January 4, 2021

"If Congress purported to overturn the results of the Electoral College, it would not only exceed [its] power, but also establish unwise precedents."

"First, Congress would take away the power to choose the president from the people, which would essentially end presidential elections and place that power in the hands of whichever party controls Congress. Second, Congress would imperil the Electoral College, which gives small states like Arkansas a voice in presidential elections. Democrats could achieve their longstanding goal of eliminating the Electoral College in effect by refusing to count electoral votes in the future for a Republican president-elect. Third, Congress would take another big step toward federalizing election law, another longstanding Democratic priority that Republicans have consistently opposed. Thus, I will not oppose the counting of certified electoral votes on January 6. I’m grateful for what the president accomplished over the past four years, which is why I campaigned vigorously for his reelection. But objecting to certified electoral votes won’t give him a second term—it will only embolden those Democrats who want to erode further our system of constitutional government."

281 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 281 of 281
Ken B said...

Ken B: “By using paper ballots, voter id, and hand counting we can have reliable voting.”
QWinn: “Hell no, I want Kamala Harris to be able to learn exactly how each person voted.”

Qwinn said...

How is Kamala going to find out whose fingerprint is on the ballot? There isn't going to be a name on it.

And is Kamala really going to travel to my precinct in Bucks County, PA to figure out how I voted? Because that's the only place that information could be legally stored.

I modified the system in order to preserve as much of the "secret ballot" as possible. But what we've learned in this election is that as long as the ballot is secret, as long as there isn't any way for a voter to verify that their vote wasn't "adjudicated" to some asshole's liking, then infinite fraud is infinitely possible. Don't get pissed off at me for getting rid of the secret ballot, get pissed at the election thieves who've made the cost of a secret ballot intolerably high.

Gahrie said...

WTF?!

I didn't repudiate a thing.

You gratuitously included me in a list where I didn't belong, (you know, a "cheap shot") and I called you out on it. You responded with a smug "I'm Canadian so I'm better" comment and I responded with a fuck you Canada comment. Than for whatever reason you accused me of opposing voter fraud which indicated your complete ignorance of my opinions, and when I called you out on that, you responded with some nonsense about me repudiating voter id.

You're a fucking troll and a bad one at that. At least Inga and Chuckles appear to be able to keep people straight.

Now go away before I taunt you again.

DINKY DAU 45 said...

-- that's bull. There are plenty of people who have testified under oath to what they witnessed and who are believable veteran poll watchers, sincere patriotic Americans who are not even partisan.

response then why cant those people prove it in court? good question!

Cant find answer on this page from person questioned ? No response after a challenge, meaning ,there is no good answer... thats' the assumption correct? sounds like all the other evidence trump had in courts 1 for 65 the count so far... I would say pretty crappy lawyers on that side RUDY??? THE KRACKEN LADY,,,RUDYS LADY FRIEND AT THE HEARING...YIKES! ITS LIKE SNL... :)

Qwinn said...

"response then why cant those people prove it in court? good question!"

Ignorant and utterly useless question.

Follow me carefully here:

The PA Supreme Court is an elected body. In 2015, fraud was committed in that election to get the Democrats voted. Despite a court sending a man to jail for committing fraud in that election, the Democrats elected by that fraud stayed on the SC.

Then, those same justices dismantled every single voter integrity measure in PA, despite not having the authority to do so.

Then, those same justices overruled lower courts that DID rule in Trump's favor, on the bullshit claim that 3 weeks after the election wasn't "timely" enough to file a lawsuit over voter fraud.

Every time you people appeal to the authority of these utter criminals, you merely confirm that you are idiots at best, but probably just complicit fascists.

Browndog said...



"response then why cant those people prove it in court? good question!"


One of a thousand examples:

David Shafer

Georgia law requires election contests to be heard within 20 days of being filed. Twenty days have passed and it is now a new year. We have filed emergency motions and even an emergency appeal to the Georgia Supreme Court. But our case has still not been assigned a judge.


Qwinn said...

