October 13, 2023

"President Biden’s reelection effort will launch a pilot test of its 2024 organizing strategy... that aims to directly leverage the personal relationships of volunteers."

"The moves come as the Democratic National Committee has redirected its organizing efforts to a new smartphone app that encourages supporters to communicate with people in their own friend, family and community circles and then report those contacts back to the party’s voter file. This 'relational organizing' has become a growing part of Democratic campaigns for several cycles, outperforming traditional door-knocking and call sheet lists that volunteers have long used to contact strangers during campaigns...."

Ben Wikler, the chair of the Wisconsin Democratic Party, said the major strategic change is that organizers no longer have to work off lists of strangers provided by the campaign. Instead, they create their own lists, based on their personal social networks or location. He said organizers can now just walk into a bar — Wisconsin ranks among the highest in bars per capita — talk to seven random people in a college community and then report back the results of those interactions.
The pilot starting next month will double the number of staff working on outreach to young and Black voters in the state. “They also allow you to sit on your couch and check in with all the people you didn’t see at church that weekend,” Wikler said. “Connecting with someone they have a relationship with is the most effective way to reach them.”...

Is this wholesome — in a Heather-Locklear-I-told-2-friends kind of way? Or is this awful — appropriating and leveraging personal relationships? If someone begins a conversation with me with a political pitch, I'm offended. But maybe most "personal" friends are just people who are looking to manipulate and use you in one way or another. 

I resist tag proliferation, but I'm making a tag for "relational organizing." I'm doing this not in spite of but because of the fact that it annoys me. It annoys me the way "the politics of meaning" annoyed me. Is "relational" even a word? Yes, it is. The OED has examples going back to the 1600s. Here's a 2006 example from Time Magazine: "Girls have traditionally practiced not so much physical aggression as relational aggression." 

Is "relational organizing" an established term? I found a few things:

1. "The Key To Creating Lasting Change? Mobilizing the People You Already Know. Relational organizing focuses on the most important tools at our disposal: our relationships and our ability to talk with one another about things that matter" (Harper's Bazaar, 2020): "Every single one of us has a network.... Hell, I even recruited my mechanic to join our legislative advocacy day once. This is what activists do. We do the work of unifying like-minded people around an issue, and then we turn those relationships into votes."

2. "How to be a Relational Organizer" (NAACP, 2020): "Talking to your friends and family about politics may seem like a daunting task, but we've got news for you - it doesn't have to be so hard. Just remember these three prompts, 'Open, Question, Action' and the conversation will flow naturally...."

3. "'If we do this right …': The new Dem organizing strategy catching fire ahead of the midterms/Operatives who helped elect Sen. Jon Ossoff are exporting their voter contact program to more states for the midterm elections" (Politico, 2022): "A group of Democratic strategists is trying to spread a novel organizing tactic in this year’s election. Technically, it’s called 'paid relational organizing,' but it boils down to this: paying people to talk to their friends about politics."

4. "The Secret to Beating Trump Lies With You and Your Friends/The pandemic wrecked traditional campaigning. Relational organizing stands to reinvent it" (Mother Jones, 2020): "... a buzzy new term: 'relational organizing.'... [It's] nothing new. Word-of-mouth and community-based activism were the backbone of the civil rights, women’s rights, farmworkers’, and labor movements.... [Some political scientists] believe relational organizing holds the most promise for people of color and other communities that historically lack political power. The possibility is being demonstrated right now, as polls show that a majority of Americans are awakening to racism in policing. That could not have happened without Black Lives Matter, a textbook example of relational organizing."

24 comments:

Lem the artificially intelligent said...

Once these people have your number you... should say, I, can't get rid of them. I made the mistake of giving money to somebody once and now I can't even block them because they are using some kind of algorithm designed to thwart blocking. Never give out your phone number to anybody ever. You'll be sorry, if you do.

Dave Begley said...

Smart idea by Ben.

But who is going to volunteer for Joe Biden?

rhhardin said...


Relational might mean having to do with a story that you related, as opposed to something read.

Kate said...

Personally, I find this horrifying. I can comfort myself that I don't do relational contacts. Even in Arizona, one of their test locations, I might escape detection.

However, I think and hope this app idea is a blunder. Remember the post from a week or so ago about how phoning is dead? Texting is preferred because it's more distant, less invasive. Now the Dems want to turn texting into something annoying. This could backfire bigly.

NorthOfTheOneOhOne said...

Is this wholesome — in a Heather-Locklear-I-told-2-friends kind of way? Or is this awful — appropriating and leveraging personal relationships? If someone begins a conversation with me with a political pitch, I'm offended. But maybe most "personal" friends are just people who are looking to manipulate and use you in one way or another.

They need to take a cold, hard look at Amway. I watched a pretty tight group of friends of mine break up in the mid-Eighties because one of them got into Amway and started with the constant "you ought to join up with us and make some real money" pitch. It was awful. This will undoubtedly destroy more relationships that it will generate votes for Biden. Only an Ivy League academic could come up with something this bad.

Sheridan said...

The East German Stasi used "relational organizing" too. The lists of contacts they developed didn't lead to positive outcomes however.

rehajm said...

The leftie grandson’s choice counts for everyone…

RideSpaceMountain said...

