@soogia1 Everything in this video is my personal opinion based on the publicly released footage. I’m questioning what appears to happen on screen and why it unfolded that way. #Minneapolis #Minnesota ♬ original sound - Soogia (SOO-jee-yah)
January 10, 2026
"Look at these terrible people who are interfering with law enforcement. Don’t they deserve to get executed in the middle of the street in the United States of America?"
Said State Representative Aisha Gomez, a Minneapolis Democrat, sarcastically characterizing the motive behind the release of new video, which you can see at "New Cellphone Video Shows ICE Agent’s Perspective Before Minneapolis Shooting/The Department of Homeland Security posted a clip of the video on social media and said it was taken by the agent, who killed a 37-year-old woman in the shooting" (NYT)(gift link).
Posts
132 comments:
I’m seeing what I saw and I see an identity politics and victim narrative from a crazed MN liberal woman. She’s trying to stir up another George Floyd riot.
1. Renee was not married to that woman; not that it makes a difference.
2. These two women had no business blocking the street and harassing ICE while they are doing their jobs.
3. The cops told her to get out of her car and she refused.
4. Renee had her older two kids taken from her because she was living with that woman. One of them (not clear to me which) put out cigarettes on one kid’s arm.
5. Renee and her partner are mentally ill and the Left whips up these people to create violence; all in the name of the Resistance.
6. I hope Minneapolis is still standing in May when I drive up to attend my daughter’s graduation from the University of Minnesota law school. She’s at the top of her class and has a great job with Big Law.
Interfere with law enforcement, and all bets are off. Don't be an ass and interfere with law enforcement...or whatever happens is on YOU.
One other thing. All of those events happened in a few seconds. High emotions. How would that politician react if someone tried to run her over and she had been run over before by another lunatic?
Stand in the cops’ shoes, lady,
Sun isn’t even up in Eastern time zone and already Althouse has to posts up pushing the elitist white female privilege perspective. It must shock you to learn, Professor, that elitist white females who try to kill people might very well get shot in self defense.
Let's see all the bodyxam footage, not cherry picked views.
There's nothing to hide, right?
Rorschach/Rashomon. We're now at Season 1, Episode 3. I'm not sure I will keep watching.
@Mark. The bodycam video sure doesn’t help your lefty scenario, does it? With all your Commie citizen journalists out there with their cameras, you’d think some video would surface supporting your position.
I do credit the script for the subtle way it shifts from demonizing the characters involved, depending on your interpretation, to demonizing the other viewers, depending on their interpretation. Clever.
A car is a lethal weapon. When a cop tells you to put down your gun, put down your gun. When a cop tells you to stop your car, stop your car.
No one has claimed Renee Good "deserved to be executed". The ICE officer didn't want to kill her. But lots of people are calling ICE officers Gestapo.
Shouldn't we all just get to interfere with Federal agents performing their duties if we don't like said duties? Shouldn't we all get to drive off from law enforcement if we just don't feel like getting out of the car? I mean, she only struck him a glancing blow with her SUV. Where's the compassion?
NO SHOTS to the face, if she only listened to ICE telling her to get out of the car. She made a terrible decision, but the decision was hers.
What struck me about the video from his perspective was the way she looked straight at him and smirked when she started to accelerate into him.
'The bodycam video sure doesn’t help your lefty scenario, does it? '
This is not his body cam, nor does it includes all the relevant officers body cam footage.
You would think Noem and others would examine the evidence completely before commenting, but its clear that they already rushed to judgement before examining all the data.
They didn't wait for the body to be cold to start lying to media.
Dave is correct- it is a very organized effort to foment violence, where politicians and strategists encourage crazies to put themselves in harm’s way. It's right out of the 60s radicals playbook. It still works…
Soogia fails to mention that she'd hit the gas before he drew his gun.
As someone who was once arrested for “resisting arrest” for continuing to sip a Coke from Del Taco after being told to put it down (yes I was young and dumb at that moment) I do find it fascinating how patient the Feds are with these career criminals like Goode who are paid to conspire against law enforcement and interfere in the execution of the law.
Further, the fact the Left is making their stand against ICE arresting the worst first, effectively shielding rapists and child molesters, tells me how truly dependent Democrats are on illegal votes. .
