February 18, 2019

"Suppose that instead of one shepherd boy, there are a few dozen. They are tired of the villagers dismissing their complaints about less threatening creatures..."

"... like stray dogs and coyotes. One of them proposes a plan: they will start using the word 'wolf' to refer to all menacing animals. They agree and the new usage catches on. For a while, the villagers are indeed more responsive to their complaints. The plan backfires, however, when a real wolf arrives and cries of 'Wolf!' fail to trigger the alarm they once did. What the boys in the story do with the word 'wolf,' modern intellectuals do with words like 'violence.' When ordinary people think of violence, they think of things like bombs exploding, gunfire, and brawls. Most dictionary definitions of 'violence' mention physical harm or force. Academics, ignoring common usage, speak of 'administrative violence,' 'data violence,' 'epistemic violence' and other heretofore unknown forms of violence. Philosopher Kristie Dotson defines the last of these as follows: 'Epistemic violence in testimony is a refusal, intentional or unintentional, of an audience to communicatively reciprocate a linguistic exchange owing to pernicious ignorance.'"

From "The Boy Who Inflated the Concept of ‘Wolf’" by Spencer Case (Quillette).

61 comments:

Jupiter said...

Unintentional pernicious ignorance? Is there a lot of that around?

gilbar said...

my $0.02
it's NOT unintentional; they're setting us up to be used to saying that violence is no big deal, then; when they hit us with a pogrom, people will say:
Oh, it's Just Violence; those folk are such cry babies

Skeptical Voter said...

It's another version of "The deplorables are too dumb to understand, and cannot be educated to our form of reality". Like the slogan that appeared on tee shirts a few years ago, "It's a Black Thing. You Wouldn't Understand", the new version is "It's A Progressive Intellectual Thing. You Wouldn't Understand."

And considering some of the bloviated pap I'm supposed to accept from progressives, it's for danged sure that I don't understand.

DanTheMan said...

I'll say it again: The motto of the modern left:

Our violence is free speech.
Your free speech is violence.

MikeR said...

Not a new idea. "Racism" has been borrowed and adulterated long ago.

Bob Boyd said...

Micro-wolf!

YoungHegelian said...

For the Classical Liberal tradition, there is a distinction between "speech" & "acts", which the PoMos reject. For them, it's acts all the way down, so that insulting speech becomes another form of violent act. Not for the PoMos is the adage "Sticks & stones...".

Also, for the Identity Left, the oppressed "Other" takes the place that the proletariat occupies in classical Marxism. In Marxism, it is the proletariat, through the dialectic of Lordship & Bondage, that sees reality for what it is. For the Identity Left, it is the Oppressed Other that sees reality for what it is. Thus, in any disagreement on matters of fact or subjective stance, it is the viewpoint of the Oppressed Other that is to be believed, for they see the "truth" of the matter. This is, in a nutshell, Standpoint Theory.

Bob Boyd said...

A similar effect occurs when modifiers are placed in front of the word justice.
Environmental justice, racial justice, social justice, etc.
People start to dismiss calls for justice as just more political activism.

NorthOfTheOneOhOne said...

Does this mean we can accuse the intellectuals and academicians of 'intellectual violence' and 'academic violence?

If so, I'm all in!

rcocean said...

Some day people are going to wake up and wonder why we're paying liberal arts professors for doing nothing of value. In fact, creating anti-value.

Matt said...

I'm inclined to disagree with the end of article about how the current use of "literally" as an intensifier is somehow in the same class of language degradation as using "violence" to mean "not violence." Its worth distinguishing between natural (albeit annoying) changes in usage with no underlying intent and attempted changes in usage by those with a political/ideological point to make. The political changes are not only stupid, but usually unsuccessful. Natural changes seem to be impossible to stop.

Gahrie said...

Speaking of counterproductive lies....have you guys heard that 25% of women who attend college are raped?

Yancey Ward said...

To accuse people of pernicious ignorance is a violent response.

Sigivald said...

Ref. also "microaggression", a term of some utility in its cleanest, most original sense ... now used most commonly do describe... half-imagined pico-aggressions.

(At least aggression was never strictly limited to the physical, either.)

tcrosse said...

'Epistemic violence in testimony is a refusal, intentional or unintentional, of an audience to communicatively reciprocate a linguistic exchange owing to pernicious ignorance.'