When something happens that leftists don't like - like, for example, George Floyd - they don't even wait a day to see if the system will work. They immediately start rioting, looting and burning for months, and Democrats turn a blind eye to it, and our "health experts" give them COVID restriction exceptions, and any caught committing violence are immediately released.

When something happened that the right didn't like - like, for example, massive election theft - they didn't immediately engage in violence. They waited to see if the system would work. They went to the courts. They were fucked over at nearly every single step of the process.

We could burn half the country down at this point, and we'd still have behaved better and more legitimately than the Left does on its best day.

You're all confusing our willingness to see just how corrupt the system has become before deciding whether or not it's worth preserving, and a lack of willingness to destroy that system down to its roots when the answer to that question is a resounding "infinitely corrupt".

There is not a single aspect of our current governmental system worth preserving. Not a whit. Not the slightest bit. Every single thing that ever made that system worth preserving has been infiltrated, gutted, destroyed and its carcass is now worn as a skinsuit to which all appeals to authority are directed.

To rebuild these institutions will require removing nearly every last single person who currently occupies them, trying them, and imprisoning or executing them. And nearly every law enacted by them must be rescinded.

There's really no other way.

That is what you have wrought.

Howard said...

The Trump team tried their best to lose all court cases and only one won. Mission accomplished. It's part of the developing media mogul money machine. The success depends on social media buzz from useful idiots like Qwinn and his Mary band of INCELs. Anger dialed to 11 smells like cash.

Ken B said...

Gahrie
You are too thick to understand your own words. You said Canada had “nothing” to teach Americans about elections, and you said it after I pointed out the things you could learn, including voter id.

Ken B said...

Qwinn
Lots of fingerprint databases out there already.
How do you check the voter is a citizen? Id. So linkable to a fingerprint even if there isn’t one on file. Or can you not imagine how to do that?
Or Kamala gets fingerprints for healthcare. Or for ...
Or simply mandates it, period.

Ken B said...

Howard
You are a closer student of these things than I, but who is your pick for the dumbest Althouse Trumpkin? The angriest? The most dishonest?

Tough field I know.

Unknown said...

Seems to me that Democrats founded the idea in the 1980's that an investigation, witnesses, hearings, etc. were demanded by nothing more than "an appearance of impropriety".

Qwinn said...

Ken B:

All valid concerns.

All overwhelmed by an election system in which EVERY voter integrity measure was deliberately dismantled and in which that in itself is not instantly considered by *everyone* to invalidate the election.

Voters must be able to check their own votes. With mass "adjudication", there's no other way. Well, actually, there'd be several other ways, if there was even an iota of trust remaining in the people who did this. We just don't trust the motherfuckers anymore. And we never, ever will. Ever. That is destroyed beyond redemption.

doctrev said...

Howard said...
The Trump team tried their best to lose all court cases and only one won. Mission accomplished. It's part of the developing media mogul money machine. The success depends on social media buzz from useful idiots like Qwinn and his Mary band of INCELs. Anger dialed to 11 smells like cash.

1/4/21, 5:57 PM

How can someone who sees the assembled machine not know what it's for?

Trump doesn't want to be Lula. He wants to be Caesar.

Big Mike said...

Oh! Can I be angriest? Pick me! Pick me!

Qwinn said...

We don't need, and I don't want, a Caesar.

We desperately need a Pinochet.

elkh1 said...

How naive can the senator be. Those against certifying the electoral votes believed the election was stolen. If the Senator believed the election was stolen, and kept quiet, why should they let a Republican win next time? If the Senator believed Creepy Biden won the election with the number of votes more than the number of registered voters in some counties in PA, of course he should certify the count.

Whatever Republicans do is irrelevant to how the Democrats grab power. If they have enough votes to eliminate the Electoral College, they will. When Reid had votes to eliminate filibusters to confirm judges, he did. Cotton is quite stupid to believe what Republicans do or not do would affect the Democrats.

Howard said...

