"It was exactly the sort of demanding text she’d once reveled in. But now she discovered to her dismay that she could not bear it. 'I hated the book,' she writes. 'I hated the whole so-called experiment [of testing whether she'd lost the ability to read deeply].' She had to force herself to wrangle the novel’s 'unnecessarily difficult words and sentences whose snakelike constructions obfuscated, rather than illuminated, meaning for me.' The narrative action struck her as intolerably slow. She had, she concluded, 'changed in ways I would never have predicted. I now read on the surface and very quickly; in fact, I read too fast to comprehend deeper levels, which forced me constantly to go back and reread the same sentence over and over with increasing frustration.' She had lost the 'cognitive patience' that once sustained her in reading such books. She blamed the internet."
From "Just Read the Book Already/Digital culture doesn’t have to make you a shallow reader. But you have to do something about it." (Slate).
August 21, 2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
73 comments:
I can relate. For the majority of my life I’ve been the kind of slow reader described in the cited text. I attrubute it partly to not reading very much in high school (just wasn’t into books and reading yet). I don’t think I can blame the internet for my reading habits. It’s probably safe to say that TV had a much bigger impact..
But I still enjoy reading, and these days it’s been one of my top past times.
I must confess
I've never read Hesse.
Or she could blame Hesse.
(But don't blame "the internet". Blame your own habits of using it, because you can find all the deep, meaningful intellectually challenging content you want online.
Or, better, don't care about not caring for that, because you have better things to do with your life, like live it.
In my life, I can analogize it to preferring to re-read Nietzsche [who could write, and preferred aphorism to page-long paragraphs] over even Kant, let alone Heidegger or nonsense like Hegel.
Enjoy yourself, FFS. You'll be in the grave soon enough.)
RE: reading. Might be too off topic, but I recently saw three, THREE young kids with their parents on a bus - and all three had BOOKS they dove into immediately upon sitting down. Three kids with BOOKS. BOOKS! I almost shat myself in shock and surprise. I kept staring at them: MY GOD THEY HAVE BOOKS INSTEAD OF GADGETS. But then worried I might be suspected of creepy pedophilia and tried to get ahold of myself.
I should have taken a photo.
So far as Wolf's assertion goes, it depends. I've been doing the internet since the mid-90's but also read constantly and not all easy reads [Thomas Carlyle's The French Revolution, for example, which I read just a couple of years ago. If one's reading is done in parallel to one's internet use, both pastimes can be kept in good working order. Let there be no hiatus!
Hermann Hesse is an author who is liked by college students.
For the last few years, I have been reading all of Shakespeare's plays. I have finished 28 of them. I read each play at least three times before I move on to the next one.
Right now, I am reading The Winter's Tale and I still am in my first reading, in the middle of the Fourth Act. This play is by far the most difficult for me to read. I figure that I might have to read it five times, a reading project that will take me several more months.
However, I can see that many parts of this play are exquisite.
I once watched an interview of Michael Witmore, the Director of the Folger Shakespeare Library. He was asked which play was his favorite, and he answered The Winter's Tale. That's why I keep plowing my way tediously through this play.
It's a byproduct of aging. And it will get worse.
I read faster when young. The mind goes first, after all.
If you've read popular speeches and sermons from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, you know ordinary people could understand complex, paragraph-length sentences with multiple subordinate clauses. We are progressively becoming stupider.
I am reading Althouse.
"Despite having written a popular book, Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain, celebrating, among other things, the brain’s neuroplasticity—that is, its tendency to reshape its circuitry to adapt to the tasks most often demanded of it—Wolf told herself that it wasn’t the style of her reading that had changed, only the amount of time she could set aside for it."
Wait, so she thought here own experience refuted the main point of her previous book, but then she wrote a book to say that no, actually, her first book was right after all, and her brain, too, had "reshaped its circuitry" etc.? OK, then.
"If you've read popular speeches and sermons from the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, you know ordinary people could understand complex, paragraph-length sentences with multiple subordinate clauses."
Hmm. Did you quiz them?
