I will put in my body who and what I desire when I desire it and not even from my cold dead hands will I permit government to take from me my natural right.
So how is the medical marijuana movement any different than 19th-century health tonics and elixirs, which were combinations of booze and opium with a splash of formaldehyde.
Trad Guy: The problem is people aren't being given medical marijuana solely for pain. They're being sold that it is a cure-all for "anxiety, sleep disorders, and Tourette's syndrome," among other things. The article actually mentions that "the strongest evidence is for chronic pain and for muscle stiffness in multiple sclerosis," though without telling us how strong is strong.
I will put in my body who and what I desire when I desire it and not even from my cold dead hands will I permit government to take from me my natural right.
It's people like this who are the first ones to whine when someone is in prison for "non-violent offenses".
You knew the stuff was illegal - be willing to take your punishment like a man.
Also there's this: "They include a small study suggesting that many brand labels for edible marijuana products list inaccurate amounts of active ingredients."
Medicine lying about the dosage it gives you should probably have the FDA up in arms because, with lots of medicine, that can literally kill you.
considering how doctors will just prescribe to you for whatever faux condition can come up with, that's not surprising. medical marijuana is just about allowing people to legally smoke pot. It was a foot in the door to legitimacy. unfortunately, we couldn't just legalize it and instead further corrupted the medical profession.
In college the students whose whole life revolved around pot drove me nuts, even though I liked to smoke some pot. It was beyond a lifestyle, it became their life.
"Hey man...you know George Washington grew hemp don't you?"
"Dude, you can make really killer rope from Hemp."
"You can make clothes and all kinds of great stuff out of hemp man."
I would respond and call out their bullshit. It was just about smoking it to get high. Everything else was just hippy garbage.
"The strongest evidence is for chronic pain and for muscle stiffness in multiple sclerosis, according to the review, which evaluated 79 studies involving more than 6,000 patients"
Well, too bad chronic pain sufferers and MS patients. I've never tried it, I don't LIKE it, so YOU must continue to suffer.
Signed,
Small government, libertarian-minded conservative.
A personal note: The MS sufferer that I know does seriously consider suicide someday. But unavailable MJ does work for her. The MS community all know some independent soul among them with a handicap Van who will get some for them at cost, but most are too law abiding to risk the legal and the social stigma of possessing the valuable plant. Too many Baptists and Methodists here are Teetotalers of alcohol and see MJ as total evil going from sin into depravity.
Religious legalism is a White washed tomb full of dead men's bones said an itinerant Jewish carpenter once...but the Pharisees got together and decided to kill Him.
"Well, too bad chronic pain sufferers and MS patients. I've never tried it, I don't LIKE it, so YOU must continue to suffer."
-- I'm fine with it being legalized. I dislike the government lying to us about their reasons for making it legal. I also dislike the FDA not doing its job and actually examining the claims made about medicinal marijuana like they would any other wonder drug.
The government has a very limited scope, and by not treating marijuana like the drug it is [one that I don't care if it is legal or not], it is NOT doing its job. How many other drugs could lie to you about the dosage they're giving you and the FDA not be upset with them?
The editorial by two Yale University psychiatrists suggests enthusiasm for medical marijuana has outpaced rigorous research and says widespread use should wait for better evidence. Federal and state governments should support and encourage such research, the editorial says.
"Perhaps it is time to place the horse back in front of the cart," Drs. Deepak Cyril D'Souza and Mohini Ranganathan wrote in the editorial.
They note that repeated recreational marijuana use can be addictive and say unanswered questions include what are the long-term health effects of medical marijuana use and whether its use is justified in children whose developing brains may be more vulnerable to its effects.
I have no problems with folks smoking weed for whatever reason they want. I do take major issue with the activists who claim wonders that do not exist for no reason other than profiting off of desperate people in pain.
"Medical marijuana has not been proven to work for many illnesses that state laws have approved it for..."
Well, duh, unless patients are inhaling MM through a nebulizer where the "active ingredient" is a pre-measured liquid, there's no way to manage the dosage other than the size of the joint or the brownie baking sheet. Which probably explains all the ballot initiatives approving its use referring to "doctor's note" rather than "prescription".
This drug (as well as any recreational drug) should be completely legal for adults to purchase and use, with obvious restrictions on using it while driving, etc. But let's not kid ourselves about it's so called beneficial uses or downplay its dangers. Be up front about it.
