kyrsten sinema swearing-in is a mood pic.twitter.com/fS1hkVnnl4— Paddingtweets (@DaneBernardo) January 3, 2019
So, my brilliant AZ fellow residents elected Dem Kyrsten Sinema to a 6-yr term in the U.S. Senate. Ms. Sinema has now demonstrated her bisexual lifestyle as well as her openly anti-religious stance during her swearing in ceremony. Another example of a Dem fooling the electorate. pic.twitter.com/latYtRsOIN— Jim Loe (@JimLoe) January 4, 2019
Why not draw attention to yourself with fashion? I like this arrival with a splash so much nicer than the splash Mitt Romney chose to make, writing a peevish op-ed about Trump's "character" and preening as the unimpeachably serious adult in the chamber.
My favorite part of this is not the right-to-bare arms, but the fur. I assume it's fake fur, but it reminds me of the first time I saw Sarah Palin.
And then there's the swearing in on a volume of the Supreme Court reporter (which volume? the one with Roe v. Wade?).
ADDED: I'm obviously not endorsing the text of tweet with the bare arms photograph. I think it's very stupid. And I don't even know what "her bisexual lifestyle" is supposed to refer to. Conservatives bristling at the sight of young women are making fools of themselves.
AND: And here's Marilyn Monroe in glasses and a bit of fur in "How to Marry a Millionaire":
Posts
290 comments:
1 – 200 of 290 Newer› Newest»The taliban supporter doesn’t want to use the Bible.
Shocking.
She looks like a dingbat to me.
Her hair looks fake. The gray stole is very Hunger Games. But that is fitting for democrats. They are the party of billionaire elite hillarywoodlanders.
"The gray stole is very Hunger Games."
And the brown stole?
Palin is a natural beauty.
Here is Sinima without the fake platinum hollywood hair, but with the pink tutu.
Good job, Arizona.
"And the brown stole?"
The brown stole is clearly very Game of Thrones. Probably from some lady Stark in the the North.
The brown stole is very dead animal. Which could also be Hunger Games - the defeated deplorable side.
I haven't followed the new Arizona Senator. One of the tweets described her as anti-religious . Is she anti-religious or just non-religious. Both sides sometimes conflate the two.
Sinema looks like the Cinema.
That's no accident.
"I assume it's fake fur" -- Althouse
Doesn't the simulated skinning of an animal send he same inhumane message as a real skinning? Would you wear a fake Zeus-the-dog fur cape? Where is the outrage?
Few people are mourning the departure of Paul Ryan but he was the guy that taught all the new congresspeole about the working of the United States- procedure, budgets, et al. Who’s stepping up to try and corral these dingbats now?
Ann Althouse said...
"The gray stole is very Hunger Games."
And the brown stole?
Sinema fits right in with corrupt wealthy plutocrats who use government power to maintain haves and have nots.
Palin fought against the cronies for the little people.
Ann’s problem is she lives in the capital bubble and looks down on those below her. She is part of the corrupt mandarin class.
It's a rorschach fur, one sees in it ones own political bias.
So, swearing in on the Constitution must be too religious.
Be interesting to know which Supreme Court Reports Volume she chose for her oath.
She is channeling Marilyn Monroe.
All the voters are swooning.
It's a free country, so Romney is free to express his opinions.
However, he did not just "criticize" Trump, but went into an ad hominem attack that thus also attacks all of us who voted - and still supports - Donald Trump. For a Republican politician that is just plain stupid.
Synema is a goofball which endears her to some Arizonans.
However, the only reason she won is because many AZ conservatives would not vote for McSally.
I don’t let politics color my appreciation of a Lana Turner-with-glasses look. Works for me
"Conservatives bristling at the sight of young women are making fools of themselves."
Looking at the first photo, the only thing bristling is my penis.
And the brown stole?
Hunger Games (2012) and Game of Thrones (2011-now) were both after 2008. Maybe the costume designers got inspiration from Palin.
I've never heard of these conservatives who are tweeting. This seems a perfect way to become internet famous.
1. Pick a female Democrat
2. Tweet something extremely stupid about her
3. ???
4. Profit
Barry Dauphin said... So, swearing in on the Constitution must be too religious.
--
Or something..negative liberties and all that.
So..negative.
Not fashionable.
{ I see that my post below naturally and w genuine respect refers to Sen. Sinema as "she", but perhaps I am committing cruelty and this lovely human prefers another sound. (If so, how could I know?) No offense intended }
The American in me is optimistic about all this new sassy blood, and I can't help but pray that Most High Good draws them to their best expression.
Pence was most Excellent also, so present, real, grace in action.
Sen. Sinema saw that, too. I can't quite make out what she says right then as they shake hands, but it is clear she is moved and saw something real and new in him.
Perhaps she caught something new, too, about America, and that then would be a healing along a golden road.
Godspeed america.
Totally. Good find on the Marylin Monroe photo.
I'll bet Kristin Cinema eats meat she didn't kill.
> Why not draw attention to yourself
Exactly!
Each and every Congressman should dress up as for the Freakers Ball and pull stunts to express their individuality at the swearing in.
I'd wear an enormous Cossack hat and swear on a dead salmon.
Self expression is the highest calling, its what America just doesn't have enough of.
Elegant, to me, and very attractive. Her politics not so much but it's too late to quibble over that.