Per one of the initial videos, her front tires were pointed to the left and spinning out while the agent was in front of the car. Ms Good turned the wheels to the right after that. To say the car was headed to the right all along is not true. If the wheels didn’t spin due to ice, the agent would have been hit more directly than he was.
They didn't wait for the body to be cold to start lying to media.
1/10/26, 5:59 AM
You are correct. Tim Walz and that putz Mayor didn't wait for the body to be cold until they started lying to the media and their constituents and inciting violence.
Mark, you're just lying. Johnson was apparently not wearing a body cam. However, the video most recently released was from his walk around the car and the woman standing outside the vehicle recording on his cell phone to document the scene, including the actual shots.
“How would that politician react if someone tried to run her over and she had been run over before by another lunatic?”
In Minnesota, she’d probably eat a salad with a fork. That’s how much sense they have.
I keep seeing these comments (like in the video) about how “she was smiling” and “she said she wasn’t angry” as if just because she said it it’s true. She’s LYING! If she was having a smiley, not angry; not trying to interfere morning she wouldn’t have been parked sideways across the street in front of a motorcade of federal officers.
I don’t know whether it was a proper use of force. At best it seems like it’s on the line. But damn if the left doesn’t totally abandon credibility when they make these arguments that insist we throw away all common sense and not believe our own eyes and ears.
Let's see all the bodyxam footage, not cherry picked views.
There's nothing to hide, right?
Yeah, release it all, like the Dems did with the J6 video.
“As someone who was once arrested for “resisting arrest” for continuing to sip a Coke from Del Taco after being told to put it down (yes I was young and dumb at that moment)“
Sip the coke, teh po-po’s getcha, Del Yeah!
The woman had a severe case of mental illness and the Left exploited that and her. Most unfortunate.
If complying with law enforcement is not required, we're all gonna need guns.
Both are true. She shouldn’t have been there and demonstrated terrible making. And the officer in question should not have shot and should likely face prosecution.
Stop drawing dividing lines.
Two things can be true. She didn't deserve to die, and he had the right to shoot in a situation where he feared for his life.
The body cam video recorded that just before that poor woman drove her vehicle into the officer after being instructed to "get out of the car", the wife told the poor woman to "drive, baby, drive."
Uh. oh. Looks like a felony murder charge is a possibility here for the wife.
Sounds like Mark knows what went down. are you a witness, Mark? Did you see the shooting? In person, I mean.
Correction: it may have not been body cam video. But the point stands. The wife apparently said "drive, baby, drive."
First it was, "She hit the gas because she was terrified and her mind froze."
Then the body cam video came out and it's, "Look she's all relaxed and just trying to de-fuse the situation."
Both a legal and vernacular definition "reasonable person" would feel their life was in danger in that situation. Jonathan Ross was justified in defending himself. It would not even be a question if politics weren't involved.
She didn't hit him.
The sounds you here are not him being struck but gunshots.
In her final words, she told her killer she was not mad at him.
He saw what he had done, turned tail and ran. Jonathan David Ross is the modern day Judas. God rest his soul.
Bullets don't stop a car though.
We all saw the shooting.
Illegal use of force. Preventable.
These masked men are not trained law enforcement and their mission is vague, ineffective...
Stop cheering this,ann. He could have unloaded his clip not just taken three shots to the head, and he should still be charged. Put down your guns and crack a law book, prof. Your early onset dementia is showing again.
In the shot where he is unholstering his gun, the brake lights are off--she has started to move the car forward. I am not a cop, but isn't it standard for cops to put their hands on their weapon when they order someone to get out of their vehicle?
One thing that is puzzling to me--why doesn't the gunshot sound in the cellphone video? Am I missing something?
As we go into day...what...3 of the endless dissecting of this event it occurs to me that what's really happening here is that America's wine moms are starting to realize that they aren't special and that the stupid games/stupid prizes model applies to them as well.
He shot into a car with an old black lab peering out the back window... these weren't cat ladies.
Matt Walsh and Dave Begley think Good being a lesbian mama justifies this. Stop letting meade influence you, ann. Hoosier stupidity. The autopsy will tell if the kill shot came from the side...
