May 7, 2019

"President Trump is right: There is a crisis at the southern border. Just not the one he rants about."

"There is no pressing national security threat — no invasion of murderers, drug cartels or terrorists. No matter how often Mr. Trump delivers such warnings, they bear little resemblance to the truth. But as record numbers of Central American families flee violence and poverty in their homelands, they are overwhelming United States border systems, fueling a humanitarian crisis of overcrowding, disease and chaos. The Border Patrol is now averaging 1,200 daily arrests, with many migrants arriving exhausted and sick. Last week, a teenage boy from Guatemala died in government custody, the third death of a minor since December. As resources are strained and the system buckles, the misery grows. Something needs to be done. Soon. Unfortunately, political gamesmanship once again threatens to hold up desperately needed resources.... Both sides need to dial back the fighting words, resist the temptation to finger-point and find a creative way through this minefield."

From "Congress, Give Trump His Border Money/No, it’s not for building the wall," by the Editorial Board of the New York Times.

104 comments:

traditionalguy said...

Mexifornia is here. And Trump doesn’t speak Spanish and neither do we. But the numbers Soros/Obama have flowing in now will require Spanish be the only language. Si.

hawkeyedjb said...

In other words, let 'em in. But it seems the blessed Sanctuary Cities are in no further need of further additions to our glorious Diversity.

Hey Skipper said...

If the NYT wants to argue for open borders, then argue for open borders.

Otherwise, it is hard to avoid concluding that the left is pathologically passive aggressive. Well, except, of course, when it is aggressive aggressive.

Rick said...

Unfortunately, political gamesmanship once again threatens to hold up desperately needed resources.... Both sides need to dial back the fighting words, resist the temptation to finger-point and find a creative way through this minefield.

Says the group encouraging the refugees because it gives them the opportunity for finger pointing.

Send them home.

BamaBadgOR said...

All but a white flag because, you know, Trump.

hawkeyedjb said...

It's no longer Mexifornia. It's Hondurafornia, and Nicaraguafornia, and Guatemalafornia. What a great idea: whenever malevolent socialists fuck up their countries, it's our duty to care for Les Miserables they create.

Achilles said...

The leftists just hate our country and the people in it.

The NYTs is owned by a Mexican billionaire.

It prints the words he wants written. Nothing more or less.

Michael K said...

How that must have pained the NY Times publisher and editors.

Bay Area Guy said...

NYT gritting its teeth: Can't. give. bad. orange. man. credit. for border!

bleh said...

Sounds like an argument for a wall.

mockturtle said...

The stupid law requiring that anyone stepping one foot across our border be entitled to an asylum hearing [years down the road] and then released pending the 'hearing' must be overturned. And yes, we do need a wall, as well.

Jim Gust said...

Obviously, if we had the wall people would not make the journey, and there would be no border crisis.

Why is that so hard to understand?

madAsHell said...

yeah.....wait until their un-vaccinated kids get mumps. They will be screaming for a wall.

CWJ said...

"President Trump is right: There is a crisis at the southern border. Just not the one he rants about."

In this case, "right" is meant ironically. It didn't pain anybody at the Times, or cause a gritting of teeth, to write it.

walter said...

Best argument for border security

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

Nancy and her gang of assholes will never fix this problem. They would rather have all the suffering than give Trump a win.

bleh said...

Seriously the NYT is inadvertently making the argument for strengthening the border in a myriad of ways, including walls. Walls are not impenetrable, and that should never be the argument for it, but walls sure slow people down.

The harder you make it for people to get across the border and the more you slow them down, the easier you make it for our border authorities to respond to illegal crossings and capture, process and deport (or grant asylum to) the illegal crossers. Strengthening the border just means making the system somewhat functional and redirecting migrants to official, legal channels. You don't need a Great Wall from the Pacific to the Gulf. You just need a defense that works.

PB said...

The solution is to close off illegal entry barrier and stop accepting the well-coached asylum claims.

hombre said...

