September 18, 2026

"Doctors told his family he was brain-dead.... A procurement organization was called in to collect his organs."

"While being evaluated for donation, Mr. Hoover opened his eyes and thrashed on the bed. The case should have been stopped. Instead, Mr. Hoover was sedated and given a paralytic drug. Hours later, he awoke again and moved his toes on command; his family was told he was merely exhibiting reflexes. In the operating room, Mr. Hoover pulled his knees to his chest and shook his head 'no.' Tears rolled down his face. The surgeon refused to proceed. Whistle-blowers say procurement executives called their staff member on-site at the hospital and demanded she find another surgeon to take the organs. No surgeon would. Mr. Hoover survived, though he still asks his older sister, 'Why did they try to kill me?' It would be reassuring — and, for some, convenient — to treat Mr. Hoover’s experience as an exaggeration, even some macabre campfire tale...."

46 comments:

Chris said...

Who knew an old Monty Python sketch would become reality.

R C Belaire said...

Good thing he wasn't in China.

Christopher B said...

or Canada

Wilbur said...

I believe the sketch was on SNL, roughly 1976-77.

Lee Moore said...

Once again. For an organ to be usable in a transport, the donor has to be still alive when it is taken. Hence the necessary euphemism of "brain death."

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

When I obtained a drivers license in FL I purposely declined to sign the organ donor paperwork. It is sad that we can’t trust the medical “profession” like we used to. But they gave up their oath (First do no harm) when they overwhelmingly sided with the CDC-Fauci COVID fiasco even after many doctors had seen adverse reactions and the “vaccine” had no ability to stop transmission.

The push to legalize euthanasia is the cherry on top. When the State can kill you and take your organs by force then you are no longer free. We are maybe one step away from that being done here as it is in Canada.

rrsafety said...

This Segal guy it’s his advocacy money from a billionaire former Enron trader and it shows. He will literally say anything to get his private equity friends into the donation space and kick out non profits. The KY case did not happen as he said. The hospital screwed up the the diagnosis with the family and the fallout has fallen upon the workers at a small OPO who don’t have access to the NYTs. Government and media are a huge shltshow and people lie all day long. It really is awful.

Bruce Hayden said...

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...
“When I obtained a drivers license in FL I purposely declined to sign the organ donor paperwork.”

Ditto here, with my partner. Used to mark “organ donor” on our DLs. Not for a decade or so. We believe in organ donating. But don’t trust the hospital system one bit.

n.n said...

Viability. Planned Personhood.

rehajm said...

…I don’t have the box checked because experiences have taught me the organ teams are way too zombie aggressive. I had no idea it was this bad…

Not an oldster. said...

Is Mr. Hoover a black man?
Seems a relevant fact to include. When you report, even recycled stories, try to draw out and answer the questions that immediately pop to mind, so the reader doesn't have to click your links. Provide a service in your summaries?

rehajm said...

…though I get the feeling once the teams are alerted the box won’t be much help…

Kathy said...

If you ever checked the box (or someone in the DMV checked it for you), you are still on the list. That status is difficult to change. And if you manage to remove your name from one list, it may still be on another.

As has been said up above, you have to be alive when your organs are taken. Dead people can't donate organs.

gilbar said...

Organ Donation makes MILLIONS (for the hospitals).. Trust me

gilbar said...

".. the donor has to be still alive when it is taken. Hence the necessary euphemism of "brain death.."

which DOES sound MUCH NICER than vivisection

gilbar said...

i stopped checking the box, when i found out that they were counting SKIN as an organ, and (taking it for WHAT?),
however, i'm sure that my name is still on their lists.

There's SO MUCH MONEY being made through organ harvesting, that they DON'T give a single cent to the "donors" or their estates

rrsafety said...

@gilbar most donated skin is used in post mastectomy breast, reconstruction or wound care associated with things like diabetes.

rrsafety said...

@leemoore what you are saying is not true. Organ recovery only occurs after somebody is dead.

Wince said...

“Organ Leroy, at his organ again.”

boatbuilder said...