The agent screwed up. He should not have shot her, even if just for the sake of not giving the left the martyr they so desperately wanted. That said, if I drove my car toward a cop brandishing a weapon and commanding me to get out of the car, I would fully expect to be shot. Something like this was inevitable, and I have little sympathy for her.
Today is January 10th, and in 9 days we celebrate Martin Luther King, Jr. Anyone on this thread besides me and maybe Ann Althouse ever read “Letter from Birmingham Jail“? Nonviolent resistance has a long and honorable history as a tactic, but part of it is accepting arrest, and no part of it involved attempting to drive over a law enforcement officer.
This is all mind reading. She can't know what he was thinking as he walked around the car.
It's reasonable to speculate that he didn't particularly like the women or their behavior, but the idea that he decided to shoot them because he didn't like their taunts seems extremely unlikely.
It seems like she's projecting on to him what she likes to believe all men think when a woman questions their masculinity.
Anyone who has held their phone for filming a long event or even just talking on speaker knows that you switch hands all the time, especially if you're multi-tasking. The agent was right handed. He switched the phone to his left to scratch his nose for all we know.
He called her an f'ing bitch after she punched it and hit him with the car, but before he knew if he'd hit her or not. His adrenaline was no doubt spiking. It's not any kind of evidence of premeditation.
I don't think that is accurate.
There were many agents with phones/ recording. That could have been the agent who asked her to get out of the car.
Again - Ross was the Agent in the street in front of her.
There were other agents!
All she had to do was obey orders. Stop and get out.
The fact that these arrogant radical leftists assume they are not bound by any laws - is all to do with the left's push to Defund the Police - and the left telling their broken rage fueled base to "put their bodies on the line"
Seeing the many videos that showed up after the initial, more favorable to the protesters video, i am almost certain that George Floyd riots couldn't have happened if Elon Musk had bought X back then.
No one has claimed Renee Good "deserved to be executed".
No one is claiming that she was executed for "interfering with law enforcement" either - she was killed in self-defense for (at best) recklessly endangering the armed officer standing directly in front of her car (and directly in her line of sight) by flooring her accelerator.
Shouldn't we all just get to interfere with Federal agents performing their duties if we don't like said duties?
Why stop with agents? Shouldn't we get to harass and impede federal judges when we don't like what they are doing? Storm the Capital to prevent passage of a law we don't like? Maybe take a shot at a Presidential candidate who espouses things we don't like?
The split seconds where her tires were spinning - that was the death zone she entered. Sad - but true.
Obey the laws, leftists.
"No one is above the law"
Said every elite Nancy Pelosi democrat.
All of those agents probably had body cams - not just Ross.
That angle appears to be the agent who asked her to stop and get out.
The Left is so articulate, just overwhelming…
https://x.com/PlanetOfMemes/status/2009703673736376793?s=20
Dave Begley said.
"4. Renee had her older two kids taken from her because she was living with that woman. One of them (not clear to me which) put out cigarettes on one kid’s arm."
I'm interested in this. Where did you find this info?
Every video so far has made it clearer that he was in reasonable fear for his life. She wasn't panicked at all. She saw him in front of her car, and she stepped on the accelerator, while her wife egged her on to "Drive." She hit the agent. Hoping that more video will change the situation is just wishful thinking at this point.
The Dude-wife yelling "Drive baby drive" - I think you can hear it in some of the audio out there.
This is why she admitted it was her fault.
The dude-wife should be arrested.
Gomez is effectively saying that the agent deserved to die, if it was wrong for him to use self-defense.
Why don’t we do it in the road?
h/t Paul McCartney
When the soviets own the power structure - they lie with ease.
One big reason why I self identify as "Conservative" and "Law and Order" is because I agree with the headline quote. Someone has to be in charge on the front lines.
I agree that the shooting was justified, and that Ms. Goode was clearly in the wrong. However, these officers are going to have to come up with a different tactic to defuse these situations. I am not smart enough to know what that is.
The woman's video here is, when you boil it down, nothing but rank bigotry. She gives herself permission to stereotype him and purports to know what he's thinking because he's a white male and you know all those white males think exactly alike.
For all she knows, the shooter could be a gay man or could be into cross dressing or pup play in his private life.
The left got over Ashli Babbitt's death pretty quickly.
