March 21, 2026

"It is well known that at the coronation of kings and queens, even modern ones, a certain curious process of seasoning them for their functions is gone through."

"There is a saltcellar of state, so called, and there may be a castor of state. How they use the salt, precisely—who knows? Certain I am, however, that a king’s head is solemnly oiled at his coronation, even as a head of salad. Can it be, though, that they anoint it with a view of making its interior run well, as they anoint machinery? Much might be ruminated here, concerning the essential dignity of this regal process, because in common life we esteem but meanly and contemptibly a fellow who anoints his hair, and palpably smells of that anointing. In truth, a mature man who uses hair-oil, unless medicinally, that man has probably got a quoggy spot in him somewhere. As a general rule, he can’t amount to much in his totality."

Writes Herman Melville, in Chapter 25 of "Moby-Dick."

31 comments:

MSG said...

Kings were anointed millennia before there was machinery.

Dave Begley said...

Grok, “ Yes, King Charles III’s head was oiled as part of his coronation ceremony.

This occurred during the anointing, the most sacred element of the British coronation ritual, which draws from biblical traditions (such as the anointing of King Solomon).

The Archbishop of Canterbury applied specially consecrated chrism oil (a mixture primarily of olive oil and sesame oil, perfumed with essences like rose, jasmine, and others) to the sovereign. Specifically, the oil was poured from the golden Ampulla into the ancient Coronation Spoon, then used to anoint King Charles on his hands, breast/chest, and head (often described as the crown of the head or forehead, forming a cross).

The words spoken during the head anointing included: “Be this/thy head anointed with holy oil: as kings and prophets were anointed…”

This moment was deliberately kept private—not televised or photographed—following long tradition, with an anointing screen (held by representatives of the Household Division) shielding it from public view to preserve its solemn, spiritual nature as a private moment between the sovereign and God.”

God has nothing to do with British royalty. One big scam.

Robert Marshall said...

Silly me, I thought Melville was commenting on Gavin Newsom: "... in common life we esteem but meanly and contemptibly a fellow who anoints his hair ..."

Ann Althouse said...

"The Archbishop of Canterbury applied specially consecrated chrism oil (a mixture primarily of olive oil and sesame oil, perfumed with essences like rose, jasmine, and others) to the sovereign."

Melville says: "But the only thing to be considered here, is this—what kind of oil is used at coronations? Certainly it cannot be olive oil, nor macassar oil, nor castor oil, nor bear’s oil, nor train oil, nor cod-liver oil. What then can it possibly be, but sperm oil in its unmanufactured, unpolluted state, the sweetest of all oils?"

Why was he certain?

n.n said...

Semantic sprinkles.

narciso said...

Is the archbishop Anglican or Druid

Ann Althouse said...

"Kings were anointed millennia before there was machinery."

It depends on the meaning of "machinery." If a wheel and axel counts, it goes back to 3500 BC. The earliest evidence of lubricant on machines is c. 2600 BC. The earliest use of coronation oil for kings seems to be ~1000 BC.

But if machinery refers to the factories of Melville's day, I would defend him by saying he didn't necessarily mean that the use of coronation oil was originally meant to lubricate the king's internal workings, just that these days, "they anoint it with a view" — present tense — of lubricating the royal machinery.

Presumably, in 1000 BC, the oil was genuinely believed to be holy, and the anointing imparted holiness to the king. These days, Melville may intend to say, we don't believe the kings connect to God, but we still use the oil, maybe because the king is machinery.



narciso said...

Melvilles tale is encyclopedic in its dimension

Bob Boyd said...

According to the internet, "Gavin Newsom uses L'Oreal's Total Control Clean Gel for his hair. He mentioned this during an interview with Ryan Seacrest. This gel is known for providing a strong hold without leaving a greasy residue."
Trump's hair routine remains closely held, it seems, but has the subject of much speculation.

john mosby said...

James I was anointed with sperm oil. Well, just sperm. Not at his coronation, but after. NTTAWWT. CC, JSM

Dave Begley said...

Native Americans never invented the wheel.

Old and slow said...

Saw a post on X yesterday about a new African invention called a barrel roller. It allows women to move water without straining their backs. Ingenious! Yes, it is a wheel.

Ampersand said...

Melville's insights must be ignored. He was a domestic abuser.

Dave said...

Dave Begley, it follows that the Native Americans have never reinvented the wheel either.

Dave said...

I rarely post, so a double post is going to be especially rare. Let me just say that I felt Moby Dick's behavior was not especially good, but I do try to align with the example of his brother, Donby.

Lem Vibe Bandit said...

No War for Hair Oil!

tcrosse said...

No War for Oil of Olay!

Smilin' Jack said...

This is a really ancient tradition. It started with the royal jelly that turns ordinary bees into queens.

tim maguire said...

Does anyone else here think this reads exactly like an Althouse essay? If it weren’t in quotes and didn’t say Herman Melville at the bottom, it would never have occurred to me that this wasn’t Ann’s writing.

tim maguire said...

at the coronation of kings and queens, even modern ones,

What does Melville know of modern kings? He was writing almost 200 years ago.

n.n said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
n.n said...

A king and queen who lay in the hay, roll in the hay, together with empathy and inclusion, will have a gay old time and coronate a viable Posterity.

WhoKnew said...

This is why I love Moby DIck. And Robert Marshall is right, sounds just like Newsome

Ralph L said...

A little dab will do ya.

Ambrose said...

I expect I am in a small minority, but I always thought Moby Dick would have benefitted from an aggressive editing before publication.

Ralph L said...

Grok separates the purpose of ancient Egyptian religious anointing from Saul's, etc. royal anointing, and that from the New Testament's anointing of guests, but I suspect they were all connected by more than oil, fragrance, and heads.

narciso said...

its like rendering a whale, a job no editor would take up

dbp said...

"Melville says: "But the only thing to be considered here, is this—what kind of oil is used at coronations? Certainly it cannot be olive oil, nor macassar oil, nor castor oil, nor bear’s oil, nor train oil, nor cod-liver oil. What then can it possibly be, but sperm oil in its unmanufactured, unpolluted state, the sweetest of all oils?"

It's a book about whales. Maybe an early example of too good to check. Possibly it was humor, I found most of the work to be highly amusing. That's certainly how I took the machinery sentence.

Smilin' Jack said...

“As a general rule, he can’t amount to much in his totality."

Because of hair oil? Wow, Melville was pretty judgmental.

FWIW, I don’t use hair oil, and I thought MD was a colossal bore.

tcrosse said...

Consider that Moby Dick was written for an audience that had little else to entertain them.

Smerdyakov said...

Maybe it’s the mention of oil but it reminded me of the mincer, a memorable image drawn by Melville. The mincer slices the blubber for boiling. For this he wears a cassock, fashioned from the phallus of the whale, which the sailors call a grandissimus. It’s in chapter 95.

Post a Comment

Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.