This probably sounded better in the original German.

Chris N said...

The War on Homelessness just escalated with 200 new cases of PTSD

chuck said...

The modern university is the moral equivalent of war.

Ann Althouse said...

I ended my excerpt with the quote about epistemic violence because it was so awful. The author of the essay also finds it awful, so don't be confused.

bagoh20 said...

When your power and influence depend on people fearing impending disaster and hating people who don't see it you can't afford to let prosperity, tolerance, and peace get in the way. When things improve, you just lower the bar of outrage and fear, or just make shit up, but you must have things so bad that only the government headed by some messiah can fix it. When the government and the messiah screw things up in the attempt, then now you actually have a real problem that of course only the same people and government can fix. It's a great scam.

bagoh20 said...

Althouse will like the word choice of this headline over at Instapundit.

"THIS ONE DOESN’T SEEM TO BE A HOAX, BUT LET’S SEE IF IT GARNERS JUST ONE PERCENT OF THE ATTENTION JUSSIE SMOLLETT GOT:

Man Pulls a Gun on Sam’s Club Customer Wearing MAGA Hat."

Read this and wonder at the depth of Trump derangement out there. I don't trust any of these hysterical people to play fair or even legal. They are dangerously deluded. We have FBI senior people admitting to treason and thinking it's cool.

https://pjmedia.com/instapundit/322114/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+pjmedia%2Finstapundit+%28Instapundit%29

Quaestor said...

Philosopher Kristie Dotson

Gawddammit! I ruined another keyboard.

Sydney said...

They do this with a lot of words. “Trafficking” used to mean illegally bringing people over the border from other countries to be sex workers, usually against their will or under false pretenses. Now it jus means pimping.

Quaestor said...

Check out the Tennessee Democrat.

Nonapod said...

The real message is whispered to the subconscious, and never officially acknowledged.

Fake messages can also be assumed or presumed, so called "Dog Whistles".

When we allow sloppy language to proliferate—for example, when we use the word “literally” to mean “metaphorically”—we degrade language and make it harder for everyone to communicate.

One of the few things I find annoying about Rush Limbaugh is his constant (purposeful?) misuse of "literally".

Kevin said...

Violence.
Racism.
Privilege.
Deplorable.

When their cries no longer elicit the required reaction, they just pick another word to start shouting.

Wolf, bear, Yeti, T-Rex. These can all be words we use for whatever we feel is threatening our flock, even if it's some old dude in a red hat who stays in his home and never ventures out.

Kevin said...

The real punishment for Jussie Smollett's hoax should be to call every hoax going forward a "Smollett".

"That's terrible if it's true, but it's probably a Smollett."

It might be a greater punishment than 3 years in the pen.

Lewis Wetzel said...

Anthony Burgess believed that language and its usage are battlefields. The elites try to control language and usage, but the common people fight back and eventually win. They win because they are free to use irony while officialdom is not.
It's an interesting idea.
The language police enforce strict definitions of a word, while the common people rebel by demonstrating the fluid nature of language.
Twitter and Facebook are notoriously censorious, but they won't reveal their rules. They can't because people will then find a way around them. If the word "camel jockey" is outlawed, people will simply use a non-censored word or phrase and give it the meaning that they want to give it.

Maillard Reactionary said...

"It's a beautiful thing, the destruction of words." -- Orwell, 1984.

As in so many things, Orwell was ahead of his time in recognizing the utility of language control to tyrants.

Let's have another Orwell quote:

"Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind."

I'm on a roll now, let's keep going:

"But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought."

Discuss.

Nonapod said...

Lewis Wetzel said...The elites try to control language and usage, but the common people fight back and eventually win. They win because they are free to use irony while officialdom is not.

A good persuader understands this implicitly. The term "Fake News" was crafted by Hillary Clinton's elite minions in an attempt to undermine the legitimacy of the 2016 election. It was repurposed. The repurposed version was then amplified by non elites.

Drago said...

What's most astonishing is how some people proudly wear their willingness to lie and smear on their sleeves, and then, when called on these lies and smears, pretend it shouldn't matter at all.

Needless to say this is always on the left....or select other lefty lackeys.

Quasimodo said...

Violence.
Racism.
Privilege.
Deplorable.
etc. etc. etc. ad nauseam

Just so many Mardi Gras beads in the eternal grievance carnival. They've lost meaning.