"But they gave up their oath (First do no harm) when they overwhelmingly sided with the CDC-Fauci COVID fiasco even after many doctors had seen adverse reactions and the “vaccine” had no ability to stop"

https://www.news-medical.net/news/20260917/US-health-officials-knowingly-relied-on-flawed-vaccine-safety-algorithm.aspx

It's a whole lot worse than this anodyne article suggests (I don't subscribe to the British Medical Journal so I can't link it). Jeff Childers at Coffee and Covid covered this yesterday. Basically the CDC knowingly used a vaccine adverse event reporting system that didn't compare the incidence of adverse events reported to other vaccines, but limited the comparison to only other MRNA vaccines. Thus the massive and overwhelming incidence of adverse events involving MRNA vaccines was passed off as being "similar to other vaccines" and thus "safe." And they knew about the problem and suppressed it, because reporting the real dangers of the vaccines would undermine public confidence.



As Childers put it (paraphrasing), it's as if they used a comparison of lung cancer incidence from Lucky Strikes vs. Marlboros, and because they were "similar," pronounced cigarettes "safe."

Evil. Huge. Corrupt. And completely ignored by the MSM.

The British Medical Journal is not some obscure gadfly outfit. It is sort of the gold standard. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_BMJ

Peachy+2 said...

the same morally void bastards who ruin teens and children with the "gender affirming care" BS.
HARM - it's all leftist greed.

Peachy+2 said...

"I heard allegations of negligence and financial fraud, including industry executives’ billing taxpayers for joyrides on private jets meant to transport organs; of organizations performing unnecessary procedures as part of a scheme to overbill Medicare. (Organ procurement organizations are nonprofits, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t trying to maximize financial reimbursements.) I’ve heard of poorer Americans waiting to receive organs passed over in favor of wealthier ones."

Non-profits are the left's mechanism for fraud.

D.D. Driver said...

That's why I am not an organ donor.

Iman said...

Who would want ‘em? 🤔

gilbar said...

"most donated skin is used in..."

and what's the rest used for? making cosmetics? Right

gilbar said...

for fun, i just did a google search for "althouse.blogspot rrsafety"
interestingly, the ONLY posts *I* found were rrsafety advocating for organ harvesting. Now, i'm NOT saying that rrsafetty is a demonic ghoul that lives off of the dying parts of other people's bodies.. I'm Just asking rrsafety.. who ARE YOU?

Saint Croix said...

Doctors told the family he was brain-dead.

It started with gross negligence (or intent?). The doctors declared a man dead, when he was not. That ought to be a huge lawsuit, right there. Almost brain-dead is not brain-dead.

While being evaluated for donation, Mr. Hoover opened his eyes and thrashed on the bed. The case should have been stopped. Instead, Mr. Hoover was sedated and given a paralytic drug.

That goes to intent. They knew he wasn't dead. You don't have to give dead people a paralytic drug.

In the operating room, Mr. Hoover pulled his knees to his chest and shook his head 'no.' Tears rolled down his face. The surgeon refused to proceed.

Good for him. Hippocratic Oath is on life-support. But some doctors apparently feel some sort of obligation not to kill people. Good news! I almost want to give him a medal. "Thank you for not killing a patient on purpose."

Whistle-blowers say procurement executives called their staff member on-site at the hospital and demanded she find another surgeon to take the organs.

You got probable cause to arrest them and charge them with attempted murder. It's a question of knowledge and intent. Did you know the patient was still alive? If so, this is a crime.

"Why did they try to kill me?"

Because apparently there is no criminal sanction for the people who did this.

Saint Croix said...

Doctors, nurses, everybody in a hospital ought to be pro-life.

RideSpaceMountain said...

"Who would want ‘em? 🤔"

Some wealthy, unscrupulous and unsentimental dude from almost anywhere, but probably China.

CJinPA said...

UPDATE: "The federal government has officially cut ties with Network for Hope, the organ procurement organization serving Kentucky, following an investigation that found widespread concerns about patient safety and organ donation practices."

Also of note: Most of this story is attributed to one named eyewitness.

Saint Croix said...

NPR has a good article on this case.

It blows me away that nobody is talking about criminal sanctions.

The non-profit blames the investigation for a drop-off in organ donors.

The accusations that emerged at the congressional hearing in September undermine trust in the organ donation system and have led to a drop in people signing up to be donors, according to an open letter released Oct. 3 by the organization.

Maybe it was the murder attempt that is chilling your chartable efforts. Did you ever think of that? You have the balls (the ovaries?) to blame the investigators for your murder attempt that was thwarted at the last minute?

Saint Croix said...

AI says the donor outfit was "decertified." Oh? Is that the punishment for murder attempts now? Decertification?

Saint Croix said...

