June 3, 2026

"Yesterday, you hijacked my first meeting with staff to disparage me, my qualifications, and my intentions with remarkable incivility and contempt... a performative display of hostility...."

"Your antipathy to the future of the show has come through loud and clear. And I have heard you."

Said Nick Bilton, "60 Minutes" executive producer, quoted in "Scott Pelley fired from ‘60 Minutes’ after confrontation with new boss/The termination marks the latest shake-up during a tumultuous period for the iconic newsmagazine" (WaPo).

What did Pelley say at that meeting?: "[Bari Weiss is] murdering ‘60 Minutes.... She does not love this place. She was brought in to kill it, and she’s been doing exactly that. She has no qualifications for her job.... What qualifies you [Bilton] to be in this position?... You have slender qualifications for this job. The changes that she’s made at the ‘Evening News’ have been catastrophic. So why should we expect that any of this is going to be any better?"

She does not love this place — How important is it that the insiders to a show love it? That could lead you awry. Outsiders were brought in to look at it critically — not through the eyes of love — and perhaps to put journalistic principles above catering to insiders who were enjoying the lovable place they had built and maintained. Maybe those erstwhile outsiders are actually terrible, and they are reshaping the place into something that suits them and ruins it for the longtime insiders. But Bilton is charged with running the place, and Pelley chose to insist on getting fired.

79 comments:

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

Pampered boy says what? Pelley can now test his theory in the Media marketplace. If he IS a valuable addition to a news op they will hire him and pay him like 60 Minutes did. If not, he can twist in the podcast wind with Colbert. I notice none of the high-minded lefties crying over Colbert's show have reached out to hire him. Why not?

Achilles said...

Learn to code you globalist sellout traitor quislings.

Be happy that you aren't getting what you actually deserve.

rehajm said...

Apparently she’s making them remove their skin suit and they feel naked…and it’s only about how they feel…

Lucien said...

Insider insurgents leaving CBS are like deep state lawyers leaving the DOJ civil rights division under Harmeet Dhillon.

rehajm said...

They’re proud they’re Woodward and Bernstein it’s just that that game has been exposed, over-exposed. So either Weiss is in charge of returning some journalism to the show or giving the impression she’s returning journalism to the show so the viewers will go back to consuming the propaganda. I stll say it’s option 2 but we’ll see…

Enigma said...

Easy way to get yourself fired: show loyality to a dead king. The king was dead and Pelley defended a corpse.

If only 60 Minutes could "take back" decades of Mike Wallace's propaganda and partisan smear jobs.

RCOCEAN II said...

Weiss was brought in by the Ellisons because they are on the same page. Zionist, Big-business friendly, and not woke. She used to belong to the same club as Scott Pelley but now she doesn't - so Scott Pelley is upset.

And who cares? What great journalism has 60 minutes been doing, the trash interview with Trump? The softballs thrown at the Bidens and Kamala? Or if we go back a few years, all the "Russiagate Trump is a Russian Asset" lies.

Sixty minues is/was just an unpaid arm of the DNC. An liberal/left propaganda machine. Remember "Fontgate?".

RCOCEAN II said...

If you look at 60 minutes Demographics, nobody under 60 watches. That's why they still have 1000 y/o Lesley stahl on the show.

Jamie said...

I can't remember the name of the iron law I'm thinking of, but its essence is that in time, any organization's mission morphs into preservation of the organization itself at the cost of its mission.

I think maybe Jefferson was intuiting this law with his "tree of liberty" observation. On the face of it, a "tree of liberty" is an organization that is worthy of being motivated by its own preservation. But maybe he recognized that the analogy is imperfect and this tree is more like a factory, and the organization charged with operating this factory is like any other organization, eventually devolving into self-preservation at the cost of the actual product of the factory.

Or maybe I'm just torturing Jefferson's thought into a shape that pleases me. Anyway, Pelley seems to think that 60 Minutes rightly deserves to exist in a particular form simply because it's been existing in that form for years, regardless of whether it's actually fulfilling its original, stated mission.

RCOCEAN II said...

Woodward and bernstein was really just woodward. Bernstein was a red diaper baby, a leftist who didn't do much after Watergate except live off his fame and go "This is worse than Watergate!" after every Republican POTUS got into a controversy.

RCOCEAN II said...

Yeah, if you look at it from a business angle, Pelley has no case. New boss, new rules. Dont like it, leave. I'm going further. I'm saying 60 minutes "Mission" was always crap. Pelley loved it because he's a leftist and he thinks Weiss is going to micromanage and make it more objective.

Its amazing how people have bought into the "objective Giants of Journalism" myth, speaking "truth to power", when most of them were just Leftwing political activists with Journo Degrees.

