It is a mistake to read An American Tragedy before having watched A Place in the Sun. It will make you think A Place in the Sun is childish and stupid. Perhaps it really is childish and stupid. Or perhaps it isn't. If you read An American Tragedy first, you will never know.
Like The Brothers Karamozov, you could stop reading An American Tragedy once the trial starts. You will not miss much and will save several hundred pages. Like how you can stop reading A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man when he gets to about high school or maybe college, except you don't save hundreds of pages in that case but the equivalent in annoyance.
I especially enjoy the comments of defense counsel. She never said that. If she did, she didn't understand enough English to know what she was saying. if she did understand, she only said such because it was coerced. And she didn't waive Miranda, so none of it matters anyway. Poor girl. Or something like that.
Along similar lines, I did see an attorney for the DC suspect on CNN. The young man was never violent, a paragon of virtue, the cops made it all up, we know how they are, DNA is rigged all the time. This homily for a man accused of torturing and then murdering, among others, a 10 year old, in front of the child's parents. He's entitled to a presumption of innocence and a fair trial, not a lying speech intended to influence public opinion and potential jurors.
"I've never bothered to read John Galt's speech either. It's so unnecessary to the story."
I've never read any of it (other than to attempt to read it and get bored 10 pages in), but from what I've read about it, it would make more sense to skip the story and read the speech.
Everyone is of course entitled to an opinion. Concluding the proper outcome before the presentation of evidence and its cross examination is hardly an informed opinion though. In that you are hardly alone. Second guessing the investigators, the prosecutors and ultimately, the jurors, is a national pastime, although it does seem biased in favor of the defense. You're starting early, but it's good to get a jump on the competition.
i think they are saying that she sabotaged the kayak............. http://www.lohud.com/story/news/local/2015/05/26/vincent-viafore-angelika-graswald-kayak-killer-orangecounty-hudson-river-new-york-murder/27983617/
Support the Althouse blog by doing your Amazon shopping going in through the Althouse Amazon link.
Amazon
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Support this blog with PayPal
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
17 comments:
"And when I returned, Mary Jo and the car were gone." - Democrat Hero.
Was she obliged to rescue him? Last I heard there was no such law.
That was "her only way out"? How about "just say no"?
Wow, even more An American Tragedy.
"Was she obliged to rescue him? Last I heard there was no such law."
Yeah, but the prosecution is saying she moved that paddle away from him.
It is a mistake to read An American Tragedy before having watched A Place in the Sun. It will make you think A Place in the Sun is childish and stupid. Perhaps it really is childish and stupid. Or perhaps it isn't. If you read An American Tragedy first, you will never know.
Like The Brothers Karamozov, you could stop reading An American Tragedy once the trial starts. You will not miss much and will save several hundred pages. Like how you can stop reading A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man when he gets to about high school or maybe college, except you don't save hundreds of pages in that case but the equivalent in annoyance.
The man in the canoe.
I never understood the particulars of that, by the way. It's probably like the constellations.
Another H.A.Rey is needed to figure it out.
A man, a plan, a canoe...
Ham: Do you see yonder cloud that's almost in shape of a canoe?
Pol: By th' mass, and ’tis like a canoe indeed.
Ham: Methinks it is like a weasel.
Pol: It is backed like a weasel.
Ham: Or like a whale.
Pol: Very like a whale.
I especially enjoy the comments of defense counsel. She never said that. If she did, she didn't understand enough English to know what she was saying. if she did understand, she only said such because it was coerced. And she didn't waive Miranda, so none of it matters anyway. Poor girl. Or something like that.
Along similar lines, I did see an attorney for the DC suspect on CNN. The young man was never violent, a paragon of virtue, the cops made it all up, we know how they are, DNA is rigged all the time. This homily for a man accused of torturing and then murdering, among others, a 10 year old, in front of the child's parents. He's entitled to a presumption of innocence and a fair trial, not a lying speech intended to influence public opinion and potential jurors.
Paid liars.
It seems to me that unless there was a witness and the "confession" is not recorded, then this should fail the reasonable doubt standard.
My favorite Freeman observed, "Like The Brothers Karamozov, you could stop reading An American Tragedy once the trial starts."
I've never bothered to read John Galt's speech either. It's so unnecessary to the story.
"I've never bothered to read John Galt's speech either. It's so unnecessary to the story."
I've never read any of it (other than to attempt to read it and get bored 10 pages in), but from what I've read about it, it would make more sense to skip the story and read the speech.
@ skyler -
"...should fail the reasonable doubt standard."
Everyone is of course entitled to an opinion. Concluding the proper outcome before the presentation of evidence and its cross examination is hardly an informed opinion though. In that you are hardly alone. Second guessing the investigators, the prosecutors and ultimately, the jurors, is a national pastime, although it does seem biased in favor of the defense. You're starting early, but it's good to get a jump on the competition.
I just read that. Do they have witnesses? How on earth are they supposed to be proving that she pulled his paddle away from him?
The only problem with the H.A.Rey constellations is that they make the real ones so disappointing!
i think they are saying that she sabotaged the kayak.............
http://www.lohud.com/story/news/local/2015/05/26/vincent-viafore-angelika-graswald-kayak-killer-orangecounty-hudson-river-new-york-murder/27983617/
Post a Comment