Kamala Harris was asked about her thought process when deciding to run for president in 2028, her answer is some of the most retarded word salad you will ever hear. pic.twitter.com/Jj8nXBATZC
— Retard Finder (@IfindRetards) June 21, 2026
Let's look at the transcript: "What people are telling me includes that they want to believe in systems. And they've lost trust in those systems. What I hear a lot is that people know that at the end of this administration there will be a lot of debris. I tell them often, I can't guarantee that it won't get worse before it gets better. But the one thing I do know is that at the end there will be a lot of debris. And it would be irresponsible to then address that in a way that we only talk about what should we do, what do we need to do to rebuild. If we do that with any sense of nostalgia, that would be irresponsible. The status quo is not working for a lot of people. And what the people are telling us is that they want things to be better. And, in some places, what that sounds like is we want that to be broken. But they don't actually necessarily mean break it through destruction. But they do mean it has to be better."
What that means is quite simple: People want things to be better. We're not told how. We're told what it's not. It's not the way of the past — not Trump's "Great Again" or "Build Back Better" and it's not the destructiveness of the far left.
AND: I do find it odd that she uses the word "systems": "What people are telling me includes that they want to believe in systems." Why would we want to believe in systems? That makes "systems" seem like religion — where the value is in the belief itself. She says people have "lost trust in those systems" — as if what people want is to avoid the bother of monitoring government.
Side issue: "Is dis a system?"

95 comments:
Ann, I do love they way every once in awhile you toss a heaping plate of red raw meat into the tiger den of your commentariat.
The first thing that came to mind when I saw the headline was this song by Fountains of Wayne. Seems appropriate to me.
Fountains of Wayne - Richie and Ruben (Fallon 2011)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RSb9Gq6aK3s&list=RDRSb9Gq6aK3s&start_radio=1
They opened a boutique they called "Debris"
Together with some kid from F.I.T
Though later it turned out he never quite
Got his degree
Eleven hundred bucks for a ripped up shirt
That came pre-stained with bleach and black dirt
Seemed just a little bit
Too steep to me - e - e - e - e
Richie and Ruben
Don't know what they're doin'
Richie and Ruben
Are both a little out of their minds
Don't give 'em a dime
They'll blow through your dough
Just like they blew through mine...
The Democrats are going to destroy this poor woman in every debate and in every primary. I predict zero delegates.
I know if I had a chance to speak to Kamala I'd tell her I want to believe in systems.
Said no one ever.
If I were a Democrat I'd truly be embarrased this person was my party's candidate for POTUS.
Word salad regurgitated and served as something edible.
oh my…
…the best part is Arnold listening…
I met my love / on a pile of debris
…like a living Cheval painting or a commercial for men’s cologne. I can’t decide…
alas, it may only be AI slop…
And Leftists believe the American nation did not elect her President because we are not ready for a strong, black woman.
Rejahm, the AI angle occurred to me, too.
It was almost painful to listen to the moderator ask her “what are you hearing?” How many words did he need to say that? How many circles did he go in?
And she, talking about debris and how some things needed to get worse before they get better, was perfectly describing what Trump faced when he came in after Biden.
She has the annoying habit of repeating part of the question like a beauty pageant contestant tends to do to use up time.
well yes, if we need to take a stab at legitimizing anything she’s trying to say, I suppose there is a flicker of sentience that exposes her handlers still believe Trump is an anomaly that will soon be gone and once he is they will be returning us to our regularly scheduled program. Normals need to dispel them of that notion….
If it's a brand new U.S. Constitution you want then Kamala Harris is the one for you!
Wilbur said...
If I were a Democrat I'd truly be embarrassed this person was my party's candidate for POTUS.
If I were a Democrat, I’d be embarrassed this woman got 75 million votes.
"At first we didn’t know exactly what this was, but we’ve developed a theory. We feel that when citizens in your society were guilty of a crime against the state, they were forced to watch this."
The "this" being film clips of Howard Cosell pontificating on something. Kamala is today's Cosell.
from Sleeper (1973),
https://www.reddit.com/r/70s/comments/17j1tnf/woody_allens_sleeper_miles_monroe_on_howard_cosell/
Rocco said...
"..If I were a Democrat, I’d be embarrassed this woman got 75 million votes.."
as opposed to the 81 million votes counted for Joe Biden?
Joe Biden had a higher vote count, than ANY President.. EVER
EVER!
81 MILLION is a LOT of vote count..
Think of work it took to make that count.
as they say: Vote Counts COUNT
Leading in the polls to become the nominee.
Minute 15:30 dear
It’s socialist blather. It’s not working because I keep saying so. I’ll fix it by replacing it with something I will tell you is better because I’m so smart and can decide these things for you. All your individual decisions belong to me.
and it's not the destructiveness of the far left.
