This is totally false. I just spoke to one MSNBC assistant and a WH staffer. The word is that Nate Silver has told us at the WH that we are safe. That is, he is going to manipulate the polls so that GOP is up-beat but in reality we are pulling the Sting operation (as Redford in the movie with Newman).
You all are so un-informed that you cannot see what is in front of you. The election is OVER.
The press has decided on the election. The voters will do what they are told.
Ah, but *whose* breast did he pull? A breast of the President? Did he give Obama a titty-twister? (Did I miss the WWF "debate" this weekend?) Or is the Wall Street Journal ascribing ownership of the First Lady's breasts to the President? (Insert outraged 13th amendment remark and finish with "Raaaaacist!")
- Obama wins, as expected as it is our destiny to not allow a minority to be defeated in his re-election. - Senate GOP lose 4 more seats. Reid is the new King. - House GOP lose 25+ seats. Pelosi is BACK.
The new Sec. of State is JFK. The new Sec. of Tres. is Mayor Bloomberg The new UN Ambassador is Bill Clinton. The next SCOTUS nominee is Hillary Clinton.
Watch for a hysterical leftist reaction as more polls begin showing Romney ahead in the next two weeks. Already, on twitter, there are threats of blacks blowing up the White House or riots if Obama loses...
I honestly feel most people (and I mean most) really are depressed with Obama's performance and the only reason they hesitate voting for Mitt is his 'Mormonism'.
Now I'm Catholic, and I do didn't care for him in the primaries, but after seeing him, his family, and more of what they are like I am quite comfortable with him and most certainly will vote for him.
And that is why you see the huge shift in voter polls. Many people now are more comfortable voting for him and the polls show it.
He will win. I hope by a landside there will be no question of who is president (unlike Al Gore and his fiasco law suit years ago.)
As the days dwindle down, pollsters have to establish their cred. On November 7 the marketers and political parties that hire these guys will something akin to "show me the money." I think you have the polls that, as nearly as I can oversample certain groups, start to realize they are about to lose big time on the 7th (not among the voters as the polls will be forgotten--but among their consitutents that hire them.)
The Code Pink womyn who dressed up as giant twats at the convention this summer made a terrible tactical mistake. They should have worn giant boob costumes instead.
Admittedly, dressing as either a boob or a twat would have been an accurate depiction of the wearer.
However, dressing up as twats gave Romney/Ryan openings they took advantage of.
Stop by the Oval to-night at 6 PM near the WH. Meet me and every-one in the COmmittee to Re-Elect (CORE) dedicated to the re-election of the greatest and the best POTUS in our world history.
Watch out pollsters, Justice's law suits are coming to make you "honest".
It's strange that the religious people who are supposed to value the separation of church and state care so much about Romney's Mormonism. He is faithful to his wife, never kill the unborn or let them die in the trash after they survived botched abortions, never take "stimulating" handouts from the govt., give to charity his wealth and time. He is a quintessential story book hard working, caring, self sufficient American. What the heck are those people saying that they can't vote for him because he's a Mormon?
That's nice news, but what matters is the Swing States. While national polls are more accurate than swing state polls, and can pull the swings states with them as trends go.... Obama still has a lead in some states Romney has to win. And the black "Bosses" and union activists have pushed their people and "women moved by their ladyparts" to vote early, (before they can change their minds). And in Ohio for example, Obama leads early voting 2 to 1.
Oddsmakers still favor Obama to win. 60-40 odds or 65-35 odds. But aren't taking anymore 65-35 odds since last week while still posting them. And a couple of London bookies have stopped taking legal bets - worried about their exposure. (Though many are playing Romney and counting on liberal Euros to bet hard on the Black Messiah)
BTW C4--I know this is off topic for which I may be chastised, but I would genuinely appreciate your views on US policy with respect to Syria--that topic seems to be flying under the radar. It looks like to me, by our inaction and vascillating, we may have allowed the Russians to gain a foothold in places not amendable to our national interest--Your thoughts, sir?
Roger J - The Russians have had that base for decades - late 60s or early 70s. The Russians need it. When the Soviet Union went down hard, we wondered if they would keep it. But the thinking was they had to have a southern Base outside the Black Sea and need for the Turks to bless their passage through the STraights of Bosphorus....critical trade routes when the Northern Ports are iced up need to be protected. That is, (Africa, ME, Asia) with huge trade each way.
As was, the new Russians abandoned all Naval Bases outside the former USSR BUT the vital Syrian one. If they lost the Syrian Base, they would be on the line tomorrow to Egypt, Libya, Malta waving food, oil, money or whatever - to get a replacement Mediterranean base for refuel and replenishment of Russian, Ukraine, etc. commercial and naval vessels.
The US is mostly fine with that. Yes, it can allow the Russians to project power, make some mischief, but also forces them to be another infidel in the region now trying to keep a lid on things.