Conservatives bristling at the sight of young women are making fools of themselves.
Althouse still falling for that one I see.
Good looking woman. Comes from troubled upbringing and all over the map as far as core values. Not so young, 42 yrs old.
Most men could care less about the brown stole- it's what's beneath it that counts.
Yeah, great find on the Monroe photo. The Senator looks a lot like Marilyn. The Senator is very good looking. A few dates with Laslo Spatula and she’d drop the bi thing.
Part of the Sinema makeover, which included misrepresenting her politics, to fool Arizona’s foolish voters. Unlike the coverage of the swearing in, leftmedia pimping for her during the campaign didn’t include, “Kirsten Sinema, bisexual atheist ....”
McSally isn’t much of a conservative although an admirable woman. Unfortunately, her inept campaigning is responsible for the loss of a Senate seat to this bimbo.
I see many women who look similar in Seattle, so when I see adult women with pink or blue or purple colored hair, the burlesque or ironic style, a hyphenated name etc I often assume something’s wrong. She’s probably anti-conventional and signaling membership to counter cultural views and some sort of ismistic platform, profession or identity.
For interested guys, this could mean she’s a lesbian or has lesbianic tendencies (stay far away) or that you’d better share similar views and be willing to put up with her views because she’s signaling them and ‘women,minorities and the oppressed first and I’m an artist.’ Hopefully she has brothers and good relationships and has a real job and is down to earth, too. Lots of ugly women end up here because men rarely pay them attention but usually they age out and find someone.
One thing I see in a lot of the identity group, ‘women are good’ class of elected officials is this counter-cultural, anti-conventional, likely regressive and childish return to women first and girlishness. At the moment they’re uniting around the vulgarity of Trump but it just as easily could be the oppression of Romney or Jeb (oh they’ll find a reason).
Beneath their professed ideals I see resentment and bitterness and need for meaning.
I don’t want people making laws who need politics to have this kind of meaning in their lives, or to be subject to the whims of an endless reactionary cohort stuffed with women unable to maintain relationships with men and meaning in their own lives. Such women usually feel justified in taking money from people who earn it to allow them to redistribute it for the latest cause.
It’s a a bit of shit-show
Martha McSally is a lightweight who managed to lose a very winnable seat in a mostly-red state. Gov. Ducey appointed her to the empty seat, which makes it another Democrat win in 2020. She is the gift that keeps on giving, but not to her own party.
Kyrsten Sinema, for all her past goofiness, will be on the extreme right wing of the next Democratic congress.
I appreciate that this country has resilience to survive a Bozo in the White House and a gaggle of bimbos in Congress.
I think she's hot. And crazy, which of course, makes her hotter. But ultimately crazy Trumps hot.
Aside from her accessorization, get back to me on the fabulousness of her constituent services office.
I keep seeing these stories of "conservatives pounce on AOC" for the dance video. What I have not seen are any pieces where a conservative criticized the video. Maybe it exists in some obscure tweet but no evidence of a groundswell of conservative criticism. Reminds of the days when the media and John Kerry (but I repeat myself) kept bringing up conservative revolt at Dick Cheney's daughter being gay, yet we never saw any evidence of that. Progressives simply assumed it existed because they assumed that is what conservatives think.
Sinema is a different story. She campaigned as a centrist Democrat and mainstream American when she was really a Code Pink radical. Pointing out she is a phony is well within fair political criticism, regardless of how well dressed she is. Who is Sinema -- the mainstream candidate or the one who thinks Arizonans are stupid?
The focus on style and tone and sexuality is fun and makes life and politics (and this blog) interesting.
I have no problem with that.
At some point, though, Synema and AOC are going to vote on important matters. They are going to urge policy prescriptions that affect (or effect?) the lives of millions.
Not to be a pessimist, but these two attractive quirky ladies will likely promote the same statist, leftist, repressive bullshit, under the guise of "fairness" or "equality," that normal, sane, working folks have been battling for decades.
"swearing-in is a mood"
Is that English? Does it mean something?
I'd say that outfit isn't what I'd expect from a Senator being sworn in. I've worked at companies that would've regard that attire as "Unprofessional" and told her to go home and change.
As for her being Anti-Christian. Wasn't that obvious during the campaign? What's wrong with Arizona, anyway?
She's strikingly good looking. In most endeavors, good looks are not a handicap. There have been several male Senators with movie star good looks, and, of course, Ronald Reagan was, in fact, a movie star. I'm not so sure striking good looks are an advantage for women in politics, however Dignified good looks like, for example, Gillibrand or Haley seems more appropriate than outright hotness. The sex appeal of Palin and Sinema subverts their message.....,. Occasio-Cortez is hot. Her message --airhead socialism--augments her hot hotness. If you're really hot and really dumb, then you're truly in Marilyn Monroe territory. I don't know that much about Sinema. Is she dumber than Ocasio?
I'm always amazed how Red State voters are ALWAYS fooled by Democrats. They campaign as moderates and then go to DC and vote as liberals.
95% of the time.
So I guess there are no new young men elected to Congress worth talking about?
I'm not sure why Palin get yoked in with this goof.
Palin was a Gov of a State, and always dressed in an appropriate manner.
This character looks like she's going on a Game Show or dancing with stars.