Of course, the crisis at the border is the problems FOR the migrants, not the problems FROM the migrants. Of course, it is up to American taxpayers, through their government, to relieve the migrants of the consequences of their self-imposed crisis. (Sarc.)

Are the leftmediaswine no longer capable of seeing the logical consequences of their phony altruism? Or perhaps they just see embracing this wave of humanity invading our country and the destruction they will wreak as a godsend for Democrat seeking to disadvantage Trump for 2020.

There is little doubt that the Democrats and their media pimps are committed to damaging the country, even irreparably, as a means of displacing Trump. I have seen nothing in politics this despicable in my lifetime.

Rick said...

The stupid law requiring that anyone stepping one foot across our border be entitled to an asylum hearing [years down the road] and then released pending the 'hearing' must be overturned

Is there a law? Or is it merely a ruling by the robed clerics?

Sam L. said...

Perhaps the Executive Board would like to contribute money to help this program?????

tim maguire said...

Both sides need to dial back the fighting words, resist the temptation to finger-point and find a creative way through this minefield."

Stuff like this reminds me of a summary of the complaint against Reagan in the early days of the AIDS crisis: curing AIDS is just a matter of waving a magic wand, but Reagan is being chintzy with the pixie dust.

CJinPA said...

Immediately boost the number of officials necessary to process asylum claims and quickly send home the 99.99% who don't have legitimate claims. This will end the crisis and discourage others from turning our border and citizenship into a joke.

"I live in a backward society with gangs" does not meet the traditional standard for qualifying for asylum.

bagoh20 said...

When murderers, drug cartels, and terrorist want to get in the U.S., they would never use the easiest way in, which is just walking across the border. That would be illegal, and they won't break the law. Besides why would they want to come here? I can't think of a single reason.

It amazes me every single day what strange contortions and lies people will tell to avoid giving Trump credit for anything just straight up without a stupid counterfactual "but," attached.

Anonymous said...

"There is no pressing national security threat..."

The inability of goodthinkers to recognize predictable (and predicted) consequences is well-documented.

By the time we get around to the state where "what all the wise men promised has not happened, and what all the damned fools said would happen has come to pass", the prog "wise men" will have long since arranged to play dumb (even with themselves) about the connecting steps between their promises and the long-term consequences of their promises, that the damned fools had laid out for them at the time the wise men made their promises.

Dude1394 said...

Excuse me while I call bull**** on the democrat propaganda outlet, even while they agree that something needs to be done. The open border democrat propaganda outlet does not see any issue with 1 MILLION illegals flooding into this country, only that they may be put out.

They could give a flying **** about the poorer people of this country that have to deal with this invasion through reduced employment, crowded schools, services and medical.

It is sickeningly elitist, self serving and snobbish.

Darrell said...

Put Democrats heads on pikes at the Southhern Border to scare away invaders.

Dude1394 said...

Effective walls would require asylum seekers to come to a gate, which could be closed, throttled, etc. NO walls allows millions to just walk over and claim asylum

Which is exactly what the open border democrat party wants.

Drago said...

"The leftists just hate our country and the people in it."

Leftists and LLR's. You never find one without the other.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

When Demcoratics win - we lose.

PM said...

The US ought to 'encourage' the 'gaming industry' to turn Guatamala, Nicaragua and Honduras into beachfront meccas ala 1950s Cuba. Local construction, a flourshing service industry and moneyed tourists would enhance the local enconomies and improve living conditions in these nations.

AllenS said...

Hey, I've got a good idea. How about a big tall wall?!

exhelodrvr1 said...

1200 arrests per day, but how many aren't arrested? 2x? 5x? That's the real question. And, yes, it is a security threat, because we don't know how many are making it in, and how many are bad apples. If just 1% are gang members, possible terrorists, etc.

Anonymous said...

madAsHell: yeah.....wait until their un-vaccinated kids get mumps. They will be screaming for a wall.