…where’s the evidence she’s saying anything like this?
She is traveling around the country listening especially to the quiet bat people.
She wants to emphasize that she is here to hear.
John Henry
…at this point she qualifies as an elder statesman of her party. Only by accident would she be suggesting the far left is not part of her future. It’s realty all they have left…
…all that debris talk and breaking the system- for a second there I thought she was on about the reflecting pool…
…after this listening tour she will be introduced to voters for about the eighth time…
I'm surprised that she didn't even mention the 762,000 people that Trump killed by cutting USAID...
She was a beta test
I do find it odd that she uses the word "systems"
I think she meant "institutions."
While it's not necessarily a word salad, it is vacuous. Just vague references to systems and debris, with no substance. It's for dumb people who want to feel like they're smart.
"Atoms and Systems, into Ruin hurled,
And now a Bubble Burst, and now a World"
- Alexander Pope
Systems = grift
Debris = broken rice bowls
Whose the twit on the left
I'm willing to accept the possibility that Trump might have screwed up the refurbishment of the reflecting pool, but I will never in any mood or under any circumstances accept the possibility that Kamala might have been the better choice for President......On the plus side, those words come from her own brain and heart.. She didn't plagiarize them. It's gibberish, but it's her gibberish and she truly believes in that gibberish.
Kamala's newly-acquired penchant for the words system and debris makes me think she's been eavesdropping on the conversation of a pair of HVAC repairmen and taking notes.
gilbar said...
as opposed to the 81 million votes counted for Joe Biden?
First, the f-curve on the vote count is a big nothingburger. It happens all the time in Democrat districts.
Second, Joe Biden had decades upon decades upon decades of sterling government service. If we hand out credit for the shape the country is in, I’d bet 10% would go to the big guy.
Sometimes a "system" is nothing but an empty appeal to authority when people don't know what the hell they're talking about.
"I know how to do it... I got a system."
From a business perspective, if some snapper head consultant walked into my office talking like this while pretending to have a solution to improve my business, I'd let them know they're insulting my intelligence and wasting my time. Please leave before I get pissed off.
I think what she was trying to say is that she hates Trump and wants to undo everything that Trump did. She wants open borders, higher taxes, return to the massive subsidies for wind and solar energy etc.
I think she uses "systems" to try to sound smart when what she really means is the loss of trust in public institutions, which is well-deserved.
And I agree with Breezy that this is just socialist blather. She does not want to include in the discussion what we should do, need to do, or has worked in the past.
“The problem of utopia is that it can only be approached across a sea of blood, and you never arrive.”
― Peter Hitchens
Michael Corleone, “Carlo, don’t tell me you are innocent. It insults my intelligence and makes me very angry.”
Carlo was murdered within 30 minutes. But at least he told the truth. It was Barzini.
The Greek roots of the word "system" simply mean "to stand together." Why can't she use more Anglo-Saxon words? Orwel would approve, but I'll bet she thinks that's systemic racism.
"Sometimes people talk like this because if they spoke straightforwardly, it would be empty or stupid."
Mission failed.
Nostalgia and debris. That's the talk of Marxist revolutionaries.
Bob Boyd said...
"Nostalgia and debris. That's the talk of Marxist revolutionaries."
Yes, and Kamala's stated notions of equity vs. equality are enough to disqualify her forever as a leader of the free world.
Sorry ladies.
At least there is an implicit understanding that people voted for Trump for a reason.
Trump put a stop to a lot of leftist democratic corruption.
USAID.
green new deal grift.
The corrupt left consider that as debris.
She - or any of the dems - will do all they can to rebuild their corrupt structures.
MN and CA and Virginia lead the way.
It's striking how you can see the wheels in her brain turning when she begins to answer the question. She partially repeats the question (as mentioned above) to buy time, throws in the word "includes" as an escape hatch, and then carefully tiptoes through this inoccuous question, being careful not to say anything or use any word or phrase that might somehow be used against her. She feels safer doing that than just answering the question directly, and she's gotten away with this her entire public life.
It's remarkable this individual has ever achieved any position of authority. I've heard people who know her personally swear that she's not like this in private, that she's actually very smart and capable. It's to her party's discredit that they've allowed her to lower her level of public discourse to such a level.
She's just scared shitless to say anything responsive.
What a fatuous idiot Kamal is. Of course people want things to "be better." Of course everyone can see that our government is broken. To act as though this is some profound insight by speaking slowly is nonsense, with apologies to our hostess.
The debris that she warns we must not feel nostalgia for will be the Constitution and Bill of Rights, a 2 party system, capitalism and free markets, individualism, equality, and a lot of people.
But don't worry. They'll replace it all with something better. They have good intentions after all.
Sometimes people talk like this because if they spoke straightforwardly, it would be empty or stupid.
