April 17, 2026

"This was a fecund period of first-person writing by women that had a transgressive and self-revealing quality, which also had the consequence of creating a kind of adrenalized form of commentary."

"Blogging was personal, but also a job, often a grind. It created cycles of argument that were rapid, intense and often punishing for the people at the center — both the subjects and the writers. As post quotas were filled, a slippage occurred between the artist and her public, the blogger and her commenters, the internet-famous and the real stars. 'Girls' permeated this media ecosystem...."

Writes Amanda Hess, in "We Need Lena Dunham Now More Than Ever/The era of 'Girls' is long gone. So why are we still so fascinated by its creator?" (NYT).

"An inveterate poster, [Lena] Dunham lived online and seemed determined to step on the rake of commentary as her influence scaled.... [Dunham said she] wished she could have had the experience of aborting a pregnancy.... She explained that her comment was made under the guise of 'a "delusional girl" persona I sometimes inhabit'.... Her name, and her auto-fictional project, had wandered beyond their creative boundaries, and the internecine debates of blogs had ballooned into a national concern. When Clinton lost the election, some blamed Dunham."

46 comments:

narciso said...

Questions no one was asking (taranto)

rehajm said...

They’re really trying to make her a thing again? Those deals with the devil are quite be rock solid, aren’t they? …next thing you know they’ll be trying to resurrect Matt Lauer- oh wait…

tommyesq said...

Virtually no one is fascinated with her. False premise.

Tacitus said...

"We need Lena Dunham more than ever." I'm rating this as True. Had zero need for her before but now she provides a minor degree of amusement. And perhaps for some thinking about pursuing her path, a cautionary tale....

Lucien said...

I thought Lena Dunham was the only person (besides herself) that Clinton didn’t blame for her loss.

Shouting Thomas said...

The bizarre schizophrenia of feminism. I’m 76, and women have been favored in academia and jobs every day of my life, but they’re also oppressed and need daring trail blazers to save them. This mind fuck has turned the majority of women into intolerable, obnoxious assholes… and they’re proud of it, too. Durham is an icon of obnoxious asshole feminism.

rehajm said...

Call of Duty : Young Males is to Lena Dunham : Old White Women

narciso said...

This is what Freud wrought

Mr. D said...

It's human nature to look at car wrecks on the highway, but there's surprisingly little demand for a wreckage industry.

tim maguire said...

So why are we still so fascinated by its creator?"

Who's "we"?

I enjoyed "Girls"--and it was a much more conservative show than most conservatives gave it credit for, but I don't think I've ever once thought about Lena Dunham except when some pop-journalist pushes her in my face.

RCOCEAN II said...

Unfunny fat cow = Dunham. "We" arent fascinated by her. People who read the NYTs are. BTW, can anyone at the NYT's write? Everything reads like its translated German. Full of jargon and $10 words to make the stupid seems smart.

rhhardin said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
mindnumbrobot said...

Make Psychiatric Wards Great Again

RCOCEAN II said...

Andrenalized form of commentary. Good God!

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

Let me reintroduce the handy term "burnout."

Caroline said...

I wonder if you’re posting about Lena as though to say, “I’m not that girl blogger.” Because you’re not. The description here is as foreign to me as it is odious, because I’ve never been a fan of chick lit or sampled these girl boss bloggers. Certainly Lena is nowhere in my field of interest. I hope she doesn’t represent a significant chunk of young women’s priorities, because the narcisissm and solipsism which possesses them is bone chilling. Oh wait, these women are now in their forties, so not young anymore. All the more scary.

rhhardin said...

Featured in Spring 2014 Oberlin Alumni Magazine for the endlessly fascinated.

RCOCEAN II said...

Didn't Dunham attack someone at Oberlin? Saying they were raciss, sexist, bigot, homophobe? I think that was in-between her wishing she'd had sex, so she could have an abortion.

Mike (MJB Wolf) said...

All the nudes that's fit to obfuscate.

Saint Croix said...

[Dunham said she] wished she could have had the experience of aborting a pregnancy

I'd forgotten that.

Celebrating your abortion is definitely a thing on the left. There was one woman -- Althouse blogged on it -- who filmed herself having an abortion. She was the star of her own little abortion movie.

I think they feminists were worried that women might feel bad about their abortions, or ashamed. And their feeling was, you shouldn't be ashamed of sex or abortion. So, many feminists were trying to turn abortion into a positive experience. Healthcare! Choice! Autonomy! Empowering women!

So that's why Dunham made that comment. She was caught up in the abortion fantasies of the left, and oblivious to the realities of abortion, and how people don't like it.

At a minimum, abortion is a failure to love. A failure to love your partner. A failure to love the baby you've created. A failure to respect the miracle of creation, that amazing gift from the Lord.

It's entirely possible that both Clinton and Harris lost because they were so pro-abortion. Clinton's husband tried to moderate the subject ("safe, legal, and rare"), but that was bullshit. He was a philanderer. And abortion has always been a major component of the Playboy Philosophy.

Mrs. Clinton might have also tried to be a moderate on the issue. Or not, I can't remember. But we all know that the Clintons, and Obama, and Biden, and Harris, were all extremists on abortion, regardless of what they said. They were all fanatical supporters of Roe v. Wade.

