July 3, 2019

"A day after pledging that the 2020 census would not ask respondents about their citizenship, the Justice Department reversed course on Wednesday..."

"... and said it was hunting for a way to restore the question on orders from President Trump. Officials told a federal judge in Maryland that they thought there would be a way to still add the question, despite printing deadlines, and that they would ask the Supreme Court to send the case to district court with instructions to remedy the situation. President Trump had been frustrated with Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross for mishandling the White House’s effort to add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, according to an administration official, and [tweeted] on Wednesday... 'The News Reports about the Department of Commerce dropping its quest to put the Citizenship Question on the Census is incorrect or, to state it differently, FAKE!... We are absolutely moving forward, as we must, because of the importance of the answer to this question.'"

The NYT reports.

116 comments:

The Mouse that Roared said...

Excellent.

Fen said...

hunting for a way to restore the question on orders from President Trump.

Just what I predicted yesterday.

Malcolm Reynolds gets it's done

Chuck said...

This has been playing out already this evening on George Conway’s Twitter feed, which is my new fun go-to news aggregator replacing Ann Althouse’s blog. The lawyers on the case have been told by the US District Court Judge to be in court on Monday, to put into writing their commitment to begin the process of producing Census questionnaires without the citizenship question.

Basically saying, don’t even think about fucking around on this anymore.

And of course here is the periodic reminder that I favor the citizenship question on the form. I like having that question on it. And I also think that the executive branch should have full powers to include such a question absent specific Congressional mandates. And if I had been on the Supreme Court, I’d have been a deciding vote for Secretary Ross.

But in fact the main reason the case was lost (and now being shoved up Trump’s flabby ass) is because of the noxious, incompetent way that they rolled it out. Like every other policy rollout from the Trump Administration.

Kurosaki said...

Motion graphic for 5$

Achilles said...

So the media was lying again.

Shocked.

alanc709 said...

George Conway? Why, wasn't Chelsea Manning's blog good enough for you? You never cease to marginalize yourself.

Original Mike said...

"...which is my new fun go-to news aggregator replacing Ann Althouse’s blog."

We'll miss you, Chuck. Wait..., why are you still here?

Achilles said...

Chuck said...

But in fact the main reason the case was lost (and now being shoved up Trump’s flabby ass) is because of the noxious, incompetent way that they rolled it out. Like every other policy rollout from the Trump Administration.

Bullshit.

You are a liar and you know this is pure garbage.

The reason the case was "lost" was because globalist traitors like John Roberts and the District Judge ignore the clearly written law and are looking for any excuse to keep our borders open and get more representation for democrats.

Trump is fighting a bunch of traitors that you are cheering for. We know you are on the democrats side.

Nobody believes you actually want the citizenship question on the census.

If you were who you say you were you would commit ritual seppuku.

Fen said...

So our resident Moby intro's a long-winded version of why this is a good idea, but does anyone doubt where he will wind up? Let's take a closer look:

Chuck: But in fact the main reason the case was lost (and now being shoved up Trump’s flabby ass) is because of the noxious, incompetent way that they rolled it out. Like every other policy rollout from the Trump Administration.

Was there ever any doubt? Note that he still assumes we are stupid enough to fall for his concern trolling. So arrogant in his ignorance. SMH.

PSA time:

Chuck: "I am afraid you are mistaking me for someone who has an interest in fair treatment of Donald Trump. I'm not your guy. I am interested in smearing him, hurting him and prejudicing people against him."

We now return to your regularly scheduled Althouse. Remember, if you need Troll Repellant, please be so kind as to purchase through the Althouse-Amazon Portal

Drago said...

LLR Chuck: "This has been playing out already this evening on George Conway’s Twitter feed,"

LOLOLOLOLOL

Michael K said...

which is my new fun go-to news aggregator replacing Ann Althouse’s blog.

How can we believe you about you "go to a twitter feed" if you keep dropping turds around here?

rhhardin said...