Might be more a matter of changing tastes than diminished concentration. I devoured the Beat Generation writers in my youth but have never reread them. OTOH, I read C.P. Snow's turgid Strangers and Brothers cycle almost by default (during an extended illness) when I was young and continue to reread it to this day. Not everything sticks.
Right now, I am reading The Winter's Tale and I still am in my first reading, in the middle of the Fourth Act. This play is by far the most difficult for me to read. I figure that I might have to read it five times, a reading project that will take me several more months.
A tip you may already know: For your first reading of a Shakespeare play, read along while you listen to a recording, pausing to make notes in the margin and repeat difficult passages if necessary. It makes the second reading far more enjoyable.
Hmm. Did you quiz them?
If the speeches were unintelligible, crowds would not stand for hours in the hot sun listening to them.
I've seen about half of Shakespeare's plays performed. I just saw a truly excellent production of Coriolanus in Stratford, Ontario. I watched the movie and listened to some excellent lectures before I went. I always prepare, but there is always a certain amount that just goes over my head. I've never made a serious attempt to read any of the plays. I wonder what that says about me? Maybe I'll give it a try when I retire and have more time.
Ernest Prole contends: We are progressively becoming stupider.
We are.
I tried to re-read "The Fortunes and Misfortunes of the Famous Moll Flanders Who was born in Newgate, and during a life of continu'd Variety for Threescore Years, besides her Childhood, was Twelve Years a Whore, five times a Wife (whereof once to her brother) Twelve Years a Thief, Eight Years a Transported Felon in Virginia, at last grew Rich, liv'd Honest and died a Penitent" and was amazed that I had previously managed to finish reading the title.
Earnest Prole:
Can you recommend audio recordings of Shakespeare's plays?
“I can relate. For the majority of my life I’ve been the kind of slow reader described in the cited text.”
Why not own slow reading? It’s like slow eating. You are savoring, thinking, being more aware of the experience.
As long as you’re not taking a timed test, working on a deadline, or billing by the hour, why does it matter if you cover fewer pages in an hour? Maybe you’re getting more.
It’s like listening to a song sung very slowly rather than fast. It’s different and not necessarily worse.
Isn’t slow sometimes better, like when you take the back roads instyof the highway?
Some things when you do them very fast, you’re considered to be doing them badly, notably sex.
The same kind of thing had happened to me, but then I started listening to Jordan Peterson‘s classes on neuroscience on YouTube from the University of Toronto. Then I started listening to his lectures. Having to navigate those complex ideas sort of rewrote my brain. Then I read 12 Rules for Life and subsequently begin Maps of Meaning and now I am on fire, reading books of philosophy, psychology, apologetics, etc., things I would not have been able to navigate two years ago.
Can you recommend audio recordings of Shakespeare's plays?
My college library had recordings performed by famous Shakespearean actors. That was so long ago that I presume they have passed into the public domain and are now available online for free.
I've always read--for almost 70 years now. Read for fun in elementary school and middle school. Read a lot as an English and history major in college--both for class and for fun.
Read for enjoyment in law school (when I had time) and continued to read to this day.
But you develop different styles of reading; there's the professional reading. That frequently requires internalization and analysis. Then there is recreational reading of light novels and mysteries. Finally there's the serious reading of military and political history. You can do recreational reading on a Kindle--and when you're off on a trip it's nice to carry half a dozen novels in half the space of a paperback book.
But you can not do (or at least I can not do) serious reading on a Kindle. There've been at least a dozen instances where I started to read something on my Kindle--and realized after 50 pages or so that I really need to read it hard copy. So I go back to Amazon and order the hard copy.
Hesse is not difficult to read. In fact, he was so popular with young people in the 70s precisely because he turned "heavy" matter, like spiritualism and mysticism, into light reading. Proust, Joyce, Wolfe and Faulkner on the other hand do the opposite: everyday life turns into a complex web of thoughts, feelings and images to get utterly lost in.
I'm a slow reader who likes the extra payoff those readers give me for the extra work I naturally put in. But I agree that having a smartphone on me at all times means the boredom that would kick in and get me to open those books doesn't get a chance to kick in anymore. There's always a new email, text, news item or blog entry to keep me mildly amused and so the big difficult books I lug around but barely read I eventually stop lugging around. I'm guilty of this behavior as I write this!