Watch the beginning of this video - for clues why officers of the law are sick of being abused and should not be so... nice.
The left care about people who abuse children.
https://x.com/MrAndyNgo/status/2009704246254678133
Filed under Deep State Murder we love. You people are lucky Jesus Christ isn't real otherwise all of you miserable bloodthirsty cowards would be going straight to hell.
----- what's really happening here is that America's wine moms are starting to realize that they aren't special and that the stupid games/stupid prizes model applies to them as well. [NorthOTOOO]
I hope you're right. They clearly think they're so special no law should apply to them. They are doing the angels' work, who could ever object?
But here we are, back in a shooting war and the losing side wants more. The Left is still pushing what elected leaders it still has to take ever-harder stands. Seems it will have to get worse before there's any chance of it getting better.
’…you miserable bloodthirsty cowards would be going straight to hell.’
I’m goin’ straight to Hell, just like my mama said.
h/t Kevn Kinney
Very deceptive TikTok presentation for at least two major reasons:
1.) Officer Ross switched hands on the phone after Good's wife confrontationally followed behind him around the right rear quarter panel and ended up in front of him, between him and the vehicle.
2.) The TikToker used a still clipped from a video to describe a sequence of events.
Boyd: “ For all she knows, the shooter could be a gay man or could be into cross dressing or pup play in his private life.”
Yes, ICE should wear pup play masks and order illegals to come to heel, roll over, and submit. No leftie could argue with that! CC, JSM
Contrary to the opinion expressed in the video, the fact that the agent was walking around the car filming with his cell phone is a strong indication that he was relatively relaxed and didn't at all expect this situation to go so bad so quickly. I don't think anybody there thought things would go like they did.
These women put themselves into a potentially very dangerous situation and I don't think they understood that. They seemed to think it was a game and that they could trust these officers to understand what they were doing and not hurt them. Worst case in their minds was likely that they'd be detained and released and then they'd talk and laugh about it over drinks with their friends. I think they'd been pushing their luck a lot lately and they were a little drunk on it, and they pushed it too far.
Howard, Jesus Christ was as real as could be. Four biographies plus other references in Josephus and Tacitus. You mean he was not the Christo messiah, I assume. If he wasn't, what he did was even more extraordinary; our western civilization freedoms and notions of equality all come directly from him and his followers.
Or show up in drag lip synching to These Boots Were Made For Walk-in, or, for repeat offenders, Here You Come Again. CC, JSM
Switching hands on the phone at the point he did is a normal preparation for defending himself manually with his dominant hand as he was being approached by an aggressor taunting him.
Renee Good is a good person! He mom pays her bills including one for TERRORISM.
What?
Howard - "love"?
No - this sucks. but Team D built the structure and training where broken people think they are above the law.
“ Why stop with agents? Shouldn't we get to harass and impede federal judges when we don't like what they are doing? Storm the Capital to prevent passage of a law we don't like? ”
Very true, people are allowed to harass police to the point that they are forced to shoot people, why should judges and Congress get a free ride? Why are only police subject to mob rule? Oh but that would be too insurrectiony.
Birches: “ i am almost certain that George Floyd riots couldn't have happened if Elon Musk had bought X back then.”
Nah, mate. There was enough video for objective people to draw the conclusion that Floyd resisted arrest, was subjected to a standard restraint technique, and died because of preexisting conditions and a pharmacy in his tummy. The left didn’t care. More than that, in typical lefty fashion, they enjoyed doing everything they did in plain view of evidence against their positions.
Rightie elites (including Trump) just weren’t strong enough to fight back.
They won’t make that mistake again. CC, JSM
"Again and again, we see these leftist protesters jeopardizing their physical safety for causes they barely seem to understand. They think their ill-informed passion is some sort of force field that will protect them from harm."
JT
Tim Walz(D) creepy wife loves the smell of burning tires.
I don't know whether or not to think of you people as sheep or as crabs pulling your mates back into the boiling water. Either way, you people are sick in the head from the social media algorithm mind virus. You are displaying the same exact response that the crazy fucked up Libturds who were cheering the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Drive baby drive... was what she said.
&
A snip of the left's training tactics.
Resist - they chanted.
