The article is written by Robert Fisk, a quasi-Truther who has written so much nonsense about the Middle East that his last name became a verb meaning "to pick apart an article line by line".
So while the article is interesting, I'm reluctant to take it too seriously.
Now that's what I call a Theocracy, Nuclear missiles in silos and all. It's a good thing that Iran has no Gay men demanding permission to marry four other men. That could distract them from wiping Israel off the map.
Don't worry about iran having nukes. They don't have nukes. Not after STUXNET entered.
There are only 50 people working at the Mossad. It's not the Mossad.
But maybe it's because nobody respects obama? The whole place is falling apart. We need more binoculars for all our ships at sea. So they can report properly. What a bunch of be-ribboned schmucks are in charge.
The interview with Fisk on the BBC today was interesting. Ahmadinejad's hedge is pork barrel spending, always a winner when you're recipient no matter how you rail against it in the abstract.
Many years ago, I met a wonderful man on the internet who knew that I enjoyed and had learned so much as a child from the fairy tales that I grew up with in America....Aesop's Fables and the Brothers Grimm.
One day, in wanting to please me, I think, he began telling me stories he had grown up with. They were Persian tales of war and valor, and difficult decisions and terrible outcomes for fathers and sons and mothers and wives, but always with some underlying message that had to do with courage today, and loss today, but always for a greater good.
Fathers killed sons, and sons killed brothers. Always for a righteous cause.
At the time, I distinctly remember that the Persian tales reminded me more of our American Civil War than they did of any recollection from Aesop or Grimm's animal allegories.
I had never cried about a single story from our civil war history, yet I shed tears every time he shared another Persian "fable".
Sorry for that aside, and back to the potential fall of Ahmadinejad.
While the man is no friend to the US or any of our close allies, I am going to suggest that he is showing unusual courage within his own country by stepping forward to begin the separation of what we would call "church and state".
The Iranian Hostage Crisis was my baby, so any trouble that befalls Amabeenanutjob is fine by me. Anyone should've been able to take one look at the kook and know he wasn't born to lead. That he survived this long is madness.
Oh, heck, Fisk. I thought there had been an actual event. We've been speculating for the better part of a month that Ahmadinejad (or "Short Round" as he's known in jackleg neocon circles) was in deep, deep trouble. There was speculation that he was about to produce a "Mahdi" in early June as a desperation-move against Khamenei, but it never seemed to come of anything.
And Penny, Ahmadinejad has zero interest in separation of mosque and state, he just happens to be a theocrat who isn't actually a religious figure in a political knife-fight with his religious head of state. The main conflict is partially a falling-out between cliques, and partially that Ahmadinejad's religious beliefs are less high-church than Khamenei's, and can be credibly described as sort of heretical. I don't understand why, but Shiism seems to be particularly prone towards spinning off weird post-Muslim sects like the Alawi, Ba'hai, and the Druze.
Support the Althouse blog by doing your Amazon shopping going in through the Althouse Amazon link.
Amazon
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Support this blog with PayPal
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
26 comments:
Oh, they'll kill him.
Can't let someone with his knowledge leave the tent.
They'll blame Mossad, of course.
Eh, they usednto routinely cut the noses off of ousted leaders. I don't think they'll be doing that this time.
This could get interesting. Iran is not a very stable country at present.
The article is written by Robert Fisk, a quasi-Truther who has written so much nonsense about the Middle East that his last name became a verb meaning "to pick apart an article line by line".
So while the article is interesting, I'm reluctant to take it too seriously.
I would Fisk the article, but it actually seems quite sound.
So, is "W" at fault for our losing Iran? Couldn't have been the fault of our smartest president ever!
Drat you Rev--got in there before me.
Dare we hope...
.. and, like Chavez, it couldn't happen to a nicer guy
Couldn't happen to a nicer guy. With Dinner-jacket it's a personal thing, the Embassy and all...
LOL
This is Urkel's fault.