Thats true of cronkite and murrow. And even more so of Wallace and Rather. They seemed "objective" because they had to be, and because society has constantly moved leftward in the last 85 years.

Spiros said...

An employee venting doesn’t necessarily signal malicious intent. Maybe he's stressed or burned out or lacks clarity or whatever. But an employee openly criticizing the boss? That's a no go. Good to see Pelley go! He can take his brand of toxicity somewhere else, like NPR or Substack or something.

Mr. D said...

Scott Pelley is a brilliant, indispensable journalist. He's told us this many, many times.

Wince said...

“Good night and good luck… you ignorant slut.”

narciso said...

Woodward was just mark felts spittoon now pelley has not abetted fraud as much say rather or miss aaron latham leslie stahl

Enigma said...

Woodward used Bernstein for credibility marketing: "Not one guy did this, but two indepdendent pros with different skills worked together to find the truth."

See later iterations of this in the tech industry, with Apple Computer (Jobs & Woz), Microsoft (Gates & Ballmer), and iD Software (genius John Carmack & buffoon John Romero).

Howard said...

Wince, for the win.

narciso said...

The airplane parody was best

narciso said...

More like the james gamg

Paul Zrimsek said...

Tough out there for prima donnas.

Amadeus 48 said...

Good riddance.

Michael said...


Bari Weiss is] murdering ‘60 Minutes.... She does not love this place. She was brought in to kill it, and she’s been doing exactly that.

After several decades of mentoring leaders tasked with turning an organization around, my advice has always been, Do not be afraid to kill that which needs to die

Money Manger said...

David Ellison, CEO of CBS owner Paramount, is currently marketing a mammoth debt deal to finance his acquisition of Warner Brothers. The market views it as a huge, leveraged stretch. He will have to scrimp and shave every penny if the deal, and his reputation, is not to go down in a historic collapse.
He calculating cold heart has no room for the childish emotions of Pelley, or the sloppy, money-losing business of CBS News.
Tell Scott it was strictly business.

RoseAnne said...

What skills and experience does Scott Pelley have in running an organization with the size and history of CBS? He apparently doesn't do well working with women who don't kow-tow to his opinions immediately.

narciso said...

They need to fire the whole lot

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ along with $1.8bn of Kleptocracy said...

One suspects Mr Pelley’s intentionally chose the loudest possible form of good-bye.

This article misses the story

On May 10th, CBS aired an interview with Bibi booked personally by Bari Weiss herself.

The real scandal is how Bari got it: she went behind Lesley Stahl’s back and let a foreign head of state choose his own interviewer like he was ordering off a room service menu.

Bibi rejected Stahl and hand-picked Major Garrett because Bibi wanted a softer ride and CBS corporate gave it to him just to secure the "exclusive."

When Scott Pelley stood up and called this exactly what it was, they fired him.

Who Bari Weiss actually is? Why was she picked by Larry and David Ellison? This all seems central to the story, so why was this not in the article?

But don’t worry this whole business will be restructured in a few years: too much debt for declining cash flows.

In a decade, Scott Pelley’s rookie card will be much more valuable than Bari Weiss’s.

Ann Althouse said...

"If you look at 60 minutes Demographics, nobody under 60 watches."

I'm 75, and I watched it circa 1980, when Mike Wallace was the main person and Andy Rooney did his thing. I didn't have cable TV yet, and there wasn't much on. I watched the nightly news around then too. I haven't watched either in the last 20 or 30 years.

RoseAnne said...

"After several decades of mentoring leaders tasked with turning an organization around, my advice has always been, Do not be afraid to kill that which needs to die." Michael

Good advice for life, not just organizations. Of course, I am not speaking of actual people, but relationships, habits, repeating bad decisions, etc.

Ann Althouse said...

40 years really.

Cappy said...

A well deserved heave-ho.

Krumhorn said...

Tell Scott it was strictly business.

Not to mention that Sundance still needs to get fed approval of the Warners deal. Self-important smug lefties need to be bitch slapped with the ho hand.

- Krumhorn

William said...

I understand that ,unlike the Colbert show, the 60 Minutes show makes money. It's a Golden Goose but it looks like it's laying the wrong kind of eggs. Maybe with the right kind of stuffing and roasted at the proper temperature, Weiss can hit on the proper way of having her Golden Goose and eating it too.

Krumhorn said...

….er Skydance

- - Krumhorn

Smilin' Jack said...

“... a performative display of hostility...."

Performative? The hostility seemed pretty sincere to me.

I think the last time I saw 60 minutes it was in black & white.

Dogma and Pony Show said...

