August 25, 2014

Are educated, intelligent adults allowed to complain that they didn't get what Obama's smiling 2008 campaign persona made them feel they could get?

Ah, it's a free country. You can complain about anything you want, but you look foolish if you don't take responsibility for your own gullibility.

Thomas Frank interviews Cornel West:
Frank: I... remember... being impressed by Barack Obama who was running for president... I sometimes thought that he looked like he had what this country needed... That was a huge turning point, that moment in 2008, and my own feeling is that we didn’t turn.

West: No, the thing is he posed as a progressive and turned out to be counterfeit. We ended up with a Wall Street presidency, a drone presidency, a national security presidency. The torturers go free. The Wall Street executives go free. The war crimes in the Middle East, especially now in Gaza, the war criminals go free. And yet, you know, he acted as if he was both a progressive and as if he was concerned about the issues of serious injustice and inequality and it turned out that he’s just another neoliberal centrist with a smile and with a nice rhetorical flair.... 
Another neoliberal centrist with a smile and with a nice rhetorical flair? That's what I hoped I might get when I voted for Obama in 2008. He never assured us he'd be a left-winger, but some people — people who wanted that — projected their hope onto him, and of course, he invited everyone to see him as the embodiment of whatever it was they hoped for.
West: And we ended up with a brown-faced Clinton. 
That's crudely stated, and I wouldn't talk like that, but that's about exactly what I hoped for. A pragmatic centrist like Bill Clinton, and as a bonus, we get the first African American President. I didn't vote merely on that hope. It was also the case that John McCain lost me. It's always only a choice between 2 (or, rarely, 3) candidates. You can't get everything you want, and you can't know everything about what you are getting.

Frank: Is there anybody who thinks he’s progressive enough today?

West: Nobody I know. 
Ha ha. That's reminiscent of the old Pauline Kael quote — which I'll take the trouble to quote correctly: "I live in a rather special world. I only know one person who voted for Nixon. Where they are I don’t know. They’re outside my ken. But sometimes when I’m in a theater I can feel them."

Hey, Professor West! Meet me. I'm an Obama-'08 voter who thinks he's progressive enough. He's even too progressive. I voted for Mitt Romney in '12 because he seemed to be more of a pragmatic centrist like Bill Clinton, and we'd have had the bonus of the first Mormon President. I'm outside your ken, Professor West, but sometimes, when you're on the internet, you can feel me.
Frank: There’s a lot of disillusionment now. My liberal friends included. The phrase that I have heard from more than one person in the last year is they feel like they got played.

West: That’s true. That’s exactly right. What I hear is that, “He pimped us.” I heard that a zillion times. “He pimped us, brother West.” That’s another way of saying “we got played.”
Who gets played in this world? Take some responsibility.
Frank: What on earth ails the man? Why can’t he fight the Republicans?...
Frank is the author of "What's the Matter with Kansas?," so the notion is: Something is wrong with you if you're not left-wing.
West: I think Obama... doesn’t realize that a great leader, a statesperson, doesn’t just occupy middle ground. They occupy higher ground or the moral ground or even sometimes the holy ground.... He always moves to the middle ground.... You go straight to the establishment and reassure them that you’re not too radical... These guys are running things, and these are neoliberal, deregulating free marketeers...
Middle ground... not too radical... that's what I wanted. Higher ground... holy ground... that's what scares me. That's where the demagogues want to take us. Government is not religion, and it shouldn't feel like religion.
West: I think part of it is just temperament. That his success has been predicated on finding that middle ground. “We’re not black. We’re not white. We’re not rich. We’re not poor. There’s no classes in America. We are all Americans. We’re the American family.” He invoked the American family last week. 
Yes, and that temperament was what got him elected. Go back and read, for example, Mara Liasson at NPR, writing in September 2008, "Even-Keeled Obama Built Image On Bridging Divides." ("He has reacted with characteristic cool and caution to the Wall Street financial crisis, holding back at times while his rival charged ahead. His campaign mantra is 'No Drama Obama.'")

West continues:
West: It’s a lie, brother. 
If it's a lie, it's the lie that got him elected. If it's a lie, he was posingposing as a centrist. But West wants to say he was posing as a progressive. When? Where? For which voters? Not the centrist voters like me who made his election possible.
West: You’ve got to be able to tell the truth... We’re not a family. We’re a people... And a nation always has divisions... and your foreign policy is running amok with Israelis committing war crimes against precious Palestinians and you won’t say a mumbling word about the Palestinian children. What is history going to say about you? Counterfeit! That’s what they’ll say, counterfeit. Not the real thing.
The "real thing" that West wants is a real thing that Americans would not have elected.

205 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 205 of 205
Michael said...

ARM

Freddie and Fannie did buy subprime mortgages.

Are you drunk?

Beloved Commenter AReasonableMan said...

No one has argued they didn't. Do you actually read what other people write?

Read this again and compare to what I wrote.

"Why did lenders suddenly shower less-creditworthy borrowers with trillions of dollars of credit? Mian and Sufi demonstrate this was enabled by the securitization of home mortgages by investment banks that did not seek federal guarantees from Fannie and Freddie—so called private-label securities, made possible by financial deregulation and the glut of cash in world markets in the wake of the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s. That private-label mortgage-backed securities were at the core of the housing meltdown is no longer in doubt,"

Michael said...

ARM

Some idiot posing as you typed the following

"AReasonableMan said...
One hint, Fannie and Freddie didn't buy the subprime mortgages whose default precipitated the financial collapse."

Another fool posing as you says that the preceeding does not say what it says.

I say that Freddie and Fannie did, in fact, buy subprime mortgages. You can look it up.

I have no idea what the real ARM thinks if she thinks at all.

Michael said...

By the way, ARM, The BofA settlement, just agreed was in the matter of Countrywide's selling billions in subprime loans to Fannie and Freddie

Rusty said...

Yes I do. Here's why. Banks were pressured to make loans to dubious borrowers under the threat of red lining. In order to minimize the risk they bundled loans and offered them for sale to mortgage investors.
These people aren't stupid.
they sought to minimize their risk and sought gaurantees from the government(F&F).the gov. gauranteed something like 3%. No Matter What the Value of the Loan. That's when the floodgates opened.
Banks began to offer 0% loans to people with no credit or income history, because no matter what they loaned they would make a min. of 3%.
people already up to their ears in mortgage debt borrowed for a flipper home hoping to ride the wave.
the market ran out of buyers, the 0 interest loans came due. (essentially a building loan. only good until the home is built and has been sold)
All of this for fear that the bankers would be investigated for red lining and then audited.
The pool of buyers was artificially manipulated. By who? the people in Washington.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 205 of 205   Newer› Newest»