Not to be a pessimist, but these two attractive quirky ladies will likely promote the same statist, leftist, repressive bullshit, under the guise of "fairness" or "equality," that normal, sane, working folks have been battling for decades.
While you and I may think this is a bad thing, the Althouses of the world feel it is a good thing.
Maybe Mitt can have a word with her. After he talks to the Motherfucker Congresswoman.
Since he's Miss Manners of DC.
"swearing in on a volume of the Supreme Court reporter"
That seems... bizarre.
At least it wasn't a Harry Potter book, I guess.
Sinema is quite striking physically- I loved the outfit a great deal. She is definitely LGBTQILF.
All that's missing are heaving breasts.
If you aren't going to use a religious text for a swearing in ritual, it is probably best to use nothing at all. It makes you look ridiculous to use anything else- it does give the impression that you don't take the ritual seriously.
Hey...doesn't the Bi in the LGBTQ.... mean two? This implies that there are only two genders you haters!
Well it was "distinctive". Let's leave it at that.
Gahrie,
Maybe you get to pick any two from the growing list.
Transgender and a diversity admonition.
The newly elected Democrat women are making both Democrats and women look stupid, but they did vote for them, so it's not just an impression.
Just what we need - more clowns in the car.
I didn't realize that politics could actually get worse than the corrupt mess it was, but that's progress.
She so hot, Mike Pence is sporting wood
Her look in that top pic with the old red is classic mid-century America. That's hot! Bernie looks like death warmed over, though. He won't be running in 2020. I don't think he'll still be on his feet.
Conservatives bristling at the sight of young women are making fools of themselves.
@Althouse, still falling for the meme, l see. Gullible is as gullible does.
IMHO, the Senate is not the place for bimbos. Clearly the voters of Arizona disagree. Is it too late to revoke Arizona’s statehood and have it revert to the status of a territory?
Democratic progressives remind us of the elite children of communist dictators.
While their countrymen starve, the hollywood crowd throws big Hunger Games parties for their own.
Let's discuss: Should an animal be killed, and skinned to make a fashion statement?
I fondly remember this recurring SNL skit:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_Talk
Pence's and the tweeter's discomfort is delicious. Very fun to witness.
Sinema's a looker. No doubt about it. And obviously more interesting in bed than that Palin nutcase, which is attractive in itself.
Now, it's possible she might go heavy on the cake make-up, or have difficulty keeping up her looks into her fifth decade and beyond. But what she's blessedly free of is the mean, angry, clenched eyebrow scowl and angry mouth corner wrinkles that the twit from Alaska has so many of. So there's that. Nicer, more carefree women are naturally sexier.
As for April Apple ("Dickin' Bimbos"), she's afraid to look down at her own self when naked out of deathly fear that she'll see Hillary Clinton's head emerging out from her vagina.
I thought we were supposed to ignore what people who identify as females choose to wear?did the rules change again?
This Althouse habit of extrapolating what “conservatives” think from a single unknown tweeter is dumb.
I thought we were supposed to ignore what people who identify as females choose to wear?did the rules change again?
Oh, you can criticize the reaction 'conservatives' are having to the looks or women, or you can also acknowledge that many of these reactions are based in experience and reasoned critique of ideas making their way through our politics.
I'm all for women looking sharp if they want to, and aesthetics is its own field.
I'm proposing the following: Many women attracted to the '-Isms' and political activism are deeply unhappy with current norms and traditions, the very rules which affect all of our lives through our institutions.
They are taking up counter-cultural and activist ideas for likely personal and professional reasons while simultaneously seeking control of those institutions, and they signal as much with their clothes (at the least, their relationship to conventional dress). They seek to make laws which will affect my personal and professional life.
If you're going to celebrate the aesthetics of glamour in political figures, I think it's reasonable to also make arguments related to aesthetics and politics based in my own experiences and Sinema's own website.
No?
As for April Apple ("Dickin' Bimbos"), she's afraid to look down at her own self when naked out of deathly fear that she'll see Hillary Clinton's head emerging out from her vagina.
Nah. Ritmo's head out of her bunghole.
As far-left as she is, I'm surprised Sinema didn't wear a burkah.
Barf. Fucking degeneracy. Screwed-up, backwards, historically and economically illiterate dumbass, perfect to represent a society of other screwed-up, backwards, historically and economically illiterate dumbasses.
But, hey, it's got a snatch so joy to the world.
I really, really hate our "new Congress". Not least of all because of emotional, irrational, braindead bitches like her and the other smug, bomb-throwing, know-nothings like AOC and those fucking muslims that dont belong in this country much less the government.
Palin was quite attractive in a down to earth sort of way, and quite sensible synema is like one of those creatures from van helsing.
When I mentioned nicer, sexier and more carefree Darrell chimed in to speak up about orifices and emerging objects. His cigarette is losing its power to pacify his fellatory urges.
You chickencucks so afraid of women... don't worry, they won't ask you to enlist, so you are still safe!
Lol. There's nothing "down-to-earth" about bitchy, self-righteous and vindictive, Narcissistico.
Palin was a phony control freak who took pains to hide what a rage-a-holic she is behind closed doors.
She reminds me of Johansens bad dye job in the spirit movie, I guess Cortez was going for the eva Mendes look,
Degeneracy. That's funny. Never underestimate how deluded the deplorables are in mistaking their ninny-ass shrinking minority, outdated, hateful and moronic views for normalcy.