'unnecessarily difficult words and sentences whose snakelike constructions obfuscated, rather than illuminated, meaning for me.'
That pretty much sums up Hesse, and I came to that opinion long before the Internet.
I'd definitely blame Hesse. Magister Ludi is very slow and just not worth the German ponderousness. I thought so when I read it 30 years ago, long before the web, and I read a lot, then and now. OTOH, I read Siddhartha a couple years ago and quite liked it.
I copied Derrida out into notebooks word for word just to slow down reading speed. Otherwise you go up to normal speed and comprehend nothing.
Incidentally typing in books doesn't help comprehension at all. It has to be handwritten.
Typing in books though has the advantage than you can search them for passages you need easily.
As you get older, you have less time left in front of you- it makes you progressively impatient. The other factor is that as you get older, you realize you aren't as knowledgeable as you thought you were when you are younger. I can easily imagine that the essay's author didn't really understand the Hesse novel the way she thinks she did- she was fooling her younger self more easily than she can now.
I mentioned to a morse code operators group that I'd put Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations on the MP3 player on the bicycle at 40wpm, and got two queries where to get the book text online. Who knew Wittgenstein would find that market there.
She's thinking with her front hole again.
The other factor is that as you get older, you realize you aren't as knowledgeable as you thought you were when you are younger.
I'm much smarter than I was when I was younger, a result of taking up an additional field. Computer programming to Artificial Intelligence to Philosophy of Language.
All related by that chain.
Ann Althouse said...
“I can relate. For the majority of my life I’ve been the kind of slow reader described in the cited text.”
Why not own slow reading? It’s like slow eating. You are savoring, thinking, being more aware of the experience.
As long as you’re not taking a timed test, working on a deadline, or billing by the hour, why does it matter if you cover fewer pages in an hour? Maybe you’re getting more.
It’s like listening to a song sung very slowly rather than fast. It’s different and not necessarily worse.
Isn’t slow sometimes better, like when you take the back roads instyof the highway?
Some things when you do them very fast, you’re considered to be doing them badly, notably sex.
I don’t disagree with any of this. I enjoy reading because it’s a slow activity. The only drawback to my style of reading is that I’m hungry to read more. I have stacks of unread books I can’t wait to get to.
Saturday Night Live covered this in 1977.
"Did you know that reading all the words in a story can help you understand the humor."
https://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/evelyn-woodski-slow-reading-course/3007522
I have to read a lot for my job, and I have to do it quickly, most of it on the web. I'm also a lifelong reader of books, but since my career got busy, my book consumption has dropped precipitously. It's definitely a different skill set.
I'm currently reading In the First Circle by Solzhenitsyn and I'm having to go very slowly. The key for me is to stick to a daily schedule and set a end goal, rather than just read till I get tired. I find if I skip a couple of days, it's much harder to pick back up.
I'm also reading, off and on, about 5 other books, so I'm sure that doesn't help.
Reading for information has speeded up considerably in the digital age , but reading for pleasure intentionally slows you down until your mind wanders. Now where was I?
"I'm much smarter than I was when I was younger"
Absent brain damage, most of us are- I certainly am (I am 52). My point, though, is that when I was younger, my assessment of what I knew and how I knew it was much further out of alignment with the reality of it.
I actually had a similar experience to that of the essay author- I had read Crime and Punishment and The Brothers Karamazov for a Russian literature course when I was a freshman in college, and I loved both novels a great deal and thought I had a firm understanding of them at the time. I reread both novels nine years ago and realized that I hadn't really understood them well at all- finding that my previous understanding didn't make any sense to me any longer.
I probably read more words today than at any time of my life, but I read fewer books than at any time in the past- I can definitely blame the internet for that.
I used to read books in bed as a regular habit before going to sleep- an hour or two, but that stopped around the time I retired (9 years ago). I keep meaning to set aside time like that, but I seem to never hold to it for more than a week or two at a time.
TL;DR.
There was an excellent set of shows by John Barton of the Royal Shakespeare Company and an amazing set of actors (Patrick Stewart, Judy Dench, Ian McKellan, etc) that I bought on DVD a few years ago (having seen it on TV long ago). You can get it on Amazon, but at a much higher price than I paid, since it seems to be out of production.