Ken B: As a Lily liver libtard, I give participation trophies to everyone who are all winners in their own special unique way.

doctrev said...

Qwinn said...
We don't need, and I don't want, a Caesar.

1/4/21, 6:27 PM

That's going to have precious little to do with it.

Browndog said...

Emerald Robinson

For the last 30 years, conservatives retreated at the start of every cultural battle by saying to each other: "this is not the hill to die on."

And now you've arrived at the last hill.

rhhardin said...

There might be a simple explanation, like some Trump vote increments were so large that they added as negative numbers, reducing his total rather than increasing it.

#software

Howard said...

Trev maybe right. Trump is qualified to be the next Gaius Caesar Augustus Germanicus.

Done in by the Deep State no less.

doctrev said...

Howard said...
Trev maybe right. Trump is qualified to be the next Gaius Caesar Augustus Germanicus.

Done in by the Deep State no less.

1/4/21, 6:38 PM

An excellent point, genuinely. Of course, Caligula was a rather young man when the Praetorians assassinated him... and Donald Trump has been picking his private security before either of us were born.

The President will probably be closer to Julius Caesar than Octavian, but Caesar Augustus was far less lenient with the conspirators than his adopted father was. Then again, I can't imagine you'll be too disappointed to see the neoliberals and neocons go.

Mark said...

People. Seriously.

How far up must they go before you admit that we've been f***ed in the ass? And that we ain't going to get unf***ed?

And it wasn't just the radical left -- it was your neighbors and family members who bent you over and rammed you and all of us.

Joe Smith said...

Where is Ratcliffe's report?

It seems to me that it could make a big difference to this discussion.

There might be nothing there, or it might be huge...

stephen cooper said...

Thus ends the little man's career, in a just world.

I do not think he is blackmailed, I just think he is an ungrateful little man.

doctrev said...

Joe Smith said...
Where is Ratcliffe's report?

It seems to me that it could make a big difference to this discussion.

There might be nothing there, or it might be huge...

1/4/21, 6:59 PM

Handed directly to Trump at the Army/ Navy game.

At this point, the masses knowing the specifics of the fraud is no longer necessary. Sides have been chosen and ignition is ready.

rightguy said...

The problem is that the dems, by overtly cheating on a comprehensive, massive & unprecedented scale, have done structural damage to the republic. And the election cannot be undone without doing even more damage. We could have just passed the tipping point. Neither side will ever accept the other's candidate. Irreconcilable differences.

Marcus Bressler said...

Why is Chuck still here?

Marcus Bressler said...

"And to Qwinn, who so reminds me of Fen, NO ONE is afraid of you dopes

No one cares if you are afraid, just that you meet the consequences of your actions.

THEOLDMAN

Iman said...

DD Driver?

Your work here are d-d-dun.

Inga said...

“Blogger Qwinn said...
We think it's time for you to feel some of the fear you've been dishing out.

1/4/21, 3:19 PM”

I said...
“And to Qwinn, who so reminds me of Fen, NO ONE is afraid of you dopes”

Marcus said...
“No one cares if you are afraid, just that you meet the consequences of your actions.”
——————————————-

That goes for Trumpists too.

Jason said...

I've never yet encountered anyone who used the word "Trumpist" who wasn't insufferably arrogant and stupid.

Still haven't.

Joe Smith said...

"I've never yet encountered anyone who used the word "Trumpist" who wasn't insufferably arrogant and stupid."

Been making this point forever. Same on the conservative side of things.

Anyone saying Drumpf or Orange Man or Cheeto or Killary or Obummer, etc. is not to be taken seriously.

They have tiny minds and sub-standard intellects.

Inga said...

“I've never yet encountered anyone who used the word "Trumpist" who wasn't insufferably arrogant and stupid.”

You’re the idiot who always uses the word “libtard”. Anyone using that term is is insufferably arrogant and stupid.

WWIII Joe Biden, Husk-Puppet + America's Putin said...

Inga is a corruptionist. Any lie will do... for The Party.

Jason said...