As someone above said, it's a lie to make it available to all regardless of medical condition with the added benefit of corrupting the medical profession in the process. Win, win. Or not. Maybe those Wisconsin doctors at the Scott Walker protests were their inspiration. Lying for a good cause is defensible in a respected profession, right?
If you want marijuana for all, just say it. Leave the lying and transparent (didn't fool anyone anyway) corruption out.
"They note that repeated recreational marijuana use can be addictive and say unanswered questions include what are the long-term health effects of medical marijuana use and whether its use is justified in children whose developing brains may be more vulnerable to its effects."
Well, that's the real question, isn't it? Assuming "medical marijuana" is mostly just a fig leaf for recreational use, what are the arguments pro and con for legal recreational use?
" "medical" marijuana was never, ever about its being used as medicine."
Of course not. The only thing I know it helps is the nausea from chemotherapy. Pain may be more a sedation effect.
garage doesn't know that Prohibition was a Progressive cause.
The whole thing reminds of the guy with diarrhea who, after everything else failed, went to the psychiatrist. A friend saw him a few weeks later and he looked great. He asked him, "How do you feel ?" "Great !"
"So the psychiatrist cured the diarrhea ?"
"No. I still shit in my pants but I'm not worried about it anymore. "
I love how most of commenters just take the word of an AP article editorializing, without actually looking at any of studies, because it fits their pre-conceived notions.
For instance, was cannabis even used in the studies? Link
what are the arguments pro and con for legal recreational use?
I suggest a modified FDA rule. FDA approval is a two pronged test, better results or less risk than current alternatives.
So to approve pot we should ask whether the recreational feeling is greater than a current alternative with the same risk or the same recreational feeling achieved with less risk than a currently legal alternative. I suspect pot passes both tests, while passing either would mean approval.
"Medical marijuana" is the legal fiction used so that people can smoke dope without going a shady drug dealer, and the states get their cut in taxes. I don't doubt that it helps some with chronic pain, but that's not why it's become so widespread.
There are tons of kids in my state (under 21) who have medical mj cards. That's a lot of kids with "glaucoma" or "anxiety attacks".
I don't think that it just helps nausea due to chemo, but nausea maybe in general. I know someone who has a hard time traveling, and they recently discovered the use of pot to greatly reduce their frequency of throwing up. This isn't a case of a pothead using this as a medical excuse, but rather someone who only smokes before longish road trips.
I love how most of commenters just take the word of an AP article editorializing, without actually looking at any of studies, because it fits their pre-conceived notions.
Honestly garage, one has to be completely obtuse to not see why.
The fact is that this was pushed, and hard, on every state in the U.S. It was purely political from the word go. Then some people come along and question the validity of all of the so-called facts, and we're the ones who are "just taking the word"? Why are you so quick to take the word of the very people who obviously have an agenda, and that is to make pot legal, one way or the other?
The other thing to keep in mind is that one of the reasons that there have not been studies showing the efficacy of pot as a treatment is that the FDA hasn't approved such, and instead has tried to suppress research into pot as a medicine.
"garage mahal said... I love how most of commenters just take the word of an AP article editorializing, without actually looking at any of studies, because it fits their pre-conceived notions.
For instance, was cannabis even used in the studies? Link"
I think it should be legalized or, at least, decriminalized. Way too many kids started down the wrong side of the criminal justice system due to a joint.
But let's not kid ourselves, lots of the medical claims are BS and may actually keep people from seeking legitimate treatment. For those medical issues where it is beneficial, God speed.
The other thing to keep in mind is that one of the reasons that there have not been studies showing the efficacy of pot as a treatment is that the FDA hasn't approved such, and instead has tried to suppress research into pot as a medicine.
But why is this?
I don't think it's as you make it out. Lot's of hard drugs are used, or their precursor plant or chemical, in drugs. Drug companies deal with hard drugs that they turn into medicine all the time. We wouldn't have pain killers otherwise.
If there is a market to turn Marijuana into a pill that would help, why wouldn't drug companies be developing this?
The answer lies in baked goods and smoked goods at Marijuana shops. No one is creating a pill, they want you to smoke it or they want to put it in food without any controls.