Just add the question and forget it.

SDaly said...

Trump should order the question to appear on the Census and say:

"Sure, the Court has the nominal power to resolve questions of law, but I suspect that the its opinion was not the real reason that it ruled as it did, given the past statements of some of the Justices, so I don't think it should get the benefit of its power in this instance. That's a thing, right Chief Justice Roberts?"

Original Mike said...

"Just add the question and forget it."

Send it to the printers and let the courts continue to argue about whether it gets used.

David Begley said...

Easy legal solution. Put the citizenship question on the census form. Under the APA recite that reason is that since 10 Dem candidates for President want to extend free health care to illegal aliens, then the President needs to know how much that will cost.

The Dems then go to court seeking an injunction. Rocket docket and irreparable harm standard of proof. Trump wins.

And, yeah, Commerce Department screwed this up but it doesn’t help that there are political hack judges in the federal judiciary. Alito had it right.

David Begley said...

Correct. Just start printing the forms with the citizenship question. Make the Dems get an injunction to stop the presses. Trump wins.

David Begley said...

And print the forms in Nebraska. The printer would be a necessary party. Lawsuit would have to be in Nebraska. Trump wins.

GatorNavy said...

Sorry, but this Conway fellow does he have any bragging rights other than schtupping his wife who is more famous than he is?

narciso said...

Largely, you would think his law school partnership would keep him busy.

narciso said...

They never do explain what he could have differently.

gspencer said...

That's the Trump I voted for. A guy who'll fight. Ya hear that Mittens, you NWO frapping puke?

D 2 said...

That's very good, SDaly.

Here in Canada, I know you gots to tell the Feds if you got the long form in 2016 your immigration (or non) status. Maybe the short form too. Does tend to silent (for a few seconds) the more-virtuous who pontificate on these matters from high towers, when they forget that little tidbit. Remind them after the pontification. In the silence that follows, you can sometimes hear kids playing merrily outside.

A sound that can act as a reminder of better days. Before the ceaseless bitterness/resentment had burrowed in.

Fen said...

That's the Trump I voted for. A guy who'll fight. Ya hear that Mittens, you NWO frapping puke?

Good point. We should not forget that the Romney/McCain approach would have been: "Gosh darn we just couldn't get it done. Not this hill. Maybe in 4 years if you donate to send us back to DC..."

Fuckers.

Even if Trump fails, there will be no Failure Theater. And Chuck's Establishment Wing of GOP is delusional if they think we will ever go back to that and their treacherous cuck ways.

It's going to be very interesting to see how the party re-aligns after the Trump Presidency. Can you just imagine the NeverTrumpers begging us to stand behind their RINO Cuck "for the good of the party"? LOL get fucked.

Drago said...

GatorNavy: "Sorry, but this Conway fellow does he have any bragging rights other than schtupping his wife who is more famous than he is?"

George Conwsy has zero real accomplishments and has delivered nothing in ensuring conservative principles win.

So naturally LLR Chuck identifies with him.

Kellyanne is a conservative fighter and has delivered the biggest political upset since Jackson and gave the republicans all 3 branches of govt.

Not to mention the first successful campaign run by a woman.

Needless to say Chuck despises and attacks Kellyanne daily.

Just like every other leftist.

Mr. Majestyk said...

Just say, "we want to know how many citizens there are." Isn't that a valid reason to include the question?

Fen said...

Oh I didn't realize we were talking about THAT Conway.

The spurned ex-husband who was married to the first woman run a presidential campaign, and who pulled off the most stunning upset in American political history.

I hear he hangs out with Michael Avanetti these days, gulping down dregs of bitterness.

Wow, Mr Principled Chuck sure can pick em.

Anonymous said...

I have decided that, despite never hearing one family story about it, that I am now a white Hispanic. My ancestors from Friesland, in the Netherlands, were subjects of the Spanish king when it was named the Spanish Netherlands. That went on for 100 or 150 years. I think that should be long enough to become a white Hispanic.

