I'm reading "FBI to release Jeffrey Epstein video ‘confirming suicide in cell’/Dan Bongino, the deputy director of the agency, hopes the video will end speculation that Epstein’s death was suspicious" (London Times).
If they're "working on cleaning it up" and "mak[ing] sure" it's "enhanced," then people are going to think there were "shenanigans." If the video is "clear as day," why do they need to clean it up and enhance it? Well, I guess he's saying we'll see "the original" and the cleaned-up, enhanced version that will influence how we look at what we'll see in that "original." I expect people to deny that they are seeing what the enhanced version is nudging us to see and to question whether the original is really the original.
I was just listening to the newest episode of Joe Rogan, where subject of Epstein comes up:
JOE: They were gonna release the Epstein files Day One. Right?... What happened? What happened? What happened? If that's what you wanted to do before you got the job and then you got the job and — Day One — you couldn't do it. Okay. So what are we saying? Are we saying that this is, this is more complicated?... The thing about them saying that I've seen the file, he definitely killed himself.... That famous HBO autopsy guy... looked at the autopsy, he looked at what had happened to Epstein's body, said, this is indicative of someone being strangled to death.... Did you ever see what Epstein's cellmate looked like?... His cellmate is this giant Italian guy who was a cop, who was a dirty cop and I think was in there for murder.... You put a murderer in with the guy who's the most high profile witness and defendant in history dealing with a sex slave operation for elites.... If a guy's in jail for four life sentences....
JAMIE: One of them is strangling someone to death with a zip tie.
JOE: Oh, Jesus... He strangled someone to death with a zip tie. He tortured him....
JAMIE: ... though he wasn't technically his cellmate at the time of the death, he was moved.
JOE: Hey, they moved me! Don't worry about it! I wasn't even there, bro!... I was just 2 cells down and my door was locked for sure!... If they have video, I mean, please show it so I can prove my innocence....
49 comments:
With AI, how can you be certain about whatever they show you.
I doubt these people would coverup an Epstein suicide, but the optics could be better.
It would be nice if they would explain, in words that intelligent people can understand, why it has taken so long. Maybe they have, but I missed it.
And I am generally a Bongino fan.
The cameras were turned off.
We should never get past that fact.
What is going on? Someone has something big on someone big. What is it?
Yah, if you wanna quash the very justified suspicions and restore some faith in government you release what you have- everything and let the public draw their own conclusions. You can explain what you have but don't lead with a 'plain as day' statement. That itself is fuel for the fire...it must be difficult for anyone inside of government, newbie or oldster, to realize how much faith has been destroyed in people's trust of what they're being told...
If they told you, you can do it yourself and here's how or this giant Italian ex-cop multiple murderer can do it and we'll say you did it yourself, which would you choose?
When someone says "Day 1," I take that to mean it's a priority, not that they will literally do it on Day 1. Especially since they can't know what is involved in releasing the video.
It's been a few months--maybe longer than it should have been, but Epstein died over 5 years ago and I really don't want this to be the highest thing on their list, so I'm glad it wasn't regardless of the "Day 1" talk.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. In this case the extraordinary claim is that Epstein hanged himself with a bedsheet from a bunkbed.
I think most people who joke about "Epstein not killing himself" are joking about the discomfitting fact that an intelligence asset/agent that kills themselves doesn't alleviate the motivation for why they killed themselves. History is replete with examples of zealots choosing death before debriefing.
So let's not split hairs counting angels on pins....Epstein didn't kill himself.
Peachy said...The cameras were turned off.
We should never get past that fact.
I know a New York cop--I run most of my police-scandal opinions (Derek Chauvin is another) past him before I decide how I feel about it. His view at t time was that every "anomaly" that supposedly indicates a cover-up--cameras not working, guards not where they are supposed to be, etc.--is actually just how things run normally in New York prisons.
There is nothing suspicious about any of it.
I don't want to watch a video of someone committing suicide. I hope "cleaning it up" means it goes out on the internet with black boxes over parts of it. Anyone who wants to watch the snuff film version can access the original.
Of course he won't blow the lid of Jeff Epstein as if that was ever in the cards. Trump used to fly around on Lolita Express with Clinton scumbags.
This is your reminder that Trump used to party with both Epstein AND P Diddy. That is pretty awesome. Epstein AND Diddy. Who else has that kind of grab 'em by the pussy cred?
https://www.nancyjosales.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/DonaldTrump2.pdf
How Epstein died is less important to me than who his customers were.