I seriously doubt the FDA would approve a smoked drug. Hence, no one is making applications at the FDA.
Conclusions and Relevance "There was moderate-quality evidence to support the use of cannabinoids for the treatment of chronic pain and spasticity. There was low-quality evidence suggesting that cannabinoids were associated with improvements in nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, weight gain in HIV infection, sleep disorders, and Tourette syndrome. Cannabinoids were associated with an increased risk of short-term AEs."
Findings "Use of marijuana for chronic pain, neuropathic pain, and spasticity due to multiple sclerosis is supported by high-quality evidence. ... Conclusions and Relevance Medical marijuana is used to treat a host of indications, a few of which have evidence to support treatment with marijuana and many that do not. Physicians should educate patients about medical marijuana to ensure that it is used appropriately and that patients will benefit from its use."
"So far, evidence suggests that marijuana may be an effective treatment for chronic pain, neuropathic (nerve) pain, and muscle spasms due to multiple sclerosis or paraplegia. In most states with medical marijuana laws, marijuana can be used to treat severe or chronic pain and severe or persistent muscle spasms."
I have always been skeptical of its medical benefit beyond the obvious ones related to improving ones mood, which isn't to say that is insignificant, but that isn't really unique to marijuana and almost surely isn't the most efficient or safest way to improve ones mood.
garage mahal said... I love how most of commenters just take the word of an AP article editorializing, without actually looking at any of studies, because it fits their pre-conceived notions.
See above. The MSM's science reporting is nearly always awful; especially beware (online) articles whose authors omit links to the studies they're scribbling about.
See above. The MSM's science reporting is nearly always awful; especially beware (online) articles whose authors omit links to the studies they're scribbling about.
Yep. Just a link to JAMA main webpage and a link to the National Institute on Drug Abuse. I like "doesn't work for sleep disorders" but side effects include "sleepiness".
You know it's legitimate because, hey, there are entire stores dedicated to it. Like all the other single-drug stores.
You say there's no such thing? Well, have I got a business opportunity for you. I'm offering ground floor opportunities for investors in my medical aspirin store chain. Dedicated solely to aspirin. We'll have franchises in every mall in America. And we're expanding to every neighborhood. Customers can select from our vast array of domestic, international, artisanal and designer aspirins. Bayer Bombers are popular at the moment, as are Hoffman Honeys. Other types sure to be in demand include St. Joe's Sweetums, CVS Zappers, Anacin Annihilators, and Salicylate Gold. We can also do special orders on request.
Don't miss this opportunity for future financial success. Invest now.
I have MS and marijuana is not helpful with any of my suite of symptoms, except perhaps one, to the extent I can tell. But it has some negatives in regard to other things that I can say its of no medical benefit to me.
I know a lot of people have said they don't think it is as useful as advertised, or that they think it is used by slackers to get stoned -- but, has anyone actually been for leaving it illegal?
Marijuana...or more accurately THC has been a Schedule III drug for years under the USP moniker Dronabinol... it is an anti-emetic and is used to stimulate appetite in cancer patients. The lie over the years has been that we need to legalize pot to benefit patients...Apparently THC laced Gummy Bears and Tea are superior to the metered dose of a pill...
Tell that to epileptic kids suffering seizures around the world being successfully treated with cannabis how much your so-called intelligence is being insulted.
Paul, marinol has issues. For one thing, as a bolus, it's not helpful to people with difficulty in swallowing. Dose-response is also poorer and can result in overmedication a la Maureen Dowd. Smoking has advantages. You can self-regulate very nicely.
I once worked in an old fashioned mom & pop drug store. The druggist owner kept a display case of antique patent medicines. One of them was Asthmatic Cigarettes, which contained cannabis. Many of the others contained opium, morphine, and alcohol.
All these medical benefit claims were just and end around so people can get high. Unless in 2010 and 2011 Denver experienced as Glaucoma epidemic. medical marihuana
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Encourage Althouse by making a donation:
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
81 comments:
Placebo
No kidding. This is probably the most potent drug allowed for public use based on almost purely anecdotal data.
But then, "medical" marijuana was never, ever about its being used as medicine.
Marijuana may not cure you, but it is the ultimate coping drug for central nervous system disorders, also called pain.
Oh gosh. I'm shocked.