When I mentioned nicer, sexier and more carefree
Yeah. Hillary's fucking head emerging from a commenter's vagina. You can't help but lie, can you?
I like Johansen and mendez, so I'm rendering a complement.
Way to go, Arizona. Jeff Flake is out of the Senate and this new bisexual is in?
Is “Trump” how we get more of this?
She has nice tits. Like you deplorables wouldn't love to fuck her.
Well, that was the part you focused on, Darrell. Not that I'd have trouble understanding why you would, of course. It was just as true as the precedent statements but gets at the heart of our female conserva-commenters' Hillary fixation. Or at least for one of them.
I used to think April Apple feared that Hillary Clinton was hiding under her bead. But now I recognize that her obsession with the woman is much more personal, and visceral.
Yep. She fears that she'll look down at herself and see Hillary Clinton emerging from her hoo ha.
Maybe it's just me, but I can't see Sinema as anything close to hot. At least she isn't in Bella Abzug territory, but she's nowhere close to AOC.
All I see is this:
https://www.bing.com/search?q=dolores+umbridge&qs=LS&pq=dolores&sk=PRES1LS2&sc=5-7&cvid=52E5DDD2ECA241E59128CCF635902F6B&FORM=QBLH&sp=3
Ha ha! Burkalow uses Bing. Hilarious!
Do you use a Commodore 64 also, Burk? How about a dial-up connection?
Bed* not "bead." Sorry.
Although I suppose that might fit in better with the alternative HDS theory. ;-)
"Conservatives bristling at the sight of young women are making fools of themselves"
Huh, what?
Even the silly tweet cited in the post is not "bristling at the sight of a young woman": Sinema isn't a "young woman," the tweeter didn't "bristle" at her sight, but, as I see it, he did take issue with her as the usual phony prog candidate, running as a moderate, beginning to bare her radiness.
Feminist retirees assuming on the basis of flimsy evidence that "conservatives" "bristle" at the "sight" of "young women" are making fools of themselves.
It figures, since issues involving "women's bodies" have done that for quite a while now. Claims about "bristling" conservatives feed The Narrative.
Titus said...She has nice tits. Like you deplorables wouldn't love to fuck her.
Titus, you need to go read that old comment thread that Althouse linked to in the post. See especially vbspurs' analysis of your old comments. Classic stuff.
Ritmo: Many of the engineers at Bing will be much smarter, more innovative, and with a much firmer grasp on statistical modeling, mathematics and problem-solving than you, if you are, I take it, some sort of psychologist.
I only know you for making frequent personal attacks, unhinged and unreasoned arguments against people with whom you politically disagree.
Whatever your underlying operating principles, your behavior here rarely recommends them.
Well she has self identified as bisexual, them again so has amber heard at one time or another, apparently not enough not to drive first Depp (it's a short trip) and musk crazy.
"Dickin'Bimbos@Home said...
I'll bet Kristin Cinema eats meat she didn't kill."
And clams she didn't dig.
That was at least 7 years ago but if you can count on anything it's that Stalker FullMoon (shyster-contractor) will live in the past - if you can even call it a life. Hard to do when he's so busy bookmarking and organizing his vast stash of blog comments.
I'm sure he's threatened by Sinema, also.
When F. Moon shyster-contractor and his wife went off on their wedding night and honeymoon they were relieved to find out that both preferred sleeping or just generally being mentally comatose to sex. It really eased up their compatibility scores.
I was in Az for a week last November. Sinema radio and tv commercials were constant and good. Signs and billboards everywhere.
McSally commercials were infrequent, and , frankly, kinda annoying. It was like Mcsally campaign thought they had a lock and did not need to put any effort at all into it.
And your point?
Romney's attention whore OP-ed was the boring old white Never Trump equivalent of Sinemas anti-religious stunt.
Moon prefers a woman who can make up for all his shortcomings - and they really are legion.
But most importantly, it means she dresses up as a t-square or ruler. Because shyster-contractors have trouble measuring things, and not lying about them afterward.
The sad thing, if you think about it, is that that means it's been at least seven years that Full Moon's been returning and jerking himself off to other blog commenters' playful/funny pretend naughty-talk.
Does your wife know you have this much trouble getting it up, Moon? I mean, your sex lives must be as rote and unfulfilling as a creaky, failing industrial assembly line but it's good to know just how great the toll this obvious shortcoming of yours takes on you.
Have you considered couples therapy?
If you want to understand the conservative discomfort with Sinema, just check out Moon's comments. The idea that he could have any relationship to a sexual existence at all mortifies him - as it does everyone else.
President Pee Pee: I would definitely NOT fuck Sinema because she looks like the type of crazy lefty dingbat who would say her consensual one night stand raped her the next day.
Cortez is attractive but crazy, synema is crazy but not that attractive. Palin is attractive and sensible,
But he does like to fancy himself as some sort of cyberspace peeping tom. Which is kind of as creepy a thing about him as anyone would expect.
Moon, the next time you crouch down against to wall to listen to your neighbors having sex, make sure they don't find out. I know that such "field research" is crucial to a sexless perv as yourself, but society has standards - and they might not be as "understanding" as you assume.
