October 2, 2018
At the Afternoon Café...
... I couldn't get to everything I'd wanted this morning. I'd meant to work my way through "'The trauma for a man': Male fury and fear rises in GOP in defense of Kavanaugh" (WaPo), and I've got a lot more to say about stoking the fear of masculine anger and the fear of fear. I mean "Male fury and fear"... aren't half the books about Trump called either "Fear" or "Fury"? What is really going on? But that will have to wait a bit. How can it wait, when everything is an eeeemergenceeeee these days? Courage! And pick your own topics, including bland and ordinary things that don't inspire the slightest quiver of trepitude. Trepitude???
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
491 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 401 – 491 of 491The man who wrote 300+ appellate decisions suddenly “lacks judicial temperament”.
Right.
Trumpit: "I predict that Trump's monumental tax evasion .."
Shorter Trumpit: it was wrong of Trump to obey tax laws!!
I have to admit, I dont think Trumpit will ever be as good at lie/smearing as Harry Reid.
PB&J
I have learned (from Trump) that making slightly wrong comments make Leftists focus on a positive.
Take the 4.5% growth of GDP last quarter...
Former Democratic candidate for Congress and weatherman for WJLA Channel 7 in Washington D.C. Dennis Ketterer has sent a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee about Julie Swetnik. Swetnik has accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct.
In the letter, which was submitted as a statement to the Committee under penalty of perjury, Ketterer says Swetnik told him in the 1990s that she enjoyed sex with multiple men at the same time. Ketterer, who doesn't drink alcohol, says he met Swetnik at a bar on Wisconsin Circle. He was there to buy a soda after a goodbye party for a co-worker in 1993 and was having marital issues at the time. Swetnik approached him, they developed a conversation and ultimately a relationship.
“During a conversation about our sexual preferences, things got derailed when Julie told me that she liked to have sex with more than one guy at a time. In fact sometimes with several at one time. She wanted to know if that would be ok in our relationship," the letter states. “I asked her if this was just a fantasy of hers. She responded that she first tried sex with multiple guys while in high school and still liked it from time-to-time. She brought it up because she wanted to know if I would be interested in that.”
“Julie never said anything about being sexually assaulted, raped, gang-raped or having sex against her will. She never mentioned Brett Kavanaugh in any capacity,” he continued.
Ketterer said he is coming forward now due to the accusations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh, which based on his experience with Swetnik, he believes are false.
"On Wednesday, Seprtember 26th, I heard that Mr. Kavanaugh had a third accuser. When Julie's name was mentioned as the accuser. When Julie's name was mentioned as the accuser, and due to the type of accusation, I was deeply troubled and felt a moral dilemma," Ketterer said. "As I watched part of the afternoon confirmation hearing the next day, and saw Mrs. Kavanaugh looking so sad I felt that she needed to know that in this instance, her husband was being mischaracterized...based on my direct experience with Julie, I do not beleive her allegations against Mr. Kavanaugh."
Ketterer also revealed he was a victim of sexual abuse as a child.
"I know what it's like to be sexually assaulted and not be believed. I was nine years old when it happened at the hands of my grandfather's best friend. I also know what it's like to be accused of something significant that I didn't do and not be believed," he wrote.
Birk,
Do you think that this new thing you learned is gonna be as effective as the purple swine thing you used to promote?
Ketterer also revealed he was a victim of sexual abuse as a child.
"I know what it's like to be sexually assaulted and not be believed. I was nine years old when it happened at the hands of my grandfather's best friend.
Jesus Christ....I'm starting to feel left out.
Poor timing. Celebs Try to Make Voting Sexy: ‘Slide It In’ for That ‘First Time.’
They’ll pay no price, yet would have made a huge issue had the Reps done this.
This just in: Reports from Kavanaugh's early childhood indicate a refusal to chew his food 32 times before swallowing.
Chuck Schumer demands additional Hearings into this latest revelation.
"Jesus Christ....I'm starting to feel left out."
For the weatherman, does he have corroboration re his current statements? Are there records (e.g. w/ his shrink) that prove he's made these sorta statements in past?
Presumably there's one standard.
PB&J
RecogniIng a true thing and pointing to that thing to encourage others to see it, I admit.
Are you trying to say the unemployment rate of 2.7% is a bad thing?
One thing I learned today from Harvard Law students:
This is an unsafe environment with a credibly accused sexual abuser of senior citizens being allowed to post.
I DEMAND that Inga (aka the boof conductor) be barred from this site.