I will put in my body who and what I desire when I desire it and not even from my cold dead hands will I permit government to take from me my natural right.
Now that makes people want to oppress you just on spec.
So is the science now settled?
So how is the medical marijuana movement any different than 19th-century health tonics and elixirs, which were combinations of booze and opium with a splash of formaldehyde.
@TosaGuy...Unlike the 1800s health tonics with booze and opium, Marijuana works for several days and causes no other problems.
This is NOT about curing the incurable disease, although it may help with seizures. It is about long term pain management.
Multiple Sclerosis is never cured, but it has to be lived with for a full life span.
Well, it's been mostly lawyers, not doctors, pushing for medical marijuana, so it's not surprising that it's mostly a lie.
Trad Guy: The problem is people aren't being given medical marijuana solely for pain. They're being sold that it is a cure-all for "anxiety, sleep disorders, and Tourette's syndrome," among other things. The article actually mentions that "the strongest evidence is for chronic pain and for muscle stiffness in multiple sclerosis," though without telling us how strong is strong.
I will put in my body who and what I desire when I desire it and not even from my cold dead hands will I permit government to take from me my natural right.
It's people like this who are the first ones to whine when someone is in prison for "non-violent offenses".
You knew the stuff was illegal - be willing to take your punishment like a man.
Bullshit claims exposed as bullshit, yet weed's carnival barkers will still hawk Dr. Feelgood's magic herbal tonic.
People in pain will always search for relief and the unscrupulous and agenda-driven and will always take advantage.
Also there's this: "They include a small study suggesting that many brand labels for edible marijuana products list inaccurate amounts of active ingredients."
Medicine lying about the dosage it gives you should probably have the FDA up in arms because, with lots of medicine, that can literally kill you.
Wake and Bake. It's the best relief for a hangover. That's it.
All these medical benefit claims were just and end around so people can get high. Unless in 2010 and 2011 Denver experienced as Glaucoma epidemic.
What next? Will they tell us acupuncture is a crock?
I just don't know any more...
"cure-all for anxiety, sleep disorders, and Tourette's syndrome"
Well f*ck that!
considering how doctors will just prescribe to you for whatever faux condition can come up with, that's not surprising. medical marijuana is just about allowing people to legally smoke pot. It was a foot in the door to legitimacy. unfortunately, we couldn't just legalize it and instead further corrupted the medical profession.
Now, I think there's probably some use, somewhere for it, medically. It's a drug; someone is going to crack it to use it medically.
I'm just hesitant to believe that it will fix literally every problem attributed it to being able to fix.
In college the students whose whole life revolved around pot drove me nuts, even though I liked to smoke some pot. It was beyond a lifestyle, it became their life.
"Hey man...you know George Washington grew hemp don't you?"
"Dude, you can make really killer rope from Hemp."
"You can make clothes and all kinds of great stuff out of hemp man."
I would respond and call out their bullshit. It was just about smoking it to get high. Everything else was just hippy garbage.
Obligatory South Park video clip.
To the contrary, it has been shown, time and time again, that a sustained course of large doses of marijuana cures Mental Acuity Syndrome.
"Take two 3ft bong hits, a few steamrollers, and call me in the morning."
"Hey man, I only smoke bongs because it's been proven that the bong water filters out all the carcinogens."
"The strongest evidence is for chronic pain and for muscle stiffness in multiple sclerosis, according to the review, which evaluated 79 studies involving more than 6,000 patients"
Well, too bad chronic pain sufferers and MS patients. I've never tried it, I don't LIKE it, so YOU must continue to suffer.
Signed,
Small government, libertarian-minded conservative.
I love it when they interview some hippie type on tv and he or she refers to weed as "my medicine". Yeah right.
Wait, you mean people who want to use drugs have been lying all this time?
Shocker!
Wait, you mean people who want to use drugs have been lying all this time?
I bet you read no farther than the title of the post.
A personal note: The MS sufferer that I know does seriously consider suicide someday. But unavailable MJ does work for her. The MS community all know some independent soul among them with a handicap Van who will get some for them at cost, but most are too law abiding to risk the legal and the social stigma of possessing the valuable plant. Too many Baptists and Methodists here are Teetotalers of alcohol and see MJ as total evil going from sin into depravity.