President Pee Pee: I would definitely NOT fuck Sinema because she looks like the type of crazy lefty dingbat who would say her consensual one night stand raped her the next day.
Careful, Gunner: These are the sort of off-limits/taboo discussions that shyster contractor Full Moon gets simultaneously massively excited/repulsed by and will throw back in your face on some night when his own sex life has become too boring even for himself. He'd tell us more about his wife and how he got this way, but he doesn't know. He's just relieved to be able to post evidence of how turned on he gets by hearing what others have to say about it.
THat's not the only part of you that's getting "misty."
It's standard poetic language - humorously expressed toward avatars (green skin). If you were literate, you might read Rumi or something like that and get the point. But the only things you read are the subpoenas sent to you when another client sues for your shoddy work.
Anyone else grossed out by Moon's pervy obsessions and misreadings? I think people got over stuff like what he's all about with The Starr Report, let alone an avatarized version of it.
Yawn. You are boring. And you're revealing more about yourself than you know - certainly a lot more than anything you think you are about me.
As for April Apple ("Dickin' Bimbos"), she's afraid to look down at her own self when naked out of deathly fear that she'll see Hillary Clinton's head emerging out from her vagina.
That is true.
Bernies Babes AKA - Communist wannabees. Like Castro and family.
That is true.
Well, at least you're honest. As opposed to whatever's motivating our resident creep.
Moon: I could write even more of those, if you wanted.
But obviously even a hundred of them wouldn't do for you the one thing you obviously intend for them to do: Give you a boner.
Moon - so I just want to know. Did they give you the boner you were looking for?
Or at least, whatever qualifies as a boner among your invertebrate species?
I think we can now safely say that if Althouse is noting increased traffic to Amazon for the purpose of purchasing Harlequin romance novels, the culprit is Moon.
Masturbatin' Moon! Getting off on all the steamy talk!
alanc709 said...
"Maybe it's just me, but I can't see Sinema as anything close to hot. At least she isn't in Bella Abzug territory, but she's nowhere close to AOC."
At least she bleached the roots.
Masturbatin' Moon's posts are taking a dramatic turn.
Damn. Must be a buzzkill for that hoped-for boner of his that never materialized in the first place.
Seven years he's been waiting to post those, folks! Saving them for himself until then.
Damn Moon. Your masturbation material has an incredibly long shelf-life.
Masturbatin' Moon. Saving his exclusive rights to the steamy talk for a time when he could no longer keep it to himself!
Ok. Moon's getting quiet now.
I guess that last one was the final remnant of the comment load he was finally able to blow.
Moon, I'd offer you to borrow my penis as well, but I'm not into whatever that conservative kooky cuck shit is that you all talk about all the time.
Another guy, maybe. You could get him to make you his cuckold. But I'm not into it. Besides, based on your habits, your wife sounds boring as hell.
Seriously, admirably imaginative seduction of Inga.
Not lame or childish.
How'd that work out for ya?
Apparently better than however your own sex life with your wife works out "for ya."
Have we heard the last of the comment load you were hoping to blow? And was it you who clipped them first or did another weirdo conserva-perv do you the favor and send them on to you?
Conservative team-work! It's like of like if Larry Craig got one of his conservative colleagues to stand outside the bathroom door and give him the signal if the adjacent stall was being entered by a cop.
Openly bisexual. On the Senate floor? Covered by C_Span?
Let's play "Pick the Lesbian."
You can't repost it again, Masturbatin' Moon. That one was already a prelude to the comment load you've already blown.
The load that took seven years.
So, you're done. And it was already creepy the first time you did it.
A pretty face don't make no pretty heart
I learned that, buddy, from the start...
Seriously, Masturbatin' Moon. Did Larry the Gardener or Thomas or chicken save them and send them to you or was it just another file in the same stash you've been collecting and diving into for years already?
Was it as good for you as it was for whoever gave them to you?
Seven years. Even tortoises don't take as long to consummate things.
Well, it looks like that's the end of that. And he's been building up to it for weeks - talking about his "reveal."
That must have given him a serious case of peeping tom blue balls - or they would have it Masturbatin' Moon even had a set of balls.
Glad you were able to get it out of your system, though. The pressure, longing, FRUSTRATION and desire it created in you must have been intense!
So what synema look like 20 years ago. That I'd the clincher.
I could care less about Sinema's sexual preference and I think her outfit is cute, and I get that she wanted to make a splash, but a svelte 50's styled peplum suit in an interesting color would have been more stylish than her unseasonable choice, and more in keeping with the Senate's historical decorum.
The overall effect is not one of daring, but of trying too hard, and were I unkind, at age 42; mutton dressed as lamb.
@Althouse Conservatives bristling at the sight of young women are making fools of themselves.
Really? Sorry, but that is uncharacteristically lazy thinking/writing.
So Masturbatin' Moon doesn't even notice that nobody's reading this supposedly steamy comments stash. He blew his load for nuthin'.
That must be like a whole day's worth of shyster contracting he could have been doing instead. And the client didn't even appreciate it!
Waah. etc.
"@Althouse Conservatives bristling at the sight of young women are making fools of themselves."
Really? Sorry, but that is uncharacteristically lazy thinking/writing.
Seriously? What fucking bullshit. You can see from the conservative Masturbator FullMoon (Shyster-Contractor) how much HE bristles at the things he's writing about.