Snake oil salesmen, for example.
"Woody Debris" was my porn name.
Systems Engineering tries to make the case that just because you make the pieces better the whole system does not work better. This is mostly delusion. The solution to complexity is in the application of countermeasures to failure classes.
Rust never sleeps.
Of course people want things to be better. The problem is and always has been that people cannot agree what constitutes better, it's one of the traits we share with the chimpanzees. And of course everyone thinks the current system is broken, they just cannot agree on what constitutes fixed. Another anthropoid political legacy. The current Democrat definition of fixed favors fewer Jews and more Muslims in higher education, the arts, and industry. Everybody but Kamal Harris knows where that comes from. Anthropogenic catastrophes tend to roll in roughly century-long cycles. It's about time for that one.
What is the purpose of speaking?
Everything sucks. It's not our fault. Only we can fix it.
Same old shit. I don't care about words. I'm ultra MAGA, but I don't care what Trump says. I rarely listen. You do things, and they help or hurt, or you don't do things. That's all there is in the end. Most politicians know nothing of doing real things, never did, never will, but here, have a salad.
Sometimes people talk like this because if they spoke straightforwardly, it would be empty or stupid.
Like when Arnold Schwarzenegger said, "Fuck your freedom!" he should have said, "Fuck your nostalgia!"
System of a Downer…
We're living in a literal "Alice in Wonderland" world where up is down, right is left. Totalitarianism masked as democratic governance. Violence as a means for political correctness. All cloaked in garbled sentences and double-meaning public statements made at conferences and at the podium of some fancy think tank presentation.
Progressive-liberal politicians speak in garbled sentences, but they're advocating for civil unrest, draconian laws to limit free speech solely to maintain their set socialist-marxist-trans agenda, and stiff criminal enforcement of their fairyland political agenda.
Listened to Hillary Clinton at Chicago's PUSH conference a week ago, advocating "upheaval". Listened to Valerie Jarrett at Obama monument opening ceremony. These political elites are well-dressed well-credentialed grifters, who want us regular-folk Americans to fight each other in the streets over ridiculous word salad causes, while they quietly steal taxpayer dollars.
How's Stacy Adams doing with her cool billion in USEPA funds from Biden Administration? Did Harris and Clinton get their share of the loot?
Wading through a sea of word salad debris...... If 'people' are telling her they want to 'believe in systems again', how come they're only telling her? Isn't this is how the Progressive party works? They look for a word or a phrase that they can engineer into resonating, and then they repeat, repeat, repeat.
We thought we left you on the debris
Of teh ‘24 election
You was yammering yer platitudes
You was the Devil’s Bargain
h/t Ronnie Lane
Wouldn't it be crazy if a politician insisted on the normal order of creating a federal budget? For the first time in over 20 years? Instead of ad hoc gigantic spending bills stuffed with all kinds of graft? Maybe that kind of "system?"
Nah, if we just create more set-asides for favored minority groups, that'll bring trust. Sure.
The reason I am an anarchist is because:
As systems* grow they behave less and less human until they become inhuman.
*-systems are what I call any entity like a government, corporation, academic organization, etc. They are designed to function a certain way, like a system.
her people steal trillions in entitlements every year. If anyone starts monkeying around fixing systems her and her supporters go broke. I suppose they could all be that stupid but…
Shorter Kamala, 'If we don't win, the system isn't working.'
“Wouldn't it be crazy if a politician insisted on the normal order of creating a federal budget”
…a reminder that Gates was kicked out not because he failed some secret congressional morality test but because he insisted on regular order and actual budgets…
Remember, this is the smartest Democrat. The Democratic Party bypassed the messy primary system to nominate her because she is the smartest, the most honest, far sighted, deep, intellectual.
The others are worse.
I cringe when I hear "listening tour".
Her political "lane", as a number of comments have skirted around, has always been a midwit supporting a status quo nobody but the connected like, and the reason she bombed out in 2020 before a single vote was cast is she has no vocabulary to express a vision of either change or restoration. It was why jn 2024 she couldn't give a single example of a thing she would have done differently than Biden. She's on the same track in 2028.
The systems didn't fail us, just like the gun didn't kill anyone. What we have lost trust in is each other, and we'd be fools not distrust people in our current culture. Why can't I trust so many of my fellow citizens? I know I can't, but I used to. What happened? It wasn't bad system design.
“I really, truly believe this. We we each have have light inside of us. And we need to know that that is what inspires our hope as much as anything external to ourselves. And when we feel that and and and not allow an election or an individual to dampen that light, umh and instead light, let that light kind of carry us in particular through moments of darkness, that that we not only act on that hope, but we inspire that hope in each other. And in particular, at this moment, it is so important that we not only have hope, but that we understand that that should be a verb.”