I am looking forward to the 2020 census.

Narayanan said...

Chuck # reports *
The lawyers on the case have been told by the US District Court Judge to be in court on Monday, to put into writing their commitment to begin the process of producing Census questionnaires without the citizenship question.


What if Trump says pffft

Giovan Pietro Bellori said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Giovan Pietro Bellori said...

Cucky Chuck’s heroes are open-borders. With them there never would have been a citizenship question in the first place, and he knows it, so he is a fucking tiresome liar.

You’re predictable and transparent, Chuck. Your time is over. You’re a Democrat and will fit right in at Frederica Wilson’s Mensa chapter. Here’s the news: NO ROMNEY OR MCCAIN IS EVER WINNING NATIONAL OFFICE. Not in 2020, not in 2120. Buy a lot of Kleenex.

n.n said...

Well, I'm impressed. A lesser man would have kneeled when a diversitist projected their bigotry upon them. Placing Americans first. Novel. Progress with a positive quality.

walter said...

"This has been playing out already this evening on George Conway’s Twitter feed, after he began posting pics of the various bottles he can lift with his clenched sphincter"

Narayanan said...

Can EO run afoul of APA?
Seriously asking!
This EO will be time limited too.

Chuck said...

Oh I don’t care what you fucking jackasses think.

This is whatcha call a wedge issue. The Supreme Court has ruled. There isn’t a Circuit Court of Appeal in the nation that will not adhere to the ruling in Department of Commerce v New York.

So Althouse will have to choose between the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and a career in law on the one hand; and her Trump Cult readership on the other. This will be peculiarly rich.

You jag off non-lawyer fuckheads don’t get it. Trump is going to have to back down on this. Like his many bankruptcies, his lost libel cases, his threatened libel cases, his Trump University fraud case that he said he’d never settle, etc.

And when Trump concedes on the litigation outcome, I want to be around to rub your noses in it and particularly to press Althouse on what should have happened. Again; to drive that wedge in between Althouse and her readershipp.

I’ve already said that I think the Executive should have the power to add the question. There is nothing wrong with the question. But the court case was lost, and perhaps when it should never have been lost, because of the peculiar and remarkable communication incompetence of the Trump Administration. But no matter what you may think about that, the federal court ruling stands. Nobody is going to violate it. Only Trump is stupid enough to talk about the that.

Giovan Pietro Bellori said...

Oh I don’t care what you fucking jackasses think.

Uh huh.

John Roberts, a cuck just like you Chuck, knows fucking well that Commerce has the authority to add the question PERIOD. He even said so, but since he's a black-robed dictator he does whatever he wants to do.

Which of your favored pols would have put the question on the census in the first place? NOT ONE.

Drago said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Drago said...

LLR Chuck: "I want to be around to rub your noses in it and particularly to press Althouse on what should have happened. Again; to drive that wedge in between Althouse and her readershipp."

LOLOL

The mask doesnt just slip, it completely falls off!!

Smear merchant Chuck screws up again.

In summary: our racist poster Chuck has openly admitted the following:

He is ONLY here to
1) knowingly and purposely smear and lie about Trump
2) drive a wedge between Althouse and her readership (note: one of the few blogsites that is not skewed to the far left)

That is precisely the sort of assignment a far left Moby operative would be assigned.

Precisely.

This quote is going to join the self-admitted smear merchant quote and live forever in providing the context necessary to understand Chuck's lefty hackery!!

Congratulations Chuck!! You've done it again!

Amazing.

David Begley said...

Chuck

Did you read the case or Ann’s analysis? It was remanded. On remand, see my solution. The 10 Dems with free healthcare for illegals is the solution. And starting printing the forms. Make a judge stop the presses. Trump wins. Barr knows how to do this.

narciso said...

Really you mean like carry permits have not been readily available in DC 11 years after Heller, how about the beck decision that was a dead letter until Janus 30 years later

narciso said...

So the court is only the left word if progs want it to be.