Yes, it's bristling. Bristling indeed.
Conservatives obviously still have a sex problem. No matter how many porno actresses their boy David Denison Donald Drumpf paid off.
Sure, it's cognitively dissonant. But we're talking conservatives. They're irrational by design.
>>What's wrong with Arizona, anyway?
Lots of Seattle people, and probably lots of Californians, moving here. It will steadily get more purple before finally turning blue. Same thing happened to Washington in the 1990s.
Hopefully, I'll be dead by the time it changes for good.
I'd propose bisexual for sexually attracted to both sexes, and disexual for has both sexes.
Disexual is like type-O blood.
She is dressing in multi decade attention whore mish mash, complete with the fake boobs with a strong dash of 'Venice Beach'. There is no character or consistency in what she is wearing except for strong colors and as much skin as a Senator can get away with (perhaps a bit more)
It is her schtick. I guess, unlike AOC, I am guessing Sinema doesn't have a dance video to out herself with.
How wonderful that the Democrats, bereft of ideas, is retreating once again to Thotery and Eye Candy to try to reverse their electoral declines. Find hot idiot, suppress as much of her ideas as possible. Create Marketing PR Viral campaign. Call anyone who says they are behaving immaturely as Evil Monsters.
I hope she has some wise men around as her advisors or I see her having a short career because you can't gerrymander a state.
Meh: Bisexual means she has twice as many partners to cheat with and some very strong issues with making choices. Horrible marriage material.
This made my day. It is about time we stopped dragging out that book of myths (aka the bible) as a symbol of swearing in. I never, ever understood this using the bible. Why not simply 'swear'?
I like the idea of using a book a law - the laws of our species - rather than a book of fables that many people don't believe in. Why not use a copy of the AZ state constitution? Good for her.
She believes she's a bisexual and she believes 9/11 was perpetrated by our soldiers and police. She's a truther.
One is an absolutely unforgivable libel and the other is an adolescent advertisement for sexual availability. Not a pretty combination.
Why does the stupidity of a woman seem to rise with the price of the frames of her glasses? And why do we have to hear about her sexual preferences? Bisexuality is an excuse when you get caught screwing around, not an "identity." She's a sexual minority like Elizabeth Warren is an oppressed squaw.
BTW, hard to understand why reading your own missives angers you so.
Assumed you would be flattered, not embarrassed.
I don't have any problem with anything I write.
But dealing with stalking perverts like yourself would be annoying to anyone.
Obviously you think (I use that word humorously) that there was some reason to posting all that right now.
You can clarify, if you know - or if you even had a point. Like I said, I don't care. But when I notice a cackling wacko outside my window jacking himself off, which is the online equivalent of what you do, anyone normal finds that disturbing. No matter what it is about me that you're jacking yourself off to.
Others can see that's what's going on also. It's up to you to clarify your own perversions, but I don't think you're able to. You just change the subject, like when a serial murderer blames his perversions on his victims for turning him on.
That's about it, dumb-dumb. Keep on masturbatin'!
Others can see that's what's going on also
Yep. Your the only one who doesn't.
Conservatives bristling at the sight of young women are making fools of themselves.
A diversitist flourish is politically congruent ("=").
Another discussion polluted by Pee Pee Tape. Jesus - and the OTHER guy gets blocked?
Simena is just a leftist - period. Who cares what she looks like.
This blog is going down hill fast.
Who cares what she looks like.
There is an established doctrine (i.e. diversity) that people are or should be judged by their "color," even when the context and purpose does not justify its use.
Ironclad said...
Another discussion polluted by Pee Pee Tape. Jesus - and the OTHER guy gets blocked?
Simena is just a leftist - period. Who cares what she looks like.
This blog is going down hill fast.
1/5/19, 3:17 PM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
That's what happens whenever leftists show up, no matter the context. They exist only to ruin and destroy which is why they should be eliminated.
By Any Means Necessary.
Blogger Chuck said...
Way to go, Arizona. Jeff Flake is out of the Senate and this new bisexual is in? Is “Trump” how we get more of this?1/5/19, 12:20 PM
No Chuck, McSally ran a horrible campaign and did not want Trump campaigning for her. So how you jump to "Trump how we get more of this..." comment is idiotic.
She’s hot and smart. Winning combo. Too bad you folks on the right could never come up with this in your female candidates, oh hell, even your male candidates.
Another discussion polluted by Pee Pee Tape. Jesus - and the OTHER guy gets blocked?
Apparently you're not able to read the part where it says that the comment was deleted by the AUTHOR
This means that, like usual, Full Masturbating Moon deleted his own comments. He does this all the time. Entire slews of threads. Dozens of his own comments. He'll delete them himself. He admits that he exists here simply to post ridiculous things (or past comments that he deliberately quotes out of context), just to get whichever response will correct him. And then, to delete the stupid post of his own that got the response.
Ask yourself if that isn't the worst kind of troll. Althouse knows this.
And when that happens, he says, "I win." He honestly believes that simply provoking a response makes him somehow good at the thread, dominant, worthwhile, etc., however you want to put it.
I'll continue to correct misquotes or quotes out of context. Or to point out, as in this one, how it reflects upon his own perversions to fixate on those he wants to cast as titillating, romantic, scandalous, sexual, whatever.