Kamala in her June 19 interview with Don Lemon
One could argue that there is not enough evident debris sourced from leftist policies and politicians scattered all over the place: the evil deep staters, Fauci, the senate rinos, the biased judges, the fraudsters, the election cheaters, etc…. All this debris still yet to be composted.
I thought that reference to "systems" joggled a vague memory.
It's a case of "what's old is new again," perhaps?
Check out Adam Smith's (1759 ! ) thoughts on "men of systems":
https://oll.libertyfund.org/quotes/adam-smith-on-social-change-and-the-man-of-system-1759
The Democratic Party used to have extremely intelligent candidates: Kennedy, Carter, and Clinton - regardless of what I thought of their policies I respected their intelligence. Obama has the cloud of affirmative action hanging over him, but his eloquence speaks to his intelligence. Biden and Harris are both blithering idiots. If I were a Democrat I would be terminally embarrassed that they were supposedly the best my party could produce.
“What I hear a lot is that people know that at the end of this administration there will be a lot of debris.”
Spoken by some debris from the last administration.
Biden and Harris are both blithering idiots. If I were a Democrat I would be terminally embarrassed that they were supposedly the best my party could produce
…consider the possibility that is by design. Biden’s infirmity gave the game away but the same could be said about Kamala and Barack- what’s important is a powerless, malleable figurehead while the evil cabal works anonymously away from prying eyes…
I’m seeing more and more of this kind of writing and speaking in students. It’s so awkward and opaque because she has lexicalized idioms as their lowest common denominator denotations without having understood the original metaphor and having no sense of the connotations of the words.
Her specific examples would take a lot of time, but as an example, think of only understanding “vitriolic” to mean something “bad” or “negative”: you are going to end up applying the word where it doesn’t make sense: “a vitriolic policy” or “a vitriolic symbol.”
This pathology shows up on people who have replaced all their real reading with online stuff—they haven’t seen words in enough different contexts and haven’t looked them up, either, so they have an impoverished understanding of their own language.
Also, Harris has brain-rotted herself with the THC gummies she got addicted to when she started using them to deal with acute anxiety from having to go on television before her cosmetic face work had fully healed is in summer 2020.
Systems like the CDC are broken (for example) because they were so completely politicized during COVID, in large part (I think) to shelter Fauci from facing up to his criminal acts.
You know who else wanted to believe in systems? Hitler.
Remember when voters were told that Biden couldn't drop out because it was too late and the DNC rules wouldn't permit it. And then voters were told nevermind what we just said you have to vote for Kamala now forget what we said about the DNC rules. And then when voters asked for a snap primary or an open convention so that they would have some role in deciding the candidate they were told there just isn't enough time for silliness like elections we have to stop Trump hey look Beyonce!
Is this the "system" people don't trust?
"She has the annoying habit of repeating part of the question like a beauty pageant contestant tends to do to use up time."
It's not so much to "use up time", as to give her severely limited mind more time to attempt to find something responsive to say. She really is as dumb as a sack of hammers. I suspect that she believes that she is merely doing what all successful politicians do, because she is simply too stupid to follow any coherent line of thought.
How much debris will be evident in the seamless transition to the first Vance administration?
and it's not nonsense. It's easy to call it "word salad," laugh, and move on, but I think it's worth understanding and putting starkly. Sometimes people talk like this because if they spoke straightforwardly, it would be empty or stupid.
…when Trump fails to dot an I or cross a T it’s dangerous to be standing between Ann and her computer but she comes up with this as analysis? US politics should not be a handicap tournament where Democrats are spotted two strokes a hole…
Gawd, I forgot how much I hate her voice.
For those of you who would like to hear more from Kamala's interview in Austria. here's the whole thing.
And if you go to 27:50 you'll find that the salad didn't stop where it did in Althouse's post. It continued like an open salad bar at Shoney's.
Also, as she dragged on and began trying to change the subject her facial expressions and body language got more and more extreme.
She beats a sentence into submission
The Democrats are going to destroy this poor woman in every debate and in every primary. I predict zero delegates.
Hmm. I think I've seen this movie before. Lemme think ....
Demon rum…
https://x.com/DumbFxckFinder/status/2068898092498440195?s=20
…yas, barring an emergent Johnny Bravo that fits the suit, she’s the nominee. Gavin is too sentient, a man with some plans. The cabal can’t have that…(music) that’s what superdelegates are for…
Prediction. If Harris is the nominee there will be zero or one debates. She will refuse to do three debates.
JD or Marco will destroy her in any debate.
…reviving an Althouse classic: “…what she meant to say was…”
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith. Also: No italics, even briefly. Use asterisks for emphasis. And don't play with the format by changing fonts or using boldface or all caps. Never include more than one extra line break between paragraphs.