But this isn't Charlie Kirk.
Leftists loved that Kirk was murdered - and then blamed MAGA for it. A total lie.
All Renee had to do was - not be there that day, arrogantly blocking ICE on purpose.
Or - ignore her wife's commands to drive baby drive...
She could have followed orders to stop get out of the car.
The officer pulled his firearm and shot when he was already around the edge of the vehicle. He leaned OVER the hood to fire. He did not fire while retreating; he already made himself
Relatively safe at that time.
She was in the wrong for what she did. But the situation also did not rise to the threshold officers are trained (and policy dictates) in which lethal force is approved.
I’m an ardent proponent of the importance of law enforcement and obeying law enforcement. I’m ALSO a proponent that to much is given (power), much is required. That includes using lethal power in the line of duty. The officer used deadly force in a split second while maneuvering his body to the side of a vehicle and then extended his body over the vehicle to aim. He chose to do this in the midst of an otherwise non violent confrontation. I pray this is not another circle the wagons situation.
Howard the Cuck sharing his vomitus with us.
We are not celebrating her death - like many horrid evil white leftist progressive democratic females openly did on social media, after Charlie Kirk was murdered by a 20-something reddit leftist who etched "Hey Fascist, catch" on his bullets.
NO - we are angry that she thought she was above the law and she got herself killed. We are angry she thought she could impede law enforcement at will, and even harm law enforcement - because her corrupt un-caring lie-fueled power whore D-commie party told her to.
Impeding, blocking and harassing Law Enforcement is not "protesting".
What strikes me here is that no one on the right can even entertain the possibility that the officer was in the wrong. The standard is here is no deadly force except when reasonably required to prevent death or serious bodily injury. It's hard to see how the two shots fired through the window from the side of the car met that standard. It's also hard to see how the smiling woman we see in the video, with her dogs in the back seat, can reasonably be understood to be dangerous. One would think these facts would counsel being open minded, until more is known. Yet Trump, Vance, Noem, and most of the readers on this blog have offered a definitive view, before any investigation. That's also hard to defend.
Get out of car and go to a concentration camp, stay in the car and be shot.
This murder is not like Charlie Kirk’s death at all.
He lost the gun debate after he was killed by a MAGAt raised and trained assassin. He did die doing what he loved though, giving a fully throated endorsement of the 2nd amendment, Reachy.
Like his fellow cultists in these comments, watching this woman’s death would have given Charlie Kirk a huge chubby.
What concentration camp? Where?
Where? Good question! Maybe Alligator Alcatraz, El Salvador, Costa Rica? It’s a little purposefully fuzzy where these pricks are taking people.
Robert Sterling
@RobertMSterling
·
17h
Authentic resistance vs. discounted off-brand Temu resistance
https://x.com/RobertMSterling/status/2009781538213302757?s=20
TBF - FO
"What strikes me here is that no one on the right can even entertain the possibility that the officer was in the wrong."
I consider myself to be "on the right" but also capable of independent thought. I'm bothered by the universal one-sidedness of this as well. I train with firearms and have been in trainings around legal expectations and requirements for use of deadly force. Supposedly a lot on the right have done similar.....yet the major voices I see don't seem able to say it's possible for Renee Good to have been in the wrong AND for the officer to have not used deadly force correctly.
Sadly, similarly, the same can be said on the Left. There's no acknowledgement that her parking sideways on a street to block ICE or that her ignoring their orders and accelerating her vehicle away from them when an officer was telling her to exit the vehicle AND another officer had just been in front of the vehicle (and in fact still was partially) when she began accelerating, was a combination of terrible judgement, ignoring lawful orders, and placing law enforcement in harms way through her actions. Her actions fully justified her being placed under arrest that day, and clearly posed real physical risk to present officers, even if I do not believe from the videos I've seen that she posed unavoidable deadly harm to the officer who fired (as he easily evaded her vehicle while simultaneously pulling his firearm, extending his body to aim, shoot, and still hold a cell phone in another hand).
Both the ICE agent and Renee were in the wrong here. To me, that's clear as day from what I've seen to date. Yet for whatever reason, discourse on those merits seems lost on almost all sides.
D-bag D-bot prefers her alien illegals roaming free - sexually abusing children at will.