If you want to think that makes him innocent and others problematic, then it just shows that you can't handle the truth.
And as for why he does it - the deeper issues and grudges - that's because he never finished school or went to college. He resents anyone who's better educated than him or who knows more than him. Yet, he plays this lawyerly game of making comments that he needs to retract immediately once the reason for objection is pointed out.
But it's a cheap imitation version of that game. Althouse knows who's here to contribute, and who's here just to goad and fuck with other commenters. And in his case, he's too much of a chickenshit pussy to leave the evidence up there of which was which, and what he was really after.
But anyone else can see it.
Even you can. Or you could, if you weren't so slow and lazy.
Why are conservative women on this thread so jealous of her?
Go bleach your hair, exercise a little, maybe get a waxing too while you’re at it.
In any event, I'll check back later to see if it's worth deleting any of my responses. Obviously since he doesn't have the integrity to leave his own comments up, there might not have been a reason to have a response. But he spent years saving up that particular batch for a reason, and I have no need to let him think he should play his fucked-up game again with it. If he's got the balls to post the comments, let everyone know why he did. I'll keep making sure everyone knows why he did - the little pervert. Until he finally comes out of his little closet and explains it to everyone for himself.
But he won't. He knows he's playing a game. Only this time it's anyone who takes him seriously that's been had.
Althouse knows the difference. There's a reason why he can't stand behind them.
Romeo responds to Ingas 3some proposal
Ritmo Re-Animated said... [hush][hide comment]
Someone who suggests threesomes considers herself too old for me and my detailed talk of actual scenarios too hot for her? Who'd have thunk it.
You know her pussy is waxed and bleached. Hot.
Uh Oh!
Seems that copy.paste PPPT exact words have somehow triggered him, again.
Poor baby.
Winning!
We need Oscar hosts. Kristen would be perfect.
President Pee-Pee Tape said...
In any event, I'll check back later to see if it's worth deleting any of my responses
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.
But he won't. He knows he's playing a game. Only this time it's anyone who takes him seriously that's been had.
Umm, you da only one reading and responding. To simple copy/paste of YOUr own comments
Althouse knows the difference. There's a reason why he can't stand behind them.
Here it comes. Appealing to mommy for help, again.
All caps hysteria on the horizon.
Althouse knows the difference. There's a reason why he can't stand behind them.
Like this Inga.
Hot. Kill the consti000shun with man-zits and an evil soul.
Women who bleach their hair like that are not authentic in their own skin. *see Wendy DAvis. She looks OK to me, but I'm a straight gal. She's attractive, but only as far as all the bling bling will take her. Lipstick, bright blonde hair, glasses. She's the perfect Hunger Games googoo.
Biversity.
Have you guys ever ate a pierced pussy? I have done some prince Alberts but it wasn’t that great. Yanked on it for a few seconds and asked them to bend over.
Hahahaha Moony, I remember that, what fun! I’m sorry no one cared enough about you to have the same sort of fun. I detect jealousy, reminds me of someone named Bruce. Eh whatever, but it is weird to be so obsessed about these old playful comments.
Confusing jealousy with mild disgust, Inga.
But then again, I do need my representatives in government to inspire me to wax and shave and bleach my private spots.
Thanks!
Unga...Allie Oop said...
Hahahaha Moony, I remember that, what fun!
Agreed. It is fun, indeed.
...somehow triggered...
Um, it wasn't I who was triggered, blue-plate special shit-for-brains. It was your boy Ironclad who accused you of being deleted (i.e. "blocked") by the moderator - when you know that you deleted yourself. So even people who might be inclined to sympathize with you, you can't get them on your side without deceiving them. That must feel really.... I don't know. Gross? You're the one who's a liar, shyster-contractor. You're used to having to cheat people to get what you want, though. Not me. We all know that.
Here it comes. Appealing to mommy for help, again.
It's her blog, dumb-dumb. Not mine. If you don't respect her enough to contribute honestly and/or humorously as she desires - rather than playing childish comment-response games that you don't take seriously enough yourself - then go tell her that.
Inga is right. Not only are you incapable of playful or flirtatious attention from someone who isn't just trying to put one over on you. You even need attention from me, someone you seem to have no respect for. So what does that say about YOU?
It says you're the dictionary definition of "loser." Again, even your right-wing friends know that about you and have commented to that effect.
Agreed. It is fun, indeed.
So says the ogling peeper.
He's been masturbating himself to those posts all day, Allie. Over and over again. Obviously he thinks there's something in them for him. A true creep.
And he's been "sitting" on them for weeks, promising he would do this as if he was holding in a fart or an orgasm and waiting until he couldn't help himself any more before letting it all go.
Eventually he would have to go from voyeur, to masturbator (holding on to them for his own strange pleasure all this time), to exhibitionist. Boom! I got you! Look at what I've been holding in and just now letting go of!
Yeah, you're a weird one, masturbating Moon. You're definitely a guy who gets his very infrequent pleasures where he can - just like any perv.
Agreed. It is fun, indeed.
You say that as if you were a party to it, when obviously you weren't.
Is this some sort of habit you pick up from being a huge cuck? Believing you're a party to the fun that others are having without you? And yet that you think should somehow involve you anyway?
Cuck-cuck-cuck-CUCK-cuck-cuck-cuck-cuckcuck-CUCK!!!