No, they won't. They'll be screaming about how it's the fault of the racist patriarchal homophobic Republicans in the American government that every poor country in the world and illegal immigrant enclave in the U.S. doesn't have a fully-funded, effectively administered vaccination program. (While at the same time being mum on the soccer-mom anti-vaxxers, and condemning as "racist" every effort at enforcement of vaccination/public health rules.)

Hari said...

So once again this is a case of both sides want the same thing (to stop the "crisis" at the southern border). They just disagree about how to get there.

Sounds an awful like how both sides wanted low unemployment and low inflation. They just disagreed how to get there. Trump was obviously wrong up and until he wasn't, and the NYT needed to write an article, "The Economy That Wasn’t Supposed to Happen: Booming Jobs, Low Inflation."

How long before the NYT writes, "The Wall That Wasn't Supposed to Happen: An End to the Crisis at the Southern Border?"

Michael K said...

What needs to happen now is maximum enforcement of E Verify and legislation (which will require a new Congress) to stiffen the terms and the penalties.

My understanding is that it is mostly a farce right now. Also, federal law to ban illegals from welfare.

n.n said...

Emigration reform. Planned Parenthood with or without the walls on the Southern border. Unplanned parenthood in America to counter the arguments of anti-nativists, democrats, and businesses dreaming of labor arbitrage. Also, a wall of photovoltaic panels, anchored by windmills, and defended by environmentalists. Something similar for immigration by air from social justice zones.

walter said...

Blogger exhelodrvr1 said...
1200 arrests per day, but how many aren't arrested? 2x? 5x? That's the real question. And, yes, it is a security threat,
--
Oh..there you go..putting forth the obvious question about the "undocumented".
But we are told they somehow know them to be less likely to commit crime than native pop.

wendybar said...

Who owns the NYTs again?? That's right....Carlos Slim...A Mexican business magnate, engineer, investor and philanthropist. Nothing to see here.

Owen said...

Who needs a wall? Why not dig a trench along the border and bury spent fuel rods from our reactors? It would solve the storage problem and anybody foolish enough to try crossing would be easy to track on a Geiger counter.

Half joking, for a friend.

The Cracker Emcee Refulgent said...

"Someone else must fix the problem we've created! Preferably a Republican!"

Anonymous said...

Unknown: They could give a flying **** about the poorer people of this country that have to deal with this invasion through reduced employment, crowded schools, services and medical.

Those problems don't exist. They're just the irrational fears of The Other projected onto Brown Bodies by hysterical bigots.

Ceciliahere said...

The liberal elites do not have to deal with the problems everyday people have with so many illegal immigrants invading their neighborhoods.

And, I thought asylum seekers had to apply for asylum in the first country they reached, MEXICO. Americans are turning out to be first class saps to allow this horror show.

WTF!

BUILD THAT WALL!!!!!

mockturtle said...

Bagoh20 sarcs: When murderers, drug cartels, and terrorist want to get in the U.S., they would never use the easiest way in, which is just walking across the border. That would be illegal, and they won't break the law. Besides why would they want to come here? I can't think of a single reason.

No, not one. Especially not drugs. If they want to smuggle in drugs they always come through the port of entry where there are drug sniffing dogs and armed Border Patrol. The risk of getting caught makes it a lot more exciting than just walking unimpeded over the open border. Oh, and many borders are so open you can drive a truck through, eliminating the challenge altogether. ;-)

Achilles said...

Drago said...
"The leftists just hate our country and the people in it."

Leftists and LLR's. You never find one without the other.

The only difference is the people they are lying to.

They are all leftists, the LLR's are just more dishonest about it.

Sebastian said...

Trump has been very clear about the invasion. The dealers and traffickers are just part of the problem.

Anyway, we face an existential question: to have a border or not to have a border? To stop the invasion or not to stop the invasion?

Therefore, in 2020, we face an existential choice. Even LLRs. Even moderate Midwestern emerita law profs.

MayBee said...

