.@AbdulElSayed says it’s ok for MEN to be in girl’s locker rooms. Why? “Well because they are going to find out about it on the internet anyway” Completely unacceptable. https://t.co/eXeh70kkeP
— Mike Rogers (@MikeRogersForMI) November 2, 2026
November 2, 2026
The theory that since we haven't protected young girls from seeing photographs of penises, it's not important to protect them from a penis in the girls' locker room.
Posts
55 comments:
Maybe they can't see it, if there's a veil over the eye port.
Guy is doing American culture a huge favor, but it's lost on the Rip Van Winkle Progressives.
El Sayed(D) is Hasan Piker's (D) mirror image. El Sayed is Hasan Piker's mini-me.
Hasan Piker(D) hates blacks, hates the USA, (all on video) lives in a 3 million dollar mansion, and electrocutes his own dog.
El Sayed and his family support the Muslim Brotherhood.
Obama supports El Sayed.
It's ok to expose girls to islamic taqiyya, because they're going to find out about it anyway...especially if they vote for it. Internet optional.
They can call women used condoms in that party, so is this really a surprise??
We need a GPPA to handle this problem. The President should set up the new Government Program for Penis Application. Mandatory in public education for all girls 5 and up. Applied skills as appropriate. Wait, what -- they already do this?
The evil collective soviet Democrat mob left insist on ruining women and girl's sports and private spaces by allowing males into them. When WE call them on it - they all collectively robotically loyally spout the same Soviet answer. "it's only a small minority".
Vile.
Can I just say, it’s kind of awesome to see on 60 Minutes a right-wing journalist asking a liberal Senate candidate a hard question. Ross needs to work on his TV game but the political shift is important. It’s so important for Democrats to get asked the tough stuff.
I was expecting "locker rooms" to be mentioned in the clip. Or male physical advantages. Neither was.
I don't think the criticism matches the clip.
El-Sayed is very smart on his feet. Reminds me of Obama. Calm, sounds good, uses liberal buzz words like “freedom.” The happy face of the Muslim Brotherhood.
I think parents ought to hold off on getting their kids smart phones. The whole "dic pic" thing is something I wouldn't dream of doing. But apparently it was a gag in one of the younger generations.
Dic Pic showdown.
This guy is a combination of weird, goofy, and dangerous.
I stand with Haley and all adult human females and their children.
I have a concussion from face palming.
St. Croix: There isn’t even the slightest of chances that I’m going to click on your D-P link, I gotta say, lol. Definitely sounds like a competition, and collection of photos, without which I can emphatically do. Thanks for the laugh, though!
Good grief. This was a non answer. Completely avoided the issue. He's so oily.
How many people regret voting early, I wonder. Whether for left or right, shit can be exposed pretty late in the campaigns.
>Saint Croix said...
El-Sayed is very smart on his feet. Reminds me of Obama.<
Yep, an Obama clone, indeed. Both smart. Both maddingly glib and facile.
Democrats have perfected the non-answer and the evasion interruption.
Think of all the analogies where seeing a picture of a thing justifies the real thing in the room with you. What an idiot.
He sounds like a manufactured fool with manufactured-ready answers that mean nothing. Smarmy smile thrown in at no charge.
Kamala Harris was one of these. But this guy comes from a different manufacturer. One that has a long-term goal for all of us. Submit or perish.
His ridiculous notion that, because your daughter can see all kinds of things on her iPhone, she should not mind seeing a large bodied young man showering next to her and watching her change in the locker room.
It's a non-sequitur. He can take his smarmy smile and pre-made nothingness answer and go back home. He says thinking that way is outdated. This is exactly the answer leftists have used to bugger Western Civilization for decades now. "Hey...quit thinking to traditionally, man. We're in a new age. Your daughter has to accept a man, not only showering with her, but running her over in the sport they play together. Because, you know, it's his 'right'."
Please. Garbage answer to back his garbage thinking.
As for the post: May I just suggest that there’s an obvious difference between random dick-pix on the ‘net and a specific naked dick in the girls locker room?
I mea, sheesh!
Likewise we must allow 9 year old girls to have sex, because that’s on the internet too. It is amusing how seemingly literate educated people can be so bizarrely out of tune with the world, but want to broadcast it in public.
In politics, a dick has always been a big thing. "They can't lick our Dick." ~ 1972
In the sense that every organization must be assumed to be run by a cabal of its enemies, the DSA is doing a good job of destroying itself.
What a silly answer. Doesn’t the man have a couple of daughters? I vaguely remember reading that somewhere but don’t know how old. How weird.
Hey, ya know what else is on the internet that the kids could encounter on their phones? Child porn, torture, animal abuse, fetishism, death, and no end of violence. (Not to mention rampant political stupidity.) Most parents would prefer that their kids not see any of that shit, either. Just like they don't want their daughters to see the swinging dick of some confused - or not so confused - teenage boy in the high school locker room.
But please, do go on with this line of thinking. Then go and tell the Muslim folk in your constituency that it's time to do away with head coverings and the veil. I mean, everyone has a phone in their pocket! They could see a woman's hair just anywhere! It's not something we have to keep hidden away. I'm sure with enough training, the men would be able to control themselves at the very sight.
FUCK THIS GUY!
His answer to a predictable question was flaccid at best. He should have spent more time firming up a better response.
I've seen videos of nuclear explosions, so ...
"What a silly answer. Doesn’t the man have a couple of daughters? I vaguely remember reading that somewhere but don’t know how old. How weird."
Not weird at all. Certainly he controls his family such that if his daughters see the penises of strange men on the internet they'll be honor killed. He's got no problem with strange dick for anyone else's kids though.
rcommal,
ha ha
I didn't even think of that!