I'm still an organ donor, by the way. The odds that some doctor will murder me are pretty low. The odds that my sweet organs might save somebody's life are pretty good. I like to play the odds.

Jaq said...

There is a law in a country that I won’t name, that has a law that only applies to people of a certain religion and race, that carries the death penalty, carried out by hanging inside of a prison. Oddly, death by hanging leaves the organs recoverable if you are right there for it.

West TX Intermediate Crude said...

A few comments above refer to the need for someone to be still alive when organs are donated.
Not necessarily- see "Donation after Cardiac/Circulatory Death."
That occurs when extraordinary means are in place to keep a patient "alive," including very powerful drugs to maintain pulse and blood pressure, and artificial ventilation through a breathing tube. When these measures are withdrawn, the heart stops within a few minutes, death is declared, and only then is the organ harvest started. The surgical team has only a few minutes to get the organs out before they start to deteriorate.
As in Brain Death donation, the people who declare (brain or cardiac) death are completely separate from the people who do the harvesting.
I'm not saying that DCD is any safer or ethical than using brain death as a criterion, only that some patients are in fact clinically dead (no heartbeat, not breathing) when they donate.

bagoh20 said...

A horrible story for sure, and something that should never happen, but that doesn't take away from the miracle and blessing of organ donation.
In a couple weeks I will be celebrating my 20th year with a woman's liver. That's 20 years I was told in 2006 I would never see, after being diagnosed with advanced terminal liver cancer.
All I ever heard was that my donor was brain dead from a car accident. I wasn't near the top of the list, but I was called at work that day and told this just happened, it was an unexpected perfect match, and surgery was today. Suddenly going from I got a few months to live to I've got a chance to I might die today on the table. That's a strange roller coaster ride that happened all at once.
The wonderful things that have happened in my life since that day and all I have been able to do for others I hope honors the donor family's loss. I wrote them a letter of thanks, but never heard back. I wish I could show them the good things that sacrifice made possible. It's a story of magic, grace, and good fortune they could be proud of.

Stephen A. Meigs said...

I had not heard of this case before. Very interesting. I'm not surprised this happened in Richmond, Kentucky. My mother died 11-19-24 two days after a comfort care (palliative care) PA (I think he was) in Forsyth hospital (Winston-Salem) misled me about what they wanted to medicate her with after saying she has about six hours to live, him saying the drug will ease her pain and make her breathing less labored. I specifically asked him whether he was giving her a strong narcotic like morphine and he said something to the effect that it was a tiny dose of a weak pain killer. Turns out he was giving her dilaudid, a drug in the morphine class four to eight time stronger than morphine. When after looking up the drug I noticed he misled me, I asked him why he was trying to kill my mom. I was banned from the hospital, I suppose because supposedly I spoke with sufficient loudness that patients outside my mother's room may have heard my complaints. She lived about 48 hours--significantly more than six.

I have a feeling many seniors in a bad way are essentially murdered in hospitals, largely because the way Medicare billing is set up. In inpatient settings, Medicare patients are given a diagnosis code. I believe the hospital is not paid according to incurred expenses, but a certain amount according to diagnosis code (Diagnosis-Related Group Billing) established shortly after admission. This is advantageous in a way, because the hospital won't have incentive to keep patients forever to increase reimbursements from Medicare, and because paperwork will be reduced from hospitals having less need to keep careful records of all expenses. However, a side effect (if disincentives are insufficient to discourage early deaths) is that the hospital can make more money by ensuring patients leave hospital quickly, so the hospital won't have to spend money on them for as long, which could lead to venal hospitals encouraging difficult Medicare patients to quickly leave to the morgue by not taking care of them well or by dosing them up with excess narcotics. Supposedly, high death rate affects a hospital's ratings from Medicare, but those ratings are not very granular, and are quite opaque. True, they say hospitals make less money on Medicare patients, but if true, in a way that just gives hospitals more incentive to off elderly patients, since then you could have hospitals competing to get the worst Medicare ratings so they won't have to deal with those patients as much while they simultaneously can save or even earn money while actually dealing with patients for a shorter time by encouraging their quick deaths, leading to higher deaths by neglect or murder.