Religious legalism is a White washed tomb full of dead men's bones said an itinerant Jewish carpenter once...but the Pharisees got together and decided to kill Him.
"Well, too bad chronic pain sufferers and MS patients. I've never tried it, I don't LIKE it, so YOU must continue to suffer."
-- I'm fine with it being legalized. I dislike the government lying to us about their reasons for making it legal. I also dislike the FDA not doing its job and actually examining the claims made about medicinal marijuana like they would any other wonder drug.
The government has a very limited scope, and by not treating marijuana like the drug it is [one that I don't care if it is legal or not], it is NOT doing its job. How many other drugs could lie to you about the dosage they're giving you and the FDA not be upset with them?
traditionalguy said...
Marijuana may not cure you, but it is the ultimate coping drug for central nervous system disorders, also called pain.
6/23/15, 12:12 PM
Unless you are a French student, in which case you are out of luck!
THE RECOMMENDATIONS
The editorial by two Yale University psychiatrists suggests enthusiasm for medical marijuana has outpaced rigorous research and says widespread use should wait for better evidence. Federal and state governments should support and encourage such research, the editorial says.
"Perhaps it is time to place the horse back in front of the cart," Drs. Deepak Cyril D'Souza and Mohini Ranganathan wrote in the editorial.
They note that repeated recreational marijuana use can be addictive and say unanswered questions include what are the long-term health effects of medical marijuana use and whether its use is justified in children whose developing brains may be more vulnerable to its effects.
Sounds reasonable to me.
The thing I take away from this article: The abbreviation Drs. is horrible and should never be used.
TradGuy,
I have no problems with folks smoking weed for whatever reason they want. I do take major issue with the activists who claim wonders that do not exist for no reason other than profiting off of desperate people in pain.
"Medical marijuana has not been proven to work for many illnesses that state laws have approved it for..."
Well, duh, unless patients are inhaling MM through a nebulizer where the "active ingredient" is a pre-measured liquid, there's no way to manage the dosage other than the size of the joint or the brownie baking sheet. Which probably explains all the ballot initiatives approving its use referring to "doctor's note" rather than "prescription".
This drug (as well as any recreational drug) should be completely legal for adults to purchase and use, with obvious restrictions on using it while driving, etc. But let's not kid ourselves about it's so called beneficial uses or downplay its dangers. Be up front about it.
Shocker!
As someone above said, it's a lie to make it available to all regardless of medical condition with the added benefit of corrupting the medical profession in the process. Win, win. Or not. Maybe those Wisconsin doctors at the Scott Walker protests were their inspiration. Lying for a good cause is defensible in a respected profession, right?
If you want marijuana for all, just say it. Leave the lying and transparent (didn't fool anyone anyway) corruption out.
Even after Colorado and Washington we're still supposed to pretend pot is a medical treatment?
Let them have their pot, and quit lying about why.
"They note that repeated recreational marijuana use can be addictive and say unanswered questions include what are the long-term health effects of medical marijuana use and whether its use is justified in children whose developing brains may be more vulnerable to its effects."
Well, that's the real question, isn't it? Assuming "medical marijuana" is mostly just a fig leaf for recreational use, what are the arguments pro and con for legal recreational use?
" "medical" marijuana was never, ever about its being used as medicine."
Of course not. The only thing I know it helps is the nausea from chemotherapy. Pain may be more a sedation effect.
garage doesn't know that Prohibition was a Progressive cause.
The whole thing reminds of the guy with diarrhea who, after everything else failed, went to the psychiatrist. A friend saw him a few weeks later and he looked great. He asked him, "How do you feel ?" "Great !"
"So the psychiatrist cured the diarrhea ?"
"No. I still shit in my pants but I'm not worried about it anymore. "
I love how most of commenters just take the word of an AP article editorializing, without actually looking at any of studies, because it fits their pre-conceived notions.
For instance, was cannabis even used in the studies? Link
what are the arguments pro and con for legal recreational use?
I suggest a modified FDA rule. FDA approval is a two pronged test, better results or less risk than current alternatives.
So to approve pot we should ask whether the recreational feeling is greater than a current alternative with the same risk or the same recreational feeling achieved with less risk than a currently legal alternative. I suspect pot passes both tests, while passing either would mean approval.