Takes you to a funny clip of the great movie Instant Family. PG-rated, I swear. Safe for work.
I wouldn't do that to you, buddy.
bagoh20 said...
“His answer to a predictable question was flaccid at best. He should have spent more time firming up a better response.”
Yes, and the reporter should have repeatedly come back hard on him, too.
Fast-talkin’
Slow-thinkin’
Sawed-off
Mohairmed abdul El
h/t Charlie Rich
The Julie Jaman story. No one in the American Hack Soviet D MSM care to delve. No curiosity whatsoever.
A MAN was in the Port Townsend WA, YMCA women's bathroom. Helping the girl(s) get undressed. (Imagine if this were your daughter or grand daughter.)
Julie (an elderly swimmer) witnessed it - and SHE was the one who got in trouble. Only in Soviet-Democrat party mob America can that occur.
What about women in men's locker rooms? Are there women (use your definition) lobbying for that? And just how would that work out?
Yeah that’s the ticket, Dems. Go with that “argument.”
People outraged by Trump’s “locker room talk” will defend and vote for him.
This guy fits my pictures of the emerging Democrat majority. If he doesn’t win it will be shockingly close. The Democrat coalition of Marxists, Islamists and useful idiots is propelling seditious assholes onward and upward. Anyone who believes it will end with Trump’s presidency isn’t paying attention. Democrats have no one else in the offing.
Saint Croix said...
"Ross needs to work on his TV game"
No kidding. The right response would be "Please don't respond with a question. Please respond with an answer." Who is the interviewer here?
When my parents generation opposed “sex ed” in school the logic was that Big Ed was encroaching on parental rights to determine how and when to broach highly sensitive issues with their children. The Big Ed lobby and their union masters insisted that they were just stepping up where (some) parents abdicated their responsibilities and once the nose was under the tent the rest followed: STD warnings, condom giveaways, “safe sex”advice for elementary schoolers, “frank discussions” in middle school classes and secret abortions for high school pupils.
Then the trans maniacs took over the socialist teachers unions and they went way too far.
Now it’s time to destroy government education because they can’t STOP having inappropriate conversations and raping children across the country. It turns out the best people to teach kids about sex are the parents who love them and care for them. Second best is peer information which can be wrong but is at least rarely fraught with sexual tension. But adults unrelated to children should NEVER initiate, participate in or contribute to discussion of sex. They can’t be trusted.
They’ve proven it over the last 50 years in which test scores keep falling while kids being abused grow exponentially.
Schools that can’t keep penises out of girls’ designated spaces like locker rooms and bathrooms also cannot be trusted to actually do their job and teach either. Incompetence is total.
Say. Where are the trolls? IEE? Igna? Freder? Left?
Whatever. Sorry guys, but Trump's war is going to put these people in power, you know why? Because if the last 8 months is "Republicans winning," I don't need it. It's always about choices and they are never one sided.
Trump got 180,000 Muslim vote in Michigan. He betrayed them.
Tell me what is factually incorrect in this ad https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kvuEXQ4k88Q
Did I miss the parse? "MEN". in "GIRL'S" not women’s locker rooms. Trick question for the Muslim guy who's prophet married a 12 year old girl?
Did he just blow up his campaign to become a martyr to the cause?
The theory that since we haven't protected young girls from seeing photographs of penises, it's not important to protect them from a penis in the girls' locker room.
That we can not stop girls who CHOSE to see a penis from looking at one, does not mean that it's therefore to force them on girls who do NOT want to be exposed to them.
What El-Sayad said is functionally equivalent to saying "rape isn't a crime if she isn't a virgin".
Oh, wait, he's Muslim, so he's probably willing to say that, too
@Howard: Hopefully, yes he did. And good riddance.
And I hope he gets a standing ullulation if he loses!
"I don't think the criticism matches the clip."
What do you think "transgenders in girls' sports" involves? There are three issues: The locker rooms, the physical risk to girls in contact sports, and the unfairness of the competition. The "information" on phones is irrelevant to the last two. So it's obvious what he's talking about. And it's also ridiculous, as if seeing something on the internet is comparable to having a guy in your locker room.
James K said...
"What do you think "transgenders in girls' sports" involves? There are three issues: The locker rooms, the physical risk to girls in contact sports, and the unfairness of the competition. The "information" on phones is irrelevant to the last two. So it's obvious what he's talking about."
Well done. I was expecting more from the clip, but I retract my objection.
Misogynist fake liberal El-Sayed.
Bet his female relatives aren't even allowed to participate in sports, nor allowed to use public restrooms.
In our rural city, it's almost impossible to distinguish between the aging progressive multi-pierced snow-cone color-haired liberal woman, and the aging multi-pierced cross-dressing trans guys with the snow-cone colored hair hanging out at the public library, or at thrift store buying size 14 dresses in bulk.
El-Sayed. Enough to make the liberal Dem woman screech with despair. Eeekkk!
“Well because they are going to find out about it on the internet anyway" Really??
So the theory is that because my child/son/daughter might see a clip or movie on the internet about torture and serial killing....that the child might as well start early and begin with killing kittens and puppies?
Its gonna happen anyway...so who cares. Right?
He's obviously lying. His step mother hid her hijab under a hat for the campaign ad, but men in women's changing rooms are ok? His wife can't even worship in the same room as he does. Insane.
So he gives ordinary people another reason to vote against him. Works for me.
All's fair in lust and abortion. QED
XX "=" XY
I really want to know...do progressives actually believe this BS or do they think the leopards will eat their face last?
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith. Also: No italics, even briefly. Use asterisks for emphasis. And don't play with the format by changing fonts or using boldface or all caps. Never include more than one extra line break between paragraphs.