To show how open minded I am, I am calling for an FBI investigation into her sexual abuse of senior citizens.
Birk,
I'm saying that the GOPe swamp is borrowing somewhere around 5% of the GDP of the USA.
So, if yur gonna make up numbersm, go w/ something that covers that plus the interest on that. IOW, get past a net breakeven number.
IMHO.
PB&J
I will agree to whatever cuts you propose.
Shall we cut Medicaid?
Social Security?
Do tell.
Perhaps a budget that didn't roll the Stimulus into every new job-budget would have been better.
Now what, Leftist?
"One thing I learned today from Harvard Law students:"
Does this include the Harvard Law grad (and Rhodes Scholar) who Althouse's blue eyed, six packed boyfriend's pac is attacking as not having the voice of the white people pictured in the attack ad against the black dude?
https://www.newsweek.com/republican-attack-ads-misleading-voters-2018-midterms-1100290
Interesting polls starting to come in. It could be that Democrats will be on the worst of all worlds? Kavanaugh confirmed and they get whipped in November?
PB&J Plan:
1) Identify overspending as a problem,
2) ?
3) Balance budget.
No pair of underwear is safe!
Big Mike,
And the polls are still at the "manipulate the tubes" stage.
Wait until the polling agencies have to report the truth just after Q3 GDP data is published.
"It could be that Democrats will be on the worst of all worlds? Kavanaugh confirmed and they get whipped in November?"
Sure,
But what if all of this R control isn't so great? Were you one of the many who were uber pro W blowing away Iraq? But, then realized the error. Later. What about his rich-person tax cuts and deficit spending and regulation roll backs? In favor of all that, too? Until we blew up, economically. Later.
Tribalism isn't wisdom.
IMHO.
Your H is a lie.
IMO
You say you have been spoken ill of. What then? Can you think that while you are a good Man that all will speak well of you--If you knew the person who has defamed you, nothing is more likely than that you would justly value your self upon that mans Censure as being the highest Applause.
Samuel Adams, Letter to John Hancock, May 11 1770
All lot of people exchanging comments with peanut whose schtik is saying things he thinks are funny.
Hmm, a left pond take. I want K confirmed, but Pritchard while often wrong about the next upcoming economic disaster never struck me as malicious.
What do we have here:
https://mobile.twitter.com/ProfMJCleveland/status/1047286907795906560
Does Sam A have anything to say about a young gal being suffocated with attempts to swipe away her clothing?
How does that rank v being spoken ill of?
Use the scale from: throw ice at you, to: give you a lifetime (40 years?) appointment to the SCOTUS where you can exert revenge (e.g., what goes around comes around) on all the gals well beyond just those who didn't want yur cock.
Doc Mike,
I'm assuming that your grammatical errors are purposeful.
Hopefully I'm not over estimating yous.
anti-de Sitter space said...
Do you have a quote where I asserted that there is only one possible reason to deny an investigation?
10/2/18, 7:30 PM
Sure:
anti-de Sitter space said...
Sane, normal anyone would want to get on the record interviews with a questioner who is probing. Regardless of man, woman, father, mother, etc.
The Rs are acting like they've got something to hide. If there was no worry, there'd be no fuss re looking for facts/data/info. So, it is logical to ask what must be hidden w/ this haste? Presumably: bad stuff. So. It is logical to ask, is it good to have a lifetime appointment for someone who can only succeed by hiding bad stuff?
Turns out logic doesn't always prevail. Tribalism.
Different strokes fer different folks.
Carry on.
10/2/18, 5:00 PM
I'll help you understand yourself since you are pretending to be unable to do so.
Your assertion above is A therefore B. The formulation A therefore B is only valid when B is the only possible outcome of A. So when you assert the desire to avoid an investigation "must be" caused by worry about the outcome you are asserting it is the only possible reason.
You're welcome.
Is it the economy, stupid?
Or is it Democrat lies that move an election?
Hard to believe Democrat lies move the needle.
What's that?
You say Heidekamp is down 10%, Memendez has 54% unfavorable, Donnelly has surrendered?
We need better liars, stat!
Feinstein demands the FBI investigation be held confidential.
She knows from confidentiality.
PB&J has things reversed.
Republicans want the report publicized.
See, also, Russia investigation documents.
now do we have Ford coaching a polygraph, lying under oath,
and Swetnick into gang-bangs since high-skool?
Nevermind that-- Who Flung Ice??
So it would appear, but will the risotto press notice.
