had been "forced" on people by rulers and would disappear if the state were smashed. In many times and places "libertarian" didn't refer to free market thinking, but to anarchism. Socialists followed a different path and learned to love state power and want more and more of it.

"Rugged individualism" -- does that really apply to today's world? We have various kinds of individualism. Do we still have the go-it-alone ruggedness? We already act in groups or "collectives" without being dominated by authoritarian collectivism. Do we need a different word or phrase to fit today's economy?

Ron Winkleheimer said...

"People want the Government to solve problems and increase the quality of life."

Cause they are doing such a great job now.

The post offices around here used to have a drive through lane with some of those blue standalone mailboxes so you could post mail without having to go into the post office. Then one day they took them away because people were breaking into them. Now the USPS has its own sworn law enforcement agency that, among other things, is tasked with investigating mail theft. So, did they put up some cameras and maybe do a stake out so that they could catch the thieves and make an example of them? Nope, much easier to just make elderly people get out of their cars.

Breezy said...

NYC, meet Venezuela.

Given what Trump is engaged in there, it’s not clear he would stand by to allow collectivism to overcome NYC, despite the recent vote in favor. Plus, it’s unconstitutional wrt property rights, at a minimum.

Achilles said...

bagoh20 said...
Capitalism is not forced. It needs protected, but herding cats is a metaphor for failure for a reason.

Most people want to take other people’s stuff. It is a very small percentage of people that an be a business owner or employer.

The United States protected those people from the much larger number of people that they want to take what they build.

The middle class in the USA was for a time a majority of people who were happy to work for those entrepreneurs who were willing to support a middle class lifestyle for the people they employed.

But the .000001% has always wanted their serfs back.

People have this silly idea that freedom and wealth built in the United States are somehow a natural thing that will just happen if you let it.

That is wrong and most Americans haven’t had to go to other places in the world and see the barbarians. They are also shocked that a large number of people will vote for widespread corruption and fraud.

There is a reason why we were never supposed to be a democracy. You people need to wake up and understand what it will take to have a Republic again.

Achilles said...

Breezy said...
NYC, meet Venezuela.

Given what Trump is engaged in there, it’s not clear he would stand by to allow collectivism to overcome NYC, despite the recent vote in favor. Plus, it’s unconstitutional wrt property rights, at a minimum.


Isn’t it shocking that Trump is willing to fight and kill socialists in Venezuela and not do the same in the United States?

bagoh20 said...

I can't believe we still have to explain this shit.
It's like standing at the top of a cliff with a pile of dead bodies (a hundred million) down below and struggling to get people headed for the cliff to turn around.
I blame the universities. Great Job!

narciso said...

Thats why we blow them up over there

Derve said...

Eat the rich.
Not the old ones... they're too tough and nasty.

Shouting Thomas said...

Did anybody really dig into that “frigidity” thing? It’s very telling. It’s a term usually applied to a sexually non-responsive woman. So, the handsome, exotic mayor is going to make the ladies come?

Yancey Ward said...

I think the most probable outcome here is that city hall and the state legislature, which Mamdani needs to implement his avowed policies, will block or water down all them in much the same way they did with DeBlasio. Mamdani will serve two terms while NYC decays slowly as it has done for the last 12 years. The city is slowly bleeding out the people who are actually keep things running.

Yancey Ward said...

A far better outcome is giving Mamdani exactly what he wants- we really do need object lessons in this country.

Peachy said...

Capitalism (private non-coerced industry) is always the host. Communism and socialism always kill the host. Every time it is tried.
No matter what they teach you at the they-them school of eternal victim.

Breezy said...

“Isn’t it shocking that Trump is willing to fight and kill socialists in Venezuela and not do the same in the United States?”

I believe he’s killing terrorists and/or drug runners. I’ve never heard him threaten socialists as a standalone reason. He reacts violently against destructive actions by others, not simply their words.

Robert Cook said...

"A number of posts on X (with stats) that Mamdani was elected by foreign-born people living in NYC; many of them being illegal aliens.