Qwinn is on to something, and is representative of a lot of people.

It's been said (I forget by whom) that American liberties stand on three boxes: The ballot box, the soap box, and the cartridge box.

Liberals should be very aware that we are running out of boxes.

Liberals have been doing their best in recent years to eliminate the utility, relevance and faith in the first two.

Half the country now knows that faith in the ballot box is bullshit, because Democrats have refused to tear up their own corrupt urban machines in Detroit, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Milwaukee, and other places. It was manageable as long as corrupt democrats mostly preyed on their own voters via bribery and graft and the effects were mostly localized. But we see now that their corruption has reached critical mass and effectively disenfranchises voters by the millions.

Normally, we have recourse to the soapbox. But express the wrong opinion and the happy-face fascists that run the Techstapo wing of the Democrat party will identify thought leaders and destroy them. They destroyed Milo. They destroyed that Google engineer. Just today they nuked MikayesFiona's account on Twitter, who was a big cheerleader for the protests. They've deplatformed more people than I can count, canceled their book contracts, harangued them from employment and demonetized their platforms, so no one can rely on full-time advocacy for a cause the liberal fascists find objectionable. Pour encourages les autres, you see.

Access to the courts is a subset of the soapbox... at least in the old days, one could have a reasonable expectation of at least presenting grievances and evidence in an effective tort system. But the Democrats have corrupted this process, too, by weaponizing their prosecutors against people acting in clear self defense against Antifa, while refusing to protect the law abiding against violence from leftist mobs.

Had mayors and prosecutors effectively stood up against Antifa a year ago, Kyle Rittenhouse would never be standing on. a street with an aid bag and AR-15 to do what cops and prosecutors should have done.

Liberals have done their best to erode confidence in every measure short of the cartridge box. Well, when all other courses of action become impossible, then action will take its course along the remaining possible axis.

And it won't be just a few radicals at Waco or Ruby Ridge. If the libs continue to abuse the soapbox and the ballot box, weaponize law enforcement against the law abiding, coddle Antifa, and use the media to gaslight while silencing dissent by all manner of coercion, they are seriously playing with fire.

It won't be a handful of radicals at Ruby Ridge, either. This could be widespread, with no institutions left with the credibility to deal with it. Because they've been destroyed by Democrats.









Jason said...

Inga: Libtard is as libtard does. I know many people who use the term and similar terms who are plenty smart, and they simply see through the Progressive happy-face fascist bullshit.

The ones who use the term "Trumpist," however, are invariably the dumbest and most insufferable even among their idiological fellow travelers.

And you are far, far too stupid to have any accurate sense of how smart I am. You just aren't mentally equipped to go much beyond your usual copy-paste of other peoples' talking points that have been packaged and handed to you.

This is true across a wide variety of subjects. You have also demonstrated yourself to be extremely gullible, and the first to believe any obvious absurdity that your masters have assigned to you. Again, this is true across a wide variety of subjects.

It's really quite embarrassing to watch. But insight isn't really a strength of yours, either.

Inga said...

It’s so strange how Trumpists love to hear themselves talk big about civil war, insurrection, guns, violence. It’s like they love getting into the fantasy as if they would be some sort of rebel hero. It’s laugh worthy.

No one is afraid of you dopes.

Qwinn said...

Jason, well said. It's four boxes, though, the one you missed being the jury box, which you dealt with indirectly. But note that they refuse to let their crimes ever come before a jury, and tell us with insults and sneers that that's how the system is supposed to work.

To which I say: No justice. No peace. And no fucking mercy.

Jason said...

Inga. You stupid, stupid woman:

I'm a 20+ year infantry officer (with a few years detour in the middle as a tank platoon leader and tank company executive officer) and combat veteran. And I know a lot... a LOT... of others, personally.

I'm not "talking big." I'm just a professional, having invested a lot of time and effort in studying the history, theory and techniques of asymmetrical warfare, insurgency and counterinsurgency (and practicing the latter in real life), observing.