Late to the party here, but this is what Ford said in her opening statement:
"I convinced myself that because Brett did not rape me, I should just move on and just pretend that it didn’t happen.
"Over the years, I told very, very few friends that I had this traumatic experience. I told my husband before we were married that I had experienced a sexual assault. I had never told the details to anyone — the specific details — until May 2012, during a couples counseling session.
"The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and I had completed a very extensive, very long remodel of our home and I insisted on a second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not understand.
"In explaining why I wanted a second front door, I began to describe the assault in detail. I recall saying that the boy who assaulted me could someday be on the U.S. Supreme Court, and spoke a bit about his background at an elitist all-boys school in Bethesda, Maryland. My husband recalls that I named my attacker as Brett Kavanaugh."
My first reading of this was that they entered couples counseling because of a disagreement of whether to add a second front door. But, on rereading it, I guess it could be that they just discussed the door issue during counseling.
Ultra wealthy leftists who leave massive amounts of wealth to their kids - A OK!
Trump wealth - just icky!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5FD5cr2H5A
Thomas Wictor on Twitter suspension.
You view this or I shit on your parades, and that is a promise.
Glenn Reynolds says:
THE ACLU HAS JUST BECOME A DEMOCRATIC PARTY SUPER-PAC: The ACLU Sponsors an Ad Comparing Brett Kavanaugh to Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein: Such nakedly political propaganda is beneath the civil liberties organization. This may be an effort — part of Larry Tribe’s strategy described here — to make Kavanaugh recuse himself from all sorts of cases once confirmed. Prediction: It won’t work. See, e.g., Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
"But it’s another example of Trump’s miraculous ability to take once-respected institutions and reveal them as the festering, wormy pustules of partisan corruption they’ve become."
The Rs are acting like they've got something to hide. If there was no worry, there'd be no fuss re looking for facts/data/info. So, it is logical to ask what must be hidden w/ this haste? Presumably: bad stuff. So. It is logical to ask, is it good to have a lifetime appointment for someone who can only succeed by hiding bad stuff?
Who's hiding stuff? The Senate Judiciary Committee has the most expensive, experienced investigative staff in Washington DC, on par with the FBI, and unlike the FBI have the power to compel testimony. The can actually get further than the FBI, that is limited to do only an inquiry. The committee staff could have done,this investigation. They could still chase down leads uncovered by the FBI.
But now, since DiFi has taken a giant shit in the middle of the committee, and they have pulled off the case, the facts would point to the Democrats hiding and obstructing.
The Left is wacky and dangerous. They have no standards. It's all ad hoc.
Bill Clinton allegedly rapes a woman? Well, that's 20 years ago! And she never even filed a police report!
Brett Kavanaugh allegedly gropes a girl at a party 36 years ago? Smash the male patriarchy! He's a sexual predator! He's unfit for the Supreme Court!
I don't see the point in engaging such nut bags.
Clearly, we need to go back and look at the high school yearbooks of Gorsuch, Kagan, Sotomoyor, Alito, Roberts, Ginsburg (did they have high school yearbooks that long ago?), Breyer, and Thomas. We may need to impeach them for excessive drinking and bragging about their sexual exploits.
Sexual exploits, whether real or imagined
Breyer was apparently quite a party animal freshman year,
Rick,
So,following your A/B thing, you've proved that I've stated that, according to me, Rs are "acting like" they want to avoid an investigation because they'd rather hide some "bad stuff" re BK.
The Rs themselves say exactly this. Until forced to capitulate to Flake and the gal Rs, the R Senators were on the record as opposing any independent review of new revelations re BK. They fully went on the record as being pro-hide, even aggressively so (e.g. that gay guy from South Carolina) re independently investigating any of these new revelations.
If you have a problem w/ the Rs wanting to avoid an independent investigation into these new revelations, you gots ta take that up w/ them. I'm only saying that they're acting like they're hiding some bad stuff because they oppose and independent investigation. That's factual.
Math/logic doesn't get any easier.
Bad news for peanut. DiFi wants to keep the FBI reports secret.
I suspect they are devastating for Ford.
This is going so badly for the Dems and their hired accusers that I now think it might actually be the best possible way of putting a little badly needed skepticism back in our culture about #metoo. This might be the only way to help the Repubs keep the house. Thanks Dems. Loco is good.