Quaestor said...

Epistemic violence in testimony is a refusal, intentional or unintentional, of an audience to communicatively reciprocate a linguistic exchange owing to pernicious ignorance.

In other words, when a whacked-out feminist lunatic who styles herself a philosopher bloviates some particularly egregious sophistry at her audience who, being too civilized to drive her off the podium in a hail of kitchen waste, sit in stunned silence, the whacked-out feminist lunatic is the victim of epistemic violence.

Epistemic violence. Hmmmm. To borrow the thunder of Inigo Montoya, I do not think it means what Kristie Dotson thinks it means.

Quaestor said...

Gawd, it's pretty evident Mademoiselle doesn't even know what linguistic means.

tcrosse said...

Who put the piss in epistemic?

Char Char Binks, Esq. said...

Orwell considered Smollett Scotland's best novelist. orwell.ru › Library › Reviews › Smollett › English

Char Char Binks, Esq. said...

It's illegal to cry wolf in a crowded theater.

FIDO said...

Add racist, sexist, misogynist, etc.

Lots of fake 'wolves' out there. I stopped listening and from what Jussie Smollett taught me, I am correct to ignore the shepard boys because their taxonomy is as bad as their vocabulary.

FIDO said...

As I've learned languages besides English, it is curious how the vocabulary, usage and the breadth of the adjectives have impact on how the people actually think.

This makes this linguistic control by the Elites and the loudest of Leftist voices something to challenge.

I was listening to this activist who called Jordan Petersen 'Someone who would destroy all the values that New Zealanders held dear'.

He was asked to defend this proposition. He could not. Make them EARN every inch of ideological space.

Phil 314 said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Phil 314 said...

There are just so many responses to this, but I'll just use the one my 3 year old granddaughter uses for situations in which she either:
-didn't hear what you said -OR-
-doesn't understand what you said -OR-
-doesn't like what you said.

"huh"

Fernandinande said...

It's illegal to cry wolf in a crowded theater.

In "Never Cry Wolf" the privileged racist (played by Nancy Pelosi) is violently grinding up mice (played by the Black Community) in a deplorable blender (played by a '65 Mustang) and the oppressed Esquimau guy (played by elderly Phillip Whatshisname) says "Good idea".

FullMoon said...

The real punishment for Jussie Smollett's hoax should be to call every hoax going forward a "Smollett".

"That's terrible if it's true, but it's probably a Smollett."

It might be a greater punishment than 3 years in the pen.


Good idea. Like "...gate" attached to scandal.

Jussie (juicy)might be better, "Another Juicy hate crime reported in Beverly Hills this morning"


Fernandinande said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Char Char Binks, Esq. said...

'The real punishment for Jussie Smollett's hoax should be to call every hoax going forward a "Smollett".'

I refuse to call him "Jussie Smollett". He called himself Fag Nigger, so out of all due respect for him, that's what I'll call him. Jussie Smollett is his slave name.

Narayanan said...

Recently entry

To perpetrate a patently ludicrous hoax for the purpose of race-baiting.
Fatiha claimed three white guys urinated on her mother in broad daylight because they didn’t like her Niqab. She jussied all over Twitter.
by Green Gordon February 17, 2019

Ingachuck'stoothlessARM said...

fairie shepard boyz iconic "HOAX" poster

"When a smollett man casts a big shadow, know that the sun is setting"

Fernandinande said...

Philosopher Kristie Dotson

Which is more useless, a philosopher or a scholar?

Both words indicate that the subject doesn't actually know anything, else they would be called "chemist" or "psychologist", etc.

gadfly said...

Said the little lamb to the shepherd boy
Do you hear what I hear?
Ringing through the sky, shepherd boy
Do you hear what I hear?
A wolf, a wolf, howling in the night
It will bring you petrifying fright.

Jaq said...

That's pretty rich coming from gaffy.

The article reminds me of Inga telling Republicans that we hate America, a country only she gets to define, I guess.

FullMoon said...

haha!
To perpetrate a patently ludicrous hoax for the purpose of race-baiting.
Fatiha claimed three white guys urinated on her mother in broad daylight because they didn’t like her Niqab. She jussied all over Twitter.
by Green Gordon February 17, 2019


Make it an official crime definition, fake hate crime:
2018-11-13

Des Moines Iowa

In mid-November, a Drake University student told school officials she had received four racist notes in one of the residence halls, at least one of which was addressed to her. After a police and school investigation, the student, who has not been charged with jussie or named, admitted to writing one of the notes.