"It's also hard to see how the smiling woman we see in the video, with her dogs in the back seat, can reasonably be understood to be dangerous. "
uh - It's easy to understand that her spinning tires and refusal to obey law enforcement orders to stop and get out of the car - can lead to consequences.
Esp knowing her background.
People who have strong feelings and rush to comment rush to comment with their strong feelings. People who wait wait. And in a sense, we're all still waiting for further developments. I wouldn't say in this case, or in the case of the Kirk shooting, that there's unanimity on the left or on the right.
One thing that influences my opinion is that the ICE officer was hit by a car and dragged 100 yards last year. Did that mean his reaction this time had some justification? Or did it mean that he should have been shifted to other activities? I don't know, but it does add a complication to the case.
Also, the mixture of "social justice war" with the mom's club 'write your own adventure' fun and games doesn't sit well. Stop thinking that harassing federal agents doing their job is a game with no consequences.
TreeJoe, That is a balanced view, and I appreciate it. In particular, I agree with you that not enough of the pro gun rights/pro use of force supporters (who tend to overlap) focus enough on the need for training, judgment and accountability that should complement those views. It's early days, but I would be surprised if that ICE officer was well trained in how to deal with this kind of situation.
I've been saying all along that both of them were in the wrong. Her wrong decision carried more personal risk than his did, but the outcome will be bad for both. I would have stepped out of the car very slowly if I were her because I know perfectly well that cops pointing guns are a very real danger. I've had cops point guns at me while issuing orders, and the only thing I ever considered was how I might best comply without making them nervous.
"as he easily evaded her vehicle"
If you can't acknowledge that she actually hit him, despite his effort to dodge, then you're not going to be taken seriously.
I'll go with Dave Begley here.
“Sexually abusing children at will.”
Every accusation is a confession.
Reachy, those are the qualities you admire in your cult leader, Donald J Trump, who is all over the Epstein files, flying on the Lolita Express, raping kids on Trump Island, with his close personal friend, Jeffery Epstein
Jaysus, Reachy you leave such low hanging fruit.
Didn’t Chris Rock have a video on being stopped by the police?
Stephen: " I would be surprised if that ICE officer was well trained in how to deal with this kind of situation."
The Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (FLETC), 30 years ago when I went thru, had extensive training on vehicle stops, including local amateur actors hired as roleplayers to give you grief and increase the stress level. Also video-based shoot/don't-shoot training (not looking at your computer screen, but on a video wall with a laser mockup of your service weapon). And of course conventional range training so that when you decide to shoot, you actually hit the person you're shooting at. Oh, and training on the law of use-of-force.
All that was in the first Clinton term, at the very beginning of the woke march through government. I can only imagine that the current FLETC training includes lots more on de-escalation and judgment.
But sometimes the other guy makes the judgment to stay escalated. CC, JSM
"Both the ICE agent and Renee were in the wrong here. To me, that's clear as day from what I've seen to date. Yet for whatever reason, discourse on those merits seems lost on almost all sides."
Just one question, TreeJoe- would you agree to let Minnesota charge him with murder and try him in Minneapolis so that these distinctions can be made by a jury? If not, then why?
Stephen said...
What strikes me here is that no one on the right can even entertain the possibility that the officer was in the wrong.
I entertained the possibility.
I watched all of the videos and determined that this woman was possessed by demons and she gets shot 100/100 times for what she did.
Oh plenty of us can consider whether or not the officer was in the right, but his guilt on that point is all on his own to deal with, not on the law to enforce. Because he isn't culpable for that shot legally. But he will deal with the ramifications the rest of his life. And that's the price of being a law enforcement officer.
TeaBagHag said...
Get out of car and go to a concentration camp, stay in the car and be shot.
This murder is not like Charlie Kirk’s death at all.
He lost the gun debate after he was killed by a MAGAt raised and trained assassin. He did die doing what he loved though, giving a fully throated endorsement of the 2nd amendment, Reachy.
Like his fellow cultists in these comments, watching this woman’s death would have given Charlie Kirk a huge chubby.
That is the spirit. RESIST you powerful woman!
Go get all of your friends and go burn some stuff down. Make sure you burn some American flags with your illegal immigrant allies.