It is very helpful in reading, performing and understanding Shakespeare, but I find it also immensely useful for reading any work with complex syntax and lengthy sentences, particularly for reading aloud. I suspect that Shakespeare was training for both audiences and orators in the 19th century.
I find almost all readings of the Gettysburg address unintelligible by the time the reader gets to "It is rather for us..." I attribute this to the actors not having sufficient Shakespeare to deliver the speech. I wish we knew how Lincoln got it across.
I'm the exact opposite. Hated old literature when I was younger. Hated all the words, the long, drawn-out sentences, the weird phrasings, etc. I mostly read science fiction.
Oddly, a couple of years after graduating college and into graduate school I got out my old Literature reading book (had lots of different stuff in it) and was captivated. Poetry, prose, whatever; I just loved the act of reading. I've read The Scarlet Letter like three times since then. Am on my second reading of Moby Dick. I've even read Jane Austen ("It's as boring as sitting in a bucket of warm wallpaper paste reading a Jane Austen novel"; Jeremy Clarkson) (Northanger Abbey, btw). Frankenstein is better than sex. Dracula actually gave me nightmares. I'm reading all of the Greek playwrights, Cicero, Dante, Conrad, Dickens, pretty much all of the Great Authors that I hated in high school and undergrad school.
Once I discovered online ebooks it was game over. FREE BOOKS.
I can't even read modern fiction anymore (except the Dune series). The most recent I'll read is Hemingway and that's not a lot of work.
I still can read The Raven and almost always find something new in it that I'd never noticed before. The Lady of Shalott can bring tears to my eyes. Ditto with Tennyson's Ulysses.
It's not just the storytelling. It's the way the words are put together that trigger some really deep emotional/rational/whatever thing. It's like music. I can dig AC/DC but Allegri's Miserere can practically make my heart stop.
Thus endeth the testimonial.
Ann Althouse said...Why not own slow reading?
My reading rate has always been slow, my comprehension high. I'm pretty sure those two things are related, which is why I've never made a serious effort to read faster. That said, there are so many books I want to read that I'm sometimes envious of the people who plow through a book every couple days.
This is not losing some kind of deep insight.
Please tell me, how is it that a child supposedly has 'deep insight and extra skills' but a far more mature woman who has actually been around the block a few times, suddenly is lesser?
It doesn't pass the sniff test.
Here is the difference: Young College Co-ed who was GA GA over the 'wisdom' of her professors (and who had tons of time to boot) could WALLOW in those self important snore fests that the Professors inflicted upon the young. If you wanted the fish that the professors threw to their acolytes as rewards, they needed to suffer through Hesse.
Some professors (ahem) never lost that sense of self importance and top loftiness. In fact they rejoice in it.
This woman, however, who actually VALUES her time, who has seen pretentious bullshit for what it actually was, has had her inner compass reject this and doesn't have time to waste on tomes which were Status Signaling Code Words.
Professional lady at 12:05 PM
I've never made a serious attempt to read any of the plays.
I'm 65 years old. I began reading the Shakespeare plays about 15 years ago. Before then, I never tried to read any of them. I had only watched a couple of Romeo and Juliet movies.
I decided to begin reading the plays after I read Susan Wise Bauer's book The Well-Educated Mind in 2003.
who has seen pretentious bullshit for what it actually was, has had her inner compass reject this and doesn't have time to waste on tomes which were Status Signaling Code Words.
OK. You aren't virtue signaling at all whatsoever in this post, correct? Just a different set of virtues. Some people like jazz, I don't get 90% of it, but I don't pretend that there is nothing there. Same with modern country music, a lot of people claim to like it, I don't get it at all and change the channel the second I hear it. I don't think that country fans are suffering from a "false consciousness" though.
I do like books with well crafted prose, even if you have to take it on its own terms. Some ideas are complex and they demand complex language. Some ideas are subtle, and they demand subtle language to tease them out. Not everybody would be happy reading the maintenance manual for a New Holland tractor, but to some people, that is the pinnacle of the written word.
Yeesh!