"Medical marijuana" is the legal fiction used so that people can smoke dope without going a shady drug dealer, and the states get their cut in taxes. I don't doubt that it helps some with chronic pain, but that's not why it's become so widespread.
There are tons of kids in my state (under 21) who have medical mj cards. That's a lot of kids with "glaucoma" or "anxiety attacks".
Part of it is that the more powerful prescription narcotics are so heavily regulated these days.
I don't think that it just helps nausea due to chemo, but nausea maybe in general. I know someone who has a hard time traveling, and they recently discovered the use of pot to greatly reduce their frequency of throwing up. This isn't a case of a pothead using this as a medical excuse, but rather someone who only smokes before longish road trips.
I love how most of commenters just take the word of an AP article editorializing, without actually looking at any of studies, because it fits their pre-conceived notions.
Honestly garage, one has to be completely obtuse to not see why.
The fact is that this was pushed, and hard, on every state in the U.S. It was purely political from the word go. Then some people come along and question the validity of all of the so-called facts, and we're the ones who are "just taking the word"? Why are you so quick to take the word of the very people who obviously have an agenda, and that is to make pot legal, one way or the other?
“We only identified two studies on inhaled marijuana which might be a reflection of the legal status,” says study author Penny F. Whiting, PhD, senior research fellow at the University of Bristol in the UK.
The other thing to keep in mind is that one of the reasons that there have not been studies showing the efficacy of pot as a treatment is that the FDA hasn't approved such, and instead has tried to suppress research into pot as a medicine.
"garage mahal said...
I love how most of commenters just take the word of an AP article editorializing, without actually looking at any of studies, because it fits their pre-conceived notions.
For instance, was cannabis even used in the studies? Link"
He types from his Cheetos stained keyboard.
I think it should be legalized or, at least, decriminalized. Way too many kids started down the wrong side of the criminal justice system due to a joint.
But let's not kid ourselves, lots of the medical claims are BS and may actually keep people from seeking legitimate treatment. For those medical issues where it is beneficial, God speed.
The other thing to keep in mind is that one of the reasons that there have not been studies showing the efficacy of pot as a treatment is that the FDA hasn't approved such, and instead has tried to suppress research into pot as a medicine.
But why is this?
I don't think it's as you make it out. Lot's of hard drugs are used, or their precursor plant or chemical, in drugs. Drug companies deal with hard drugs that they turn into medicine all the time. We wouldn't have pain killers otherwise.
If there is a market to turn Marijuana into a pill that would help, why wouldn't drug companies be developing this?
The answer lies in baked goods and smoked goods at Marijuana shops. No one is creating a pill, they want you to smoke it or they want to put it in food without any controls.
I seriously doubt the FDA would approve a smoked drug. Hence, no one is making applications at the FDA.
From the actual JAMA articles:
Conclusions and Relevance
"There was moderate-quality evidence to support the use of cannabinoids for the treatment of chronic pain and spasticity. There was low-quality evidence suggesting that cannabinoids were associated with improvements in nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, weight gain in HIV infection, sleep disorders, and Tourette syndrome. Cannabinoids were associated with an increased risk of short-term AEs."
Findings
"Use of marijuana for chronic pain, neuropathic pain, and spasticity due to multiple sclerosis is supported by high-quality evidence. ...
Conclusions and Relevance
Medical marijuana is used to treat a host of indications, a few of which have evidence to support treatment with marijuana and many that do not. Physicians should educate patients about medical marijuana to ensure that it is used appropriately and that patients will benefit from its use."
"So far, evidence suggests that marijuana may be an effective treatment for chronic pain, neuropathic (nerve) pain, and muscle spasms due to multiple sclerosis or paraplegia. In most states with medical marijuana laws, marijuana can be used to treat severe or chronic pain and severe or persistent muscle spasms."
I have always been skeptical of its medical benefit beyond the obvious ones related to improving ones mood, which isn't to say that is insignificant, but that isn't really unique to marijuana and almost surely isn't the most efficient or safest way to improve ones mood.
garage mahal said...
I love how most of commenters just take the word of an AP article editorializing, without actually looking at any of studies, because it fits their pre-conceived notions.
See above. The MSM's science reporting is nearly always awful; especially beware (online) articles whose authors omit links to the studies they're scribbling about.
"I know someone"
Science!