You shouldn't project your own ignorance and uselessness on your betters.





I'm Not Sure said...

I believe a link to this image was posted previously, but regardless- it's a reasonable illustration of "conservative" vs. "progressive". In this case, "conservative" is on the left (as though there was any doubt).

https://www.domesticgeekgirl.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/american-manhood.jpg

Jason said...


(In b4 Inga makes some lame reference to her REMF POG fobbit daughter)

Qwinn said...

Jason is correct that tbere is no institution left with the power and credibility to stop what's coming. None. They've all been infiltrated utterly and twisted to serve the political interests of the Swamp.

There's nothing of the old order worth preserving. No fairness or justice to be found in it... in fact, nothing but the polar opposite. And if you think they aren't chomping at the bit to take your retirement savings and ship you to a gulag, you haven't paid attention..

No reason to hold back. At all.

Ken B said...

Big Mike
Sorry, that would be like giving PeeWee Herman a Most Macho prize. But you do stamp your feet occasionally.

Qwinn said...

Actually, I take that back. The one institution that could save this, that hasn't trashed their credibility, is the US military.

But we know Obama purged everyone who achieved high rank by merit, and replaced them with sycophants. It was in all the papers (buried on page B56, of course).

Will the lower ranks do what's right? Will they ignore their complicit criminal commanders and follow their Commander In Chief? Will he even give the orders that are so desperately needed? These are the questions keeping me up at night, because if they don't and he doesn't, it will be up to the citizens, and that's going to be much much worse.

I'm Not Sure said...

BTW- with regards to "conservative" vs. "progressive" in the image link I posted previously, the "progressive" image was chosen by progressives themselves, to represent progressives.

Just in case anyone wasn't sure, and thought that maybe I was mocking them.

Ken B said...

Ken B: In Canada we don’t let the government count votes in secret.
Trumpkins: We do!

Ken B: In Canada we don’t let one party decide what machines count the vote, without review.
Trumpkins: We do!

Ken B: In Canada we don’t let the government allow voters with no ID.
Trumpkins: We do!

Ken B: In Canada we don’t let the government use electronic ballots that can be manipulated.
Trumpkins: We do!

Ken B: Wow.
Trumpkins: You Canadians never stand up for your rights!

Ken B said...

Qwinn “ Actually, I take that back. The one institution .... that hasn't trashed their credibility, is the US military.”

This might be true still. Give Biden a year. Less probably.

Readering said...

So many loons come here to comment.

Qwinn said...

Trump is doing an excellent job of laying out the mountains of evidence at the Georgia rally. And he hasn't even mentioned the videos yet.

Qwinn said...

I hadn't heard of Bibb County that he just mentioned. At 9:11pm, Trump had 29,000 votes and Biden had 17,000 votes. A few minutes later, Trump had 17,000 votes and Biden had 29,000 votes.

No evidence!

Inga said...

“So many loons come here to comment.”

I’ve seen this happen to other blogs. Little by little the extremist element started frequenting the blog and within a year or two they were the vast majority of commenters. Every sort of conspiracy theory one could dream up and lots of talk of guns. Liberal commenters left one by one and the original blog’s personality was taken over by the extremist’s rhetoric.

daskol said...

That's too bad. I didn't expect Cotton to fall for that "but, but muh norms!" bullshit.

daskol said...

I hope Tom Cotton enjoys his norms and his collegiality with his colleagues. To the kind of people who'd like to support a guy like he seemed to be, he seems either hopelessly confused about the nature of the fight he's in, or corrupt.

Chuck said...


Blogger Jason said...
I've never yet encountered anyone who used the word "Trumpist" who wasn't insufferably arrogant and stupid.
...


This prompts a semi-serious question on my part; what better name might apply to Trump’s supporters?

Can’t say “Republicans.” Because “Republicans” includes George and Jeb Bush; Dick Cheney; Mitt Romney; Paul Ryan; Jeff Flake; Brian Kemp; Brad Raffensperger; Pat Toomey; Christopher Krebs; Adam Kinzinger; Will Hurd.