Giovan Pietro Bellori said...

If only Trump would wear a bow tie!!!

narciso said...

John Roberts had grown in the parlance of Tom Bethell like Anthony Kennedy and souter before him,,

Pookie Number 2 said...

I want to be around to rub your noses in it and particularly to press Althouse on what should have happened. Again; to drive that wedge in between Althouse and her readershipp.

I do hope that one day the good Lord grants you the awareness to see just how very sad this statement is.

Chuck said...

HAHAHAHAHA!

I was wrong! The District Judge didn’t say that he wanted this shit about Trump’s Tweeting straightened out in Monday; in a 3:30 pm hearing today (and transcribed and released this evening) he said he wants this shit figured out Friday at 2 pm!!!!

The poor fucking DoJ lawyer had to sit there on the record and say that he is doing his best to figure out what is going on.

Every trial lawyer who has spent one day in federal court knows what a humiliating, crazy beatdown that was.

Link to the transcript here:

https://mobile.twitter.com/Tierney_Megan/status/1146525716483362821

Drago said...

"Dept of Black People" Chuck: "I am afraid you are mistaking me for someone who has an interest in fair treatment of Donald Trump. I'm not your guy. I am interested in smearing him, hurting him and prejudicing people against him."


"Dept if Black People" Chuck: "I want to be around to rub your noses in it and particularly to press Althouse on what should have happened. Again; to drive that wedge in between Althouse and her readershipp."

Everything you will ever need to understand Chuck and discount every utterance.

LOL

narciso said...

George hazel, a former Obama us atty in baltimore, quelle surprise.

Giovan Pietro Bellori said...

Cucky Chuck’s so happy right now guys!!!!

Chuck said...

Woah, that District Court transcript may be the worst judicial bitch-slapping that Trump and one of “his” attorneys has gotten in the short history of this Administration. The lawyers who know how to read between the lines of judicial transcripts are having a ball with this.

narciso said...

You would think they would a tiny speck of respect for citizens, but that's too much to ask, did he allow 'room to destroy as well'

Giovan Pietro Bellori said...

It’s like Obama were still president, or as Chuck thinks of it, the Golden Age!

Original Mike said...

Heaven forbid a lawyer have a bad day.

narciso said...

Another Hawaiian judge in a different garb,

narciso said...

After one is only defending the interests of the citizenry which by rights are the only ones entitled to a franchise, but things started going by the wayside with kleznick then doe.

Michael K said...

Chuck said...
Oh I don’t care what you fucking jackasses think.


It's a good thing you don't know or care. I doubt you could be embarrassed but you could look like a fool.

Beasts of England said...

'Again; to drive that wedge in between Althouse and her readershipp.'

Wow. Something's wrong with you, boy...

Chuck said...

Poor Josh Gardner. He’s on vacation for the Fourth of July holiday; he’s done his best to act professionally (as the Judge notes on the record as the hearing begins), but he is blindsided by a Trump Tweet just like the Court and the Plaintiff attorneys and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and the whole country were.

So Gardner has to appear for this hearing via teleconference, probably with very limited opportunity to reach anybody in his Department or elsewhere, and has to answer for Trump. When nobody can,

narciso said...

Judge hazel has shown he doesn't care about the question of who has the franchise, well we know in Baltimore observance of the law in general is an optional thing

Drago said...

I havent seen Chuck this happy since the dems won the House in 2018.

Drago said...

Naturally, Chuck is wrong on the facts again..(and always in the leftists direction)

Here's a more sober and in point view of todays events:

"This is all fun and games for the left but the fact of the matter here is that Hazel is not only hostile to what the administration is doing, he’s irrelevant. The only question hanging out there is whether Justice and Commerce can cobble together a plausible rationale that will pass the smell test for 5 justices on the Supreme Court.

