I know the pain of losing loved ones to assassination. Charlie Kirk stood for life, faith, and truth—unashamed of Jesus. Now is not the time to attack him, but to honor his legacy, pray for his family, and ask: Where will you spend eternity? pic.twitter.com/p6zF34CNZD
— Alveda C. King, Ph.D. (@AlvedaCKing) September 17, 2025
September 18, 2025
"... conversations unbecoming to a Christian..."
Posts
18 comments:
Her's is the voice of an America I once knew.
Hers is the voice of pre-24/7/365 social media. Sane.
The King has spoken. She is correct and her advice is on point.
Lovin it!
Awesome message. Spreading the name of Jesus in public. A lot of us Christians are reluctant to do that.
If you take your Christianity seriously, it's an exceptionally difficult spiritual discipline, constantly forcing you to say and do things that feel counter intuitive.
Alveda King is the real deal. A gem.
At some point “we” are going to figure out this is a spiritual battle.
She’s pro-life all the way.
Spending eternity is temporizing the essence (Kenneth Burke). What a thing is is represented by where it came from (origin) or where it winds up (eternity). But the point is to represent what a thing is, which is what religion represents by where you go.
It's a sky-daddy thing. The point is the moral component and its effect on who one is in life, for which religion is an allegory.
[ filters through Christian:Zen translator] > Well said
She might as well say think about how many virgins will you get.
Leftists don't believe in eternity. They believe this world is all there is, and a very large cohort consider this world to be hell. They're going no where, and simultaneously, they've arrived.
Alinsky was correct that, at least with Christianity, living up to our own rules is impossible. That's why we turn to God. It takes constant purposefulness to try and stay the course.
To which I say, "Amen". Beautifully stated. As a Jew, I wish we had a more openly Christian nation as we once did. I don't know how or why stating religion or showing your faith became an unaccepted thing in our regressive world. But I do know this: We were a better nation when at least a large segment of the population felt it had to answer to something that was larger than a negative response on social media.
We had standards- apparent and known to all- when we were a more outwardly religious country. We have no standards now. Not for anything. Not even for responses to someone being brutally murdered in front of his family and the nation.
OK that's nice. But I wish we'd move past this is not Christian or that is Christian. I'm not even positive Kirk was a real Christian. He celebrated the jewish sabbath and was a big supporter of Israel's genocide in gaza. You'd think number 1 Christian behavior would be deploring and being against killing women and kids.
But no matter what my opinion on his Christianity, his assassination was an outrage.
The USA's public morals and public standards war hinges on the Democrat's tortured 1990s defense of Bill Clinton. The left cheered upon getting rid of Republican Senator Bob Packwood for being a "hugger" (1995). Then Slick Willie slipped and slid all over the place, with a longterm lifestyle 100x worse. His Hollywood buddies like Harvey Weinstein likely wanted protection for their fun play time too.
Then, Monica Lewinsky broke the implied Party rules and kept her stained blue dress. The Party routinely defended the indefensible, and in due course, projected its worst sins onto former Democrat Donald Trump.
She’s lovely. Thank you—I would have missed this.
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.