Can’t say “Conservatives.” Because “Conservatives” includes Justices Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett. It also includes George Will and George Conway. Also includes Bill Kristol and Charlie Sykes.

Since “Republicans” and “Conservatives” are misnomers, and since Trump has never shown much of any devotion to the Republican Party or the Conservative movement, what better name is there, than “Trumpists”?

daskol said...

Hillary is better at naming Trump supporters than you, man. Hillary.

daskol said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
daskol said...

Tom Cotton Warms Chuck's Cockles

Chuck said...

Blogger daskol said...
Hillary is better at naming Trump supporters than you, man. Hillary.


She said... Wait, no; I am not going to paraphrase her. I am going to cut and paste the transcript:
”I know there are only 60 days left to make our case — and don't get complacent, don't see the latest outrageous, offensive, inappropriate comment and think well he's done this time. We are living in a volatile political environment.
"You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? [Laughter/applause]. The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people, now have 11 million. He tweets and retweets offensive, hateful, mean-spirited rhetoric. Now some of those folks, they are irredeemable, but thankfully they are not America.
"But the other basket, the other basket, and I know because I see friends from all over America here. I see friends from Florida and Georgia and South Carolina and Texas, as well as you know New York and California. But that other basket of people who are people who feel that government has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures, and they are just desperate for change. It doesn't really even matter where it comes from. They don't buy everything he says but he seems to hold out some hope that their lives will be different. They won't wake up and see their jobs disappear, lose a kid to heroine, feel like they're in a dead-end. Those are people we have to understand and empathize with as well."


So Mrs. Clinton thought that half of Trump’s supporters were in a “basket of deplorables,” not for who they were or for honest political differences, but because they were racists, or Islamophobes, or xenophobes, etc.

And she thought that another half of Trump’s supporters needed understanding by her Democratic Party.

When was the last time that Trump gave that much credit to “half” of Democratic voters?

Jason said...

Chuck:

what better name might apply to Trump’s supporters?

Ummm... "Trump's supporters," dumbass!



Chuck said...

Blogger daskol said...
Tom Cotton Warms Chuck's Cockles


This latest move reminds me of the Tom Cotton I used to admire.

But he lost me after his lying about the Trump “shithole countries” meeting.

Inga said...

“And he has lifted them up. He has given voice to their websites that used to only have 11,000 people, now have 11 million. He tweets and retweets offensive, hateful, mean-spirited rhetoric.”

And oh boy was she right on.

Roughcoat said...

Have there been any studies or investigations, formal or informal, concerning what active duty military personnel would do, and to whom they would give their loyalty, in the event of a civil war? I am not personally familiar with any, but I'm sure that something along those lines has been or is currently being conducted. Somebody must be wargaming civil war scenarios for the military. I fully expect that the usual suspects -- the three-letter agencies -- are working secretly and independently in this regard.

Gahrie said...

Just for the record:

The Constitution explicitly gives Congress the power to overturn the results from the Electoral College. That's the only reason why you have a vote in each house to accept the results...because they have the power to NOT accept the results.

The Senator is either amazingly ignorant of the procedures of the Senate, or he is willfully lying to us. This is the man being presented as Trump's successor.

Inga said...

“Trumpists” is actually the nicest thing I could think of.”

Exactly. Shouldn’t they be honored to be called Trumpists?

Gahrie said...

Have there been any studies or investigations, formal or informal, concerning what active duty military personnel would do, and to whom they would give their loyalty, in the event of a civil war?

Not that I know of. But it is pretty well established that most members of the military come from red states and red regions in blue states. They also tend to come from a class of people often characterized as deplorable. Lots of them are bitter clingers.

Jason said...

...In which Chuckles perfectly demonstrates the accuracy of my observation.

Gahrie said...

When was the last time that Trump gave that much credit to “half” of Democratic voters?

Probably six or seven years ago when the Democratic Party and the rest of the Left were still giving him awards.

YoungHegelian said...