No one really cares about the lawsuit in Hazel’s court because he doesn’t have the authority to impose an injunction preventing the mailing of the forms or their processing as that is an enumerated responsibility of the Executive in the Constitution. If he did try to do that, he would be in direct conflict with the Supreme Court which would have already allowed the question into the Census. The only reason his injunction is still in place is because the case in his court was not the one heard by the Supreme Court.

The strategy in Hazel’s court is to try to throw up enough obstacles to the Census going out with the citizenship question in a timely fashion that the Administration will have to fold. If the Administration makes it across the hurdle set by SCOTUS, the odds of a nothingburger case like the one here derailing the Census approaches zero. The single important thing that happened here was that the government was given an immaterial deadline to declare its intentions. If it doesn’t, the only thing happens is that a bunch of lefties get to masturbate to fantasies of Trump getting a comeuppance when the case Hazel is overseeing restarts."

Well, lefties & LLR-lefties.

LOL: "immaterial deadline"

Its interesting to read what real non-lefty/obama lawyers have to say about things.

Lefty/dem/LLR "victories" are in short supply so its funny to watch our far left posters like Chuck celebrate like this.

Looks like Chuck will be hitting that bottle a little harder soon...

eric said...

Blogger Chuck said...
Poor Josh Gardner. He’s on vacation for the Fourth of July holiday; he’s done his best to act professionally (as the Judge notes on the record as the hearing begins), but he is blindsided by a Trump Tweet just like the Court and the Plaintiff attorneys and Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and the whole country were.

So Gardner has to appear for this hearing via teleconference, probably with very limited opportunity to reach anybody in his Department or elsewhere, and has to answer for Trump. When nobody can,


shorter Chuck, "Why can't Trump realize that he's supposed to subject himself to lawyers and judges?!! Who does he think he is, president?!"

eric said...

No one really cares about the lawsuit in Hazel’s court because he doesn’t have the authority to impose an injunction preventing the mailing of the forms or their processing as that is an enumerated responsibility of the Executive in the Constitution.

This is confusing. Isn't it an enumerated power of the Legislative branch?

Of course, they delegated it to the Executive via legislation years ago, but they could still take that power back if they wanted.

Original Mike said...

Chuck doesn't give a crap about the country, but poor Josh Gardner...

Chuck said...

No, I really do care. I said already that I think a citizenship question could and should be on the census.

I care about the country.

It’s Trump that I do not care about.

Drago said...

2 tanks and 2 APC's and the lefties/LLR's are claiming Trump is declaring literal Martial Law!!!

How can anyone not laugh and laugh and laugh at Chuck and his insane dem pals at this point.

Trump = Stable Genius!!

To be fair, if your competition were todays LLR's and lefty allies, all you have to do is push back a little and their lunacy becomes exposed!

Fen said...

Chuck: Oh I don’t care what you fucking jackasses think.

Sure, that's why you come here every day and talk shit.

Just go away. No one likes you, no one wants you here. Meade has told you several times you are no longer welcome here and yet you persist.

Girl don't go away mad, just go away.

Fen said...

2 tanks and 2 APC's and the lefties/LLR's are claiming Trump is declaring literal Martial Law!!!

Are the 2 APCs Bradleys? If so, they don't really count :)

(sorry, little bit of LAV-25 rivalry there)

Original Mike said...

"I care about the country.
It’s Trump that I do not care about."


Forest. Trees.

Fen said...

Chuck: to drive that wedge in between Althouse and her readership

LOL. Althouse and I have been at odds going on 6 years now. You think you'll be able to *increase* the amount of contempt she has for me? Ha. You take yourself way too seriously.

Chuck said...

Blogger Drago said...
2 tanks and 2 APC's and the lefties/LLR's are claiming Trump is declaring literal Martial Law!!!


I never claimed that Trump was declaring martial law. Indeed, I’d claim that Trump was far from martial law, inasmuch as he wanted a very big Soviet/North Korean-style military parade, and the US military and civilian leadership told him he couldn’t have it. That’s not martial law, that’s presidential fecklessness.

R C Belaire said...

