The laughter that these fools generate from me is rewarded by the fact that one day, I will know that they will end up in the lowest pits of hell for what they've done to this country. Concerned, huh? Still using weasel words to hide how incompetent and devious you are?
The very hottest lowest pit of burning of hell is reserved for the trio. You know who you are...Meth, PMJ and Jay. Because being a despicable hypocrite is a sure way to get there, Meth. Born again "preacher" to a Priest, that's Meth, arrogant enough to tell Father Fox how he is wrong about salvation.
In some ways, Obama is a continuation of Bush's policies and expansion of some of them. He's following the incentives while constrained by the limits of the office.
But practical politics and community organizing determines his pandering to his pro-peace, extremely idealistic base, which are all manner of secular humanist, universalist, and activist.
He needs to be seen ending all wars, reaching his goals, and gradually leading us towards peace, which is impossibly ideal.
What the American people elected, and re-elected was an inexperienced man, a man of the Left, less hawkish than Hillary Clinton.
This is what happens when people closer to Inga's worldview are in charge.
The short run is propping themselves up on Wall Street, the military, the fruits of the country.
The long run is a huge Statist clusterfuck with a terrible economy, a politics of patronage, a divided and balkanized electorate, and a small, elite core of the right people keeping the show going and crushing dissent.
Only giving "the trio" a bit of their own medicine. Meth is a delicate flower now?
We aren't the ones that require said medicine, you intractable sub-human vermin. Your vapidity, immoral delusions, and rank dementia notwithstanding of course. Just make sure to wear your bright yellow coat, take your umbrella, and make sure you have a giant piece of paper taped to your back with your vitals just in case you are found wandering the halls of BevMo looking for your favorite box of vino. Derp.
The very hottest lowest pit of burning of hell is reserved for the trio. You know who you are...Meth, PMJ and Jay. Because being a despicable hypocrite is a sure way to get there, Meth. Born again "preacher" to a Priest, that's Meth, arrogant enough to tell Father Fox how he is wrong about salvation.
I never said I was a born again preacher. I have many friends in the faith that are clergy. Many of them disagree with the pope and father fox as I do. I said as much. But oh no, that isn't good enough for you since you seem to think that it bears the brunt of arrogance to call someone wrong when they are. Oh dear what shall we do? Inga has pontificated her dismay and abject aggrievement again for all of us to see. Hey bitch, do you gnash your teeth and wail whenever you read one of my posts? I suppose you must hit up your stores of hooch to calm your vapors and hackles down.
Isn't there a marxist or nazi rally you are missing out on somewhere?
Part of what is worrisome to me is that Holder is seemingly doing the same thing as Obama - plausible deniability based on nonfeasance and lack of oversight. He has ostensibly been in the loop for both Fast and Furious and the AP & Rosen phone record scandals, but in all these cases said that though he ostensibly got the memos and emails, that he ostensibly reviewed the stuff, he really didn't, because he is too busy to deal with the day-to-day operation of his department. A President GW Bush or Romney (both Harvard Business grads) would point out that he is responsible for his people, and, esp. the people he has hired to screen this stuff from him. If some things like these get through, and he doesn't see them, but they do harm him or his boss, the underlings (and esp. direct reports that he does control) should be fired and replaced by people who won't miss such.
Things got out of hand because he wasn't doing his job, and part of his job is having direct reports who are smart enough to identify these sorts of things and bring them to his attention, and to fire them if they don't. He didn't, and they weren't.
LOL! I'm glad to see Meth hasn't lost his oomph, I was worried there for a few minutes. He is still the lovable mouth foaming, drooling extremist in your midst.
Inga, These are terrible times for you and your ilk. It's showing, and most are enjoying it. I actually have some pity for you as you shoot from the hip like Annie Oakley. Stick to diet pontifications, you @ least know a little about that.
These ass-hat wearing clowns have never been in whack.
So's I searched the 'tubes and found this:
“Whack” as a verb first appeared in the early 18th century meaning “to beat or strike sharply and vigorously,” and was probably formed in imitation of the sound such a blow would make. As a noun, “whack” started out meaning just such a blow, but soon developed a range of secondary meanings. One of the odder uses was “whack” meaning “a portion, one’s share,” originally slang in the criminal underworld meaning “a share of the proceeds of a crime.” Just how this sense developed is uncertain, but it may have been coined as a play on the “splitting” of the loot. This “fair share” sense then went on to mean “an agreement” (“‘I’ll stay if you will.’ ‘Good — that’s a whack’,” Mark Twain, Tom Sawyer), and, in the 19th century, “in fine whack” and similar phrases appeared meaning “in good order” or, of a person, “in good shape.”
By 1885, the opposite sense had predictably appeared, and a person (or body part) in bad shape was described as “out of whack” (“His liver is out of whack and no mistake,” 1918). Almost immediately the phrase was also applied to mechanical devices (“Being able to get at any part of the mechanism which may be ‘out of whack’ is important,” 1906), which is the most common sense in use today.
I am curious as to Inga's opinion on Obama and Hillary. Do you still support them? Or are you possibly a decent person? There is no longer room to be both.
