The Eighth Circuit, applying the newest Supreme Court cases, says yes to a 40-year-old, stone monument in Plattsmouth. Dissenting judges objected to the lack of a "contextualizing presence of other messages or some indicia of historical significance."
I said it last June. The rule is: old things carved in stone should be left alone.
August 31, 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
3 comments:
wow ann... ur just a little to the left of my right wing LOL... God Bless -- Romey
pigeons make more use of that stone than people do. I never look at things covered with bird poop.
I'd be more likely to look at it. Even photograph it if the crap was just so.
Post a Comment