@Gahrie,

Have there been any studies or investigations, formal or informal, concerning what active duty military personnel would do, and to whom they would give their loyalty, in the event of a civil war?

I once joked with my brother: "Do you know what about 65% of the enlisted men in the armed forces call Bible-thumpers?" "No." "Mom & Pop."

Inga said...

Trump’s popularity slips in latest Military Times poll — and more troops say they’ll vote for Biden

The latest Military Times poll shows a continued decline in active-duty service members’ views of President Donald Trump and a slight but significant preference for former Vice President Joe Biden in the upcoming November election among troops surveyed.

The results, collected before the political conventions earlier this month, appear to undercut claims from the president that his support among military members is strong thanks to big defense budget increases in recent years and promised moves to draw down troops from overseas conflict zones.

But the Military Times Polls, surveying active-duty troops in partnership with the Institute for Veterans and Military Families (IVMF) at Syracuse University, have seen a steady drop in troops’ opinion of the commander in chief since his election four years ago.

In the latest results — based on 1,018 active-duty troops surveyed in late July and early August — nearly half of respondents (49.9 percent) had an unfavorable view of the president, compared to about 38 percent who had a favorable view. Questions in the poll had a margin of error of up to 2 percent.

Among all survey participants, 42 percent said they “strongly” disapprove of Trump’s time in office.”

Rt41Rebel said...

Polls are great Inga. Some of the best are within 20% error.

Qwinn said...

Partnering with Syracuse University? LMAO. Why not just partner with Berkeley or Portland U?

BUMBLE BEE said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Qwinn said...

Chuck says the word "conservative" includes Chief Roberts, George Conway and Bill Kristol - LMAO.

Sorry, Chuck, but no. Just no. Not in the dreams of a thousand communist propagandists - no.

jim said...

See the kind of BS you are enabling: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/01/05/michigan-trump-wrong-number-chatfield/

How do you like the idea of Trump flying off to Scotland on Jan 20? And where after that?

lawyapalooza said...

How many of you volunteered to spend a day or two or three to act as a poll observer? If you did, please identify the fraud you witnessed. Its such a crick of shit that Trump's lawyers are likely to face serious sanctions in WI and hopefully, elsewhere.

I stood for 15 hours next to an attorney volunteer from the Republican party and we saw the ballots going through a triple review process. While we were not allowed to approach voters, if they approached us with questions, we were allowed to answer them. AS a result, I personally helped some people ensure their vote for Trump was done correctly, and I am confident my colleague did the same for those who wanted to make sure they had correctly completed for Biden. Fewer than 20 people had questions.

So let's hear it, fraud-claimers-- what did you do election day and the days thereafter and what fraud did you witness?

Ken B said...

Inga: Shouldn’t they be honored to be called Trumpists?

I prefer Trumpkin. Ist implies an ideology to me, and there really isn’t one. Either term pisses them off though.

Qwinn said...

Lawyapalooza:

I was a poll watcher in Bucks County PA. I was lied to and told that I had no right to watch the in person vote, and could only stay outside and check total vote count once an hour or so. I was NOT allowed to watch the mail in count in any way, and an analysis of that mail in data (I have over 30 years experience as a Data Analyst) revealed absurdities such as "Biden performed significantly better among a group that was 60% registered Democrat (the mail in vote, he got 78%) than he did among a group that was 100% registered Democrats (the in person Democrat vote, which Biden did *at best* 75%, assuming no in person Republican or non affiliated voted for Biden)".

Gahrie said...

The latest Military Times poll shows a continued decline in active-duty service members’ views of President Donald Trump and a slight but significant preference for former Vice President Joe Biden in the upcoming November election among troops surveyed.

And we all know how accurate polls are.

ken in tx said...

The Democrats seem to be the Bart Simpson party. We didn't cheat because nobody saw us cheat, but if they did, you can't prove it.

Bart's mantra, "I didn't do it. Nobody saw me. You can't prove it."

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 281 of 281   Newer› Newest»