Alternatively, the problem perceived by the Republicans could be equal parts (1) after the revelations about Comey, Strzok, and McCabe, coupled with the stonewalling by Rosenstein and Wray over requested documents (documents that the House and Senate, in their oversight role, are legally entitled to request and receive) may have them not trusting the FBI, and (2) last Saturday was pretty much the last day the vote could be held in time for Kavanaugh to take his seat on the Court in time for opening day.
I am coming to the conclusion that this story has a lot of similarity to the Bush TANG story.
CBS and Rather put out the fake story and bloggers and blog commenters quickly recognized the hoax.
That is happening now with the revelations about the building permit, the paper on hypnosis to recover memories, the rental use of the house and the two doors to the house myth, the polygraph and her changes in the written statement.
The shift to the alcohol allegations shows they don't even believe the story themselves.
Now, we have lefty radical demonstrators harassing Senators.
I'm only saying that they're acting like they're hiding some bad stuff because they oppose and independent investigation. That's factual.
I see we can add "factual" to the growing list of words you don't understand. As proven there are other reasons why the Rs might oppose another investigation so your assertion they "must be" hiding "bad stuff" is simply false.
Be sure to let me know should you need more help understanding what you're written.
Latest rumor out there is that Feinstein's office has been investigated as part of the FBI's probe. Interesting, if true.
Perhaps I should do as Althouse and the usual collection of trolls do, and assume that it's true because it could be true.
What Rick said at 8:51 is what I said, only he put it much, much more succinctly.
Ditto what he said at 9:41.
And what is this "independent review" anti-what-ev wants? Who besides the FBI would conduct such a review, empowered by what legal authority?
Is he so obtuse as to claim, given all we've been through re Strzok et al, that the FBI is PRO-Trump and therefore willing to give his SCOTUS nominee a pass?
Snort.
If brains were C4, anti-what-ev couldn't blow his nose.
1) Assume bad stuff,
2) No bad stuff is coming out,
3) Therefore, Republicans are hiding bad stuff.
Geometric logic from PB&J.
Bay Area Guy says: I don't see the point in engaging such nut bags.
I agree. Doing so lends seeming credibility to their antics.
Oops! Looks like "totally credible" li'l Chrissie has been rebutted once again:
Under questioning from experienced sex-crimes prosecutor Rachel Mitchell last week, Ford said that she had "never" had "any discussions with anyone ... on how to take a polygraph" or "given any tips or advice to anyone who was looking to take a polygraph test." She repeatedly said the process was stressful and uncomfortable.
But in his declaration, the ex-boyfriend wrote that, "I witnessed Dr. Ford help [Monica L.] McLean prepare for a potential polygraph exam" and that Ford had "explained in detail what to expect, how polygraphs worked and helped [her] become familiar and less nervous about the exam," using her background in psychology.
chickenlittle said...
Is there any objective news that got Howard so riled today or is he just taking something out on the commenters?
Well, yesterday WAS the first of the month. I'm sure that payday for the Soros folks.
The trolls earned their money today.
The bottom is falling out of Christine Ford's story. We now have the "fear of flying" (or maybe she told her lawyers she didn't want to go to Washington because of fear of lying and they misheard her), her response to why she didn't accept the committee offer to fly to her, her second door story, and now the "never" helped anyone prep for a polygraph and didn't know anything about polygraphs.
Grassley is hammering the lawyers for the polygraph and therapy notes but I think she is already toast.
What was that phase? Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus - how about Falsus in quattuor, falsus in omnibus?
Hmm, a left pond take. I want K confirmed, but Pritchard while often wrong about the next upcoming economic disaster never struck me as malicious.
Here's the link to the Ambrose Evans-Pritchard piece.
My sinister battle with Brett Kavanaugh over the truth
Yahoo thought enough of this to put it on their feed, but I got there from Drudge. What is surprising is that I don't think people are seeing this for what it really is.
What Evans-Pritchard is doing (in a very stealthy way) is using the "hot meme" of Kavanaugh to bring up the murder of Vince Foster again. You can hear the question he wants to ask: "Judge Kavanaugh, isn't it true you help cover-up the Clintons murder of Vince Foster?".
He was one who was chasing the Mena story for the spectator, re deep state doings in the ozarks
Here's the link to the Ambrose Evans-Pritchard piece.
My sinister battle with Brett Kavanaugh over the truth
--
404 not found
Holy shit. A letter claiming to be from a guy who lived with Ford for several years.
https://mobile.twitter.com/ShannonBream/status/1047293294567456770?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1047293294567456770&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitchy.com%2Fbrettt-3136%2F2018%2F10%2F02%2Freport-christine-blasey-fords-ex-boyfriend-says-she-coached-a-friend-on-taking-a-polygraph-more%2F
If this is for real she lied. IF.