Aggie said...

When it comes to Lena Dunham, I guess the feminist category of journalists is showing clear signs of suffering from Stockholm syndrome. She's determined to make herself popular, more than that, a household word, using every single resource that she can call upon, every bit of rancid popular culture leverage. And it all stinks to high heaven.

But I'm just as determined to ignore it by golly, and her, not just ignore it, but explicitly, summarily reject it, all the way down to its deep-fried, bleach blond roots.

Achilles said...

Lena Dunham is 1% of the United States 2% problem.

95% of our problems go away if we put 3rd world animals in jail and tell women like Lena Dunham to shut up.

Wince said...

When Clinton lost the election, some blamed Dunham.

"How was I to know... she was with the Russians too. Ha!"

narciso said...

As i elaborated the Old Gods are sad

Ampersand said...

Missing from description: self-respect, deferral of gratification, discretion, capacity for self criticism, etc

Whiskeybum said...

Some are asking whom the NYT author is referring to as “we”. The answer is: it probably doesn’t include you. Think back to the Steinberg New Yorker cover of the view from 9th Avenue… that’s the only “we” that the author knows of or cares about.

Jim said...

Who’s this Lena Dunham I keep hearing about and why should I care?

Howard said...

It makes me completely discount whatever anyone says when they say "we". It's a first order tell of a snow job and assumes the intended audience are ignorant morons lacking all self confidence and self respect. 0/10 will not read.

CJinPA said...

Caroline said...
I wonder if you’re posting about Lena as though to say, “I’m not that girl blogger.”


Not sure of the intent, but it's impossible to not read a post about a NYT-celebrated woman blogger and not think about the woman blogger blogging about the bloggers.

Luckily, the Prof isn't like the Lena blogger or I wouldn't be here every (week)day.

Howard said...

More like a fecal period of first-person diarrhea by a woman with a transmissive and self-evacuating form of IBS

Smilin' Jack said...

“ Who's "we"?”

Not *them*.

Beth B said...

Lena is so "Fetch"! Or so the media keeps trying to tell me.

Lazarus said...

Didn't Dunham attack someone at Oberlin?

Off the top of my head, she wrote about bad sex, possibly rapey, with a trombonist (or other music student) at Oberlin. He sued and settled for much less than he should have.

Lazarus said...

Well, it is good that the Times writes about bizarre leftish cults as it does about the alt.right. The next step though, would be not writing as though the bizarre.left were normal.

I liked her show, but, like so much else in yesteryear's pop culture, I don't think about it now. Possibly for some people, Lena Dunham is as endlessly fascinating as 1960's musicians are for other people. But they probably aren't a very large group.

Jupiter said...

So which is it, "Girls just wanna have fun", or "Chicks just want to ruin everything"?

Jupiter said...

"Clinton's husband tried to moderate the subject ("safe, legal, and rare"), but that was bullshit. He was a philanderer."
In Bill Clinton's defense (a decidedly unfamiliar position for me), he was, and no doubt is, sterile. So he really didn't have any skin in that game.

Wilbur said...

Howard said...
It makes me completely discount whatever anyone says when they say "we". It's a first order tell of a snow job and assumes the intended audience are ignorant morons lacking all self confidence and self respect. 0/10 will not read.
--------------------------------------------------------------------

That's funny ... whenever anyone says "you people" I presume that person is a Leftist jackass addressing those he thinks are ignorant morons.
I concede it is a rebuttable presumption.

Biff said...

Generally, headlines of the form "We Need X Now More Than Ever" are the exact opposite of the truth.

Jim Gust said...

Hillary lost that election all by herself. Although the MSM pushing Trump stories did not help her.

MadTownGuy said...

Amanda Hess, in "We Need Lena Dunham Now More Than Ever/The era of 'Girls' is long gone. So why are we still so fascinated by its creator?"

What you mean, "we," Amanda?

"When Clinton lost the election, some blamed Dunham."

Heaven forfend anyone should take the risk of blaming Hillary.

Read Buzz Patterson's stories on X about her behavior. Eek.

Lazarus said...

I accidentally stumble on the Lena Dunham cult:

I Was Very Jealous of Lena Dunham
We're all just girls slouching towards redemption
Rafael Frumkin

https://rafaelfrumkin.substack.com/p/i-was-very-jealous-of-lena-dunham

I tried to figure out if Rafael was a boy or a girl, but Rafael is non-binary, and therefore not sure him/her/theirself.

The blogpost includes a Vogue photo taken back when Adam Driver could actually lift Lena and carry her on his shoulders.

Not Illinois Resident said...

Hillary Clinton: "I lost the 2016 Election because of Lena Dunham's "Delusional Girl" posts!"

Clyde said...

"Now more than ever." Is she going to give a Checkers Speech?

JIM said...

I'm not sure I would be able to stifle a laugh if you told me Lena was your role model.

mikee said...

Dunham could lose some weight and start a sequel series to Girls. She could call it Little Women. If that name isn't already taken of course.

Bunkypotatohead said...

GIRLS was just Sex and the City for 20-something Jewish girls. Hannah and Carrie even had the same "job"...writing pointless pop culture dreck for online publications.
Sarah Jessica Parker should have sued Dunham for IP theft.

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.