May 7, 2026

"In 2025, more than 100 dams were dismantled in 30 states, reconnecting around 4,900 miles of waterways...."

"The resulting free-flowing waterways are healthier, cooler and less prone to algal blooms, and serve as vital habitat for migratory fish and other aquatic life. They’re also safer.... While dams that are critical for flood regulation, water storage or irrigation must stay in place, many no longer serve their original purpose and are at risk of collapse.... The National Inventory of Dams, compiled by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, lists about 92,000 dams.... But, according to the National Aquatic Barrier Inventory, there are hundreds of thousands of smaller and unregulated structures that block waterways. The majority were built to create swimming and fishing holes or reservoirs for water supplies, or to generate power and irrigate farm fields.... Low-head dams, which are designed to have water flow over them, create a recirculating current downstream that can trap people and debris. They’re known as 'drowning machines'.... 'There’s just so many of these deadbeat dams on the landscape.'..."

I'm reading "America the Undammed/More miles of the country’s rivers were reconnected last year thanks to dam removals than at any other time in history" (NYT).

And I noticed this, from a few years ago: "Dams like the one that killed Anna Last are 'drowning machines'" (Knox News). There's a good diagram at the link, showing the treacherous water flow, and here's part of the explanation:
  • The recirculating waters will trap even the most experienced swimmers (including would-be rescuers) and disorient them in the thrashing water as if they are in a washing machine;
  • The water has low buoyancy due to all of the air bubbles making life jackets all but useless;
  • The water pushes, pulls and dips individuals in an infinite number of ways where rocks, rebar, concrete and other debris from the river are waiting;
  • The rivers and streams are filled with cold water and can lead to hypothermia even in the summer;
  • The dams are usually made of vertical concrete or masonry, which make climbing out nearly impossible.

26 comments:

NMObjectivist said...

Removing dams. Yet another sign of cultural decline. Self-destruction. We don't have to do this.

Bob B said...

Like I trust the government to make the right choices.

Earnest Prole said...

Coincidentally, California’s first major dam since 1979 is proceeding full speed ahead.

Leland said...

to generate power and irrigate farm fields.

This is what they want to get rid of?

Clyde said...

So maybe don't swim downstream from the dams, then?

Michael Fitzgerald said...

A couple of nephews of mine nearly drowned going over a dam in a pretty slow moving river. They got trapped for some minutes before escaping, and neither could explain how they managed to get out if it. They had all their phones, wallets, and keys in a dry bag. They went back the next day and the dry bag was still stuck in the trough going underwater and popping back up then going down again....

Ann Althouse said...

"and neither could explain how they managed to get out if it"

I can't get back into the article — paywall — but I think I remember seeing that eventually the water will throw you out. You have to stay alive until that happens. Did the dry bag ever escape or is churning there still?

narciso said...

Like the aprs banging on the obelisk

Aa if that did work the floods in the appalachians worse

Ann Althouse said...

There are 92,000 dams, many of them deadbeat dams. The ones that serve a good purpose aren't being removed. Things go up and some of them need to come down.

IamDevo said...

Swimming/boating/canoing/rafting on a river of any size near one of those ubiquitous low head dams is a recipe for disaster. If you go over and get caught, you simply spin like a load of laundry in a front-loading washing machine until you run out of air and/or the gods of the dam decide to spew you out below the hydraulic. Don't ask how I know.

BarrySanders20 said...

Many of them are currently (heh heh) pointless. They existed for some reason years ago that no longer exists. Round here, crews recently removed dams on the Menomonee River and the Milwaukee River and it has improved habitat and fish migration. https://www.jsonline.com/story/sports/columnists/paul-smith/2016/04/06/paul-a-smith-milwaukee-river-has-come-far-but-much-work-remains/84954668/?gnt-cfr=1&gca-cat=p&gca-uir=false&gca-epti=z1101xxu003646e1101xxv002544&gca-ft=197&gca-ds=sophi

Kirk Parker said...

> The ones that serve a good purpose
> aren't being removed.

Guess again -- that statement needs to be amended to read "
The ones that serve a good purpose in the mind of some bureaucrat or activist aren't being removed."

We have a small local dam that serves a fabulously good summer water recreational purpose, that is almost certainly going to be removed because The Beautiful People aren't the ones using it.

BarrySanders20 said...

Post about a recent lawsuit after dam removal lowered the water level by 4 feet, turning a riverside home into a marsh-side home.They Removed the Dam Thing

Michael Fitzgerald said...

They went home and got an extension pole for tree trimming and fished the dry bag out. This was around the time that there was an incident where multiple young people rafting down a southern river were drowned in a similar situation. Here's a website that lists drownings from swimmers or rafters going over dams and getting trapped.
https://krcproject.groups.et.byu.net/browse.php

Enigma said...

Hot dam!

Older dams cause the water body to fill with sediment -- this starts were the river/stream enters and where the sediments first drop out from moving water. Over time the lake/pond turns into flat marshy wetlands and loses the ability to store water.

Here NYT is doing the legwork for Obama-era EPA regulations that sought to take control over all waterways in the country. Removing dams is somewhat ironic, as environmentalists are ALSO introducing beavers and fake beaver dams to rebuild wetlands that support more plants and animals.

Leave old dams alone = new wetlands and faster moving waterways SOON

Take old dams out = faster moving waterways NOW

https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/bdas.htm
https://nmbeaverproject.org/

Anthony said...

Kirk Parker said... "The ones that serve a good purpose in the mind of some bureaucrat or activist aren't being removed."

Don't Trust Big Stupid Government. Big Stupid Government is Asshoe.

Oh Yea said...

Near Dayton there were a number of those low dams on the Miami River creating those hazards. They were removed and with some minor work it was turned it into a popular whitewater kayaking area right in the middle of town. Absolute plus to the area and the major dams for flood control still exist performing their purpose.

Narr said...

Damme! Damme I say!

Jim at said...

The same shitheads who want to ban natural gas - while forcing us into electric vehicles - also want to remove four hydroelectric dams on the lower Snake River.

RJ said...

Yeah, nobody needs flood control or electricity. Dynamite them all

Big Mike said...

Ann Althouse said...

There are 92,000 dams, many of them deadbeat dams. The ones that serve a good purpose aren't being removed. Things go up and some of them need to come down.


Oh Gawd. Another liberal who presumes that the government makes always right and never wrong. Would you bet your pension on the highlighted text, Professor?

Sheridan said...

Responding to Jim - I live in NW Montana and am part of an electric co-op. We depend on those dams to provide affordable power.

Humperdink said...

I personally watched a kayaker drown going over a low head dam. He chose to go over it after heavy rains as a challenge. Expelled from the kayak, he was trapped in the “churn” for 45 minutes at the base of the dam. His hand would surface every 60 seconds and then go subsurface again. Firefighters were helpless. His lifeless body finally broke free. It was terrible to watch.

I am still not sure of the value of low head dams.

rrsafety said...

This is great news. New England has thousands of dams built over a 100 years ago take aren’t used, pose failure flood risks, hurt fish migration and a host of other problems. Get rid of them all.

Big Mike said...

The

Jim at said...

We depend on those dams to provide affordable power.

So do we. And farmers rely on them for shipping crops to market.

The ones that serve a good purpose aren't being removed. - Althouse

Uh-huh

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 4 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.