Mainstream journalism self-immolated a few years ago when the whole industry decided their job was to promote progressive viewpoints rather than simply report events and let the public form its own opinions. This served not only to advance their own ideological agendas, but also to elevate their self-perceived importance to society.

Maynard said...

“Performative” is the word for today.

And tomorrow. It’s what they do.

Oh Yea said...

"Ann Althouse said...
"If you look at 60 minutes Demographics, nobody under 60 watches."

I'm 75, and I watched it circa 1980, when Mike Wallace was the main person and Andy Rooney did his thing. I didn't have cable TV yet, and there wasn't much on. I watched the nightly news around then too. I haven't watched either in the last 20 or 30 years."

Ditto. Watched religiously from the earliest days while I grade school. Started falling out of love with it while watching it with college friends as we started noticing the contradictions and inaccuracies. Finally gave up for good in late '80s when they produced a totally stilted feature on a subject that I intimate knowledge from work.

Enigma said...

@IEE and his AI-generated drivel: Bibi rejected Stahl and hand-picked Major Garrett because Bibi wanted a softer ride and CBS corporate gave it to him just to secure the "exclusive."

So, this is now "balance" after decades of 60 Minutes giving lefties boosts far in excess of a soft ride for exclusives? A dirty pot calls off-white paint black.

Jay Vogt said...

The classy way to do this, is to retain McKinsey to come in and do an evaluation & recommendation. They'll know where you want to go. This way, you can get rid of everybody you want and you can strongly emphasize that you'd hired experts and this is their plan.

William said...

Scott Pelley, Don Lemon, Stephen Colbert. You could fill a hall closet in the Broadcaster's Hall of Fame with the talent that has been rudely ousted by the MAGA movement. Where will it end? I fear for the future of Joy Behar,

Dogma and Pony Show said...

Can anyone enlighten us as to what changes Weiss has made to the Evening News that Pelley is calling "catastrophic?"

Jimmy said...

The show started in 1968, and like a great many ideas born at that time, is way past time for it to go away.

Indefinitely Extended Excursion™️ along with $1.8bn of Kleptocracy said...

Call it "3600 Seconds" so new generations think they're getting more news for their time.

narciso said...

Hans Mahncke on X: "One of Scott Pelley’s most infamous moments came when he attacked President Trump for defunding Peter Daszak, claiming Trump was standing in the way of a cure for Covid, when in truth Daszak helped create it in the first place. It was a total inversion of reality. Good riddance. https://t.co/BR3mhzCsy0" / X https://share.google/zAjGNwnF9K1pF4auO

friscoda said...

And the letter states that he was fired for cause, so no severance package without a fight

Dogma and Pony Show said...

"Bibi rejected Stahl and hand-picked Major Garrett because Bibi wanted a softer ride and CBS corporate gave it to him just to secure the 'exclusive.'"

As if newsmakers don't have the inherent ability to choose whom they sit down with for an interview.

If that's Pelley's main grievance, he's a buffoon.

narciso said...

I stand corrected

Aggie said...

He thought he was the brave defender & owner of the Legacy. I wonder how many millions of dollars he walked away from with those stunts, gone because he could be fired 'for cause'. I bet those were exciting meetings in the corner office, reviewing the events with the lawyers.

Welcome to the exciting new world of Substack, Scott. Let's see. There's Jennifer Rubin.... Don Lemon..... Jim Acosta.....Chris Cuomo.... Dan Rather..... Brian Seltzer...Chris Wallace..... Andrea Mitchell.... Gosh I hope there's room for all of you.

narciso said...

That clown car is getting crowded

Bob Boyd said...

Dumping Pelley will probably increase audience share. You catch more flies with honey than vinegar and water.

Bushman of the Kohlrabi said...

Pelley sounds just like your typical run of the mill government employee, which is what he was.

Iman said...

Pelley can continue his panic and meltdown in retirement.

Good riddance to bad rubbish.

bagoh20 said...

I've had to do similar firings and seen them done with other employees like this. The initial concern about the negative effect of losing that person is quickly replaced by relief and excitement about replacing them and moving past the obstacle they were. I've never seen it regretted by the company. Executives that let it fester always fail, or sometimes they get lucky and the person leaves on their own.

bagoh20 said...

If this is a mistake, we'll soon see Pelley making millions on his exceptional talent and journalistic skill.

mezzrow said...

Looks like everyone involved got what they wanted.

To this reader, Pelley's future would seem to be more Troy McClure than Eric Severeid.

bagoh20 said...

It impossible to keep an employee who acts out like that in front of other staff.

RCOCEAN II said...