Baloney.

Robert Cook said...

"And so, the thievery, rent seeking and money laundering kicks into high gear with no opposition."

Perennials of capitalism.

Peachy said...

Madmanni was elected because most NYCers didn't even bother to vote.
it doesn't help that the other candidates were terrible. Esp. Cuomo.
the only good candidate was the current Mayor. Mayor Adams. But Adams didn't follow the corrupt script. He complained about the illegals using up the cities resources. A big no no on the corrupt left. why they framed him, and made him toxic.
Communists are good at that.

Achilles said...

Breezy said...
“Isn’t it shocking that Trump is willing to fight and kill socialists in Venezuela and not do the same in the United States?”

I believe he’s killing terrorists and/or drug runners. I’ve never heard him threaten socialists as a standalone reason. He reacts violently against destructive actions by others, not simply their words.

Socialists have killed way more people than terrorists and drug dealers over the last hundred years.

Robert Cook said...

"I already avoid NYC and don't see myself ever going back as long as Communists run the city into the ground."

Ha! More Baloney! It's no wonder you creeps adore a sociopath like Trump: you're the stupid being led by the stupider (sic)!

Achilles said...

narciso said...
Thats why we blow them up over there

They are right here. We don’t need to go anywhere to find barbarians. Venezuela is much farther away from the USA than Minnesota.

Peachy said...

"The real fun will be watching what happens to Mamdani’s net worth over the next 4 to 8 years."

-Stephen Green.

yep.

Robert Cook said...

"Merriam-Webster defines collectivism as a political or economic theory advocating collective control especially over production and distribution."

Hey! It sounds like America!

Peachy said...

madmanni's capitalist dressing wife needs more high fashion.

Peachy said...

Robert Cook - that definition is dangerously close to "Fascism."

That you think that definition is positive - is telling.

Peachy said...

Laughably - "Collective Control" is usually a pack of greedy know-it-all bureaucrats - doing all they can to cheat to win to stay in power.

Peachy said...

No matter how many times dedicated leftist Democratic True-Believers/cultists whine and lie -
The Truth is - The democrat party is 100% corrupt.

Remember - the corrupt democratic party want to see anyone who calls them out for their corruption - murdered.
just like the soviets.

Robert Cook said...

"…a strange riff on this I have- before contemplating this entry I saw an image from in the NY Post the people watching the swearing in. NYC has been integral in my life since I was little, grew up nearby, lived there for a time in college, regular business trips as an adult, etc- so I have history with the city. So the image of the people in the crowd standing there, watching I was struck at how odd their faces looked, how…alien. Used to be you could place what borough or neighborhood someone was from but not these people. Alien culture to me…odd…except yes,perhaps they are imports, un-American, not used to our elections…"

The "alien culture" you see are the children of America's affluent families, relocated to NYC to live a "hip" life. They have driven out (or overwhelmed by numbers) the immigrants and children and grandchildren of immigrants who swarmed to NYC, largely employed as manual workers. Those were the distinctive faces one could discern as living in particular areas of NYC. Today, no matter which borough where one might seek affordable lodgings, prices of lodgings determine that today's newcomers to NYC are largely white immigrants from the land of Suburbia, (or wealthy foreign immigrants). That's the "Alien culture" you see.

John henry said...

“Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed?” said Dr. Ferris. “We want them broken. You’d better get it straight that it’s not a bunch of boy scouts you’re up against — then you’ll know that this is not the age for beautiful gestures. We’re after power and we mean it. You fellows were pikers, but we know the real trick, and you’d better get wise to it. There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted — and you create a nation of lawbreakers — and then you cash in on guilt. Now that’s the system, Mr. Rearden, that’s the game, and once you understand it, you’ll be much easier to deal with.”

John henry said...