While at the hospital with my mother, I believe I was subjected to more propaganda about comfort care and the cruelty of not having a do not resuscitate order (chest compressions on elderly can break their bones supposedly and nurses, etc., doing it supposedly may be traumatized upon hearing the bones snapping, what they were telling us), than I was about what the options were for trying to improve her condition. I knew from studying serial killers and assassinations that often their murders are more about the mystique of being able to encourage others to kill than about the joy of killing, and so I figured good chance this hospital is partly infested with occult serial killer crap (I had to pass by a plaque each day en route to her room, which pointed out the building was dedicated April 20, 1964, which I noticed was Hitler's 75th birthday).(cot'd)

Stephen A. Meigs said...

Anyway, as I do whenever studying a murder, a week or two after she died I looked up the dates for possible occult significance. Turns out the date was the 52nd anniversary of Madison High, Richmond, KY, losing so many football fans, etc., when their plane returning from the state playoffs crashed in Elkton. That made sense to me because Maryland's deadliest accident was the December 8, 1963, Flight 214 disaster in Elkton, Maryland, and unlike Maryland's second–fifth deadliest disasters, all four of which had weird coincidences with the Key Bridge disaster, Flight 214 did not. But it does, in a way, if you consider that the Elkton, Kentucky, crash affected Madison High, since President Madison started the War of 1812. Possibly also why the school shooting happened in your Madison not long after all this was going on. My mother died on the second anniversary of a fatal plane crash in Winston. The plane's last stop had been at the London-Corbin, KY, airport (where the tornado hit last year, ironically enough), not far south of Richmond, KY. Corbin was last stop before the 1944 Jellico train wreck (James Earl Ray possibly was involved), and in a London hospital is where Donald Harvey got his start murdering. Orville Majors murdered in Clinton, Indiana, where the ignored orders were (or weren't) given that caused the 1944 Terre-Haute wreck (James Earl Ray possibly, again). Now, Charles Cullen last murdered in the medical facility in Somerville, NJ, as in the old Somerville Terra Cotta Plant next to the old Terra Cotta station in DC where the rear-end collision killed about 53 fifty years to the day before Lloyd Lee Welch, Jr., was purportedly born. William Gaither took George Atzerodt to Mullican's tavern at the south end of Redland Road in Derwood, MD, the day Lincoln died. Mullican lost a daughter in the Terra Cotta wreck and lost a son off Redland Road in Derwood near a current branch of the Thomas Somerville and Co. plumbing supply place when he was mostly decapitated and mutilated by train No. 7 in a railway cut north of Derwood station. Pretty obvious in 1975 on the anniversary of the Bainbridge, MD, plane crash two policemen (one from Forsyth County) were killed off Redland Road in Advance, NC, over same balderdash. I figure hospital may have put my mother in Room 126 'cause Atzerodt stayed at Room 126 in Kirkwood House below Andy Johnson's residence when he was to kill him.

Vance said...

I think, based on his other comments, Jaq is trying to imply that Israel hangs people. All while he cheerfully cheers on every Muslim brutal murder of women, Christians, Buddhists and gays, naturally.

Earnest Prole said...

No “survival” tag?

Greg The Class Traitor said...

Instead, Mr. Hoover was sedated and given a paralytic drug.

By who? Has that person been referred to the DAs office for attempted murder? Why not?

Hours later, he awoke again and moved his toes on command; his family was told he was merely exhibiting reflexes

Again, by who? Has the Hospital fired whoever said that? Why not?

There needs to be accountability, not just stories in the paper.

Big Mike said...

@Greg, *1000

Gospace said...

I donated platelets yesterday. For the 18th time this year. Hopefully my donations are saving lives. At no cost to mine.

I am not on the organ door list after death. Why? Stories like this. This type of thing is far more common then most think- and cases will be covered up as rapidly as possible.

Now that we're euthanizing youngsters- and the first one went smoothly- how long before before it's done on an operating table? With the parents richly compensated? Secretly, of curse. At first.

Peachy+2 said...

Bagoh - that is an amazing story. Wow. You are truly blessed.

Reminds me of a deep sadness I hold. I lost a dear dear cousin to liver cancer just a few years ago, in 2024. I often wondered if she could get a new liver somehow. Not privy to her situation in total, I regret I didn't try harder to help her. She was a nurse by trade, but worked hard and became the 2nd in command in a hospital system.

Big Mike said...

+1000

Peachy+2 said...

My very over-weight and unhealthy aunt died and was on the donation list. I was surprised they could harvest anything from her - but they did get her corneas.

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith. Also: No italics, even briefly. Use asterisks for emphasis. And don't play with the format by changing fonts or using boldface or all caps. Never include more than one extra line break between paragraphs.