This reminds me of some writer soon after 9/11 when Bush was advocating we go to Afghanistan. The writer, I forget who, pointed out that many on the left only support wars that benefit others, not the US. The NYT will support the idea there is a border crisis, but not based on the idea that it might be bad for the US, only bad for the people trying to get here.

Yancey Ward said...

Even the NYTimes realizes the danger the Democrats are in on this issue. This is the first part of the retreat- providing some covering fire.

narciso said...

That would be Ann Coulter,

Bay Area Guy said...

Build the Wall!

Drain the Swamp!

Lock her up!

All short and to the point. It's an unending process....

Michael said...

The plain fact of the matter is that simply living in a s**thole country, fearing for your life, and somehow making it to the US border are not grounds for asylum under any law. Such cases should be rejected out of hand and turned back at the border - whatever various NGO's have scripted for them to say. If this policy were implemented and publicized the flow would stop PDQ. And quote Andrew Jackson to the Ninth Circus if necessary.

Owen said...

Yancey @ 12:04: "...This is the first part of the retreat- providing some covering fire."

Excellent. Exactly so.

Can we speculate on the next step as the Progs conduct diversionary and screening moves to allow their main force to exit the scene of the debacle?

Better yet, can we describe a counter-counter-move, that will choke off the channel for their retreat?

Robert Cook said...

"This reminds me of some writer soon after 9/11 when Bush was advocating we go to Afghanistan. The writer, I forget who, pointed out that many on the left only support wars that benefit others, not the US."

The war we started in Afghanistan didn't benefit anyone.

dreams said...

Why would anyone have any respect for the NY Times? I don't.

tim maguire said...

Robert Cook said...The war we started in Afghanistan didn't benefit anyone

I'm sorry, who started the war in Afghanistan?

stlcdr said...

Why on earth is any of this Trumps fault?! It is wholly and completely the fault of Congress.

bgates said...

"On May 7, the New York Times wrote:"

"President Trump is right: There is a crisis at the southern border....[R]ecord numbers..violence and poverty...overwhelming United States border systems...overcrowding, disease and chaos....As resources are strained and the system buckles, the misery grows. Something needs to be done. Soon...[M]inefield."

"I'm Donald Trump, and I approve this message."

DAN said...

We live in a world where, as poet Conrad Aiken said, "We must hear and bear the news from everywhere, infinitesimal or vast, from everywhere." And almost instantly. What that means is that poor people in South and Central America are watching CNN, or might as well be. The news from the border right now is, "Come on up. Trump's foes are holding him off. You can make it across."

bgates said...

If just 1% are gang members, possible terrorists, etc.

The left says that because of ~30,000 annual homicides and suicides involving firearms the government should confiscate all 270 million civilian firearms. Based on that ratio, the tolerance should be more like 0.01%.

Jaq said...

The war we started in Afghanistan didn't benefit anyone

Mullah Omar should have thought of that before he approved the 9-11 attacks then.

Rick said...

The writer, I forget who, pointed out that many on the left only support wars that benefit others, not the US."

It's not quite true. They would support a war benefiting the US as long as they were directly credited. It's more accurate to note the left evaluates all political positions solely by partisanship.

Example:

The left supported economic sanctions against South Africa. This was a government opposed by all and not having sanctions created the opportunity to criticize Republicans.

The left was/is against economic sanctions in Iran and Venezuela. The left is politically allied to these governments so they oppose economic sanctions.

Ambrose said...

They know it is a losing proposition to be the "open borders" party in 2020, and so there will be subtle or maybe not so subtle attempts to shift the narrative over the next 18 months.

narciso said...

The result of the sanctions were to deliver south Africa, which has critical resources to the eastern bloc, hence their enthusiasm

narciso said...

Umkhonto du siswe was the armed wing of the ANC, Mandela was the original commander later Jacob Zuma the future warlord was chief.

Big Mike said...

