Althouse: "So, traditional-gender-roles folks, you have the trans crowd to thank for returning us to the 1950s!"

February 16, 2020

"So, traditional-gender-roles folks, you have the trans crowd to thank for returning us to the 1950s!"

Glenn understands my point.

216 comments:

«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 216 of 216

Inga said...: “We only see it in the threads where you show up. Your lack of self-awareness is awe-inspiring.”

Your lack of general awareness is awe inspiring. I didn’t comment on this thread or yesterday’s thread of the same topic at all until now. You are either senile or one of the jerks who misunderstands people’s points with great regularity.; 2/16/20, 8:28 PM
chickelit said...: The irony is that progress leads to regress. That is not generally recognized and could be the beginning of something larger.; 2/16/20, 9:01 PM
Gahrie said...: @Gahrie, don't repeal it. Just suspend it until women choose to face up to their responsibilities. ;-}

No woman must be made to feel bad about, or responsible for, anything, ever.; 2/16/20, 9:12 PM
Gahrie said...: @Rusty, @Gahrie, I understand that a new form of battery based on aluminum in the presence of oxygen. Still some technical problems to be solved.

I'm hopeful we'll make the jump to solid state batteries in the near future. They'll be cheaper, longer lasting, more efficient and you won't have to worry about maintaining their temperature. Just this week Tesla extended the range on its cars with a software update.; 2/16/20, 9:16 PM
zefal said...: Shaming women who are good at sports and are upset that they will be the ones that pay the price for your "selflessness." You know you're a "liberal" when....; 2/16/20, 9:33 PM
bagoh20 said...: The point is, I guess, that women are caring and compassionate, just not toward other actual women. It's an anti-woman argument, but the fact that a woman is making it is pretty good proof. If I said it, it would be misogynistic.

The He Man Woman Hater's Club welcomes you.; 2/16/20, 9:36 PM
Mark said...: Come on, Inga.

You got the primo number 201 comment spot . . . and you screw it up and have to delete it.

Sheesh.; 2/16/20, 9:50 PM
Big Mike said...: @Inga, you did get that I'm laughing at you, right? I regard people like you as being a hilarious example of why abortion should be legal.; 2/16/20, 10:08 PM
Inga said...: BM, do you know why I give you those initials instead of saying your name? Apparently you don’t realize how many times you sound like a demented old geezer. I try not to laugh at people like you because it would be unkind.; 2/16/20, 10:19 PM
Achilles said...: I think it is funny that I am the only person that wants Inga to post here.; 2/16/20, 10:26 PM
Achilles said...: Gahrie said...
@Rusty, @Gahrie, I understand that a new form of battery based on aluminum in the presence of oxygen. Still some technical problems to be solved.

I'm hopeful we'll make the jump to solid state batteries in the near future. They'll be cheaper, longer lasting, more efficient and you won't have to worry about maintaining their temperature. Just this week Tesla extended the range on its cars with a software update.

Dr. Goodenough is one of the most influential people most people have never heard of.

I am less skeptical of this development than most pie in the sky shit we hear about. He already gave us lithium ion and he got the nobel for solid state batteries with lab results a few months ago.

The man never made a dime off lithium ions. I hope he makes money off this one.

I have built an electric car minus the battery. We ran out of money at that point. We have the 114V motor and the inverter/controller.

The project could be restarted shortly it sounds like. Our car with these batteries would have 500+ mile ranges and it sound like the main component is sodium electrolyte.; 2/16/20, 10:44 PM
n.n said...: The irony is that progress leads to regress

Progress is monotonic [unqualified] change, which has an imputed positive sense. Progress is "forward-looking" when it is perceived as desirable. Progress is "reverse-looking" or regressive when it is not.; 2/17/20, 1:10 AM
Hammond X. Gritzkofe said...: So, transgender women will be allowed to take over female sports because women are compassionate, caring, empathetic and non-competitive and will step aside. Transgendered women, having none of these expected attributes of women, will have no compunctions with this take-over of women's sports from women.

In women, competitivity is subordinated to compassion;
therefore they humbly submit to disrespect and bullying by trannies.

Trannies revel in disrespecting and bullying women;
therefore, lacking compassion, trannies are not real women;
so not being real women, trannies do not belong in womens sports.; 2/17/20, 4:10 AM
Big Mike said...: @Inga, the difference between us is that when I die, people will mourn me.; 2/17/20, 5:08 AM
Professional Lady said...: Lawyers, especially litigators, are competitive people. I guess women shouldn't be litigators either because their compassion and empathy for the other side will override their duty to strive for the best possible result for their clients.; 2/17/20, 6:12 AM
hstad said...: Blogger Dave Begley said...
So we believe science for global warming but we don't believe science when it comes to two sexes and chromosomes.

How, exactly, does that work? 2/16/20, 12:45 PM

"SHOW ME THE MONEY" is what you should've posted.; 2/17/20, 1:14 PM