I haven't read all the comments up to this point, so I may be repeating something.

Why not print two versions of the census form - one with and the other without the question. You'll be ready either way. Yeah, it'll cost more but doesn't everything?

readering said...

Gov't enjoined from printing "second" version

Giovan Pietro Bellori said...

Chuck loves the country, it’s just that he loves lawfare way way more. Chuck loves the country, he just hates us way way more.

Chuck agrees with a million Trump initiatives, he just doesn’t think any of them should be implemented.

Birkel said...

Smear Merchant Chuck, self-admitted racist fopdoodle, when you want to rub my nose in something, please send your full-contact gymnasium address so I can submit to your nose rubbing.

Or be a drunk pussy.

Francisco D said...

Chuckles,

Have another drink and go to sleep.

Birkel said...

Smear Merchant Chuck will never give up his full contact gymnasium name.
But here I am waiting for a nose smearing.

Fucking drunkard.

Original Mike said...

Inga said she was going to rub our faces in it (it being the Mueller Report). She doesn't hang around here much lately.

John henry said...

Does anyone here even know what the issue is?

I listened to the oral arguments. Or about half of them. They were boring.

The Supremes don't have any question that they can ask the citizenship question. Even the people that are opposing asking it admit that there is nothing wrong with collecting the information.

The argument, from the opposers, is that asking the question will make the census less accurate. Dept of Commerce says no, it won't affect accuracy.

We've asked it on a bunch of previous censuses, it seems a perfectly legitimate question.

And, according to both sides and, it would seem the Supremes, is a perfectly legitimate question.

Except as it affects census count accuracy.

John Henry

John henry said...

Blogger Dick said...

HAHAHAHAHA!

I was wrong! The District Judge didn’t say that he wanted this shit about Trump’s Tweeting straightened out in Monday; in a 3:30 pm hearing


No Dick,

You were not wrong. You were not mistaken. You were not misinformed.

You LIED to us.

At least by your definition of the word.

You owe us all an apology for lying to us.

John Henry

Original Mike said...

"Does anyone here even know what the issue is?"

Not me. I'm sure Chuck could explain it after he finishes jerking off.

Michael K said...

Blogger readering said...
Gov't enjoined from printing "second" version


I doubt that will stand. Lots of "Hack in Black" Obama judges trying to run the country. I guess they have a pen and a phone
.

Drago said...

readering: "Gov't enjoined from printing "second" version"


"No one really cares about the lawsuit in Hazel’s court because he doesn’t have the authority to impose an injunction preventing the mailing of the forms or their processing as that is an enumerated responsibility of the Executive in the Constitution."

Sad Trombone for readering and inebriated Chuck.

narciso said...

Which raises the question, who on our putative side signed off on hazel, now the Senate wouldn't flip till 2014 but still.

Drago said...

Hazel is an obama judge.

Mr. Majestyk said...

Au contraire, Drag. By ruling as he did in the census case, Roberts proved there is no such thing as an Obama judge, a Bush judge, a Clinton judge, or a Trump judge.

Mr. Majestyk said...

Drago

wholelottasplainin' said...

Mr. Majestyk said...
Au contraire, Drag. By ruling as he did in the census case, Roberts proved there is no such thing as an Obama judge, a Bush judge, a Clinton judge, or a Trump judge.


**************

Entertain us, please do, Majestyk, by adding an argument to your empty, fact-free assertion.

snort

Tom T. said...

Notice how Chuck tacitly backed down from his original assertion that the judge is demanding a commitment from the government to proceeding without the question. Now he's saying only that the judge wants this figured out. I wonder if his concession is driven by having finally read the opinion. The court clearly held that the administration has the authority to include the question. It's just a question of whether it wants to make the effort to do so in time.

n.n said...

So, the issue, is that identifying as a citizen, may pose an undue "burden". Civil rights were always so controversial, and we've made great progress since.

readering said...