Former Vietnamese Foreign Minister Nguyen Co Thach famously acknowledged in 1989 that strict rent controls had severely damaged Hanoi’s housing infrastructure, stating,

“The Americans couldn’t destroy Hanoi, but we have destroyed our city by very low rents,” and that the government had realized the policy was “stupid” and needed to change.

Earnest Prole said...

One of the most amusing things about American politics is the conspiracy between Mamdani lovers and Mamdani haters to imagine he has vast powers that will unilaterally transform New York.

bagoh20 said...

"Collective Control" of someone else's stuff. You don't need the government to control your own stuff. Political power is for controlling stuff you didn't make, pay for, or maintain, which the collective never handles for you when they take control.

RCOCEAN II said...

They're not making anymore land in NYC. Why is that so hard to understand? Trying to decrease rents by increasing "Supply" in a city of 8 million people isn't going to work.

Anyway, a political platform of "I got mine jack, fuck you" isn't going to be successful. Its a loser.

narciso said...

The city council, is not likely to offer much resistance other bodies not so much

Hassayamper said...

Socialists have killed way more people than terrorists and drug dealers over the last hundred years.

Indeed they have, in fact more than all the common murderers of any stripe, put together, by several orders of magnitude.

38 nations officially adopted the principles of Marxism over the past century. 36 of them have abandoned it, but the pile of corpses it left in its wake was at least 100 million high, and perhaps as much as 250 million.

If there were any identifiable group that most richly deserved an expansion of Trump's war of extermination on the drug runners to remove the most truly perilous threats to our nation, it would be curtains for anyone espousing the principles of Marxism.

narciso said...

Jay Bhattacharya on X: ""The warmth of collectivism." Sheesh. https://t.co/1ZlY5YpIUQ" / X https://share.google/K5oViRS3A5mCDe2XI

narciso said...

Much of the property is in the hands of the authorities gah

boatbuilder said...

Robert Cook - that definition is dangerously close to "Fascism."

It is sad commentary that calling it "Fascism" is considered a worse charge than calling it what it is--Communism. Communism just cuts out the middleman. In the misery and cruelty sweepstakes, fascism is running way behind.

narciso said...

Yes stalin would not be as forthcoming aa dr ferris or o'brien in 1984

Vance said...

So the leftist defense to "Mamdami is a Muslim communist who will implement horrible policies!" is not a "No, he would never do that!" It's not "No, his policies won't be horrible!" It's "Oh, don't worry, other people will keep him in check! Praise Mamdani and diversity!"

So the best outcome Cook and his fellow leftists have is hoping that Mamdani is too powerless to implement his open agenda of communism and Muslim gang rape of all the women and children. But we are supposed to celebrate the victory of "Diversity" over things like "America" I guess.

boatbuilder said...

They're not making anymore land in NYC. Why is that so hard to understand? Trying to decrease rents by increasing "Supply" in a city of 8 million people isn't going to work.

Anyway, a political platform of "I got mine jack, fuck you" isn't going to be successful. Its a loser.


A simple question, RC--are you going to give up your place (apartment?home?) to someone who isn't willing to pay what it costs, but who is deemed more deserving? How does it work?

Another question: When they build all those "affordable" apartments, are the "nice" ones* going to be available to everyone, or just to those with "connections?"

*Before they go completely to crap, like every single public housing project everywhere, every time.

It sounds to me like you think that demand should somehow be reduced. How do you do that? (I think Mandami has a plan which will drastically reduce demand, but I don't think you're going to like it.)

narciso said...

The esser wing of the nazis (which included rohm) was foolish enough to think that nationalization would happen

JK Brown said...

I've noticed even conservative influencers condemning individualism. The young have been indoctrinated to conservatism well.

Gemeinnutz geht vor Eigennutz (i.e., the commonweal ranks above private profit), is likewise the idea underlying the American New Deal and the Soviet management of economic affairs. It implies that profit-seeking business harms the vital interests of the immense majority, and that it is the sacred duty of popular government to prevent the emergence of profits by public control of production and distribution." ---von Mises, Ludwig. (1947) Planned Chaos

Mason G said...

