I always enjoyed listening what he had to say. Still, as did Leo, I noticed the obituary didn't have much to say about his reportage of Democrats.
And how cute was it that Broder noted his college newspaper was torn by the two factions - Liberals and Communists? Have conservatives ever been welcome in the media?
I'd place him the Walter Cronkite bin of "Journalism". Someone from a time when there were so few channels of information that they took on the oracular function, not because their information or insight was so great, but because there was only channel 4, 6, 12 and that goofy UHF channel to choose from. Thank God that has been swept. Hasta la vista.
My condolences to his friends and family, but ....
The company man from the company paper in the company town. The dull, bland face of government in control of everything. The Florsheim loafer stamping in your face...forever.
RIP, a democrat mouthpiece has been silenced. Everybody has nice things to say about you when you pass but I've watched him for decades and won't miss him.
I had read a glowing review of Broder's work years ago. I watched him on tv for years, waiting for him to be interesting or memorable. He never was. Oh well.
Gergen is another story. He was at least interesting at times, even though he is very fickle. Spending too much time in DC will ruin a person, apparently.
Sorry Broder died but he should have retired a long, long, long time ago. He not only was dull, but beneath the "Can't we all get along" exterior beat a rather dishonest reporter.
During the Amnesty debate, Pete Wilson gave a talk about Prop 187 and amnesty. Broder questioned (aka debated) Wilson about it, and constantly tried to state various lies as facts.
He was one of those "Responsible" "Fair" old-timey MSM Reporters who tried to be "objective" but who'd twist the truth when some REAL IMPORTANT liberal position was at stake.
And he was really, really boring. But sorry he's dead.
Gergen is another story. He was at least interesting at times, even though he is very fickle.
You need to define "interesting". Gergen always struck me as a phony underneath the moderate, serious exterior. I'm mean how can anyone seriously flak for both Reagan AND Clinton? Usually when old 'Melon Head' appears, I change the channel.
I used to read Broder regularly, but in recent years he dropped even the skimpiest effort to appear objective, culminating in a pitifully low point when he dedicated a column to effusive praise of Janet Napolitano shortly after she announced that "the system worked" when the "Underwear Bomber" was stopped by fellow passengers on his flight.
Broder should have quit a long time ago, before he became a pitiable parody of a journalist.
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Encourage Althouse by making a donation:
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
26 comments:
Not mentioned: Broder called for Clinton to resign the presidency during the Monicagate scandal.
If you've lost David Broder, you've lost the dean of the Washington press corps.
Click on my David Broder tag to see the last time I wrote about him. I was as cruel as I could be.
I saw him speak at the law school a while back. I have a decent caricature I drew of him that time. I found him really bland.
*clicks on "David Broder" tag*
Then has to wonder: Will the coroner ever ask: Did Ann Althouse start it?
I always enjoyed listening what he had to say. Still, as did Leo, I noticed the obituary didn't have much to say about his reportage of Democrats.
And how cute was it that Broder noted his college newspaper was torn by the two factions - Liberals and Communists? Have conservatives ever been welcome in the media?
R.I.P.
and one of the most respected writers on national politics for four decades
That means dull.
Nobody says Limbaugh is respected.
I'd place him the Walter Cronkite bin of "Journalism". Someone from a time when there were so few channels of information that they took on the oracular function, not because their information or insight was so great, but because there was only channel 4, 6, 12 and that goofy UHF channel to choose from. Thank God that has been swept. Hasta la vista.
I liked Broder. "Dull" and "bland" he got to the crux of things.
RIP
My condolences to his friends and family, but ....
The company man from the company paper in the company town. The dull, bland face of government in control of everything. The Florsheim loafer stamping in your face...forever.
They were obviously using a 15-year old headshot for any of his latest columns, because I had no idea the man was 81.
RIP, Mr. Broder.
WV: soymede ... the healthy alternative to Meade.
From the Leftist standpoint, he was very conventional, although I have to say he never got into the snark his comrades like Richard Cohen.
I thought he was an honest Liberal
RIP David
RIP, a democrat mouthpiece has been silenced. Everybody has nice things to say about you when you pass but I've watched him for decades and won't miss him.
I used to gag every time I heard the word "dean" to describe this guy.
Never, I mean never, did I find this guy interesting or insightful. An absolute dud.
I had no idea the man was 81.
Same.
Time is relentless.
Were David Broder and David Gergen ever seen in the same place at the same time?...thought not.
David Broder was the turgid epicenter of convential wisdom.
It has now moved to Ezra Kleins lunchbox.
David Broder made Wally Cox look like Charlie Sheen.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
I'll have to say that I think that Broder was truer to his convictions than the mealy mouthed fair weather political chameleon Gergen....patooie!
I liked his style. Broder was an equal time balloon popper.
I wonder if I will still get him confused him with that other guy - David Gergen.
Ricpic:
Sorry, I see you beat me to it and said it better too.
I had read a glowing review of Broder's work years ago. I watched him on tv for years, waiting for him to be interesting or memorable. He never was. Oh well.
Gergen is another story. He was at least interesting at times, even though he is very fickle. Spending too much time in DC will ruin a person, apparently.
Sorry Broder died but he should have retired a long, long, long time ago. He not only was dull, but beneath the "Can't we all get along" exterior beat a rather dishonest reporter.
During the Amnesty debate, Pete Wilson gave a talk about Prop 187 and amnesty. Broder questioned (aka debated) Wilson about it, and constantly tried to state various lies as facts.
He was one of those "Responsible" "Fair" old-timey MSM Reporters who tried to be "objective" but who'd twist the truth when some REAL IMPORTANT liberal position was at stake.
And he was really, really boring. But sorry he's dead.
Gergen is another story. He was at least interesting at times, even though he is very fickle.
You need to define "interesting". Gergen always struck me as a phony underneath the moderate, serious exterior. I'm mean how can anyone seriously flak for both Reagan AND Clinton? Usually when old 'Melon Head' appears, I change the channel.
BTW, is Daniel Schoor dead yet? Who else but NPR would've hired this 90 year-old liberal has-been and keep him on the air for 20 years.
I used to read Broder regularly, but in recent years he dropped even the skimpiest effort to appear objective, culminating in a pitifully low point when he dedicated a column to effusive praise of Janet Napolitano shortly after she announced that "the system worked" when the "Underwear Bomber" was stopped by fellow passengers on his flight.
Broder should have quit a long time ago, before he became a pitiable parody of a journalist.
Post a Comment