Awww, Leslyn, are you all butt hurt that I put the boozed up old crone in her place?
Because saying that I will burn in the hottest part of hell is so constructive and on topic from that nasty old cunt Inga.
It's a little out of whack that you get so upset when I point out that alcoholic bitches on disability on the wrong side of 60 will not live as long as healthy young 30 year olds.
Can't handle the truth, can you cunt?
Fuck yourself. How's that for an editorial statement?
You call for my comment to be deleted, but not that comment from Inga that it was responding to.
Hypocrite.
And how the ruddy hell was I supposed to know what comment you were responding to? For all the context you provided (i.e., none), you might have been talking about anyone. Our blogress, for one.
OK, "You will be there first" ought to have tipped me off, but in future, it might be better to name actual names, rather than referring to an unidentified someone earlier in a thread as a "decrepit old cunt."
Bwahahahahahaha! Good grief. PMJ I love when you do your stuff, it is great showing your fellow conservatives here what you are made of, you and your brethren.
He said he was ‘not comfortable’ approving a search warrant affidavit for Rosen’s emails that characterized him as a criminal conspirator and would change the process.
Holder "wasn't comfortable" but he did it anyway? And he thinks we need to change the rules so he won't break them next time? He's such a Good German.
Support the Althouse blog by doing your Amazon shopping going in through the Althouse Amazon link.
Amazon
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Support this blog with PayPal
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
36 comments:
The laughter that these fools generate from me is rewarded by the fact that one day, I will know that they will end up in the lowest pits of hell for what they've done to this country. Concerned, huh? Still using weasel words to hide how incompetent and devious you are?
For the annals of great quotes from the Obama administration.
I do not think this word "great" means what you think it means.
I do not think this word "great" means what you think it means.
"Annals" is a pun.
Mistakes may have been made.
Sounds like something from a Hitler video.
(Holder video?)
Aren't these actions considered "unprecedented," and yet he's blaming regulations and "guidelines"?
The very hottest lowest pit of burning of hell is reserved for the trio. You know who you are...Meth, PMJ and Jay. Because being a despicable hypocrite is a sure way to get there, Meth. Born again "preacher" to a Priest, that's Meth, arrogant enough to tell Father Fox how he is wrong about salvation.
Inga said...
The very hottest lowest pit of burning of hell is reserved for the trio.
No, there's only room for you, right beside Der Fuhrer and Choom, when he gets there.
Wow, Inga. Right out of the box today with personal attacks? Is it that week already or are you already over Crone Hill?
In some ways, Obama is a continuation of Bush's policies and expansion of some of them. He's following the incentives while constrained by the limits of the office.
But practical politics and community organizing determines his pandering to his pro-peace, extremely idealistic base, which are all manner of secular humanist, universalist, and activist.
He needs to be seen ending all wars, reaching his goals, and gradually leading us towards peace, which is impossibly ideal.
What the American people elected, and re-elected was an inexperienced man, a man of the Left, less hawkish than Hillary Clinton.
This is what happens when people closer to Inga's worldview are in charge.
The short run is propping themselves up on Wall Street, the military, the fruits of the country.
The long run is a huge Statist clusterfuck with a terrible economy, a politics of patronage, a divided and balkanized electorate, and a small, elite core of the right people keeping the show going and crushing dissent.
Only giving "the trio" a bit of their own medicine. Meth is a delicate flower now?
Inga said...
Only giving "the trio" a bit of their own medicine. Meth is a delicate flower now?
We aren't the ones that require said medicine, you intractable sub-human vermin. Your vapidity, immoral delusions, and rank dementia notwithstanding of course. Just make sure to wear your bright yellow coat, take your umbrella, and make sure you have a giant piece of paper taped to your back with your vitals just in case you are found wandering the halls of BevMo looking for your favorite box of vino. Derp.
Eric Holder sittin' on the railroad track
Somethin' out of whack.
Inga said...
The very hottest lowest pit of burning of hell is reserved for the trio. You know who you are...Meth, PMJ and Jay. Because being a despicable hypocrite is a sure way to get there, Meth. Born again "preacher" to a Priest, that's Meth, arrogant enough to tell Father Fox how he is wrong about salvation.
I never said I was a born again preacher. I have many friends in the faith that are clergy. Many of them disagree with the pope and father fox as I do. I said as much. But oh no, that isn't good enough for you since you seem to think that it bears the brunt of arrogance to call someone wrong when they are. Oh dear what shall we do? Inga has pontificated her dismay and abject aggrievement again for all of us to see. Hey bitch, do you gnash your teeth and wail whenever you read one of my posts? I suppose you must hit up your stores of hooch to calm your vapors and hackles down.
Isn't there a marxist or nazi rally you are missing out on somewhere?
