March 1, 2017

"Imagine all the tatted, gauged, man-bunned and pussy-hatted young progs who tuned in hoping to see someone like Kamala Harris give the Dem response. Instead they got Gramps at Cracker Barrel."

Said exiledonmainstreet in the comments to "Will you still love Trump tomorrow?"

207 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 207 of 207
buwaya said...

"Kamala Harris is not the female equivalent of Obama.

Rather, she's the black equivalent of Sarah Palin."

No, that's not correct. She is an exotic, like Obama, or more so. Jamaican-White-Indian (from India).

And a product of academia, both parents were professors, and she's something of a red-diaper baby besides. Certainly not anything like Sarah Palin, a true native product of the common people.

And she slept her way into political influence via Willy Brown.

Douglas B. Levene said...

'd vote for someone who promised to outlaw manbuns on any man not carrying a samurai sword.

Roughcoat said...

I'm a hater, but I also have a sense of humor. The two aren't mutually exclusive, you know.

Achilles said...

Meade said...
exiledonmainstreet said...
"Wow. I've been quoted on the front page by Althouse. "

And let's be clear -- not only front paged but your quote actually WAS the post itself. High praise indeed.

My own quote, just for the record, spoken out loud while having both hands on the wheel, was somewhat pedestrian by contrast. "It was like watching a rerun of Hee Haw without the hilarity or the hooters."

Alright, we can't all expect to have all our zingers frontpaged all the time.

Congrats, exiled.


The content generated on this site and in the comments is better than most of the media, IMO.

Gahrie said...

"Wow. I've been quoted on the front page by Althouse. "

Insty too......

Gospace said...

Chuck said...

I don't think any Republican was going to beat Clinton in '96.


He was an incumbent president. He took less then 50% of the popular vote. He was eminently beatable. Perot running ensured Clinton's win no matter who was running as the Republican. A true two way race with no Perot might have seen greatly different results, but, we'll never know.

As far as Trump's executive order go, his are different in one important way then Obama's EO's were. Obama's were saying "don't enforce the law", in violation of his Constitutional duties to see that the laws are enforced. Trump's are saying "enforce the law."

Michael K said...

"A true two way race with no Perot might have seen greatly different results, but, we'll never know."

That was '92. The '96 race saw waling dead Dole take one for the team. The Deep State team, that is.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 207 of 207   Newer› Newest»