Folks are forgetting that there is the new issue of equal protection violation revived by discovery of dead gop operative files. Remanded to maryland district court from fourth circuit under tight deadline for evidentiary hearing. Govt tried to stop that by conceding defeat. friday deadline to either reaffirm concession or submit roadmap for new discovery and trial on equal protection. This case in Maryland is different from NY case that went to USSC.

readering said...

But gov also said plan to file new application to USSC for clarification of last week's ruling. Sounded lame.

Jon Ericson said...

Meltdown chuck is best chuck.
LOL Get fucked.

Mr. Majestyk said...

"wholelottasplainin' said..
Mr. Majestyk said...
Au contraire, Drag. By ruling as he did in the census case, Roberts proved there is no such thing as an Obama judge, a Bush judge, a Clinton judge, or a Trump judge.


**************

Entertain us, please do, Majestyk, by adding an argument to your empty, fact-free assertion.

snort"

Sarcasm

walter said...

Chuck said...I care about the country. It’s Trump that I do not care about.
--
George Will is not and Will not be in a position of power.
But in your smear mission, do tell us your Dem pick to conserve conservatism.

Michael McNeil said...

In summary: our racist poster Chuck has openly admitted the following:

He is ONLY here to
1) knowingly and purposely smear and lie about Trump
2) drive a wedge between Althouse and her readership (note: one of the few blogsites that is not skewed to the far left)

That is precisely the sort of assignment a far left Moby operative would be assigned.
Precisely.


Howard, too. It was so apparent the other day when he was cynically trying to portray buwaya — one of the most respected and thoughtful of posters here — as being seriously cra-cray.

Good luck with that, Howard. You're despicable – but we recognize you for what you are.

Drago said...

Mr. Majestyk: "Au contraire, Drag. By ruling as he did in the census case, Roberts proved there is no such thing as an Obama judge, a Bush judge, a Clinton judge, or a Trump judge."

Au contraire right back at ya.

I submit Roberts proved there is no such thing as a "GOPe" judge.

There are certainly obama and Clinton judges.

Fen said...

Chuck: Trump wanted a very big Soviet/North Korean-style military parade

The slightest effort to be fair and research this topic would reveal that Trump got his inspiration from this during a French parade honoring their military.

But you have already confessed you have no interest in objectivity or fairness:

Chuck Confession #1: "I am afraid you are mistaking me for someone who has an interest in fair treatment of Donald Trump. I'm not your guy. I am interested in smearing him, hurting him and prejudicing people against him."

So I can only imagine that the reason you keep showing your face here is for the abuse. Fits the pattern of a conservative Cuck that gets off on humiliation. What's the name of your insurance carrier? We need to start charging you for these sessions.

Crazy World said...

Chuck, what the F$$$ is your problem? You spew hate here daily. It is beyond sickening.
Bye

Jon Ericson said...

FBI needs to investigate the suspicious circumstances surrounding "Justice" Roberts' Irish adoptees.

Narayanan said...

Does not separation of power include one branch telling others NOYDB!?

I see everyone being asked THE Question when you travel back from close to border in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California.

There are also video of citizen resistance to being asked respond with under what authority CBP have.

Next step will be to remove CBP checkpoints.

It will be interesting to see USA political culture on 2026.

http://www.usa250.org/

! UK now fighting for Independence from Europe!

Could that be what Don and Queen were discussing?

Twinkle said...

Nice post. It is really interesting. Thanks for sharing the post!
Web Design Company in Tuticorin | Domain Name Registration In India
Web Design Company In India | Digital Marketing Company in India
Bulk SMS Service India | SEO Company India
PPC Services in India | Social Media Marketing Company in India

narciso said...

As I pointed in the other thread, mr gardner is a swamp pirate, most recently involved in trying to steel hank Greenberg's AIG fron him.

readering said...

We know the proposed citizenship question is politically motivated for sure.

Hagar said...

The citizenship question is a legitimate question to ask, or it is not.

