October 17, 2026

"By a certain light, this is the first time that the British director’s vision will be seen properly."

"The restoration contains censored moments once thought lost, like frenzied, naked nuns writhing sexually on a giant crucifix or a Mother Superior (Vanessa Redgrave) making love to a phallic bone fragment.... The uproar makes sense in context. 'When people saw the film, because Ken’s imagery is so visceral, they were shocked by it,'  said the critic Mark Kermode, who befriended Russell in the 1990s and was instrumental in finding the lost footage and reintegrating it into the director’s cut.... Yet Russell, who died in 2011 at 84, was adapting a respected 1952 nonfiction book, 'The Devils of Loudun' by Aldous Huxley, and a stage version by John Whiting that followed in 1961. The plot centers on a Roman Catholic priest, Urbain Grandier (Reed), who unabashedly pursues sexual relationships with women, but also presides over the walled city of Loudun as a sort of secular stronghold where Catholics and Protestants live together peaceably."

From "In 1971, This Film Was a Scandal. In 2026, It’s a Respected Period Piece. 'Ken Russell’s The Devils' was deemed shocking for scenes with orgiastic nuns and a debauched priest. But its serious aims are clear in a new restoration" (NYT).

I can't remember how I was ever able to see this film, but I did see it, I believe in the 70s, and for many years I'd always include it on my very short list of favorite films — along with "Aguirre the Wrath of God" and "My Dinner With Andre." Clearly, I had a taste for a certain sort of male character! I have no idea how this film would strike me today. But I think it would resonate with present-day themes: a strong political man ruined over his sexual acting out and women who lose their rationality when overexcited by sex and politics.

As Kermode puts it: "It is really a brilliantly serious, heartfelt story about brainwashing, about the politicization of religion, about the use of hysteria."

Speaking of naked writhing and early 70s films the critics panned, I got through "Zabriskie Point" the other day. Not good. Seems to say if only you can be young, beautiful, and naked — and kick up a big cloud of white dust while having intercourse in a barren landscape — you can save the world. I was worried about the dust — borax?!— and the damage to the landscape — Death Valley  and I couldn't even believe those 2 crazy lovers could enjoy their gritty play. We're supposed to think they do because the camera pulls back and shows the landscape full of naked couples simulating sex. Who are they? Where did they come from? Answer: This is art. They're an idea.

fullsizeoutput_94

9 comments:

baghdadbob said...

Mother Superior jumped the gun.

Shouting Thomas said...

Ridiculing religion seemed so rad in 1971, but I was only 21. Since then, it’s been a daily onslaught, with each critic imagining that he invented the complaint. I just didn’t know when I was 21 that the same trite ridicule had been going on for hundreds or thousands of years.

Lazarus said...

Was it Monty Python who parodied Russell's films? It was hard to do, since much of Russell's work was already self-parody. His movies about Isadora and Nijinsky were alright though.

IamDevo said...

Ridiculing religious faith is so, so avant garde. It's never been done before. It is truly the mark of an adventurous, inquiring mind, like that of an infant who smears his feces on the bumpers of his crib. And combining it with sex? Wow, who could have thought that was possible. And it's one of your favorites? Your mother would be ashamed.

William said...

The movie would probably have made more money if they had recruited Racquel Welch instead of Vanessa Redgrave.

john mosby said...

One of you dear commenters with better AI-fu than mine needs to generate “Aguirre’s Dinner With A Debauched Priest.”

I am sure all the surviving original artists would enthusiastically consent to fair use of their NIL. CC, JSM

Earnest Prole said...

It’s nearly impossible to imagine how the director of a movie as fine as “Blow Up” could also create something as wretched as “Zabriskie Point. It’s similar to the puzzle of how the writer of “Wichita Lineman” could also pen “MacArthur Park.”

loudogblog said...

I had a friend in college who was a big Ken Russell fan. I remember watching this film with him over a pay TV service back in the early 80s. (There's a reason why people used to call it "Skinemax" back in those days.)

Smilin' Jack said...

“I'd always include it on my very short list of favorite films — along with "Aguirre the Wrath of God" and "My Dinner With Andre." Clearly, I had a taste for a certain sort of male character!”

The Oliver Reed—Wallace Shawn type. Uh…OK.

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith. Also: No italics, even briefly. Use asterisks for emphasis. And don't play with the format by changing fonts or using boldface or all caps. Never include more than one extra line break between paragraphs.