First, are the ranks of journalists so full that they need to deploy them on “how to cut your own hair in the great C19 crisis” stories?
Second, do they not have any professionalism? I guess they always had “others” doing the work to make the scene/shot look right. But seriously, no attention at all paid to what’s in the shot? Even if it’s just security and self preservation, like make sure your tax returns, social security number, home address, banking info aren’t laying around where someone can see them?
Third, why would anyone shoot this in their bathroom? Set up in an open room with a natural background like it’s a Skype job interview.
Fourth, it just reminds me of the funniest “news” story ever...
“We have the names of the pilots from that plane crash at SFO: captain Sum Ting Wong, Wei Tu Lo, Ho Lee Fuk....
From the Wikipedia page... "Simon stated unambiguously in interviews, however, "I wrote The Sound of Silence when I was 21 years old", which places the timeframe firmly prior to the JFK tragedy, with Simon also explaining that the song was written in his bathroom, where he turned off the lights to better concentrate. "The main thing about playing the guitar, though, was that I was able to sit by myself and play and dream. And I was always happy doing that. I used to go off in the bathroom, because the bathroom had tiles, so it was a slight echo chamber. I'd turn on the faucet so that water would run (I like that sound, it's very soothing to me) and I'd play. In the dark. 'Hello darkness, my old friend / I've come to talk with you again.'" In a more recent interview with Wynton Marsalis, Simon was directly asked, "How is a 21-year-old person thinkin' about the words in that song?" His reply was, "I have no idea." According to Garfunkel, the song was first developed in November, but Simon took three months to perfect the lyrics, which he claims were entirely written on February 19, 1964. Garfunkel once summed up the song's meaning as "the inability of people to communicate with each other, not particularly internationally but especially emotionally, so what you see around you are people unable to love each other."
Why are there so many retarded f'ng people in influential positions in this country? A nation of absolute buffoonery from top to bottom, from side to side.
I stopped falling for these sort of clickbaits ever since learning PT Barnum used a sign saying, "This Way to the EGRESS!" to hurry people out of his sideshow.
One of my favorite scenes of all time is in "The Big Lebowski".
I would link it except the combination of scenes takes place at two widely separated segments of the movie, but you have to be sharp to catch it.
Oh screw it...here you go. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xs3OWJ53rHE https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgUlx28ao3k
The entirety of the comedic irony in Western Civilization is that the phallus is comedic while the vagina is sacred. It's actually the opposite if you go back in time and read the original greek and latin. It is the vagina that is comedic. The 'vessel' is the subject of much abuse and maligning.
So many men have allowed themselves to be womanized. In ancient Sparta young girls were brought to the exercise grounds (where men would exercise naked) to malign the men in an effort to motivate them and also weed out the psychologically unconfident (an essential ingredient in battle). We live in that society now. It has done quite a bit of damage.
But this question from - AlbertAnonymous said..."...do they[journalits] not have any professionalism?..." - really surprise me.
My friend, since the advent of the .www, making vanity press available to virtually all, journalistic professionalism has all but vanished. The disappearing act began at least a decade earlier, when advertisers started calling the shots as to what was published. Now it is the editors and publishers calling the shots, in response to demands by the financial stakeholders. As a general rule, there is no "professionalism" in journalism, publishing, and the media in general. Even so-called peer-review journals are subject to the directives of the money-makers.
"A nation of absolute buffoonery from top to bottom, from side to side."
Availability bias. There are some thoroughly impressive people too, and a whole lot of people at every point on the spectrum between the two. Not to mention with most people it depends over time.
Click here to enter Amazon through the Althouse Portal.
Amazon
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Support this blog with PayPal
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
27 comments:
If there isn't a naked man at the end of this, I'm going to be really upset.
Nah, that's just funny.
It makes no sense.
Situational Awareness.....get some!!!
Eh, you could barely see the guy.
"It makes no sense."
Exactly this.
It's difficult to imagine how something this stupid could happen by accident.
full nude, in misty haze. eh.
Wasn't there a season of Dallas that opened with a guy who had died in the previous Dream Season suddenly appeared in the shower?
This was on purpose. By either the man, the woman, or both. I know kink when I see it.
I love my brothers-in-law but they can't stop sending inane, cornball videos, as if they just discovered the interwebs.
>>This was on purpose.
Yep. Click bait. It worked.
This is goofy for so many reasons.
First, are the ranks of journalists so full that they need to deploy them on “how to cut your own hair in the great C19 crisis” stories?
