"Ms. Swetnick said she was raped at one of the parties, and she believed she had been drugged. None of Ms. Swetnick’s claims could be independently corroborated by The New York Times, and her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, declined to make her available for an interview.... Unlike two other women who have accused Judge Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, one who went to college with him and another who went to a sister high school, Ms. Swetnick offered no explanation in her statement of how she came to attend the same parties, nor did she identify other people who could verify her account.... In her statement, Ms. Swetnick said that she met Judge Kavanaugh and Mr. Judge in 1980 or 1981 when she was introduced to them at a house party in the Washington are... She said she attended at least 10 house parties in the Washington area from 1981 to 1983 where the two were present. She said the parties were common, taking place almost every weekend during the school year. She said she observed Judge Kavanaugh drinking 'excessively' at many of the parties and engaging in 'abusive and physically aggressive behavior toward girls, including pressing girls against him without their consent, "grinding" against girls, and attempting to remove or shift girls’ clothing to expose private body parts. I also witnessed Brett Kavanaugh behave as a "mean drunk" on many occasions at these parties.'"
The NYT reports today.
If the allegations are true, there must be many, many other witnesses. Where have they been all these weeks? And why would she go to "at least 10 house parties" if they were as she described?
The NYT suggests there's a gap in the account because Swetnick doesn't say how she got to go to the same parties as Kavanaugh. We're told Swetnick grew up in Montgomery County, Md., and graduated from Gaithersburg High School — a public school — in 1980 and attended the University of Maryland. That puts her in a less elite crowd. She's also 2 years older than Kavanaugh and graduated from high school 3 years before he did, so it makes it a little hard to picture them at the same parties. Did older, state-college women go to parties with prep school boys years younger than them? If they did and the boys raped them, repeatedly and systematically, how could the boys get away with it, and why are there not many more women coming forward with the same allegations? And why are we getting this through Michael Avenatti?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
409 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 401 – 409 of 409funsize.. What's going on? Trump is accomplishing things in this country it has not seen in years. Listen to the UN speech again. Look around the world. "Immigrants" over running every western culture, no one standing up for their culture. Prosperity, optimism are starting to return to USA. All those things Barry Soetoro chose not to do, are finally being done. That is until the next dem administration.
According to Vinneccy, Swetnick threatened him after they broke up and even after he got married to his current wife and had a child.
“Right after I broke up with her, she was threatening my family, threatening my wife and threatening to do harm to my baby at that time,” Vinneccy said in a telephone interview with POLITICO. "I know a lot about her.”
"She’s not credible at all,” he said. “Not at all.”. - Politico
Crack,
> No - you assumed ideas, I clearly labeled as someone else's, were my own.
I don't see evidence for this assertion. I only acknowledged I too can understand why Democrats would be PO'd. My question for you was where do YOU draw the line, so I can understand your position.
> I get regarded as a Democrat a lot, here, and a hardcore Republican offline - the dilemma of the black conservative: There's no safe space and no way to make anyone happy.
I'm a conservative atheist living in CA. Don't cry to me about not being able to express your political views without repercussions. See my handle? And, frankly, you don't seem like a person that needs a safe space, and relish pointing out inconsistencies of thought and information in others. I'm not faulting; am only observing.
> As you can see, it essentially means "what you can get away with."" I want it stopped.
I'm having a hard time reconciling this claim with your comments on this blog post. The principles are similar, yet you seem to be arguing Democrats are OK to use these tactics. Or perhaps you are only arguing the people claiming "foul" are really hypocrites or something.
> First, the people's interests have to be determined and agreed upon.
Yeah, that's a more involved discussion.
The Crack Emcee said...
I can't tell you how many house parties I attended that ended in gunfire. Did I stop going? Hell no. I got smarter over the years, but, I still think of those parties fondly
You know who you just reminded me of? On The Boondocks. The stupid belligerent younger brother. Did you see the ep where he starts "dealing" cookies; gets shot by the Girl Scouts gang, saved only by the bulletproof vest his brother gave him; comes home, contemplates the bullet and ending his career; then gets the call for more cookies and goes right back into it? That's you. That's what you're describing.
Titus said...
"Are the daughters going to be there tomorrow when he talks about pulling a train?"
Not only pulling a train but discussion of three-ways and then of course the invasive questions into his virginity.
Your sympathy is too touching, Titus.
"Become human. Become decent."
Says the human shit stain without a hint of irony or self-awareness.
Kurt Schlichter says:
"So, the best case is Swetlick is not lying and is a monster who knew minors were being raped, shrugged and kept on partying? Am I reading this right?"
Plus - she was in college. Why would a college age female go to High School gang rape parties?
It would be pretty easy, wouldn't it, to authorize an FBI investigation of these charges?
Thank you for nice information. Please visit our web:
Muhamad Kahfi
Post a Comment