If you Clinton supporters have trouble believing Juanita, why not go the evidence from a pro-Clinton publication, Slate:
My favorite part of the defense of Clinton:
There is limited evidence that her first husband was abusive, so maybe she cooked up the story to explain a bloody lip he had given her. And if she was raped, why didn't she tell her own husband? - Is Juanity Broaddrick Telling the Truth? - Slate
So she can't be believed because her husband was abusive (Saudi Arabia defense of a man) and why oh why didn't she tell her abusive husband immediately that she was raped!
And Hillary recently called her a liar on this kind of basis. Remember, as a feminist, it is your duty to put this couple back in the White House!
tim in vermont said... Flowers was completely consensual. The problem with using Broaddrick though is that she is probably still too angry. Imagine that!
Tim, I wish I could link to that Howie Carr audio. Broddrick was so good and at ease, and she and Kyle were like to affible lady's at a social gathering who knew from experience exactly the characters of the two people they were talking about.
The problem with Flowers is it opens up conversation about Trumps affairs.
I know, it's like hanging a carrot in a box trap. I am quite Sure that Donald Trump will be more than happy for the conversation to go that way. Millennials aren't as forgiving of Bill's "alpha sex" as Wonkette and her generation of 'feminists'.
Broadrick never got a fair hearing. In 1990, the country spent months glued to the tv with the Anita Hill charges ("who put a pubic hair on my coke?") against Clarence Thomas; yet Broaddrick was dismissed and ignored, because she posed a threat to the elite left.
I don't Hillary is so dense so as to make any mention of anyone's affairs.
If she is that stupid, Trump merely has to say he would never be so reckless and unmindful of national security as to have an affair while occupying the Oval Office.
Or set up his own e-mail server. Only a traitor or a complete jackass would do either.
Adjunct professor of sexual violence law at New England Law Wendy Murphy talks with us about sexual assault allegations against Pres. Bill Clinton and their implications in the 2016 presidential election. http://www.necn.com/news/politics/NECN_10716_BroadsideClintonSexScandals_6p_NECN-364595471.html
Well Broadrick is feeling left out and wants to join the party. http://www.theamericanmirror.com/juanita-broaddrick-confront-hillary-trump-invited-debate/
Tump is just trolling the Hillary's Jack Mark Cuban front seat appearance threat because Queen Jennifer Flowers takes a Jack. Juanita Broaddrick is trump. I think none will show up at the debate, but weirder things have happened this cycle.
"Broadrick never got a fair hearing." She got a very fair hearing for a state totally controlled by the Democrat Party having be raped by the Democrat State attorney General and future Governor and President.
The investigation was just as professional as the FBI's of Hillary.
David Begley said... Maybe Trump is using a diversionary tactic. He says he'll invite Flowers but he'll bring Broadrick.
9/25/16, 11:04 AM
That would be a master stroke. Democrats can shrug off Flowers, because it was a consensual relationship and everyone knows that Bill is an old horndog and nobody cares about sex-hating Republicans, right? Plus, Trump had affairs, so there! But Broaddrick will force them to mention the words "Clinton" and "rape" in the same sentence.
Sometimes karma is not instant. Sometimes it takes decades. Let's hope it runs right over Hillary's dogma.
FullMoon said... The problem with Flowers is it opens up conversation about Trumps affairs.
If, if, anyone cared about Trump's affairs, he wouldn't be the nominee. Democrats don't have any standing to even bring affairs up, and Republicans have shown that in Trump's case, their a complete non-issue. He's on his third wife. Gets along well with his first two. Obviously he's had affairs. But when even his ex-wives don't come out and complain about it, who cares?
Trump has divisions of men, women, and Posterity ready to stand their ground. He has the female chauvinists and their male chauvinist accomplices on the run.
Drudge is having a heyday with this one right now.
Trump threatens to bring Gennifer Flowers to debate... BROADDRICK: I want to come too! PAULA JONES: What about me? WILLEY: Clinton Sex Assault Victims 'Could Fill The Entire Audience'... UNCONVENTIONAL PREP...
Maybe Trump should invite the survivors of Benghazi to the debate. That is a direct challenge to her bogus claims that her "experience" makes her more qualified than Trump. She has a lot of experience, all of it bad.
Juanita Broaddrick and Dolly Kyle (one of Bill's early girlfriends before Hillary) were on the Howie Carr radio show a month or two ago.
What they had to say in total concurrence was absolutely riveting, persuasive and devastating. I think those two come across better than Flowers.
Trump should invite them to sit in the front row.
Trump is either stupid, or being very kind to Hillary Clinton in only talking about outting Gennifer Flowers in the front row, instead of Juanita Broderick.
Support the Althouse blog by doing your Amazon shopping going in through the Althouse Amazon link.
Amazon
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Support this blog with PayPal
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
32 comments:
Juanita Broaddrick and Dolly Kyle (one of Bill's early girlfriends before Hillary) were on the Howie Carr radio show a month or two ago.
What they had to say in total concurrence was absolutely riveting, persuasive and devastating. I think those two come across better than Flowers.
Trump should invite them to sit in the front row.
If you Clinton supporters have trouble believing Juanita, why not go the evidence from a pro-Clinton publication, Slate:
My favorite part of the defense of Clinton:
There is limited evidence that her first husband was abusive, so maybe she cooked up the story to explain a bloody lip he had given her. And if she was raped, why didn't she tell her own husband? - Is Juanity Broaddrick Telling the Truth? - Slate
So she can't be believed because her husband was abusive (Saudi Arabia defense of a man) and why oh why didn't she tell her abusive husband immediately that she was raped!
And Hillary recently called her a liar on this kind of basis. Remember, as a feminist, it is your duty to put this couple back in the White House!