Now that's what I call a Theocracy, Nuclear missiles in silos and all. It's a good thing that Iran has no Gay men demanding permission to marry four other men. That could distract them from wiping Israel off the map.
Maybe Prince can go over and intervene
You mean ahma-dama-ding-dong is getting tossed? Persia's been a family owned business since Kakamamie left france and got in.
God just works in strange ways. Protecting Israel.
While Assad and Q-Daffy are holding on.
What an amazing place. Tourism's down, though. And, the greeks aren't gonna survive on the EURO once the german's pull out.
We're going from "interesting" to "very interesting." Almost like watching rope-a-dope.
Don't worry about iran having nukes. They don't have nukes. Not after STUXNET entered.
There are only 50 people working at the Mossad. It's not the Mossad.
But maybe it's because nobody respects obama? The whole place is falling apart. We need more binoculars for all our ships at sea. So they can report properly. What a bunch of be-ribboned schmucks are in charge.
The interview with Fisk on the BBC today was interesting. Ahmadinejad's hedge is pork barrel spending, always a winner when you're recipient no matter how you rail against it in the abstract.
The awesome fruits of Obama's support of the Green Revolution.
Oh, wait ...
The Drill SGT said...
Couldn't happen to a nicer guy. With Dinner-jacket it's a personal thing, the Embassy and all...
Precisely. He was eyeballed by several of the former embassy staff, correct?
http://davidm.blogspot.com/2005/02/first-use-of-verb-to-fisk.html
"I would Fisk the article, but it actually seems quite sound." That would be in accord with 'sound and fury, signifying nothing'.
Cheers
See ya Dinnerjacket!
I have an affinity for Persian tales.
Many years ago, I met a wonderful man on the internet who knew that I enjoyed and had learned so much as a child from the fairy tales that I grew up with in America....Aesop's Fables and the Brothers Grimm.
One day, in wanting to please me, I think, he began telling me stories he had grown up with. They were Persian tales of war and valor, and difficult decisions and terrible outcomes for fathers and sons and mothers and wives, but always with some underlying message that had to do with courage today, and loss today, but always for a greater good.
Fathers killed sons, and sons killed brothers. Always for a righteous cause.
At the time, I distinctly remember that the Persian tales reminded me more of our American Civil War than they did of any recollection from Aesop or Grimm's animal allegories.
I had never cried about a single story from our civil war history, yet I shed tears every time he shared another Persian "fable".
Sorry for that aside, and back to the potential fall of Ahmadinejad.
While the man is no friend to the US or any of our close allies, I am going to suggest that he is showing unusual courage within his own country by stepping forward to begin the separation of what we would call "church and state".
Can "bad" men lead positive change?
Good news all around.
The Iranian Hostage Crisis was my baby, so any trouble that befalls Amabeenanutjob is fine by me. Anyone should've been able to take one look at the kook and know he wasn't born to lead. That he survived this long is madness.
Waiting for the end of the world,...his, at least.
Fisk conveniently omits any mention of Ahmadinejad's rabid anti-Semitism and Holocaust denial, but ...that's Fisk.
A pox on all their houses...
Oh, heck, Fisk. I thought there had been an actual event. We've been speculating for the better part of a month that Ahmadinejad (or "Short Round" as he's known in jackleg neocon circles) was in deep, deep trouble. There was speculation that he was about to produce a "Mahdi" in early June as a desperation-move against Khamenei, but it never seemed to come of anything.
And Penny, Ahmadinejad has zero interest in separation of mosque and state, he just happens to be a theocrat who isn't actually a religious figure in a political knife-fight with his religious head of state. The main conflict is partially a falling-out between cliques, and partially that Ahmadinejad's religious beliefs are less high-church than Khamenei's, and can be credibly described as sort of heretical. I don't understand why, but Shiism seems to be particularly prone towards spinning off weird post-Muslim sects like the Alawi, Ba'hai, and the Druze.
If you are too crazy for the mullahs, you are just really crazy.
Post a Comment