I attempted to photograph the 1979 total solar eclipse (Minot, ND). Not knowing what I was doing, all of the images were way overexposed. But in a couple of them, in the corner of the image, was a small, multiple internal reflection image of the eclipse, properly exposed. Sometimes the artifact is your friend.
Proof or proper focus. When I’m doing night time photos, astronomy and in my case, sunsets over our lake here in Dallas, I look for those flares to validate and then lock focus. Could be a street light next or or close to the subject, the 6 point stars from a long exposure nebula capture or as in the case, the points spreading from the sun. You can refine the sun to circular with a few simple enhancements in the native iPhone photo edit software (which I do for just crap stuff on the go) or more accurately (but equally easy) In Adobe Lightroom, Photoshop, or great for just a couple quick edits (but the ability to work with just objects while avoiding layers) Photoshop Express. Always enjoy the morning sunset photos but don’t always comment. First blog I check each morning.
If you are ever at a solar eclipse, look at the ground under a tree; the leaves make hundreds of pinhole cameras, and there will be little images of the eclipse projected on the ground. Then take pictures of those. Not sure why this doesn't seem to work with the regular round sum, maybe it does, but the round shape is not distinctive enough to perceive, but I have pictures of the little eclipses projected onto my porch steps.
Abrams actually talks about his love of lens flares. I watch that compilation video and my eyeballs are ready to bleed. But they way he uses them in movies has never bothered me. In fact, I think his films always look fantastic.
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.
Encourage Althouse by making a donation:
Make a 1-time donation or set up a monthly donation of any amount you choose:
18 comments:
The proper term is lens flare.
Cool!
"That's all there is. There isn't any more."
Pretty cool.
I hear a Monty Python cartoon chorus in my head.
"The proper term is lens flare."
I attempted to photograph the 1979 total solar eclipse (Minot, ND). Not knowing what I was doing, all of the images were way overexposed. But in a couple of them, in the corner of the image, was a small, multiple internal reflection image of the eclipse, properly exposed. Sometimes the artifact is your friend.
It looks like something in the distance is chopping up the rays.
But a cool effect from the "lens flare"
Thanks Howard.
Proof or proper focus. When I’m doing night time photos, astronomy and in my case, sunsets over our lake here in Dallas, I look for those flares to validate and then lock focus. Could be a street light next or or close to the subject, the 6 point stars from a long exposure nebula capture or as in the case, the points spreading from the sun. You can refine the sun to circular with a few simple enhancements in the native iPhone photo edit software (which I do for just crap stuff on the go) or more accurately (but equally easy) In Adobe Lightroom, Photoshop, or great for just a couple quick edits (but the ability to work with just objects while avoiding layers) Photoshop Express. Always enjoy the morning sunset photos but don’t always comment. First blog I check each morning.
Ethel Barrymore's line. Here applied to a different institution in NYC.
“The proper term is lens flare.”
Or you might just need to clean the lens.
If you were J.J. Abrams, that would mean that you took this picture in the future.
If you are ever at a solar eclipse, look at the ground under a tree; the leaves make hundreds of pinhole cameras, and there will be little images of the eclipse projected on the ground. Then take pictures of those. Not sure why this doesn't seem to work with the regular round sum, maybe it does, but the round shape is not distinctive enough to perceive, but I have pictures of the little eclipses projected onto my porch steps.
"Not sure why this doesn't seem to work with the regular round sum, maybe it does, but the round shape is not distinctive enough to perceive, "
It does work.
We used a colander at last year's eclipse. It makes nice images of the partial phase.
Very nice composition. Good work.
Here is the J.J. Abrams Lens Flare compilation video
Abrams actually talks about his love of lens flares. I watch that compilation video and my eyeballs are ready to bleed. But they way he uses them in movies has never bothered me. In fact, I think his films always look fantastic.
amazing services digitizing services
Post a Comment
Please use the comments forum to respond to the post. Don't fight with each other. Be substantive... or interesting... or funny. Comments should go up immediately... unless you're commenting on a post older than 2 days. Then you have to wait for us to moderate you through. It's also possible to get shunted into spam by the machine. We try to keep an eye on that and release the miscaught good stuff. We do delete some comments, but not for viewpoint... for bad faith.