There is a 65 hour course on Audible by a Dartmouth professor on Shakespeare's plays. It will open them up to you. Amazon Prime has some recent BBC productions of some of the plays that have modern film production values. I highly recommend them. They are not free, but they are not expensive. But I listened to the course first. After that course, I found myself listening to Julius Caesar on Audible on a car ride just for entertainment.
If the speeches were unintelligible, crowds would not stand for hours in the hot sun listening to them.
If the alternative were working in the hot sun ...
Seriously, I think we underappreciate how unentertaining pre-modern life was. And how little it took to be more entertaining.
That said, there are so many books I want to read that I'm sometimes envious of the people who plow through a book every couple days.
I wonder if 90% of those people are reading genre fiction like Louis L'Amour or some area of sci fi, for example, where they already have a foundation in all of the tropes, and so they don't have to think too hard to understand it. That's not fair to L'Amour, who often writes paragraphs that I stop and think about, though.
Kevin FTW!
These days I tend to skim while reading. And if a novel doesn't begin with the hero being chased through the woods by werewolves I lose interest by the second or third page.
Per Althouse: Why not own slow reading? It’s like slow eating. You are savoring, thinking, being more aware of the experience.
Yes. It's why I don't like audio books. Sometimes I read a passage over and over, as you say, savoring it, weighing it, sometimes absorbing it for later enjoyment.
Great writing moves us out of the ruts of our thinking, and the older one gets the harder getting out of a rut is, even if those ruts represent our accumulated wisdom. Her problem was that she didn't keep up, it's like "I am going to run five miles once a year so that I can still do it when I am seventy...."
> I used to read books in bed as a regular habit before going to sleep- an hour or two,
I sometimes read math or physics texts and pick a problem to work in my head until I fall asleep.
OK. You aren't virtue signaling at all whatsoever in this post, correct?
Of course not! Moi! As Althouse can tell you, I am as plain as mud and twice as dirty.
I do like books with well crafted prose, even if you have to take it on its own terms. Some ideas are complex and they demand complex language. Some ideas are subtle, and they demand subtle language to tease them out. Not everybody would be happy reading the maintenance manual for a New Holland tractor, but to some people, that is the pinnacle of the written word.
Mmm. Perhaps. Then again, one of my favorite reads as a kid was Asimov's spin on the Bard's plays.
Asimov seemed to follow Niven's doctrine: If you have something important to say, say it as plainly and clearly as you can. If you have nothing to say, put it any damn way you want to.
Asimov was able to clarify difficult concepts and introduce historical and cultural curlicues to illuminate instead of obscure.
I would be a lot more tolerant of the Academy if they did not reward turgid prose so much so that a man who admitted to writing nonsense hadn't been given an award for 'really complex and nuanced writing'.
There are complex thoughts requiring complex writing...and then you ALSO have navel gazing assholes who can't actually write with ANY clarity.
It is not a sin to point out that the Emperor has no Prose.
Smartphones are a double edged sword when reading. On the one hand, it is really nice to be able to not just look up words, but references. For instance, you can finally read the Odyssey and keep up with the classical allusions, even if you went to a second rate state school like I did that didn't teach the classics.
On the other hand, there is the siren Althouse, always beckoning.
My tastes have changed, I didn't have the patience for Laurence Sterne or Thomas Carlyle when I was young. Now I enjoy their sheer playfulness. I consumed all of Herman Hesse one year in college. I expect now I would find that earnest mysticism tedious.
On the rarer occasions I'm in the mood for serious, I find a single poem by Dickinson more than enough of a mental workout.
There are a couple of tricks that make understanding Shakespeare far easier. First, the syntax of the dialogue generally does not follow the iambic pentameter on the page, which is why it helps to listen as you read. Second, a small percentage of words require a gloss to understand their Elizabethan usage. A good text will footnote them, and it’s sometimes useful when approaching the more complex passages to read the footnotes first and make notes in the margin so that you understand the words in context the first time you hear and read them.
Nowadays I tend to read mostly DIY/craft and history...with a little Steampunk for fun. My two go-to books kept bedside are Edith Wharton's "Age of Innocence" and Shakespeare's "Richard III". I randomly select a page and am instantly transported. Many a night I fall asleep in NYC's Gilded Age or Medieval Gloucester.
