So says the "Author With One New York ‘Times’ Best Seller," who made only $49,000 last year — "$30,000 from book advance/$14,000 from teaching two retreats/$5,000 from narrating own audiobook."
Quoted in "What Do You Do and What Do You Make? 60 New Yorkers about what they brought in last year" (New York Magazine).
I selected that one story out of the 60 — all of which are interesting — because I was charmed by the statement "I’m trying to manifest more abundance." It's a lighthearted — and culturally connected — way to express real pain. How can you live in NYC on $49,000 a year? And yet you hit the envied goal of publishing a best seller!
I don't need to extend this post by expounding on the words "manifest" and "abundance." What would you pay me to resist the impulse? I'll continue. Briefly.
"Manifest" is New Age self-help jargon, used ironically by our best-selling author.
ADDED, ironically: Here's Ezra's book "Abundance," commission earned.
Posts
46 comments:
Live in NYC on $49K? Let's check the totality of government subsidies. Rent control? Food? Medical insurance? Transit? Etc. Etc. Etc.
Gaming the system is a literal career in blue states and cities. Yes, gaming the rules can also be a career with different handouts in red places too.
Anybody who knows anything about the "great writers" of the past should realize that dodging starvation is part of it. Look at Hemingway's memoire where he told his wife he was meeting somebody for lunch so that she could eat at home while he went hungry.
Fitzgerald was better fed, but he admitted to Papa that he first wrote the story with the "real ending," for self respect, then changed it to make it marketable.
If that doesn't sound like fun to you, you probably shouldn't aspire to writing as a career.
"Manifest" is New Age self-help jargon, used ironically by our best-selling author.
Well our teachers taught us Boomers about America in the 19th Century and the doctrine of “Manifest Destiny” in elementary school in the 1950s, high school in the early 1960s, and American History lecture-discussion class in the mid-1960s. So I’ve seen the word before, though its use as a verb is quaint.
Abbondanza is an Italian noun meaning "abundance," "plenty," or "an overflowing wealth" of resources, often used to describe a large, generous quantity of food or good fortune. It is a popular name for Italian restaurants, including a well-known spot in Key West, Florida.
Regarding “Affordability,” here in Virginia self-described “moderate Democrat Abigail Spanberger inherited a budget surplus from her Republican predecessor but immediately set out to pass a raft of nuisance taxes for no fiscal reason whatsoever.
That dude did nothing all year and still got $49,000. Not bad.
Actually, abundance was taken over by the federal govt. way back during the "Mad Cow" scare when the idiot Sec of Ag
added it the official government vocabulary of weasel words for use in important statements.
”I’m trying to manifest more abundance, but I’m really feeling the income streams have dwindled."
Upon first reading that, my money was on Gavin Newsom.
A much better book: Superabundance https://www.amazon.com/Superabundance-Population-Innovation-Flourishing-Infinitely/dp/1952223393
Shilling for Ezra.
How far you've fallen.
Sad particularly, because you're not hard up for cash.
Embarrassed for you, "prof."
When people show you who they are... believe them.
You didn't have to sell our country out to advance your own interests, but you do... is this winning in your warped mind?
I thought Abundance was a Matt Iglesias thing. Wait no he's the one who wants billion people in the US. Anyway, I never found either one of them interesting to read.
The real abundance was the followers we accumulated along the way.
“How can you live in NYC on $49,000 a year?”
Lots and lots of people do, $49K is above the poverty line.
Isn’t manifest abundance the result of capitalism as opposed to the manifest scarcity of socialism?
I’m trying to manifest more abundance.
That's a great phrase because it takes a mundane idea, "I want to make more money", and makes it intriguing.
From Google, "manifest: will (something) into being by the exercise of mental powers or through force of belief."
That's so much better than getting a side gig walking dogs.
Abundance means you don't need to a tighter budget. Go ahead, get that fancy coffee, you've got abundance!
$10,000 ---> $500
Abundance ----> scarcity
"I’m trying to manifest more abundance" sounds virtue signally. Like they don't want to say something so crass as 'I'm trying to make more money.' It turns 'make more money' into something that sounds like you're doing it for everyone, like you're doing your part for the greater good...which, in a hidden hand sense, you actually are.
FYI, to be a best seller, a book need only sell a (relatively) large amount for a short time - e.g., 7000 units in a week. It does not necessarily imply long-term sales or a large amount of royalties.
I am reading Bernard DeVoto's "1846 The Year of Decision". Written in 1943 before any hint of wokemania. Regarded as one of the best histories of the American West, especially the annexation of Texas, California, and the Oregon territory. We tend to assume history was inevitable when we learn of it 150 years later, but it was anything but inevitable at the time. It took vision and determination with lots of political intrigue amid the backdrop of a nation about to pull itself apart over slavery and states rights. Manifest Destiny is how they sold the idea and free land is how they got people to move west. Mexico was a pathetic remnant of a near-dead Spanish Empire, and the Brits were busy with other concerns which led to concessions on the 49th parallel. That opened up the territory, the destiny was manifest, and the land was abundant. Pretty much the opposite of modern day NYC yet people, even lefties, still seek to manifest abundance.
Over there in that article - the pediatrician is making way above average for a pediatrician and the cardiovascular surgeon is making way below average for his specialty.
I failed to fully describe the government's use of abundance as a weasel word. The actual term, still widely used, is "...an abundance of caution."