Flowers was completely consensual. The problem with using Broaddrick though is that she is probably still too angry. Imagine that!
Good point, Tim. Plus Bill was "seeing" Gennifer for 12 years !
The problem with Flowers is it opens up conversation about Trumps affairs.
She's not "the one" Bill Clinton raped.
So Hillary can use that in defense.
Hillary should leave a seat open for Ambassador Stevens because they are friends.
tim in vermont said...
Flowers was completely consensual. The problem with using Broaddrick though is that she is probably still too angry. Imagine that!
Tim, I wish I could link to that Howie Carr audio. Broddrick was so good and at ease, and she and Kyle were like to affible lady's at a social gathering who knew from experience exactly the characters of the two people they were talking about.
The problem with Flowers is it opens up conversation about Trumps affairs.
I know, it's like hanging a carrot in a box trap. I am quite Sure that Donald Trump will be more than happy for the conversation to go that way. Millennials aren't as forgiving of Bill's "alpha sex" as Wonkette and her generation of 'feminists'.
Maybe Trump is using a diversionary tactic. He says he'll invite Flowers but he'll bring Broadrick.
Birkel wins the Internet!
Broadrick never got a fair hearing. In 1990, the country spent months glued to the tv with the Anita Hill charges ("who put a pubic hair on my coke?") against Clarence Thomas; yet Broaddrick was dismissed and ignored, because she posed a threat to the elite left.
I believe you Juanita!
I don't Hillary is so dense so as to make any mention of anyone's affairs.
If she is that stupid, Trump merely has to say he would never be so reckless and unmindful of national security as to have an affair while occupying the Oval Office.
Or set up his own e-mail server. Only a traitor or a complete jackass would do either.
Adjunct professor of sexual violence law at New England Law Wendy Murphy talks with us about sexual assault allegations against Pres. Bill Clinton and their implications in the 2016 presidential election.
http://www.necn.com/news/politics/NECN_10716_BroadsideClintonSexScandals_6p_NECN-364595471.html
Well Broadrick is feeling left out and wants to join the party.
http://www.theamericanmirror.com/juanita-broaddrick-confront-hillary-trump-invited-debate/
Maybe someday a pro-life candidate will be able to fill half the seats with women who regret getting an abortion.
Tump is just trolling the Hillary's Jack Mark Cuban front seat appearance threat because Queen Jennifer Flowers takes a Jack. Juanita Broaddrick is trump. I think none will show up at the debate, but weirder things have happened this cycle.
"Broadrick never got a fair hearing." She got a very fair hearing for a state totally controlled by the Democrat Party having be raped by the Democrat State attorney General and future Governor and President.
The investigation was just as professional as the FBI's of Hillary.
"having been raped", sorry.
David Begley said...
Maybe Trump is using a diversionary tactic. He says he'll invite Flowers but he'll bring Broadrick.
9/25/16, 11:04 AM
That would be a master stroke. Democrats can shrug off Flowers, because it was a consensual relationship and everyone knows that Bill is an old horndog and nobody cares about sex-hating Republicans, right? Plus, Trump had affairs, so there! But Broaddrick will force them to mention the words "Clinton" and "rape" in the same sentence.
Sometimes karma is not instant. Sometimes it takes decades. Let's hope it runs right over Hillary's dogma.
"nobody cares but sex-hating Republicans"
FullMoon said...
The problem with Flowers is it opens up conversation about Trumps affairs.
If, if, anyone cared about Trump's affairs, he wouldn't be the nominee. Democrats don't have any standing to even bring affairs up, and Republicans have shown that in Trump's case, their a complete non-issue. He's on his third wife. Gets along well with his first two. Obviously he's had affairs. But when even his ex-wives don't come out and complain about it, who cares?
Trump has divisions of men, women, and Posterity ready to stand their ground. He has the female chauvinists and their male chauvinist accomplices on the run.
Exhume Vince Foster and prop his skeleton in the front row! Full freak show.
Anne Murray: "What About Me?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICeYjh1s2ro
Drudge is having a heyday with this one right now.
Trump threatens to bring Gennifer Flowers to debate...
BROADDRICK: I want to come too!
PAULA JONES: What about me?
WILLEY: Clinton Sex Assault Victims 'Could Fill The Entire Audience'...
UNCONVENTIONAL PREP...
Maybe Trump should invite the survivors of Benghazi to the debate. That is a direct challenge to her bogus claims that her "experience" makes her more qualified than Trump. She has a lot of experience, all of it bad.
Trump should place one of those stuffed Garfields on his podium to represent Kathleen Willey's cat.
EDH said...9/25/16, 9:46 AM
Juanita Broaddrick and Dolly Kyle (one of Bill's early girlfriends before Hillary) were on the Howie Carr radio show a month or two ago.
What they had to say in total concurrence was absolutely riveting, persuasive and devastating. I think those two come across better than Flowers.
Trump should invite them to sit in the front row.
Trump is either stupid, or being very kind to Hillary Clinton in only talking about outting Gennifer Flowers in the front row, instead of Juanita Broderick.
"nobody cares but sex-hating Republicans"
Bears repeating...
Wilbur said on 9/25/16, at 11:12 AM CDT
Or set up his own e-mail server. Only a traitor or a complete jackass would do either.
Setting up your own e-mail server is much better than using Yahoo or even Gmail.
Blogger Sammy Finkelman said...
Setting up your own e-mail server is much better than using Yahoo or even Gmail.
9/26/16, 9:51 AM
Oh, blabbity blah, you're such a hack, Sammy. On what grounds OTHER than the ability to beat discovery?
AprilApple,
Still think Trump is in this to throw it to H?
Post a Comment