That headline at the Washington Post sent me right to the OED to see when "aesthetic" first became an adjective.
The relevant meaning is "Of a thing: in accordance with principles of artistic beauty or taste; giving or designed to give pleasure through beauty; of pleasing appearance." The OED traces that back to the 1800s:
1855 — We had just completed a not very æsthetic quantity of boned turkey.
Musical World 21 April 181/1
1862 — I heard an exquisite ask a lady ‘if she snored?’ She..said, ‘No, I do not.’ ‘I am glad to hear it—it is not a very æsthetic process.’ Life amongst Colliers iv. 83
1881 — The little coffee-room, too, had been papered fresh with a modern æsthetic wall-paper—the steady march of culture and taste is so fast and unflinching everywhere!
G. D. Leslie, Our River ii. 31
Another adjectival meaning is to refer to a person who has good taste, but that's also from the 1800s: "He is highly aesthetic, but not very genial" (1844), "My first impression of him at college was of a purely æsthetic man" (1860).
So what is the WaPo article going on about? Apparently, younger people have been annoying older folks by using "aesthetic," the adjective, a lot, and some older people, instead of merely complaining that the word is overused, are snottily asserting that "aesthetic," the adjective, is not a word. If you're going to act like this, you'd better be right:
@gqtrendtalks Maya rudolph with Jimmy kimmel #mayarudolph #jimmykimmel #hollywood #viral #fyp ♬ original sound - GQ trend Talks

32 comments:
They have now taken words and made them new words, which is not a thing
Holy carp do you live under a rock? Lefties reinvent words all the time- affordability, insurrection, widespread…it’s a thing!
How about... Asstastic?
Looks like the boomers have realized they are on the way out.
Maya Rudolph is only 53. She's Gen X.
Never mind aesthetic as an adjective, what about exquisite as a noun? That 1862 example shows us a very foppish way to denigrate a popinjay.
Jimmy Kimmel is also Gen X.
Gen X flies under the radar and Boomers get blamed for everything. Be aware: the old folks are now including Gen X.
Or was that a macaroni observing a dandy?
I thought the noun form of the word was 'Aesthete'
Ann Althouse said...
Maya Rudolph is only 53. She's Gen X.
Gen X isn't aesthetic.
Boomers sounds better.
"I thought the noun form of the word was 'Aesthete'"
That would be the noun for a person who cares about aesthetics.
You could say that person "is aesthetic" or "is an aesthete."
But I think these kids today might say "That guy is so aesthetic" when they mean he is good looking or he's someone somebody who cares about aesthetics might want to derive pleasure from staring at.
I would be happy to accept "aesthetic" if it were to replace "iconic" or "incredible". No such luck.
I was a good aesthete in high school. Unfortunately, I wasn’t aesthetic enough to get a college scholarship.
I seem to recall a little cartoon story-- Beerbohm maybe?-- about a young man breaking off his engagement by telling his fiance' that he was aesthetic.
Aesthetic . . . riiight.
"Never mind aesthetic as an adjective, what about exquisite as a noun? That 1862 example shows us a very foppish way to denigrate a popinjay."
Yes, thanks for noticing that. I was hoping you would.
"I seem to recall a little cartoon story-- Beerbohm maybe?-- about a young man breaking off his engagement by telling his fiance' that he was aesthetic."
Aesthetic only appears once in ""Zuleika Dobson; Or, An Oxford Love Story":
"Yet was there nothing Narcissine in her spirit. Her love for her own image was not cold aestheticism. She valued that image not for its own sake, but for sake of the glory it always won for her. In the little remote music-hall, where she was soon appearing nightly as an “early turn,” she reaped glory in a nightly harvest. She could feel that all the gallery-boys, because of her, were scornful of the sweethearts wedged between them, and she knew that she had but to say “Will any gentleman in the audience be so good as to lend me his hat?” for the stalls to rise as one man and rush towards the platform."
Trying to prevent new usage is impossible. I tried for a month to correct friends and family who used the term “gaslighting.” The fucking gaslight was the evidence showing the main character was sane and her husband was manipulating her. So gaslighting should mean exposing manipulation.
I’d rather be a dandy than an aesthete.
Are you not familiar with the Gilbert and Sullivan operetta "Patience"?
Grosvenor: I am a broken-hearted troubador
Whose mind's aesthetic and whose tastes are pure.
Lady Angela: Aesthetic! He is aesthetic!
Grosvenor: Yes, yes, I am aesthetic! And poetic!
Chorus of Ladies: Then we love you!
G&S, of course! I'm embarrassed.
This is why if your are discussing/debating an issue with someone if they use the word pedantic you know you are dealing with bad faith.
> Nouns are repurposed as
> adjectives all the time.
I think a more coherent explanation is that nouns are allowed to modify nouns in English.
I think it's great the OED's second example of "aesthetic" as an adjective uses "exquisite" as a noun!
I’m a fan of just using a hyphen between two nouns. So car-key and coffee-cup. It’s a more readable version of compound nouns like fireman.
Pales in comparison to the misuse of "fraught" without saying what it's fraught with. CC, JSM
I associate aestheticism with Oscar Wilde, but I now see it predates him. I went to a choose your own curriculum college and my advisor and I called my program "Applied Aesthetics." I don't think it would have occurred to me to call a person aesthetic, I think I would have called a person "pretty."
I saw Patience at the Savoy Theatre 10 ys ago. Nice wordplay.
My women friends thought it derogatory.
> My women friends thought it derogatory
NTTAWWT
“Nouns are repurposed as adjectives all the time.”
And as verbs:
BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO.
That’s a grammatically correct and meaningful sentence in the English language. (In parsing it, note that written in upper- and lower-case some of the ‘B’s would be capitalized.)
"BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO."
That could use some punctuation and some lowercase typography. (And there's no need to fucking shout!)
Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo; buffalo buffalo buffalo.
See? With a little grammatical tidying-up, even that ridiculous string evens out to something comprehensible, like Marlin Perkins for Mutual of Omaha.
Aesthetics will survive the academic crunch. A licensed aesthetician can not only discuss theories of art and beauty but can also apply skin care and beauty treatments.
“ Quaestor said...
"BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO."
That could use some punctuation and some lowercase typography. (And there's no need to fucking shout!)
Buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo; buffalo buffalo buffalo.
See? With a little grammatical tidying-up, even that ridiculous string evens out to something comprehensible, like Marlin Perkins for Mutual of Omaha.”
No. It would be “Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.”
And I’ll go further and shout to the rooftops:
BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO BUFFALO!
NO! NO! NO! Smilin' Jack. You can't read English. I'll explain: There are two kinds of buffalo -- buffalo from Buffalo and plain old buffalo of the plains. Buffalo from Buffalo seek only to deceive other Buffalo buffalo, whilst plain old buffalo confine their chicanery to themselves. Got it?
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.