Second, do they not have any professionalism? I guess they always had “others” doing the work to make the scene/shot look right. But seriously, no attention at all paid to what’s in the shot? Even if it’s just security and self preservation, like make sure your tax returns, social security number, home address, banking info aren’t laying around where someone can see them?
Third, why would anyone shoot this in their bathroom? Set up in an open room with a natural background like it’s a Skype job interview.
Fourth, it just reminds me of the funniest “news” story ever...
“We have the names of the pilots from that plane crash at SFO: captain Sum Ting Wong, Wei Tu Lo, Ho Lee Fuk....
Bathroom acoustics is the best, for various stringed instruments.
Australian songwriter Tiffany Echhardt recorded her first album "Girl Guitar" in a laundromat for the acoustics.
Yup, done on purpose, and it succeeded.
"Made ya look."
Staged, for sure.
Fair question implied by our host's title: if it were a lady, this would be a different conversation.
And if the NYPost had called THAT a "hairy situation," we'd be in for a lot of op-eds about sexism for a while.
The Sound of Silence was written in the bathroom.
From the Wikipedia page... "Simon stated unambiguously in interviews, however, "I wrote The Sound of Silence when I was 21 years old", which places the timeframe firmly prior to the JFK tragedy, with Simon also explaining that the song was written in his bathroom, where he turned off the lights to better concentrate. "The main thing about playing the guitar, though, was that I was able to sit by myself and play and dream. And I was always happy doing that. I used to go off in the bathroom, because the bathroom had tiles, so it was a slight echo chamber. I'd turn on the faucet so that water would run (I like that sound, it's very soothing to me) and I'd play. In the dark. 'Hello darkness, my old friend / I've come to talk with you again.'" In a more recent interview with Wynton Marsalis, Simon was directly asked, "How is a 21-year-old person thinkin' about the words in that song?" His reply was, "I have no idea." According to Garfunkel, the song was first developed in November, but Simon took three months to perfect the lyrics, which he claims were entirely written on February 19, 1964. Garfunkel once summed up the song's meaning as "the inability of people to communicate with each other, not particularly internationally but especially emotionally, so what you see around you are people unable to love each other."
Why are there so many retarded f'ng people in influential positions in this country? A nation of absolute buffoonery from top to bottom, from side to side.
Such an embarrassing time to be alive.
Fair question implied by our host's title: if it were a lady, this would be a different conversation.
Funny coincidence just the other day: When working from home goes wrong: Woman forgets to turn the camera off as she goes to TOILET during a video conference call
For those too lazy to click, it's funny despite the fact that she's a woman.
I stopped falling for these sort of clickbaits ever since learning PT Barnum used a sign saying, "This Way to the EGRESS!" to hurry people out of his sideshow.
Here's how it was done in 1986 with Patrick Duffy on Dallas
One of my favorite scenes of all time is in "The Big Lebowski".
I would link it except the combination of scenes takes place at two widely separated segments of the movie, but you have to be sharp to catch it.
Oh screw it...here you go.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xs3OWJ53rHE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgUlx28ao3k
The entirety of the comedic irony in Western Civilization is that the phallus is comedic while the vagina is sacred. It's actually the opposite if you go back in time and read the original greek and latin. It is the vagina that is comedic. The 'vessel' is the subject of much abuse and maligning.
So many men have allowed themselves to be womanized. In ancient Sparta young girls were brought to the exercise grounds (where men would exercise naked) to malign the men in an effort to motivate them and also weed out the psychologically unconfident (an essential ingredient in battle). We live in that society now. It has done quite a bit of damage.
The high standards of social workers??
I thought it was funny! Put up, probably.
But this question from - AlbertAnonymous said..."...do they[journalits] not have any professionalism?..." - really surprise me.
My friend, since the advent of the .www, making vanity press available to virtually all, journalistic professionalism has all but vanished. The disappearing act began at least a decade earlier, when advertisers started calling the shots as to what was published. Now it is the editors and publishers calling the shots, in response to demands by the financial stakeholders. As a general rule, there is no "professionalism" in journalism, publishing, and the media in general. Even so-called peer-review journals are subject to the directives of the money-makers.
"It's funny because he's a man."
Fact check: true.
Matt, 12:23:
"A nation of absolute buffoonery from top to bottom, from side to side."
Availability bias. There are some thoroughly impressive people too, and a whole lot of people at every point on the spectrum between the two. Not to mention with most people it depends over time.
I wonder how many blunders of this type are of the accidentally-on-purpose variety.
Post a Comment