You should move to a better country than the US. Any other country would be better for you than here.
BTW, I just barely had the opportunity to watch the TikTok video. Deranged woman projecting.
Howard said...
I don't know whether or not to think of you people as sheep or as crabs pulling your mates back into the boiling water. Either way, you people are sick in the head from the social media algorithm mind virus. You are displaying the same exact response that the crazy fucked up Libturds who were cheering the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
You are being a whiny sad sack.
Nobody is happy this woman got shot. She was a retard who let other people including her "wife" get her to do stupid shit.
I wont be happy when the people who trained her to do this are executed.
But it does need to happen. If you want to be nice you can exile them. But they can't stay here.
Consider what the reaction would have been if she had, in fact, run him over, which would have been quite probable had her wheels not spun out for that first half of a second. Which of the commenters above would claim it was just an accident and she was blameless because she was trying to drive away from a situation she accidentally got herself into?
Peachy: "We are not celebrating her death"
I am. Enough of these people have to die so that they stop being tragedies and just become statistics. Statistics that influence the behavior of the group.
Can't let these people repeat 2020. That led to four years of oppression and the near-fall of the republic. All because people were afraid of being called the baddies. The proper response is to double down on the righteousness of these shoots. Respond to faux outrage and mourning with ridicule. Alinsky all the way.
HEY HEY HEY RENEE! HOW MANY COPS DID YOU RUN OVER TODAY? NONE, YOU STUPID BITCH! CC, JSM
There are a couple of slow mo videos of her still of the agent pulling his weapon. They show Good’s front left tire spinning on ice before he pulls. Obviously the engine was revving as he was standing in front of the vehicle. Her intention was immaterial at that point. Also, if misogynists were as rampant as these liberal women claim, there would be a bounty on them.
None of these guys wants to be involved in a shooting. I bet it worries them more than anything except being killed. It can ruin your life and send you to jail for a long time. That's why he called her a bitch, but none of that matters either. It's all about if he had a reasonable fear she was going to run him over, which he already experienced once.
What this woman is doing is using a claim of misogyny and toxic masculinity to fire up a stereotype and take a warm swim in her bigotry.
FredSays said...
Didn’t Chris Rock have a video on being stopped by the police?
Yes. And had the anti-ICE training used it for instructional purposes, this would have never been a story.
Stephen said...
What strikes me here is that no one on the right can even entertain the possibility that the officer was in the wrong.
Quite the contrary, I certainly did entertain that possibility. So, I looked at the Byrd-Ashley Babbitt standard applied by the Biden DOJ. Along with the addition of Good wielding a dangerous weapon at the time, which Ashley Babbitt did not:
U.S. Capitol Police Lieutenant Michael Byrd was not charged in the fatal shooting of Ashli Babbitt on January 6, 2021, because federal investigators concluded his actions were a reasonable act of self-defense or the defense of others. The Department of Justice (DOJ) determined there was insufficient evidence to prove he willfully violated Babbitt's constitutional rights.
Key reasons for not pursuing charges included:
Justified Use of Force: The DOJ concluded there was no evidence to disprove that Byrd reasonably believed it was necessary to shoot to protect Members of Congress and staff who were being evacuated from the House Chamber.
Failed Compliance by Rioters: Byrd stated he gave multiple commands for the crowd to stop as they attempted to break through the barricaded doors of the Speaker's Lobby, which were ignored.
Protection of Life: The Capitol Police internal investigation found his actions were within department policy, noting that he potentially saved lives by stopping a violent mob from accessing the House chamber.
Insufficient Evidence of Willfulness: To charge a law enforcement officer with a federal civil rights violation (18 U.S.C. § 242), prosecutors must prove the officer acted "willfully" to violate a constitutional right. The investigation found no evidence that Byrd acted with a "bad purpose" or malice.
Investigations and Outcomes
DOJ Investigation (April 2021): The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia announced it would not pursue criminal charges based on the evidence.
Internal Investigation (August 2021): The Capitol Police Office of Professional Responsibility cleared Byrd of wrongdoing, determining his conduct was lawful and in accordance with department policy.
Administrative Action: Byrd did not face internal discipline.