Strange about the 404. I'll try again:
My sinister battle with Brett Kavanaugh over the truth
Pristine Ford is beginning to smell.
Surely this letter is easy to verify. Either the guy lived with her or he did not — should be easy to check.
Either the guy lived with her or he did not — should be easy to check.
Even easier would be to check the credit card records.
Some of the tweets are hilarious on that feed. This would corroborate her claim she didn’t tell anyone until 2012!
The Left wants to win
Howard is a Leftist.
He is trying to make the voters less passionate about this character assassination by minimizing things.
It is not working, but he is working this like he's being paid.
Hmm.
What DOES your polling say?
If Menendez can't do better than 50% in Jersey, this bodes very ill for Democrat prospects. He should face a lock since that state is pretty corrupt.
But Menendez, who would love to meet Howard's kids and grandkids, is totally fine and Kavanaugh who has only had one partisan flake throw an accusation at him, is horrible.
Nice moral myopia going on.
This stuff about Ford is irrelevant, and I say this not as a Howard Clone.
The Althouses in the world won't care. It will be a 'yes but', statement. "Yes, Ford might have lied about that polygraph stuff BUT she is sure HE did it."
Instead, by pointing out the multiple lies and distortions by Ford, the Althouses of America will hate you for making them blatantly foolish.
´There is danger for him who taketh the tiger cub, and danger also for whoso snatches a delusion from a woman.'
"Pick your own topics, including bland and ordinary things that don't inspire the slightest quiver of trepitude."
‘New Age’ beliefs common among both religious and nonreligious Americans
We've been swallowed whole.
"In explaining why I wanted a second front door, I began to describe the assault in detail. I recall saying that the boy who assaulted me could someday be on the U.S. Supreme Court, and spoke a bit about his background at an elitist all-boys school in Bethesda, Maryland. My husband recalls that I named my attacker as Brett Kavanaugh."
My first reading of this was that they entered couples counseling because of a disagreement of whether to add a second front door. But, on rereading it, I guess it could be that they just discussed the door issue during counseling.
She had the presence of mind to slip in "elitist", though. The dog whistle and Democrat talking point about Kavanaugh's white male privilege. Never mind he busted his ass.
It would be nice if this tactic (which Althouse still refuses to discuss in any but the most bland of terms) caused a major shift in the polls. That 'blue wave' suddenly turning into a 'red tide'...and all the fingers point Fienward for that shift.
That is if there is Karma. She will still be a millionaire. Still have K Street at her beck and call. But having caused the loss of MULTIPLE Dem senators.
I am reminded of that Old Lady cut totally from the Nursing Home 'Society' in her twilight years in 'Better Call Saul'. All the pussy hat wearing idiots singing her praises, but Schumer lost her number. She doesn't get invites any longer.
And now Ford is being destroyed (something I heartily approve of. She wasn't a pawn).
Let her taste nothing but ashes and iron for the rest of her days. She can have scotch with Hillary there.
Someone here is actually trying to claim that Republicans are hiding something for wanting this shitshow to end this week? Really? Which party sat on the accusation for months? It wasn't the GOP.
Why didn't Feinstein and Ford's lawyers ask for an FBI investigation back in July when this accusation first came up? Why did they hide this story for so long? Maybe because they realized the story was so full of holes that it wouldn't withstand scrutiny and would quickly be dismissed by the FBI. And therefore it would be useless as a delaying tactic unless they waited until the very last minute to reveal it.
The left's game is obvious, even to people who don't follow politics closely. This is not at all about wanting to get to "the truth" about whether an emotionally disturbed woman was groped at a party almost 40 years ago. It's a disgusting delay tactic. Feinstein, Flake and other phonies don't really care who suffers from this dirty political game.
But just as the made-up Russia story and calls for an investigation backfired on the Dems by not only failing to prove any Trump collusion with Russia, but instead revealing shocking deep state corruption, I hope this sleazy scheme backfires and we see an enthusiastic Republican turnout on election day. And it would be poetic justice if the left ends up with a SC judge who thoroughly hates their guts.
Oh, one more thing: If this latest FBI investigation, that the Dems demanded, ends up making Feinstein's office look corrupt and the accusers and their lawyers look like big fat liars, that would be ... well, I'd call it karma but I don't want the Crack MC to yell at me. ;)
Crack would never yell at you. He just... well, emphasizes his points with some derision, mocking and insults.