Lol. I guess this explains the big fear on the right. They really are all just a bunch of potential and actual cuckolds. Weird.
Sinema actually isn’t that young, and she looks great. She's quite attractive.
I thought the outfit looked cheap and goofy, especially from the back. She doesn’t seem like a serious person but maybe that’s what people are looking for.
Funny how simple copy/paste of romantic and fun comments from the past trigger PeePee.
Inga sees the humor and enjoys the memories.
PeePee becomes angry and regretful and hateful and incoherent and insulting.
Nah, not really. She's just ridiculing you - ("I’m sorry no one cared enough about you to have the same sort of fun. I detect jealousy,") - whereas I can point out what a pathetic cuck-perv it reveals you to be. As I guy, I realize how debased another guy would have to be to get off voyeuristically and publicly on the fun that others are having. I can't recall any other guy who would do something so self-debasing. So I emphasize the point of what this must make you. You really must be one of those "cucks" your side is always talking about. I don't know any IRL and never did. But you definitely ARE one of those, of that we can be certain! ;-)
Eh whatever, but it is weird to be so obsessed about these old playful comments.
Word to the unwise, Cuck. When a woman calls you "weird" and "obsessed," she's not having good fun with you. She's underscoring how creepy she finds you.
It doesn't bother me any more than it doesn't bother her. But you are a creep and should seek help from someone for your paraphilias. It doesn't bother me to point that out, either. It's not some secret I have to keep - how fucked up you are. Eventually they'll get you into real trouble.
Again, none of that fun involved you. But you must post on it as if it did. Just like a cuck would do.
You seem to not get this and actually delight in proving what a cuck you are.
Haha!
What a goof !
This is fun.
How much of the night can we whittle away like this?
LOL. I haven't had this much fun in ages.
Keep on cuckin'!
You're as uncomfortable as Mike Pence.
'Night, cuck!
And if you ever get lucky enough to have sex, I'll invite you into my own bedroom so you can watch how it goes, first. Well, scratch that. We can see you're stuck on the basics - which your parents failed you at - so here goes: https://www.amazon.com/Where-Did-Come-Peter-Mayle/dp/0818402539
You can even buy it on Amazon. Do the blog a favor!
Learn about what's actually going on behind those closed doors with your wife and those other guys.
CUCK!
Does repeating the same unsuccessful line three additional times (like you do on this blog) account for your lack of luck in the non-cuckold world?
Endearing:
Ritmo Re-Animated said...
I've definitely dated women at least 15 - 20 years my senior. Gladly so. Will gladly do it again. And again.
11/6/11, 10:14 PM
INGA )Anonymous said...
Our souls shall entwine shamelessly in that field of flowers. Well I'm firm for my age, and I long to feel your hands run though my silver tresses.
Funny how simple copy/paste of romantic and fun comments from the past trigger PeePee.
Inga sees the humor and enjoys the memories.
I appreciate your intense interest and deep concern in my own sexual pleasure.
Oh wait - no I don't. But I can see from your comment how much you want me to.
Haha. This is even more fun. You don't have a clue.
Cuck without a clue!
If it would help you, Cuck, you could have an inflatable doll made of me to watch your wife having sex with.
I heard those things are expensive. But you've wasted at least 7 hours today pursuing your debauched pleasure.
So clearly it would be worth all that money to you. Even on your own meager wage.
You can take some pictures of it all, if you want. Post them on Instagram!
Cuck - your skills are obviously shit. But you're a contractor.
Can't you get a designer to carve a bas relief of of me having sex with your wife in the molding of the next house you work on?
That way you could really get all this out of your system!
No one's reading you. You're as much a cuckold of a commenter as you are a husband.
At the end of the day, all those comments of yours will be deleted. And the ones I'm posting - about what a cuck you are to me - will still stand.
You must get something out of that.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I think we've found a true dyed-in-the-wool cuck. Full Moon!
Come on, Cuck. Bring it to 200.
You can do it.
You can go all night, if you have to.
How many all-nighters have you pulled watching your wife go at it with these other guys?
It's important to have a hobby, after all. What a pity that yours are so... well, impersonal!
Lol. Enjoy the cuckoldry!
PPPT promises:
I'll continue to correct misquotes or quotes out of context.
Still waiting for the first correction
dustbunny said - "I thought the outfit looked cheap and goofy, especially from the back. She doesn’t seem like a serious person but maybe that’s what people are looking for."
Metoo. but that means we are jealous or something.
Not serious but hot is what people are looking for. With a sprinkle of Trump-hate and promises of Venezuelan economic goodness.
Still waiting for the first correction.
The correction is what you intended to get out of posting it. What you think the purpose of it was.
But we now all know. This is about your cuckoldry. Your getting off on how others enjoy themselves.
CUCK IT UP, MOON-CUCK! 2019! Yes! Time to get cucked-up!
Aren't there like huge swingers scenes where you can recruit your wife's next, um, well whatever you call the dudes who get her to cuckold you? Maybe you can go to Key West or something, find the guys you want (no, I'm not interested) and get them to fuck her for you?
I realize that you, as a cuck, want as little control over the process as possible. But come on. Man up just a tiny bit. At least select the guys that she'll cuckold you with.
You can do it, Cuck. I have faith in you.
Either that or you're just getting really boring.
Post a Comment