C4--thank you, and you are correct that from Czarist times forward the russians need some warm water ports. My concern is that we are not drawing much of a line in the sand with the russians--syria is the tip of the iceberg as you point out. If the russians want to make nice with the middle eastern powers we need to have some strategy to mitigate it. Perhaps thats what Obama mean when he told Medevev to tell Vladimar he, Obama, would have more flexibility after the election.
We already know Massachusetts voters can't sustain enough self-control to keep a conservative in office even if they manage to shake off their socialisism once in a great while and elect a Republican to save their sorry hides. Massachusetts deserves EW if they're dumb enough to vote her in.
Interesting. I'm not voting for either because my reservations about both are too strong and I think when people are bullied out of voting third party it encourages mediocrity and a bad poll read, but it's still a subconscious relief from dealing with the Obama hypnosis last election.
Every darn time I scroll past this I read... Romney pulled a breast of the president... and I think what a riot that headline would be if the president was a woman.
- Obama wins, as expected as it is our destiny to not allow a minority to be defeated in his re-election. - Senate GOP lose 4 more seats. Reid is the new King. - House GOP lose 25+ seats. Pelosi is BACK.
U.S. Economy collapses under 20 trillion dollar debt and Obamacare mandates. Iran goes nuke (as well as Egypt) and nukes Israel Libya becomes a al qaeda quasi-state North Korea nukes South Korea World War III starts
-Romney wins -Republicans take Senate -Republicans increase control of the House Iran pleads for mercy North Korea goes belly up We balance the budget and get rid of Obamacare Western Europe slowly recovers from their recession.
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Encourage Althouse by making a donation:
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
38 comments:
Just like a Mormon to pull a breast to a knife fight.
That's what happens when you have binders full of women.
Oh, snap!
It wouldn't surprise me to learn that you can see the blue veins in Romney's abreasts.
Sagging indicator.
Preference cascade underway.
Numbers perking up for Romney.
Let's have a look at those abreasts.
Oh, what a bunch of unserious tea baggers you all are! ;)
This is totally false. I just spoke to one MSNBC assistant and a WH staffer. The word is that Nate Silver has told us at the WH that we are safe. That is, he is going to manipulate the polls so that GOP is up-beat but in reality we are pulling the Sting operation (as Redford in the movie with Newman).
You all are so un-informed that you cannot see what is in front of you. The election is OVER.
The press has decided on the election. The voters will do what they are told.
Why you refuse to accept this is beyond logic?
Ah, but *whose* breast did he pull? A breast of the President? Did he give Obama a titty-twister? (Did I miss the WWF "debate" this weekend?) Or is the Wall Street Journal ascribing ownership of the First Lady's breasts to the President? (Insert outraged 13th amendment remark and finish with "Raaaaacist!")
Looks like the Demos' boob job sprung a leak.
And, remember, this is also the MSLSD poll.
Romney wins
Republicans take Senate
Republicans increase control of the House
Aiken wins
Predictions (as I already voted yesterday).
- Obama wins, as expected as it is our destiny to not allow a minority to be defeated in his re-election.
- Senate GOP lose 4 more seats. Reid is the new King.
- House GOP lose 25+ seats. Pelosi is BACK.
The new Sec. of State is JFK.
The new Sec. of Tres. is Mayor Bloomberg
The new UN Ambassador is Bill Clinton.
The next SCOTUS nominee is Hillary Clinton.
Watch for a hysterical leftist reaction as more polls begin showing Romney ahead in the next two weeks. Already, on twitter, there are threats of blacks blowing up the White House or riots if Obama loses...
http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/154804/
I honestly feel most people (and I mean most) really are depressed with Obama's performance and the only reason they hesitate voting for Mitt is his 'Mormonism'.
Now I'm Catholic, and I do didn't care for him in the primaries, but after seeing him, his family, and more of what they are like I am quite comfortable with him and most certainly will vote for him.
And that is why you see the huge shift in voter polls. Many people now are more comfortable voting for him and the polls show it.
He will win. I hope by a landside there will be no question of who is president (unlike Al Gore and his fiasco law suit years ago.)
As the days dwindle down, pollsters have to establish their cred. On November 7 the marketers and political parties that hire these guys will something akin to "show me the money." I think you have the polls that, as nearly as I can oversample certain groups, start to realize they are about to lose big time on the 7th (not among the voters as the polls will be forgotten--but among their consitutents that hire them.)
The Code Pink womyn who dressed up as giant twats at the convention this summer made a terrible tactical mistake. They should have worn giant boob costumes instead.
Admittedly, dressing as either a boob or a twat would have been an accurate depiction of the wearer.
However, dressing up as twats gave Romney/Ryan openings they took advantage of.
Romney pulled a breast! Scandal! Cue Gloria Aldred!
"However, dressing up as twats gave Romney/Ryan openings they took advantage of." lol--no double entrendre there :) Well played, exile....
Sandra Fluke better get busy while she can.
She's gonna run out of free birth control soon.
Then she'll have to pay for her own sex, or go without.
Stop by the Oval to-night at 6 PM near the WH. Meet me and every-one in the COmmittee to Re-Elect (CORE) dedicated to the re-election of the greatest and the best POTUS in our world history.