Wisconsin and Arizona...I'm trying to contain my shock.

Wince said...

Who wants to brag they voted for Biden in 2020, much less tell "friends" to vote for him in 2024, outside of the usual public payroll patriots?

Wince said...

Who wants to brag they voted for Biden in 2020, much less tell "friends" to vote for him in 2024, outside of the usual public payroll patriots?

MadTownGuy said...

"The Secret to Beating Trump Lies With You and Your Friends/The pandemic wrecked traditional campaigning. Relational organizing stands to reinvent it" (Mother Jones, 2020): "... a buzzy new term: 'relational organizing.'... [It's] nothing new. Word-of-mouth and community-based activism were the backbone of the civil rights, women’s rights, farmworkers’, and labor movements.... [Some political scientists] believe relational organizing holds the most promise for people of color and other communities that historically lack political power. The possibility is being demonstrated right now, as polls show that a majority of Americans are awakening to racism in policing. That could not have happened without Black Lives Matter,a textbook example of relational organizing."

Isn't that what the Cambridge Analytica brouhaha was about? In any case, Zuckerberg had probably given the DNC an updated friends list...

MadTownGuy said...

Funny, When Obama Harvested Facebook Data On Millions Of Users To Win In 2012, Everyone Cheered

Facebook faces what some are calling an "existential crisis" over revelations that its user data fell into the hands of the Trump campaign. Whether or not the attacks on the social media giant are justified, the fact is that the Obama campaign used Facebook (FB) data in the same way in 2012. But the reaction from the pundits and press back then was, shall we say, somewhat different.

According to various news accounts, a professor at Cambridge University built a Facebook app around 2014 that involved a personality quiz. About 270,000 users of the app agreed to share some of their Facebook information, as well as data from people on their friends list. As a result, tens of millions ended up part of this data-mining operation.

Consulting firm Cambridge Analytica, which paid for the research, later worked with the Trump campaign to help them target advertising campaigns on Facebook, using the data they'd gathered on users.

But while the Trump campaign used Cambridge Analytica during the primaries, it didn't use the information during the general election campaign, relying instead on voter data provided by the Republican National Committee, according to CBS News. It reports that "the Trump campaign had tested the RNC data, and it proved to be vastly more accurate than Cambridge Analytica's."

Since this involves the Trump campaign, the news accounts have been suffused with dark conspiratorial tones. The Times article talks about how Trump consultants "exploited" Facebook data, and quotes a source calling it a "scam." It has been widely described as a massive data breach.

But Facebook had been promoting itself to political parties looking for a new way to reach voters.

Nor was this the first time Facebook users had their data unwittingly shared with a political campaign.

In 2012, the Obama campaign encouraged supporters to download an Obama 2012 Facebook app that, when activated, let the campaign collect Facebook data both on users and their friends.

According to a July 2012 MIT Technology Review article, when you installed the app, "it said it would grab information about my friends: their birth dates, locations, and 'likes.' "

The campaign boasted that more than a million people downloaded the app, which, given an average friend-list size of 190, means that as many as 190 million had at least some of their Facebook data vacuumed up by the Obama campaign — without their knowledge or consent.

If anything, Facebook made it easy for Obama to do so. A former campaign director, Carol Davidsen, tweeted that "Facebook was surprised we were able to suck out the whole social graph, but they didn't stop us once they realized that was what we were doing."

This Facebook treasure trove gave Obama an unprecedented ability to reach out to nonsupporters. More important, the campaign could deliver carefully targeted campaign messages disguised as messages from friends to millions of Facebook users.

The campaign readily admitted that this subtle deception was key to their Facebook strategy.
"

More at the link.

MadTownGuy said...

I get random emails from some Democratic Party organizers, one of which is working the reservations in northern AZ. No doubt they're plying Leaphorn and Chee to get with the program.

robother said...

I saw the bumper sticker for this 20 years ago all over Boulder: Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Republican. I thought, So much for the secret ballot. Boy, I had no idea.

Michael said...

There's a "Biden message"? Who knew?

Original Mike said...

"The reelection effort is focused on recruiting large numbers of volunteers to use their own relationships to spread the Biden message directly"

Aye, there's the rub.

Ampersand said...

This works well for people who care less about their friends than they do about politics.

retail lawyer said...

Does anybody here have friends rude enough to do this?

Lilly, a dog said...

In the previous thread, farmgirl's great post at 6:41 PM showed how to properly do "relational organizing."

Kevin said...

Isn’t this how cults work?

Mr. Forward said...

"Open, Question, Action."

Open the Door.
WTF!
Kick ass.

boatbuilder said...

This is how they explain things when it turns out that a whole lot of "friends and relatives" who never voted before and/or didn't intend to vote decided this time to vote for the great leader Joe Biden. By mail, of course.

MadTownGuy said...

Kevin said...

"Isn’t this how cults work?"

Yes. Cancel culture (=shunning), mandatory face coverings, ritual ablutions, unquestioning obedience to 'experts..'

Tina Trent said...

They left out the part where tech billionaires give hundreds of millions to people like Van Jones to sell his people out using paid cadres of otherwise underemployed college and grad school lefties who are mad at their daddies.