BTW- Benedict Cumberbatch's rendition of Richard III in the Beeb's Hollow Crown series, season 2 is spellbinding, and such is his skill, and the entire cast, that declarative Elizabethan English quickly transmutes into what we perceive as natural modern speech. Ben Whishaw's Richard II in season one is also a stunner. The entire cast is excellent with a few unexpected castings, such as Sophie Okonedo as Queen Margaret.
This is a lavish production and adaptation for TV and as such isn't the heavy slogging you may recall from Lit 101...one may even call it GoT:The Original.
Anyhoo you can find both seasons on PBS Great Performances, Amazon, iTunes and YouTube.
"She had, she concluded, 'changed in ways I would never have predicted. I now read on the surface and very quickly; in fact, I read too fast to comprehend deeper levels, which forced me constantly to go back and reread the same sentence over and over with increasing frustration.'"
She's stupid.
I expect now I would find that earnest mysticism tedious.
Anthony Burgess says that Hesse told him it was "ersatz orientalism," or maybe that was Enderby.
You know what I can't figure out? The NBA. Why do they put the hoop ten feet high so that it makes it hard for anybody to just put the ball in it? I think that they are just status signaling. Why is there a net in tennis anyways? None of it makes any sense!
One thing that interests me about the idea of reading something deep as a set time every day. The people I know who do that are reading scripture.
Earnest Prole - thanks for the tips on reading Shakespeare. These days, I find myself listening to more books than reading them - maybe combining reading and listening in this case would be the best.
"I wonder if 90% of those people are reading genre fiction like Louis L'Amour or some area of sci fi, for example, where they already have a foundation in all of the tropes, and so they don't have to think too hard to understand it. That's not fair to L'Amour, who often writes paragraphs that I stop and think about, though."
L'Amour is interesting for such a popular genre-fiction writer. I liked his books better before he became "America's Storyteller" and just turned out fast-moving westerns with a more or less authentic background. I even like his earlier works (such as his Hopalong Cassidy novels, reissued in the 1990s) which were less polished but had a crude energy to them.
But he could be interesting when he was more polished. One of my favorite L'Amour novels is SHALAKO, the first page of which, in my edition, deals simply with the hero riding along in the desert. The prose is beautiful and evocative--and goes against all current conventional wisdom that writers should start their novels off with a bang (I've heard it called the "Shoot the Sheriff" opening), instead of setting up character and setting. Soon Shalako hears gunfire, but not right at the beginning.
Chuck says: I sometimes read math or physics texts and pick a problem to work in my head until I fall asleep.
That's funny because just the other night I couldn't sleep because I was struggling to picture the molecular structure of starch [don't ask me why]. Finally, I picked up my phone and Googled it. Then I was able to sleep contentedly.
Magister Ludi was visited by the Suck Fairy.
The term has been around for years, but this snowflake has just encountered it and it is Big News.
I hear there is also a Sexism Fairy. I have not met this one, but she has allegedly hit some of the formerly progressive novels of Robert A. Heinlein.
After I had my first baby in 2001, I re-read all the Brönte novels I'd enjoyed in high school while breastfeeding.
I had my last baby in 2018 and I scroll Facebook and play Words with Friends while breastfeeding. I also work on administrative stuff (returning phone calls, texts, emails).
I used to read a book a week, but now I really struggle to do so. I don't have time during the day, ever, and by the time I go to bed I don't have the energy to focus. During the aforementioned breastfeeding I am interrupted constantly by my toddler and others so it's pointless to try to focus on something like a book.
I do worry about my attention span. Internet doesn't help.
P.S. I read Beneath the Wheel for AP English my senior year in high school, and, in a stroke of luck, concurrently, Unterm Rad for AP German.
I've become a much more impatient reader as I've gotten older.
Get Good, get to the point, get interesting.
Or I'm outta here.
Partly, its because I've read enough weighty Classic tomes and thick novels to know that some authors need "a million" words to express their great thoughts, and others take a million words because they can't get to the point. Or they're using a blizzard of words to puff up their small ideas.
Mailer is a perfect example.
Post a Comment