I'm not impressed with the same pathetic attempts to smear Trump because decades ago he associated with Epstein. Trump called the cops on Epstein and no longer associated with him afterwards. Guilt by association is a logical fallacy, but I expect no less from people that cannot form rational arguments.
The problem with the "prison business as usual" explanation is that Epstein was very very high profile, and highly public; the FBI, the CIA, and the press were all over the handling of Epstein. The idea* that the prison authorities were simply negligent is preposterous.
*Joe Biden ruined "the idea" as a phrase, but whatever...
The rise of deep fake voices (e.g., Jordan Peterson and the lobster song) and AI video has rendered all electronic "recordings" suspect forevermore. Will this turn out to be a faked video feed, a la the Ocean's 11 vault?
When computers first hit the scene, it became tough to separate real from fake documents. The old USSR went back to torn matchbooks as a form of ID (one half given to each person). Torn paper matches perfectly, and is very hard to fake.
Physical evidence is still mostly real, but genetic engineering may soon make DNA tests useless as evidence.
As the world turn, every dystopian sci-fi plot comes true. I'm waiting for time travel.
With all the public suspicion so widely expressed, and the confidence of the public so low, why would they withhold this information until now? This video could have been released or at least described when it happened, and much of the suspicion avoided, although many, including me, would still not trust the previous administration about anything.
All of Epstein's properties were infected with cameras. Where are the recordings?!
It's easy to say that if you're Dan Bongino you should "release what you have- everything and let the public draw their own conclusions" (rehahm, 9:22am), but that is clearly impossible in this case. Much of the evidence is videos of adult males (and maybe females) having sex with children. It's grossly illegal for anyone except an authorized member of law enforcement to even view such films. They can only be released to the public with black rectangles added to make them PG or R instead of XXX. Whether they can be sanitized enough to show in court without covering all the details that clearly demonstrate the guilt of the adult participants is a good question.
Should DOJ at least release the names right now? That's not so easy, either, because you have to disambiguate them first. There's a 'John Roberts' on the flight logs? Hah It must be the Chief Justice! Or maybe it's the Fox news commentator, or the actor/comedian, or the British businessman, or one of the other dozen or so living John Robertses on the Wikipedia John Roberts disambiguation page, or one of the hundreds of John Robertses in the world not famous enough to be on that page. If you're Dan Bongino, you need to make damned sure you get the right one, and can prove it, before naming him. If the only way you can prove it is to show some kiddie porn with him in it, we're back to problem 1.
The election was in November, and the inauguration was in January. Nobody likes a tease, Dan.
I thought the controversy around it was that they didn't have video.
I concur with Dr. Weevil. I also understand foolish statements were made that it would be easy, only to discover that it isn't so easy. I'm patient enough to wait but can agree that waiting is easier without the tease of something being imminent.
Trump hopped a ride on his neighbor's jet once, from West Palm Beach to NYC, not to the famous island. He later banned Epstein from Mar a Lago after Epstein approached one of his staff.
Donnie was good pals with Jeffie and it’s been documented that he rode on the Lolita Express with him on multiple occasions.
Maybe it’s not that he committed suicide that people doubt, it’s that he was conveniently allowed to commit suicide, to protect powerful pedos, like Donnie?
Joe Bar said, "All of Epstein's properties were infected with cameras. Where are the recordings?!"
Tel Aviv, by way of Langley, after the corporation made duplicates.
...and no, THOSE you will never see.
How can the DoJ release info on any of his clients unless they're indicting them? Has the statute of limitations run out on most of them by now--was that the point of years of inaction? Looks like his innocent "friends," if there were any, would want their names cleared, but how?
TBH lives down to her filthy pseudonym by lying about Trump and Epstein. He once accepted a ride on Epstein's plane between Miami and New York City. There is no evidence whatsoever of "multiple" rides, much less of even one flight to Epstein's island in the Caribbean, which is what honest people mean when they say "Lolita Express".
"Trump hopped a ride on his neighbor's jet once, from West Palm Beach to NYC, not to the famous island. He later banned Epstein from Mar a Lago after Epstein approached one of his staff."
