If transgenderism is appropriate, then transracialism is appropriate.
Transracialism is not appropriate.
Therefore, transgenderism is not appropriate.
Showing posts with label Jim S.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jim S.. Show all posts
May 10, 2017
"If transgenderism is appropriate, then transracialism is appropriate./Transgenderism is appropriate./Therefore, transracialism is appropriate."
That's the argument Rebecca Tuvel believed she was making, but the reason feminist philosophers freaked out, Jim S. argues, is that Tuvel's modus ponens argument flips all too easily into this modus tollens argument:
Tags:
feminism,
Jim S.,
logic,
philosophy,
Rachel Dolezal,
Rebecca Tuvel,
trans-,
transgender
August 8, 2013
Jim S. is right, I need more nominees for Most Embarrassing Sentence in Major Media, 2013.
He says:
So prod me toward some other nominees.
I think if you're looking for the most embarrassing quote in major media, you can do no better than this description of Huma Abedin that Instapundit draws attention to:Ultra-close readers of this blog with great memories know that I defended that sentence — and some sentences around it — as "so gloriously absurd, that they must be intentional satire and not a new level of good press."
She wore bright-red lipstick, which gave her lips a 3-D look, her brown eyes were pools of empathy evolved through a thousand generations of what was good and decent in the history of the human race.
So prod me toward some other nominees.
Tags:
embarrassment,
Huma Abedin,
Instapundit,
Jim S.,
journalism,
writing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)