There is no pressing national security threat — no invasion of murderers, drug cartels or terrorists

If you write for the New York Times then cheap hard drugs from Mexico is a benefit, not a problem. As to murderers, perhaps the editors should talk to Angel Moms for a fresh perspective. Or the parents of Kate Steinle.

Jeff Brokaw said...

They are right in that something does need to be done.

How about this: crack down on Leftist groups funding, organizing, and promoting these caravans that create the mess in the first place

It just might work!

narciso said...


Some details here:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.economist.com/middle-east-and-africa/2017/03/16/south-africas-love-affair-with-russia

narciso said...

Herein is a connection to uranium one:

President Zuma remains committed to nuclear project and Russia | News24
https://m.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/president-zuma-remains-committed-to-nuclear-project-and-russia-20171105

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

How about this: crack down on Leftist groups funding, organizing, and promoting these caravans that create the mess in the first place.

Indeed.

Note the hacks in the press and their dishonesty.

narciso said...

Well Carlos slim would t give them an allowance itherwise
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.timeslive.co.za/amp/news/south-africa/2018-04-06-ill-support-zuma-no-matter-what-says-carl-niehaus-outside-court/

bagoh20 said...

This reminds me of when the Bush administration was in front of congress warning them about the coming subprime mortgage crisis, and the Dems kept telling them there was no crisis. I'm talking about you, Barney Frank.

They were never held accountable for that avoidable and foreseeable disaster, and they probably won't be held accountable for what's coming from this becuase our press sucks.

narciso said...

Fellow stepped down on corruption charges in 2009

Michael K said...

If you write for the New York Times then cheap hard drugs from Mexico is a benefit,

I still wonder if the drug cartels are funding Democrat opposition to the wall.

traditionalguy said...

The complaint seen threw NYT's eyes is that we cannot provide enough instant schools, hospitals, dentists, food stamps, and Catholic Priest distributed free resettlement transportation vouchers to the interior along with free housing vouchers to service our new citizens. If Puerto Rico got a quick $90 billion, where is the border communities loot?

Michael K said...

the Dems kept telling them there was no crisis. I'm talking about you, Barney Frank.

Maxine was there too. I had video of it on my blog but the video has disappeared.

narciso said...

Well there was a contributor David carr who was strung out on heroin.

Wince said...

Both sides need to dial back the fighting words, resist the temptation to finger-point and find a creative way through this minefield."

Minefield?

Isn't that what they call a gaff?

bagoh20 said...

Nobody has to start a war in Afghanistan - you just show up and join in.
Nobody ends a war in Afghanistan - you just give up and leave.

I get the impression they like it - religion of peace and all.

bagoh20 said...

"I still wonder if the drug cartels are funding Democrat opposition to the wall."

The cartels are flush with cash, we all know which party they prefer in power, and keeping the border open is really important to their business, so to think they are not contributors to the DNC in some way would be naive. Probably numerous avenues of help are provided: voters, money, muscle, threats. They got 'em all.

narciso said...

Report from the front:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theepochtimes.com/ex-cop-infiltrates-human-sex-trafficking-ring-goes-in-to-rescue-kids-on-his-own_2873144.html/amp

n.n said...

The crisis at the border is in the middle of the bridge, where collateral damage progresses in both directions. One way through normalization of immigration reform. Another way through avoidance of emigration reform. Labor arbitrage, democratic leverage, and planned parenthood.

Kevin said...

Three stages of every outside the beltway strong by the NYT:

1. There is no problem, Trump is lying.
2. There is a problem, but Trump got everything wrong.
3. We must elect a Democrat because Trump can't solve the problem!

n.n said...

ex-cop-infiltrates-human-sex-trafficking-ring-goes-in-to-rescue-kids-on-his-own

Semper fidelis.

Kevin said...

Last week, a teenage boy from Guatemala died in government custody, the third death of a minor since December.

Remember, deaths of American kids by illegal immigrants are not the real problem.

That's the problem Trump talked about.

He was very, very wrong.