Sandra Fluke better get busy while she can.
Consider it done!!
Fluke takes center stage in Reno (Sandra Fluke, the woman at the center of a media firestorm earlier this year after Rush Limbaugh called her a “slut,” spoke Saturday in front of about 10 people at the Sak ‘N Save in north Reno.)
Watch out pollsters, Justice's law suits are coming to make you "honest".
It's strange that the religious people who are supposed to value the separation of church and state care so much about Romney's Mormonism. He is faithful to his wife, never kill the unborn or let them die in the trash after they survived botched abortions, never take "stimulating" handouts from the govt., give to charity his wealth and time. He is a quintessential story book hard working, caring, self sufficient American. What the heck are those people saying that they can't vote for him because he's a Mormon?
That's nice news, but what matters is the Swing States.
While national polls are more accurate than swing state polls, and can pull the swings states with them as trends go....
Obama still has a lead in some states Romney has to win.
And the black "Bosses" and union activists have pushed their people and "women moved by their ladyparts" to vote early, (before they can change their minds).
And in Ohio for example, Obama leads early voting 2 to 1.
Oddsmakers still favor Obama to win. 60-40 odds or 65-35 odds. But aren't taking anymore 65-35 odds since last week while still posting them. And a couple of London bookies have stopped taking legal bets - worried about their exposure. (Though many are playing Romney and counting on liberal Euros to bet hard on the Black Messiah)
Wow, you guys are easily distracted by breasts!
Althouse: duhhh; did I every tell you about the worst breasts I ever saw? They were WONDERFUL
Dunno, Roger...
I've seen some pretty ugly boobs in my life, and not just on the pages of National Geographic.
C4--I am starting to worry about you. :)
BTW C4--I know this is off topic for which I may be chastised, but I would genuinely appreciate your views on US policy with respect to Syria--that topic seems to be flying under the radar. It looks like to me, by our inaction and vascillating, we may have allowed the Russians to gain a foothold in places not amendable to our national interest--Your thoughts, sir?
Roger J - The Russians have had that base for decades - late 60s or early 70s.
The Russians need it. When the Soviet Union went down hard, we wondered if they would keep it. But the thinking was they had to have a southern Base outside the Black Sea and need for the Turks to bless their passage through the STraights of Bosphorus....critical trade routes when the Northern Ports are iced up need to be protected. That is, (Africa, ME, Asia) with huge trade each way.
As was, the new Russians abandoned all Naval Bases outside the former USSR BUT the vital Syrian one.
If they lost the Syrian Base, they would be on the line tomorrow to Egypt, Libya, Malta waving food, oil, money or whatever - to get a replacement Mediterranean base for refuel and replenishment of Russian, Ukraine, etc. commercial and naval vessels.
The US is mostly fine with that. Yes, it can allow the Russians to project power, make some mischief, but also forces them to be another infidel in the region now trying to keep a lid on things.
But you will lose Sen Scott Brown in Massachusetts. Yes, Warren will win. Really sad.
C4--thank you, and you are correct that from Czarist times forward the russians need some warm water ports. My concern is that we are not drawing much of a line in the sand with the russians--syria is the tip of the iceberg as you point out. If the russians want to make nice with the middle eastern powers we need to have some strategy to mitigate it. Perhaps thats what Obama mean when he told Medevev to tell Vladimar he, Obama, would have more flexibility after the election.
CASCADE....10...9...8...7...6...5...4...
We already know Massachusetts voters can't sustain enough self-control to keep a conservative in office even if they manage to shake off their socialisism once in a great while and elect a Republican to save their sorry hides. Massachusetts deserves EW if they're dumb enough to vote her in.
Interesting. I'm not voting for either because my reservations about both are too strong and I think when people are bullied out of voting third party it encourages mediocrity and a bad poll read, but it's still a subconscious relief from dealing with the Obama hypnosis last election.
wyo sis, the state GOP keeps putting up there 'moderate' republicans. We actually have a few good pro-life Democratics hidden in that group.
Every darn time I scroll past this I read... Romney pulled a breast of the president... and I think what a riot that headline would be if the president was a woman.
Ha!
Looks like everyone else read it that way too. I'm so ashamed of you all! LOL.
- Obama wins, as expected as it is our destiny to not allow a minority to be defeated in his re-election.
- Senate GOP lose 4 more seats. Reid is the new King.
- House GOP lose 25+ seats. Pelosi is BACK.
U.S. Economy collapses under 20 trillion dollar debt and Obamacare mandates.
Iran goes nuke (as well as Egypt) and nukes Israel
Libya becomes a al qaeda quasi-state
North Korea nukes South Korea
World War III starts
-Romney wins
-Republicans take Senate
-Republicans increase control of the House
Iran pleads for mercy
North Korea goes belly up
We balance the budget and get rid of Obamacare
Western Europe slowly recovers from their recession.
It' one or the other folks.
Ann Althouse said...
Wow, you guys are easily distracted by breasts!
Yes. Yes we are.
Post a Comment