It seems like a million years ago, but back in Feb 2025, 60 minutes had to publish the transcript of the Kamala Harris intereview because it was obviously edited to make her look good.

RCOCEAN II said...

Eric Severaid. Walter Conkrite both gone at 65. Lesly stahl - she gets to work till 84!

Earnest Prole said...

Your terms are acceptable.

Goldenpause said...

Insulting your new bosses generally is a guaranteed ticket out the door. So Pelley either pulled his stunts with the intention of being fired or believed his own hype that he was indispensable and expected to get his way. In two weeks he will be as relevant as Don Lemon.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

I'm with Althouse. I DID watch the show in my 30s and 40s but stopped before the Pelley era, maybe about the time that Anderson Vanderbilt joined the team. It sucked and wasn't getting better. Not one clip I've seen since then has changed my mind. Wife used to DVR it but we never watched so she stopped.

They made it very obvious they HATE any GOP who comes on or gets profiled. Pure hate. It was hard to watch. Then they'd give Joe a tongue bath for naming his fave ice cream. I try to avoid haters.

Good luck Bari! Remember when she left NYT because the wokies revolted? And why? Because they published a Senator recommending we make the demonstrations more peaceful less rioty.

Scientific Socialist said...

A boss fires an insubordinate employee, as if that’s been proscribed by Rome.

Michael said...

bagoh20 said:

The initial concern about the negative effect of losing that person is quickly replaced by relief and excitement about replacing them and moving past the obstacle they were.

Without fail, whenever I had to terminate an employee, one or more came to me afterward to say , What took you so long?

mikee said...

Much like other revenants of the second half of the past century, 60 Minutes has not survived the changes in media wrought by much more available, much more creative, and infinitely much more individualized outlets that can get millions of viewers. Why watch a show that had to light a truck on fire to pretend the gas tank was unsafe? And so on, for years of examples of not just bias but BS on the show.

SNL is rarely funny, late night talk is dead, 60 Minutes has no purpose other than to stroke the egos of its creators. And CBS has no need to fund it and its prima donna staff in perpetuity. Good riddance.

Aggie said...

BeGone

Fred Drinkwater said...

Michael, long ago I has a director whose staff management philosophy included this, about problem employees: "You can shoot them, fix them, or move them. But you can't wait."

Joe Bar said...

Jamie said...
"I can't remember the name of the iron law I'm thinking of, but its essence is that in time, any organization's mission morphs into preservation of the organization itself at the cost of its mission."

That's Jerry Pournelle's Iron Law of Bureaucracy.

Joe Bar said...

I anxiously await reviews of Pelley's upcoming podcast.

gilbar said...

do people REALLY think, that their new boss HAS TO "love" their current work?
REALLY?
If your work is REALLY that lovely.. WHY do you have a new boss?
why aren't YOU the new boss?
hmmm

Lazarus said...

Mike Wallace was 60 minutes (with help from Morley Safer and Andy Rooney). That's why they kept him around until he was mummified with age. He did hard-hitting interviews with America's corporate rulers. 60 Minutes and CBS aren't willing to go after our new government, NGO, and media rulers. Have they even done any exposes of corporate wrongdoing lately? I wouldn't have heard anything about 60 Minutes at all if there weren't a movie based on their earlier exploits a few years back.

Woodward and Bernstein were just conduits for the Deep State -- or for one resentful bureaucrat's vengefulness. Investigative reporters just do the work that leakers want done.

Josephbleau said...

The cemeteries are full of indispensable men.

narciso said...

https://x.com/greg_price11/status/2062195621017387126

narciso said...

Tom Elliott on X: "Recall how Scott Pelley used 60 Minutes to run cover for Andy McCabe lying to the FBI during his anti-Trump witch hunt. He's always been a progressive activist masquerading as a professional journalist." / X https://share.google/7tXMquSvdRalBZrVA

Butkus51 said...

Seems Pelley doesnt love "this place".

"This place" meaning the USA.

Clyde said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Clyde said...

Unlike a baseball manager who throws a tantrum and gets ejected from the game, Pelley will not return tomorrow night.

bagoh20 said...

I can remember well that everybody I knew, and I would naively swallow the "investigative" stories 60 Minutes would feed us back in the day. We never questioned that they were the good guys catching bad guys. The reason I stopped watching years ago was when the stories started getting exposed as fraudulent. I never went back, but for a while there we swallowed it all. They made us feel good for not being successful businessmen, or dedicated Christians, or Republicans. I guess a good number of people are still drinking that Kool-Aid, but Bari is looking to go with a more nutritious drink, but the kids got used to the sugar.

narciso said...

About 20 years ago with rathergate but appsrently many of the reports from the iraq war the couric interview etc etc

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.