No ONCE. Six times or so. One time he rode to DC with this guy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Middleton_(businessman)
I'm sure they were "draining the swamp." 🤣😂🤣
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/ghislaine-maxwell-epstein-donald-trump-flight-logs-b1980802.html
🤯 BTW, Mark Middleton "committed suicide" with a shotgun *30 feet away* while he was hanging by a tree. Nothing to see here.
Right on cue, Trump is considering pardoning his old pal Diddy. Cannot make this shit up.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14764801/diddy-sean-combs-trial-live-updates-latest-lawyer-testimony-mia-cassie.html
Jeffrey Epstein shows how thin the line between James Bond and a James Bond villain is. Give Bond a few billions, a couple of mansions and an island of his own and would he behave that much differently from Goldfinger or Dr. No?
Dr.Weevil, at LEAST 6 rides you ninnie.
I’m starting to think that people who devote themselves to defending Cheeto Pedo might be delusional or are being intentionally dishonest.
@Lazarus, I don't recall 007 liking underage girls. Billions in gambling losses, Cirrhosis of the liver, more legal bunnies than the playboy mansion stuffed in every nook and cranny, and justified paranoia that someone's coming to kill him I could see.
Chasing jailbait while trying to steal nuclear submarines I do not. Epstein was a monster, and not even Fleming could've dreamed him up.
If you're going to insist on "at LEAST 6 rides" you might want to also point out that (as I said) none of them were to Epstein's Caribbean island or anywhere near it, that all were in 1993-94, long before Epstein was known to be a pedophile, and that pervs using Epstein for access to underage girls wouldn't take their wives and kids along. Who are the ninnies here? DDD and TBH.
“Long before Epstein was KNOWN to be a pedophile.”
That’s super funny. I hope this is satire.
Like Donnie’s close pal Jeffery Epstein was a fine upstanding citizen until he was just struck by a bolt of lighting and became a pedo.
Keep it coming! That shits hilarious
Police first investigated Epstein in 2005, and he was first charged with a crime in 2006. Was he already molesting underage girls a dozen years before? If even the police didn't know, how was Trump supposed to know? Only a lying swine would call him a pedophile on that timeline. The fact that Trump stopped accepting rides from Epstein more than ten years before the police began investigating suggests that he decided Epstein wasn't someone he wanted to hang around with long before he or anyone else had any hard evidence of crime. Anyone who calls him a "close pal" is an obvious and stupid liar.
My good Doctor, you know as well as I do that Donnie knew before the police because he was right there with his buddy, raping and finger blasting away happily….until it became known.
All we know for fact is that Donnie was extremely close friends with a pedophile, to the point where they traveled together many, many times. This fact makes it more than likely, that they diddled lots and lots of little girls together.
The weirdos here claim many facts. I see them as Jethro Bodine reciting ought oughts is ought, one ought is ought…
Just like Trump fought pedophilia by teaming up with Jeffrey Epstein, he's now cleaning up the crypto industry by selling his own meme coin as president. But the left is too stupid to understand this level of four-dimensional chess.
Three round trips on the same plane is "many, many times"? All we know for fact is that TBH is an evil and sick-minded individual who almost certainly has some images on her PC that the police would be very interested in.
You know who doesn’t have to manufacture excuses for palling around with someone who rapes children?
Someone who doesn’t pal around with those who rape children.
Dr. Evil,
You are the one worshipping and defending an associate of a child rapist, you sick fuck.
If you live in a glass house, don’t throw stones, you ninnie.
Neither I nor anyone I've ever met "worships" Trump, which means that you are a liar and a "sick fuck", as your very pseudonym illustrates. Have a miserable life trapped in the living Hell that is your own foul mind.
"You are the one worshipping and defending an associate of a child rapist, you sick fuck."
Nobody is buying this crap. We have Hunter Biden's own video on his laptop of his own adventures in child rape and none of it bothered you until it became clear to you guys that Biden was going to lose. Still you don't really care. We have the word of a young woman who said that the video that looked like Biden grabbing her nipples when she was twelve was exactly what it looked like. None of this bothered you in the least, but now I know, you didn't even vote for him, am I right? Nobody did. I don't know where that 80 million number came from when every Democrat denies it.
James Bond might have had objections to statutory rape -- he didn't seem to have any qualms about "rape rape" -- but surely he was smart enough to know that stealing nuclear weapons would bring such blowback as to be counterproductive. The way for secret services and super villains to wield power is to work behind the scenes and not call attention to themselves. With enough money and connections, it's possible to start out as a secret agent and work one's way up to supervillain.
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.