Dear corrupt left, go F yourselves said...

58% of Democratics believe Rachel Maddow's bullshit.

Drago said...

BleachBit-and-Hammers: "58% of Democratics believe Rachel Maddow's bullshit."

And 100% of LLR's did as well.

gilbar said...

Robert Cook said...The war we started in Afghanistan

Cook nails it, as usual!
Who built the planes? WE DID!
Who produced the jet fuel? WE DID!
Who created the microsoft flight simulators? WE DID!
IF ALL Americans had voluntarily committed suicide, then the war (that WE STARTED) never would have had to take place

Right Cook? Everything IN THE WORLD is America's fault; right? All people are good, except for Americans, who are EVIL!
Right Cook?

Tina Trent said...

Yes, we have to scoop up the garbage from Occupy Border.

Is there any doubt our elected officials despise us? Even unambiguously want us dead?

My next door neighbor was carted away last week. An illegal, serial, child and possibly adult rapist, turns out.

He has a fairly substantial record in just two counties around here -- I'm sure he has more of a record elsewhere, but I gathered only locally. All sorts of jurisdictions are making it increasingly difficult to find criminal records online -- I can't do the blogging about recidivists I used to do.

This guy has several driving without a license arrests and child abuse/dv felony charges. All violence charges dropped or reduced to misdemeanors. No consequences for all the driving infractions. And he obviously has no auto insurance.

So while my husband and I pay out the ass for uninsured driver, our neighbor is anally raping children while driving with no license. And my (conservative) former state rep up the road, Kevin Tanner, argued with me that we don't have problems with illegal immigrants in this area. Bullshit: most of my neighbors are illegal immigrants. How do I know? I used to run work crews. I did refugee and immigrant placement when I was still a sucker. I know what I'm talking about.

Given my history, this rapist-neighbor thing is really . . . steaming me. I also can't find out the details of his crimes, and the DA has refused to answer questions, including whether he will be released on bond. And this guy has come down the road onto our property and talked to me, and I am alone here in the woods isolated from anyone else a good bit of the time.

So what do I do? Carry my gun when I'm outside because my elected officials will not enforce the law? Stop sleeping? It took me years to sleep after the last time. This is the reality of illegal immigration/crime, for people not upper-class-Democrat-liberal enough to protect themselves from the consequences of upper-class-Democrat policies.

CWJ said...

"Last week, a teenage boy from Guatemala died in government custody, the third death of a minor since December."

Amplifying Kevin's 2:20pm comment -

Assuming they included December (otherwise they would have said "this year"), that's three deaths out of over 180,000 arrests. Take away "last week" and the deaths drop to two. So what is it? A normal death rate out of a large population under considerable physical stress of unknown though probably less than optimal health. Or an outsized human tragedy to be laid at the Administration's doorstep.

Paraphrasing Stalin, 3 deaths are a tragedy, hundreds of gang shootings and murders are a statistic.

Achilles said...

Robert Cook said...


The war we started in Afghanistan didn't benefit anyone.

It wasn't supposed to.

War isn't supposed to be for benefit.

After we win there are benefits. But we weren't allowed to win.

On purpose.

I think there were some benefitters in the situation though. I don't much like them.

mockturtle said...

Own asks: Better yet, can we describe a counter-counter-move, that will choke off the channel for their retreat?

Yes. Let's send all these migrants to sanctuary cities and states before they have a chance to rescind their law.

Fen said...

Just a reminder - Cook referred to our boys as "parasites" for serving in the military during what he calls "peacetime". He has no idea what he is talking about.

Osama bin Laden, the founder and first leader of the Islamist group Al-Qaeda, was killed in Pakistan on May 2, 2011, shortly after 1:00 am PKT (20:00 UTC, May 1) by United States Navy SEALs of the U.S. Naval Special Warfare Development Group (also known as DEVGRU or SEAL Team Six). - Wiki

He probably thinks we projected force into Pakistan via teleportation. When we weren't sucking off the gov teat of course.

ccscientist said...