Wince: what are your sources for all that? Not contesting it - on the contrary, I want it for my own case! Thanks - CC, JSM
I watched the soogia1 video. Setting aside the shooting, what crap human beings they are to talk that way to people. The narrator seems simply delighted. Disgusting on that level.
Google AI: "Why was officer byrd not charged in the shooting of Ashley Babbitt"
Stephen said...
What strikes me here is that no one on the right can even entertain the possibility that the officer was in the wrong.
It depends on what you mean by "in the wrong." He should have been trained not to step in front or behind a vehicle driven by an uncooperative individual. Was he in the wrong to exercise his natural right to self-defense? There exist countries where self-defense is illegal, but the United States is not one of them, thankfully. Ergo, the question answers itself.
The standard is here is no deadly force except when reasonably required to prevent death or serious bodily injury. It's hard to see how the two shots fired through the window from the side of the car met that standard.
If in fact there were shots fired through the side of the window.
It's also hard to see how the smiling woman we see in the video, with her dogs in the back seat, can reasonably be understood to be dangerous.
So in your world, Stephen, there is no such thing as vehicular homicide? Honda Pilots weigh more than two tons, and being hit by one will do more than just "leave a mark." You need to consider that the woman was smiling because she though her elitist white female privilege would let her get away with injuring an ICE agent.
One would think these facts would counsel being open minded, until more is known.
You might consider whether you are in possession of genuine facts, and whether you are open-minded.
Yet Trump, Vance, Noem, and most of the readers on this blog have offered a definitive view, before any investigation. That's also hard to defend.
I've seen three videos, and all lead to the same conclusion. (1) She defied the lawful orders of a law enforcement agent. (2) She knew -- or should have -- realized that there was an agent in front of the car, and she accelerated anyway. She died of stupidity, and out in the real world, where I live, that tends to be pretty fatal.
"So, I looked at the Byrd-Ashley Babbitt standard applied by the Biden DOJ."
Well, there's your problem, right there. Democrats don't believe that the rules they apply to themselves should also apply to people they don't like.
Hey Google AI,
Why was officer Byrd not charged in the shooting of Ashley Babbitt?
“Because she was advancing toward lawmakers with a violent mob, intent on stopping the certification of ballots by any means necessary. She broke through a window and was crawling through it with violent insurrectionists at her back.
That violent mob assaulted dozens of officers, causing several deaths, minutes before that dim bulb twat fucked around and found out.
but she has been sober for 5 years now.
A person is dead. That's really all there is here. Again, the person is dead. Anytime the state kills anyone, whomever that is, there's reason for skepticism. That doesn't mean it wasn't justified, but it's correct to look into it. I don't care who it is, but I do care about the facts. I don't care if she's white, or a woman. That doesn't matter. She's dead.
TeaBagHag said...
Hey Google AI,
Why was officer Byrd not charged in the shooting of Ashley Babbitt?
“Because she was advancing toward lawmakers with a violent mob, intent on stopping the certification of ballots by any means necessary. She broke through a window and was crawling through it with violent insurrectionists at her back.
That violent mob assaulted dozens of officers, causing several deaths, minutes before that dim bulb twat fucked around and found out.
but she has been sober for 5 years now.
Why aren't you out burning stuff down with your illegal alien friends?
Don't you have some ICE officers to try to run over somewhere?
A Democrat leans into American civil liberties unburdened. Quelle surprise.
Good operated a progressive projectile (PP) of mass capacity interfering with legislative enforcement. Babbit was unarmed in a prone position escaping the Pelosi-rrection.
Anyone who obstructs an ICE agent in the performance of his duties needs to be arrested.
Anyone who, like she did, violently resists arrest needs to be shot and killed.
Any other questions I can help you with, State Representative Gomez?
the wife felt regret in involving her lover with anti-Ice club and inspiring her to drive baby drive.. Said it was "her fault"
2 hours later she was cleaned up and on CNN.
Renee shoulda just walked away.
Certainly, the public has a right, or perhaps a duty to monitor or observe our sworn law enforcement officers as they carry out their missions. However, as a civil society the public also has an obligation to respect the law and to reserve itself from obstructing or impeding carrying out that mission.
Don't do the thing that will make you dead before exhausting legal recourses. Democrats need to SERIOUSLY lower the temperature.
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.