Part of what is worrisome to me is that Holder is seemingly doing the same thing as Obama - plausible deniability based on nonfeasance and lack of oversight. He has ostensibly been in the loop for both Fast and Furious and the AP & Rosen phone record scandals, but in all these cases said that though he ostensibly got the memos and emails, that he ostensibly reviewed the stuff, he really didn't, because he is too busy to deal with the day-to-day operation of his department. A President GW Bush or Romney (both Harvard Business grads) would point out that he is responsible for his people, and, esp. the people he has hired to screen this stuff from him. If some things like these get through, and he doesn't see them, but they do harm him or his boss, the underlings (and esp. direct reports that he does control) should be fired and replaced by people who won't miss such.
Things got out of hand because he wasn't doing his job, and part of his job is having direct reports who are smart enough to identify these sorts of things and bring them to his attention, and to fire them if they don't. He didn't, and they weren't.
LOL! I'm glad to see Meth hasn't lost his oomph, I was worried there for a few minutes. He is still the lovable mouth foaming, drooling extremist in your midst.
:)
Inga, These are terrible times for you and your ilk. It's showing, and most are enjoying it. I actually have some pity for you as you shoot from the hip like Annie Oakley. Stick to diet pontifications, you @ least know a little about that.
These ass-hat wearing clowns have never been in whack.
So's I searched the 'tubes and found this:
“Whack” as a verb first appeared in the early 18th century meaning “to beat or strike sharply and vigorously,” and was probably formed in imitation of the sound such a blow would make. As a noun, “whack” started out meaning just such a blow, but soon developed a range of secondary meanings. One of the odder uses was “whack” meaning “a portion, one’s share,” originally slang in the criminal underworld meaning “a share of the proceeds of a crime.” Just how this sense developed is uncertain, but it may have been coined as a play on the “splitting” of the loot. This “fair share” sense then went on to mean “an agreement” (“‘I’ll stay if you will.’ ‘Good — that’s a whack’,” Mark Twain, Tom Sawyer), and, in the 19th century, “in fine whack” and similar phrases appeared meaning “in good order” or, of a person, “in good shape.”
By 1885, the opposite sense had predictably appeared, and a person (or body part) in bad shape was described as “out of whack” (“His liver is out of whack and no mistake,” 1918). Almost immediately the phrase was also applied to mechanical devices (“Being able to get at any part of the mechanism which may be ‘out of whack’ is important,” 1906), which is the most common sense in use today.
You will be there first, you decrepit old cunt.
Tick tock, tick tock.
I will be alive and kicking long after your fat disgusting body is worm food.
One of the few advantages of being in the generation fucked by yours is that I get to laugh when you are dead.
Tick tock you old bitch.
I am curious as to Inga's opinion on Obama and Hillary. Do you still support them? Or are you possibly a decent person? There is no longer room to be both.
"I really messed up this time" - Jeffrey Dahmer
Things only seem out of whack because you were caught.
Bush is better than annal.
Seconding leslyn. Ann, please delete that.
Awww, Leslyn, are you all butt hurt that I put the boozed up old crone in her place?
Because saying that I will burn in the hottest part of hell is so constructive and on topic from that nasty old cunt Inga.
It's a little out of whack that you get so upset when I point out that alcoholic bitches on disability on the wrong side of 60 will not live as long as healthy young 30 year olds.
Can't handle the truth, can you cunt?
Fuck yourself. How's that for an editorial statement?
And Michael Dulak Thompson, why so math-phobic?
Bigot.
You call for my comment to be deleted, but not that comment from Inga that it was responding to.
Hypocrite.
President-Mom-Jeans,
And Michael Dulak Thompson, why so math-phobic?
Bigot.
You call for my comment to be deleted, but not that comment from Inga that it was responding to.
Hypocrite.
And how the ruddy hell was I supposed to know what comment you were responding to? For all the context you provided (i.e., none), you might have been talking about anyone. Our blogress, for one.
OK, "You will be there first" ought to have tipped me off, but in future, it might be better to name actual names, rather than referring to an unidentified someone earlier in a thread as a "decrepit old cunt."
Inga said...
The very hottest lowest pit of burning of hell is reserved for the trio. You know who you are...Meth, PMJ and Jay.
11:27 AM
It's a short thread Michael.
She says I'm going to the lowest pit of burning hell. I just pointed out that she will be beating me to it.
And for future reference, Inga is the only decrepit old cunt that I know of on this site.
And my apologies for writing Michael instead of Michelle, unintentional.
Bwahahahahahaha! Good grief. PMJ I love when you do your stuff, it is great showing your fellow conservatives here what you are made of, you and your brethren.
He said he was ‘not comfortable’ approving a search warrant affidavit for Rosen’s emails that characterized him as a criminal conspirator and would change the process.
Holder "wasn't comfortable" but he did it anyway? And he thinks we need to change the rules so he won't break them next time? He's such a Good German.
Drink up old sow, Obamacare won't have you very high up on that liver transplant list.
Just try not to leech too much money from the productive members of society before you are composted.
President-Mom-Jeans,
And my apologies for writing Michael instead of Michelle, unintentional.
Now apologize for putting a "p" in "Thomson," and we're all good :-)
What hypocrisy, oh well to be expected.
Yet another embarrassment of the "cool" administration.
Post a Comment