"All of us learn to write in the second grade. Most of us go on to greater things."
Bob Knight
Uh, yeah, the author thing. I quit and now make real money doing a job that no one wants to do. I still write, just as a hobby. Also, $30k for an advance is very good. However, you can make that working minimum and probably spend less time doing it than writing a book. In short, don't quit your day job.
I’m traveling. I look around and I see so much Covid lockdown devastation. Then chi com soros joe and the cancer Walz satellites stole our money for their commie projects .
"That's so much better than getting a side gig walking dogs."
One of the 60 workers in the NY Magazine article is a dog walker. That person makes almost twice as much as the best-selling author — $92,000.
"I charge at least $40 an hour. I have a steady base of around 30 dogs, but the unpredictability is hard. Sometimes you start off the day thinking you’re going to make $500, then clients cancel. I’ll have a slow day around once a week and make only about $250. One client whose dog got walked twice a day, five days a week, moved away, which meant I lost $15,000 in annual income. And then, you know, the dogs die. It’s a real one-two punch. Your friend you see every day dies, and you also take a massive pay cut. Suddenly, you need to put feelers out to find new clients. I know I have to stop dog-walking the way I am. It’s too physically exhausting. I want to switch to training dogs, but it’s hard to get going on its own and I don’t have enough of a safety net."
Dog walking is too hard!
So many people get dogs to add *pleasure* to their lives.
It's all a matter of perspective, but when it's what you do for money, the activity that would be a pleasure becomes onerous labor.
Ask any prostitute. And there is a prostitute among the 60 in the article. She makes $284,000.
The whole "manifest" industry of self-help gurus reminds me of that old commonsensical phrase of my childhood: wish in one hand, shit in the other, see which one fills up first.
I've reached my limit for New York Magazine this month. Many Althouse links I suspect.
Dude could lead a retreat a week and make over $300K. If he’s really crafty, the retreat could be Watch A Bestselling Author Write and he could get a couple of books knocked out at the same time. CC, JSM
Ann Althouse said...
Dog walking is too hard!
I dunno the Meade-house pet situation but, yes, walking a dog (or dogs as I have seen people do) on a leash is hard. You're not following a Roomba on a string. Think more like one of those robotic rolling balls with a squirrel tail springing from one side of the sidewalk to the other, slamming to a stop for sniffs and leaks, and generally acting like a toddler on crack. While keeping alert for potential adverse encounters with other pedestrians and animals. I like our little guy but walking him is definitely a workout.
New York is a luxury good
Ann Althouse said...
"Dog walking is too hard!"
You have to pick up the "leavings," too.
Unless you're John Grisham or Stephen King, the economics of book publishing are very much stacked against writers.
Depending on the type of book (and the author's relative negotiating power), the writer's cut of a book's sale price (which is often discounted from the cover price) is typically just 6% to 10%. Of course, 15% of that goes to their agent (which they need to have just to get a publisher to consider them).
If they're lucky enough to get an advance, it's usually paid in three parts -- one third each when the deal is signed, one third when the manuscript is accepted, and one third when the book is published. And since they're only getting 6% to 10% of the sales price, the majority never receive any royalties beyond that.
You can make a higher percentage by self-publishing on Kindle -- but Amazon still takes a big cut, you're responsible for all expenses, and it's harder to get readers to notice your book. If you sign up for Kindle Unlimited, you get a fee for each time someone reads the book, but it's far less likely that they'll buy it. And you only get paid for the number of pages they actually read.
It's no wonder that very few authors -- even "best-selling" ones -- can actually make a living from their writing.
I'm pretty comfortable but $15,000 annually to have the dog walked might be a little over my budget.
15k would feed Sharon from Minnesota for 19.23 years.
Fitzgerald was better fed, but he admitted to Papa that he first wrote the story with the "real ending," for self respect, then changed it to make it marketable.
Interesting. Have these "director's cuts" ever been found and published?
Let's check the totality of government subsidies. Rent control? Food? Medical insurance? Transit? Etc. Etc. Etc.
Great economists lament that government transfer payments generally aren't counted as income. It distorts so many policy conclusions...
"How can you live in NYC on $49,000 a year?"
Why would you? Live somewhere cheap - it's not like any of his income depends on being in NYC.
"Great economists lament that government transfer payments generally aren't counted as income. It distorts so many policy conclusions..."
Doing that, the number of those living in "poverty" would crater. Too many incomes are dependent on that not happening.
As well, actually putting a public number to those government transfer payments would surely piss off a great many of the people working jobs to pay the taxes that fund those payments.
…a squandered opportunity to instantly reduce inequality and improve the income levels of the most needy- literally overnight!
…no new government program. No new government debt. Where’s the fun in that I guess…
I used up my New York links so couldn't see the article. I'd be interested in looking at the author's book based on the fine phrase about manifesting abundance.
"Actually putting a public number to those government transfer payments" would merely, in the case of the feds, be complying with US Constitution Article I Section 9, paragraph 7. It's not supposed to be optional.
“ mezzrow said...
Abbondanza is an Italian noun meaning "abundance," "plenty," or "an overflowing wealth" of resources, often used to describe a large, generous quantity of food or good fortune.”
I thought he was Vito Corleone’s consigliere
I manifest abundance by working my ass off 5 days a week.
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.