Althouse: "7 Unintentionally Sexual Optical Illusions."

July 15, 2012

"7 Unintentionally Sexual Optical Illusions."

Hilarious.

12 comments:

edutcher said...: I dunno, 1 and 2 don't look unintentional to me.; 7/15/12, 6:47 PM
Ann Althouse said...: "I dunno, 1 and 2 don't look unintentional to me."

Well, that's what's so great about them. Look closer.; 7/15/12, 7:02 PM
edutcher said...: I did.

Of course, even with glasses, I'm still half blind.; 7/15/12, 7:08 PM
Michael K said...: That is pretty lame. A couple were OK but others were a stretch. Is that unintentionally sexual ?; 7/15/12, 7:20 PM
Ann Althouse said...: The first 2 are classic.

It's all about the arms.; 7/15/12, 7:24 PM
Shawn Levasseur said...: Arms.. and arm pits especially.

Some of the others aren't so much optical illusions as they are humorous juxtapositions where there's no doubt what you are looking at. (The baby bonnet, the Lucy shirt); 7/15/12, 7:42 PM
Wince said...: No. 6 is one of those illusions that's difficult to bring your brain back to after the illusion has been revealed.; 7/15/12, 8:19 PM
bearing said...: The baby hat isn't unintentional -- nor is it sexual, exactly. The knitting pattern of the baby hat that looks like a breast has been going around breastfeeding circles for quite some time...; 7/15/12, 8:38 PM
MadisonMan said...: Look closer.

Yes, let's.

(Kinda obvious, but why not); 7/15/12, 9:03 PM
Craig said...: Well hung is, well, armed.; 7/16/12, 9:07 AM
Craig said...: Four armed is forearmed?; 7/16/12, 9:11 AM
Jose_K said...: Nsfw:
Fistering illusion:
http://bowlphilosophy.wordpress.com/2010/11/16/carlos-tevez-searches-rio-ferdinand/; 7/16/12, 9:41 AM