Lion Kavanebriated must be borked. I've had enough of the lion pro-rich Rethuglican party. The lion GOP must be crushed in the midterm erections. You lion people all but lynched Obama. Your lion party stole the 2000 & 2016 erections. I would ban the lion GOP for that reason alone. Feel free to form a New Nazi Party. My new Tesla is set to "accidentally" run over New Nazis, and hunters. I got the armored version. I expect to be shot at by gun-toting deplorables on speeding motorbikes.
She had the presence of mind to slip in "elitist", though.
You aren’t from around the Washington area, are you? Nothing more privileged than to be a student at Holton-Arms School, and nothing says “wealthy, priviledged party girl” more loudly than Holton-Arms cheerleader.
Got to this late.
For a minute there it looked like Howard was going to go full Ethel Merman on us.
Howard said...
Right Hairball: you people prefer republicans on K-Street and working for GeneralDynamicLockheedL3BoeingKBRHalliburtin chugging down the Trillions in War Machine Largess.
10/2/18, 1:21 PM
Late to the party but: yes indeed, Howard, advanced weapons are such a waste. I'd much prefer you and your Marine buddies in Crapistan armed with pointed sticks. The pretty ones like you, they'd keep alive for a long time.
Night Owl said...
"Oh, one more thing: If this latest FBI investigation, that the Dems demanded, ends up making Feinstein's office look corrupt and the accusers and their lawyers look like big fat liars, that would be ... well, I'd call it karma but I don't want the Crack MC to yell at me. ;)"
Then call it "serendipity" and let's grab beers - wait.
etbass said...
"Crack would never yell at you. He just... well, emphasizes his points with some derision, mocking and insults."
Also known as "Keeping it real."
I expect to be shot at by gun-toting deplorables on speeding motorbikes.
Trumpit, if you expect us to play straight men for your routine, you have to be careful about going over the top and ruining the whole shtick, but that there was pretty damned funny.
You know, Crack “Karma” is often used as a metaphor. You are free to assume that every time I use the word “God” it is as a metaphor for the whole fucking universe and all of its unfathomable machinations and how they manifest in our tiny little lives.
anti-de Sitter space said...
"If Flake goes to K Street - I say we sue."
What if Althouse's six packed, blue eyed boyfriend cashes in?
10/2/18, 2:31 PM
Who, Howard?
anti-de Sitter space said...
Honest Q:
You couldn't ask an honest Q if somebody jammed your little limp dick into a light bulb socket and played Home Jeopardy with their hand on the switch.
tim in vermont said...
"You know, Crack “Karma” is often used as a metaphor."
You know, tim, I can always spot the NewAger by who decides this shit needs defending.
It's an almost foolproof give-away.
Humans are what humans are, Crack. Our brains evolved over hundreds of thousands of years before anybody ever thought of empiricism. A lot of people find it taxing to use their cerebral cortex when their brain stem offers them a ready answer. Don’t expect me to expect the world to be cleansed of morons, or to worry that they don’t live forever due to their stupidity.
You once asked me why I didn’t just put down Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance Know thy enemy is the answer, but it’s fine if you want to keep pegging me as a New Ager. It’s kind of amusing to me.
Good for the Colorado Rockies! I went to bed after the 12th inning so missed the win but I'll wager the Wrigley Field fans were pretty crushed. Frankly, the Rockies' defense looked a bit shaky. Haven't watched them enough to know if this is usual.
Let's all root for the Oakland tonight!
Crack: "It's an almost foolproof give-away."
So, not "foolproof" then.
Next obvious question: how not-foolproof is it?
even aggressively so (e.g. that gay guy from South Carolina)
PBJ, how do you know that Graham is gay? Did his dick taste like shit? For all you know that's just how your mom's cunt is. Smells like it from a mile away, so play the odds.
Oh-I'm sorry-Trumpian misdirection - you've never had your mom's cunt-she only lets you in the back hole.
Aha! More misdirection. Your mom doesn't have front hole or back hole, only a cloaca. So are you a bird or reptile? I'm voting reptile all the way.
blessings, take care
...
Did I get your style right? I tried at least as hard as your girl Hillary did with the reset button.
For Crack
https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensalzberg/2018/10/01/who-endorses-tcm-expect-deaths-to-rise/#43b305f16418
Also known as "Keeping it real."
"Keeping it real" is just a way of saying..."I get to act like an asshole and you're not allowed to call me on it".
Post a Comment