Henry said...

The plan backfires, however, when a real wolf arrives and cries of 'Wolf!' fail to trigger the alarm they once did.

In actuality, the plan never backfires and the villagers slaughter every wolf, coyote, and wild dog in the entire wilderness.

If you look at history, crying wolf is dangerously effective.

In Barry Lopez's classic Of Wolves and Men, he discusses the extinction of wolf populations in parts of the west in unsparing terms. Bounties that encouraged hunters and trappers to turn in proof of wolf kills (ears, nose, bone of the foreleg) lead inexorably to government-run programs in which wolves were poisoned and trapped in great numbers.

Ingachuck'stoothlessARM said...

The Wolf Who Cried 'Boy!'

who's the real aggressor?

Inga...Allie Oop said...

“What's most astonishing is how some people proudly wear their willingness to lie and smear on their sleeves, and then, when called on these lies and smears, pretend it shouldn't matter at all.”

Unselfaware.

Maillard Reactionary said...

FullMoon @3:03 PM: I second this proposal.

Drago said...

Inga: "Unselfaware."

"hoax Golden Dossier/there are no anti-semites in the Womens March" gal speaks.

Discuss.

Drago said...

"unselfaware" are the legions of lefty liars who bought into this laughably obvious hoax, on top of the laughably obvious Covington hoax, on top of the Russia stole the election from Hillary hoax.

The list is endless and Duke Lacrosse will never be the same.

Drago said...

Go ahead Inga. Admit that you still think the hoax golden dossier is a real thing!

LOL

RobinGoodfellow said...

“Words mean whatever we say they mean.”

Martin said...

Yes, and "sexual assault" now means overhearing and being mildly offended by a joke someone told on the other side of the room, in a group you aren't even part of.

And, "racism" includes someone saying "niggardly" because YOUu are so poorly educated you don't even know what the word means or where it comes from.

And pretending that the T has anything in common with the L, B, and G in LGBT.

But, really, shame on all of us for letting them get away with it.

Bob Loblaw said...

Academics can misuse a common word like that, but they can't stop the rest of us from rolling our eyes and thinking they're idiots.

Unknown said...

Hello viewers around the Globe, I was despondent because i had a very small penis, about 2.5 inches soft and 4 inches hard not nice enough to satisfy a woman, i have been in so many relationship, but cut off because of my situation, i have used so many product which doctors for me, but none could offer me the help i searched for. i saw some few comments on the INTERNET about this specialist called Dr,OLU and decided to contact him on his email: Drolusolutinthome@gmail.com) so I decided to give his herbal product a try. i emailed him and he got back to me, he gave me some comforting words with his herbal pills for Penis Enlargement, Within 3 week of it, i began to feel the enlargement was surprised when she said that she is satisfied with my sex and i have got a large penis. Am so happy, thanks to Dr OLU I also learn that Dr OLU also help with Breast Enlargement Hips and Bums Enlargement etc.. If you are in any situation with a little Penis, weak ejaculation, small breast_hips_bums do get to Dr OLU now for help on his email (Drolusolutionhome@gmail.com) or add him on whatsapp line +2348140654426



Hello viewers around the Globe, I was despondent because i had a very small penis, about 2.5 inches soft and 4 inches hard not nice enough to satisfy a woman, i have been in so many relationship, but cut off because of my situation, i have used so many product which doctors for me, but none could offer me the help i searched for. i saw some few comments on the INTERNET about this specialist called Dr,OLU and decided to contact him on his email: Drolusolutinthome@gmail.com) so I decided to give his herbal product a try. i emailed him and he got back to me, he gave me some comforting words with his herbal pills for Penis Enlargement, Within 3 week of it, i began to feel the enlargement was surprised when she said that she is satisfied with my sex and i have got a large penis. Am so happy, thanks to Dr OLU I also learn that Dr OLU also help with Breast Enlargement Hips and Bums Enlargement etc.. If you are in any situation with a little Penis, weak ejaculation, small breast_hips_bums do get to Dr OLU now for help on his email (Drolusolutionhome@gmail.com) or add him on whatsapp line +2348140654426