"New York City has taken the first step on the road that leads to Snake Plissken."

Snake Plissken? I thought he was dead.

Clyde said...

Collectivism is anathema to real Americans, because it turns the proper relationship between citizen and government on its head. Collectivist movements, whether Communist or Fascist, believe that the State is supreme, and the people should be subjects under its control. Americans, by contrast, believe in liberty for themselves and that the People should be citizens who control the government, not vice versa.

FullMoon said...

Unless this guy does something to piss off the people who voted for him, he will easily get reelected, and will eventually run for gov.
What could he possibly do to alienate his voters? And, more immigrants will be voting next cycle, which is good for him.
He will give free stuff to poor and low income. Not going to affect middle class. Taxes go up, low income don't pay anyway, so they will not change their vote.
Crime statistics don't matter unless you are a victim, or know a victim.
Public defecation and urination isn't personal if you are not in the area.
So, what can he do to lose votes? DeBlasio was terrible and he had no problem being reelected.

wendybar said...

"Identify all the individualists in this picture. Now identify all the collective..."

https://x.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/2006931886288036260?

bagoh20 said...

Nice link, wendy. That's perfect.

narciso said...

Im reminded colectivos are the name of the militia in venezuela

Big Mike said...

Snake Plissken? I thought he was dead.

@Mason G., he married Mrs. Zorro, lives forever in our hearts.

Big Mike said...

@Mason G., oops. Wrong action hero.

Mea Sententia said...

On TikTok I follow a New York woman who grew up in the old Soviet Union. She does not speak warmly of the warmth of collectivism.

Spiros said...

Leftists align themselves with Islamists like Mamdani in the name of anti-imperialism and solidarity. But the Iran Revolution offers a grim warning -- the Ayatollah massacred tens of thousands of Leftists almost immediately after the Revolution succeeded. Women's rights stood in the way of "true" Islamic governance and were radically restricted.

Why do the Leftists believe that Islamists will tolerate a classless society and secular (!!!!) governance? It's like their anti-White racism and anti-Semitism has blinded them to reality.

Greg The Class Traitor said...

Mamdani said it, he highlighted it: "We will replace the frigidity of rugged individualism with the warmth of collectivism." He promised it. He attributed warmth to it.

Well, those burning in Hell are indeed warm

narciso said...

Kolyma was a might on the cold side

Jim at said...

Working together to improve society is the whole point but instead people just prefer to give our rights, money and power to the oligarchs.

Want to know how Mamdani got elected? Because too many voters believe stupid shit like the quote above.

Nice said...

I just spoke with my neighbor who's family is in NYC right now. The streets of Upper West Side are Unbothered and couldn't care less. Downtown, Midtown= same. The people crabbing about this don't live in, and not connected to NY. In NYC, the rich are too loaded to be financially affected by any of his policies no matter how anti-capitalist, and the poor don't pay taxes; too stupid to know any better and/or too wealthy to care.

Maynard said...

We all know that Cookie is an "intellectual;" Marxist. One should not be surprised that he will defend his fellow traveler.

There really is no reason to argue with these people.

They have the moral high ground. If you do not agree, you must suffer the consequences.

Peachy said...

JK Brown:
"I've noticed even conservative influencers condemning individualism. The young have been indoctrinated to conservatism well."

These fake conservatives are just bully bois - paid off by the same dark forces that run drudge.

Butkus51 said...

so many books, so many ignorant people

Rusty said...

Comrade Bob. It's easy to be a socialist,(or whatever you're calling yourself), when you're enjoying the benefits of capitalism.
You haven't refused your pension, have you?

Greg The Class Traitor said...

Working together to improve society is the whole point but instead people just prefer to give our rights, money and power to the oligarchs.

Socialism is ALL about giving "our rights, money and power to the oligarchs" called "politicians" and their hangers on.

You have to be world class stupid to even pretend to believe that socialist politicians are anything other the power mad thugs who aspire to be oligarchs

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.