To base a decision on this on whether the DoJ lawyer's explanation of why the Gov't wants to ask the question was heartfelt or not, or well phrased, is pure BS.

Chuck said...

Blogger Tom T. said...
Notice how Chuck tacitly backed down from his original assertion that the judge is demanding a commitment from the government to proceeding without the question. Now he's saying only that the judge wants this figured out. I wonder if his concession is driven by having finally read the opinion. The court clearly held that the administration has the authority to include the question. It's just a question of whether it wants to make the effort to do so in time.


It was DoJ lawyer Josh Gardner who was on that he transcript, saying that he was trying to figure out what was going on. The lawyer, the plaintiffs, the District judge, and Commerce Secretary Ross all thought it was a done deal. Then Trump started Tweeting, apparently in response to something he saw on Fox News. And so the judge hauled them all into his chambers via a teleconference. In order to set a timetable for committing the SCOTUS ruling into a stipulated order in their case. Everyone had to interrupt their Independence Day holiday to respond to Trump’s Tweet.

TJM said...

Reject the census results from states that refuse to cooperate. This is beyond ludicrous. The libtards can't get a majority of American citizens to vote their way, so they need to import them

Hagar said...

Come on, readering.
The Constitution spells out the political basis for the government of this nation, and the census clause was put in there to provide data for the political guidance of Congress and the President in setting suitable policies to ensure successful outcomes.
It is what the word means.

Rusty said...

readering said'
Well. Since the Census is in the constitution and the constitution is the "supreme law of the land" then yes. It has always been political. It is used to determine, among other things, how government services and largess are apportioned.IE' Seeing that the taxpayers money is spent wisely and properly. You want all those services and money going to actual citizens, don't you? I don't know about you , but I pay a lot of money in taxes and I'd like to see whatever it is spent on goes to actual mericans. Shouldn't they be first in line?

Original Mike said...

"Everyone had to interrupt their Independence Day holiday to respond to Trump’s Tweet."

During the course of my career I had to work many, many holidays. Big Fucking Deal.

Birches said...

Maybe they shouldn't have tried to weasel out of trying to not include the question in the first place if they didn't want their fourth of July ruined.

Giovan Pietro Bellori said...

Fopdoodle lawyer more worried about enough leisure time for other fopdoodle lawyers than the pointless cuck on the Court.

Readering is worried about the politicization of the census? I guess she can't read the Spanish-language press. They're all for it--the other way, of course.

readering said...

I can't read Spanish, true (sad).

walter said...

TJM said...The libtards can't get a majority of American citizens to vote their way, so they need to import them
--

Democratic Presidential candidate Cory Booker has caused controversy by crossing into Mexico to escort deported asylum seekers back over the border.
The Senator, 50, visited the Mexican border city Ciudad Juarez from El Paso, Texas, to help five women who had previously been sent back to Mexico.
He was joined by immigration rights attorneys and advocates to get the women, who are fleeing domestic violence, admitted back into the US.
However, he has been accused of breaking the law by critics who claimed he violated legislation which prohibits 'bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens into the United States in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry'.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7212579/Democratic-candidate-Cory-Booker-causes-controversy-helping-immigrants-return-US.html

Birkel said...

readering, as always, projects the Leftist motivation onto the other.
The other in this case is Americans who would like to determine its own destiny.
The other does not want open borders to change the demographics of the nation.

We see what you want: power over the other.

Giovan Pietro Bellori said...

Readering, I’m cool with you for admitting that. 👍

Paco Wové said...

"We know the proposed citizenship question is politically motivated for sure."

No more so than removing the question in the first place. Maybe less. I can certainly see why having the question on the census is superior to not having it, without any "political" considerations.

NEO-FIDO said...

So the SC now decides on what is or is not printed?

Since Roberts punted, not forbidding but sending it back down the chain, obviously there is some validity to Trump's claim.

So print the questionnaire WITH the question and you can instruct the Census takers on whether to ASK the question or not.

Easy peasy.