"No one is creating a pill, they want you to smoke it or they want to put it in food without any controls"
And "they" want to smoke it and eat it.
Cool Prog drug = cool. Old Prole drug = uncool.
See above. The MSM's science reporting is nearly always awful; especially beware (online) articles whose authors omit links to the studies they're scribbling about.
Yep. Just a link to JAMA main webpage and a link to the National Institute on Drug Abuse. I like "doesn't work for sleep disorders" but side effects include "sleepiness".
I like "doesn't work for sleep disorders" but side effects include "sleepiness".
What are the differences between "sleepiness" and "sleep disorders"? Or are you just ignorant?
You know it's legitimate because, hey, there are entire stores dedicated to it. Like all the other single-drug stores.
You say there's no such thing? Well, have I got a business opportunity for you. I'm offering ground floor opportunities for investors in my medical aspirin store chain. Dedicated solely to aspirin. We'll have franchises in every mall in America. And we're expanding to every neighborhood. Customers can select from our vast array of domestic, international, artisanal and designer aspirins. Bayer Bombers are popular at the moment, as are Hoffman Honeys. Other types sure to be in demand include St. Joe's Sweetums, CVS Zappers, Anacin Annihilators, and Salicylate Gold. We can also do special orders on request.
Don't miss this opportunity for future financial success. Invest now.
Serious inquiries only.
"I like "doesn't work for sleep disorders" but side effects include "sleepiness"."
Sleep apnea [where you're "asleep" but not getting rest] can be thought of as a sleep disorder that sleepiness won't help.
Also, just BEING sleepy doesn't mean you CAN sleep.
What to make of Shona Banda's case?
If it works for her, fine. Let her have it. Control freaks at both ends of the political spectrum don't know when to quit.
kcom-
You would be better served by opening Doritos-only stores.
Also, just BEING sleepy doesn't mean you CAN sleep.
Which prompts me to recommend a book: The Family that Couldn't Sleep, by D. T. Max.
Be happy this is not a family you're born into.
I have MS and marijuana is not helpful with any of my suite of symptoms, except perhaps one, to the extent I can tell. But it has some negatives in regard to other things that I can say its of no medical benefit to me.
Has anyone here said to NOT legalize marijuana?
I know a lot of people have said they don't think it is as useful as advertised, or that they think it is used by slackers to get stoned -- but, has anyone actually been for leaving it illegal?
Is there a medical use for Doritos?
Tell me it's so.
It's the only thing that allowed me to sleep given the meds I was on. I will be forever grateful.
Is there a medical use for Doritos?
Tell me it's so.
In some patients, they can prevent anorexia.
Marijuana...or more accurately THC has been a Schedule III drug for years under the USP moniker Dronabinol... it is an anti-emetic and is used to stimulate appetite in cancer patients. The lie over the years has been that we need to legalize pot to benefit patients...Apparently THC laced Gummy Bears and Tea are superior to the metered dose of a pill...
Duh!
Apparently THC laced Gummy Bears and Tea are superior to the metered dose of a pill..
But then the government couldn't also tax your joints.
I'm fine with it being legalized. I dislike the government lying to us about their reasons for making it legal.
That's my take also. Legalize pot all you want...but why insult my intelligence in the process?
"but why insult my intelligence in the process?"
Seconded.
.but why insult my intelligence in the process?
Tell that to epileptic kids suffering seizures around the world being successfully treated with cannabis how much your so-called intelligence is being insulted.
Paul, marinol has issues. For one thing, as a bolus, it's not helpful to people with difficulty in swallowing. Dose-response is also poorer and can result in overmedication a la Maureen Dowd. Smoking has advantages. You can self-regulate very nicely.
Way to dodge the point, Garage. But, of course, it was "for the children". The last refuge of scoundrels in an argument.
I once worked in an old fashioned mom & pop drug store. The druggist owner kept a display case of antique patent medicines. One of them was Asthmatic Cigarettes, which contained cannabis. Many of the others contained opium, morphine, and alcohol.
No shit.
http://nalert.blogspot.com/2015/06/5-more-drug-psas-that-tried-to-scare.html
Ultimate placebo. That's why it "cures" literally anything
All these medical benefit claims were just and end around so people can get high. Unless in 2010 and 2011 Denver experienced as Glaucoma epidemic.
medical marihuana
Post a Comment