June 7, 2026
"He read 'Moby-Dick' at 9. He could devour 400-page books in an hour. He had a photographic memory."
"As an after-dinner party game, he liked to recite 'Paradise Lost,' starting from any line a tipsy guest chose."
Tags:
Dwight Garner,
Harold Bloom,
John Milton,
Moby Dick,
reading

17 comments:
Pro tip: don't put 'Dick' and 'devour' too close to each other if you are trying to praise someone. CC, JSM
I did not read the NYT article because it demands email, but Bloom’s “Western Canon” and the “Anxiety of Influence” introduced me, who Clep tested out of humanities due to great hs English I-IV classes, to what literature is. I even read a complete Shakespeare. Hurra for Bloom and his love for fine literature.
So he claimed anyway ...
One can devour a book without necessarily reading every word.
CS Lewis would do the same from any book in his Oxford library, and loved to challenge students to see if they could catch him up. There are people who can just do such things
In hs I was assigned to memorize the prolog to the Canterbury Tales in Middle English. I can still say it today in perfect accent. You remember what you like, what you learn in reinforcement.
I am sure there are many in China who can recite verbatim from Mao’s red book.
I think I can recite the Pledge of Allegiance, but only in bell bottoms and tie dye.
For some reason I read “All Quiet on thr Western Front” at 10 and all my adult relatives thought I was a pervert. Çest la vie.
Sure, but can he count dropped toothpicks instantly by sight?
Inna-gadda-da-vida, baby!
Sounds like bullshit.
I've met prodigiously talented people. Exceptional talents come with a cost. There seems to be a distance from others attributable to feeling one's own oddness.
Whatever. He was a serial liar about things that really counted.
That he could memorize everything only hurts his case as a human.
He hobnobbed with terrorists, at dinners with Obama in Chicago, and hated ordinary Americans. Yes, he was good at Moby Dick.
Typical gormless academician.
I'll take allan bloom for a thousand
I'm not impressed with Dwight Garner. Can't the Times do better? And why not have an editor for fiction and one for non-fiction?
Bring back zombie dwight mcdonald
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.