It is not the geography of the US that makes us rich, it is our political system and our people. The countries where the immigrants are coming screwed up their own country and now want to come here...why? Fix your own country. No place in South America is a desert. Life could be good there. Argentina was once one of the richest countries till they elected Peron (etc corruption). Venezuela had it all and threw it away by electing a despot. Mexico should be a pretty good place--we certainly send them enough $. Brazil has so much beauty and natural resources--again, corruption and bad government. None of this is our fault.

narciso said...

fwiw:


https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/07/white-house-immigration-plan-border-security/

Seeing Red said...

They should have been colonized by the British instead of the French and Spanish, etc.

Henry said...

I'm not going to read the whole thing, but I agree with the entire quote. Including the "both sides need to dial back the fighting words". That "dialing back" would include Congress spending time on actually legislating immigration law instead of dumpster diving for Trump's tax returns.

Mark said...

If things are that bad in Honduras and Guatemala, etc., then what needs to be done is military intervention by the international community. They need to send armies in those places and overthrow the leaders and put a bunch of people on trial for crimes against humanity for creating such hell-holes.

Henry said...

Achilles -- There was nothing to win in Afghanistan. There's no standard for "win" that isn't fantasy. Saying "we weren't allowed to win" is like saying "we weren't allowed unicorns".

Henry said...

I'm sorry, who started the war in Afghanistan?

You don't like the word "started"?

Would "restarted" be better?

How about the war we augmented at tremendous cost and no benefit in Afghanistan?

narciso said...

Except those are center right regimes, for the most part,

Gretchen said...

Part of the problem is that all the loopholes are being advertised to would be crossers. They are getting marketing messages. Who is paying for those?

Treks Himalaya trekking said...

Treks Himalaya an indoor outdoor trekking and tours operative company takes you that further way to guarantee you has a memorable trip that you have been dream with Treks Himalaya is part of your choice for Trekking in Nepal. We have 3 days to 30 days Nepal Trekking to choose but it depending of your timetable for Trek in Nepal. We always respect our duty to constantly your Nepal Holiday. Whether you are looking for a quiet gateway, a memorable outing with a family or an exciting nature. We offer you with the best progressive Nepal Tour information and itinerary leading focused and modified as per your requirements for Hiking in Nepal. It is significant to memorize, though, it necessitate an enough level of physical homework and must remembers that there is also a psychosomatic assurance in walking in mountains. We specialize in organize Nepal travel activities excursion such as:- Trekking, Helicopter Tour, Peak Climbing, Mountain Flight, Honeymoon Tour, Sightseeing, Rafting, Jungle Safari, Pilgrim’s Tour, Hotel Reservation, Air Ticket, Tibet and Bhutan Tour many more your vacation desire. https://www.trekshimalaya.com
https://www.trekshimalaya.com/annapurna-panorama-trekking.php
https://www.trekshimalaya.com/annapurna-base-camp-trekking.php
https://www.trekshimalaya.com/ghorepani-trekking.php
https://www.trekshimalaya.com/helicopter-tour-in-nepal.php
https://www.trekshimalaya.com/manaslu-trekking.php
https://www.trekshimalaya.com/mardi-himal-trekking.php
https://www.trekshimalaya.com/annapurna-trekking.php
https://www.trekshimalaya.com/langtang-trekking.php
https://www.trekshimalaya.com/phaplu-everest-base-camp-trek.php

Fen said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Fen said...

both sides need to dial back the fighting words". That "dialing back" would include Congress spending time on actually legislating immigration law instead of dumpster diving for Trump's tax returns.

"Much appreciated. Just ignore that we weaponized the FBI and CIA in an attempt to oust the duly elected President of the United States. Let's just move on. You guys go back to the 19th Green and have a round on us. Congratulate yourselves for snatching an orderly retreat from the jaws of defeat. We'll go back to the drawing board and plan our next missile strike. Thanks."