Writes Trump, on Truth Social.
January 5, 2026
"Today, the Trump Administration is proud to announce the United States of America’s updated Childhood Vaccination Schedule."
"This Schedule is rooted in the Gold Standard of Science, and widely agreed upon by Scientists and Experts all over the World. Effective today, America will no longer require 72 'jabs' for our beautiful, healthy children. We are moving to a far more reasonable Schedule, where all children will only be recommended to receive Vaccinations for 11 of the most serious and dangerous diseases. Parents can still choose to give their children all of the Vaccinations, if they wish, and they will still be covered by insurance. However, this updated Schedule finally aligns the United States with other Developed Nations around the World.... Many Americans, especially the 'MAHA Moms,' have been praying for these COMMON SENSE reforms for many years...."
Posts
15 comments:
...72 seems like too many if the kid's health and sanity is the first priority. Also just watch who goes mad over the new recommendations...
He's right to distinguish between vaccines and jabs. Also to discern risk based on context. And the inflammatory injuries caused by a liberal schedule. A science-based schedule considered by parents and doctors, without indemnity or favor.
Remember ... a vaccination is a weakened form of the actual virus it aims to prevent you from getting.
The COVID19 abomination is not a vaccine. Do not have this crap injected into you. It is editing your DNA.
If you want vaccines to stop appearing like a conspiracy, the element of choice is vital. Of course, now that people know how desperate the attempt to inject SOMETHING during COVID was, especially when the mutations made previous doses worthless, that's going to be a hard sell. A decent pro,-acience move by the Administration.
how DARE Him!
How can we DESTROY our own children, if we are not FORCED to poison them?
NO ONE can be permitted to decide on their own,
for their own children!
ALL MUST BE Forced, to have all 72.. whether they help or hurt!
72 into every child born!!!?
That's one hell of a business success if nothing else.
I can't think of anything like it.
I used to think that required college book sales was a pretty amazing scam, but that's far less volume. My hat is off to you bastards in pharmaceuticals. You guys git-r-done!
"My body - my choice" belongs here, not with that other thing.
Such a kick ass administration. All dems can do is whine and complain. Their astroturf protest signs should all read, “we demand the status quo!”
Senator Bill Cassidy (R-LA) says:
The CDC announced Monday it would be reducing the number of recommended vaccines for children from 17 to 11. Cassidy, a physician and longtime proponent of vaccinations, said this move will “make America sicker.”
“The vaccine schedule IS NOT A MANDATE. It’s a recommendation giving parents the power. Changing the pediatric vaccine schedule based on no scientific input on safety risks and little transparency will cause unnecessary fear for patients and doctors," he added.
Insurance companies will continue to pay for current vaccines.
"Hep-b- primarily spread by sexual Contact and dirty needles. Why in h--l is this recommended for all newborns?"
AI says there used to be about 20,000 cases among newborns (typically from infected mothers), with maybe 12,000 developing into chronic lifelong infections. The vaccine did away with those, so now the only cases left are the ones you describe.
This is a big improvement.
Now if they can readjust the ratio of adjuvant to antigen in the vaccines we should see a substantial reduction in auto-immune diseases and related intolerances (gluten, peanut, milk, etc.).
Think of the adjuvants as pre-amplifiers for the immune system. If they are cranked up too high, you end up amplifying things you don't want to amplify, and ever single inoculation with the adjuvant risks the development of an immune response that you don't want (i.e., to some gluten that is in the child's intestinal tract or some peanut in saliva).
The problem is that the adjuvants are tested to see if increased amounts lead monotonically to worse outcomes. That's an essential test, but you've got essentially a Monte Carlo process going on. Everything's good if the immune system you are over-stimulating is only exposed to the desired antigen(s). But when there are sub-clinical immune responses already active that you are unaware of (the baby has an occult respiratory virus, for example) those consequent morbidities will be scattered throughout the data. We should be testing for frequency of adjuvant exposure, not just total adjuvant exposure, and we should do so with control arms.
The fundamental issue is that adjuvants are cheap, and antigens are expensive to make, keep uncontaminated, and test frequently. So over time there has been pressure to shift the balance towards adjuvants, and at this point the pre-amp is cranked too far and is blasting our every pop, crackle, and feedback squeal, and the result is a massive increase in instances in which the immune system is attacking stuff we don't want it to attack.
Hmm.... only about a dozen comments. Where are all the experts, weighing in on this latest outrageous assault on medical science and the disastrous return to the Dark Ages?
For a long time I thought the biological solution would favor the Right. Leftists are just too neurotic to reproduce. But this sort of thing makes me think Darwin may wipe out the Right as well. The centrists may inherit the Earth after all.
Aggie said...
“Hmm.... only about a dozen comments. Where are all the experts, weighing in on this latest outrageous assault on medical science and the disastrous return to the Dark Ages?”
Everybody: Harumph! Harumph! Harumph!
Gov. LePetomaine (pointing): I didn’t get a ‘harumph’ outta that guy.
Hadley Lamar: Give the governor a ‘harumph’!
That guy: Harumph!
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.